12 minutes ago, darbie-foos said:

MAGA rules, and you are an esteemed low level member promoting the lost cause Biden era losers who got destruction-ized by MAGA, a much superior entity then anything on the DEI woke obsessed liberal card and who now resort to displaying and confirming their genre with their constant imbecile actions since they are far too stupid to see the next day on their losing calendar. Trump beat your useless democrats without breaking a sweat as he did with Hillary. You are on the losing side for thick and dense bone heads. u r in a mess!

Could you please post the above in structured English!

I lost the will trying to read it!

21 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

I totally agree regarding any president/premier/ruler of any country  wanting to reduce waste!

The only problem is the underhand obfuscating way in which Trump claims to be attempting to do it!

So you do not think he is trying to reduce corruption and waste?

20 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

Could you please post the above in structured English!

I lost the will trying to read it!

You are the same, on the losing side of EVERYTHING. You lose and make idiots of yourselves and the people on the winning side laugh at you and your ridiculously moronic actions. when will you ever learn?

 

45 minutes ago, darbie-foos said:

MAGA rules, and you are an esteemed low level member promoting the lost cause Biden era losers who got destruction-ized by MAGA, a much superior entity then anything on the DEI woke obsessed liberal card and who now resort to displaying and confirming their genre with their constant imbecile actions since they are far too stupid to see the next day on their losing calendar. Trump beat your useless democrats without breaking a sweat as he did with Hillary. You are on the losing side for thick and dense bone heads. u r in a mess!

Any chance of rewriting in English with sentences?

It is just a jumble of words at present!

29 minutes ago, mogandave said:

So you do not think he is trying to reduce corruption and waste?

Read my post again!

The answer to your question is in the first line!

God help the USA when people are so blinkered by their MAGAlomania that they cannot read the first line of a post and have to question it!

3 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

Read my post again!

The answer to your question is in the first line!

God help the USA when people are so blinkered by their MAGAlomania that they cannot read the first line of a post and have to question it!

I read it again ant it is not clear to me. I think you should re-read the question.

 

It is amusing that you accuse others of being blinkered. 

13 minutes ago, mogandave said:

I read it again ant it is not clear to me. I think you should re-read the question.

 

It is amusing that you accuse others of being blinkered. 

I am confused now!

Do you want me to re-read my own question, which since I wrote it I don't think re-reading it will do any good to either of us or do you mean you want me to re write it?

If you want the  simple question of "read my post again" re-written or rephrased please point out what ambiguity is confusing you!

1 hour ago, mogandave said:

Yes, it is in the article you linked to. You have to add two numbers together, but it’s there.

 

This not from the article I cited....

1 minute ago, candide said:

This not from the article I cited....

Liar

 

12 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

I am confused now!

Do you want me to re-read my own question, which since I wrote it I don't think re-reading it will do any good to either of us or do you mean you want me to re write it?

If you want the  simple question of "read my post again" re-written or rephrased please point out what ambiguity is confusing you!

I am not confused 

2 minutes ago, mogandave said:

Liar

 

Ah OK, I thought that was the source in the post to which Yellowtail replied when he made the quoted comment.

This one

https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-results-nationwide-covid-19-fraud-enforcement-action

Just now, candide said:

Ah OK, I thought that was the one in the post to which Yellowtail replied.

So it is from the article you linked to, correct? 

 

You should read what you link to.

 

1 hour ago, darbie-foos said:

MAGA rules, and you are an esteemed low level member promoting the lost cause Biden era losers who got destruction-ized by MAGA, a much superior entity then anything on the DEI woke obsessed liberal card and who now resort to displaying and confirming their genre with their constant imbecile actions since they are far too stupid to see the next day on their losing calendar. Trump beat your useless democrats without breaking a sweat as he did with Hillary. You are on the losing side for thick and dense bone heads. u r in a mess!

Dully noted! 🙂

13 minutes ago, mogandave said:

So it is from the article you linked to, correct? 

 

You should read what you link to.

 

And they have done something.

11 minutes ago, candide said:

And they have done something.

Indeed. $1.6B out of $403B, and (apparently) no safeguards put in place. 

 

Do you think that’s enough, or do you think more should be done?

51 minutes ago, mogandave said:

I am not confused 

Then please retract your confused posts!

5 hours ago, Screaming said:

EPA administrator Zeldin demands return of $20B in taxpayer money wasted by Biden administration

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/epa-administrator-zeldin-demands-return-20b-taxpayer-money-wasted-biden-administration

 

"The days of irresponsibly shoveling boatloads of cash to far-left activist groups in the name of environmental justice and climate equity are over," Zeldin said. "The American public deserves a more transparent and accountable government than what transpired these past four years."

Shoveling boatloads of taxpayers money to support Marxist social justice 

warriors radical agenda!

 

Notice the name on the bottom?

 

 

55 minutes ago, mogandave said:

Indeed. $1.6B out of $403B, and (apparently) no safeguards put in place. 

 

Do you think that’s enough, or do you think more should be done?

The $1.4B is from mid-2023, I don't know the current count. It's certainly not enough but due to the large number of cases, it's not surprising that it may be slow.

 

The Dems proposed a fraud prevention and recovery act particularly aimed at Covid related fraud. Guess which party opposed it?

I would not be surprised if the GOP ends up voting a similar bill one day.

15 minutes ago, candide said:

The $1.4B is from mid-2023, I don't know the current count. It's certainly not enough but due to the large number of cases, it's not surprising that it may be slow.

 

The Dems proposed a fraud prevention and recovery act particularly aimed at Covid related fraud. Guess which party opposed it?

I would not be surprised if the GOP ends up voting a similar bill one day.

Burisma Biden "proposed a fraud prevention and recovery act" ? Did he now😉. The age of critical thinking appears to have been replaced by narratives.

 

9 hours ago, scottiejohn said:

Then please retract your confused posts!

Please re-read the question 

8 hours ago, candide said:

The $1.4B is from mid-2023, I don't know the current count. It's certainly not enough but due to the large number of cases, it's not surprising that it may be slow.

 

The Dems proposed a fraud prevention and recovery act particularly aimed at Covid related fraud. Guess which party opposed it?

I would not be surprised if the GOP ends up voting a similar bill one day.

Indeed. $1.6B out of $403B, and (apparently) no safeguards put in place. 

 

Do you think that’s enough, or do you think moreshould be done?

23 minutes ago, mogandave said:

Please re-read the question 

What was the question?

27 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

What was the question?

Exactly 

Read it ! 
“The list literally goes on and on — and it has all been happening for decades”.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/02/at-usaid-waste-and-abuse-runs-deep/

7 hours ago, mogandave said:

Indeed. $1.6B out of $403B, and (apparently) no safeguards put in place. 

 

Do you think that’s enough, or do you think moreshould be done?

I have already replied that it's not enough.... and that a proposal to do more has been rejected by the GOP.

24 minutes ago, candide said:

I have already replied that it's not enough.... and that a proposal to do more has been rejected by the GOP.

Like the “bipartisan” border bill that kept the border open and expedited legalization,

 

I understand you think everything is Trump and the GOP’s fault, but given that, do you support doing something about it now? 

 

 

Just now, mogandave said:

Like the “bipartisan” border bill that kept the border open and expedited legalization,

 

I understand you think everything is Trump and the GOP’s fault, but given that, do you support doing something about it now? 

 

 

More deflection... I was mentioned a fact, which explains (possibly among other causes) why so little money has been recovered.

 

I wrote it's not enough. In other words, more should be done. Is it clear enough for you?

 

I will express my opinion more clearly.

 

This is just a political show trying to present something, already investigated and identified, as a new discovery of a hidden scandal by DOGE.

 

This is known already, there was a congress investigation and a bill discussed. The bill was rejected by the GOP. There may or may not have been enough good reasons to reject this bill, but it explains why not enough has been done.

 

So more should be done. What does the current administration intend to do about it, in order to recover more money and fines?

 

10 minutes ago, candide said:

More deflection... I was mentioned a fact, which explains (possibly among other causes) why so little money has been recovered.

 

I wrote it's not enough. In other words, more should be done. Is it clear enough for you?

 

I will express my opinion more clearly.

 

This is just a political show trying to present something, already investigated and identified, as a new discovery of a hidden scandal by DOGE.

 

This is known already, there was a congress investigation and a bill discussed. The bill was rejected by the GOP. There may or may not have been enough good reasons to reject this bill, but it explains why not enough has been done.

 

So more should be done. What does the current administration intend to do about it, in order to recover more money and fines?

 

You’re the one that keeps deflecting and blaming Trump and the GOP. 

 

I think Trump and Co. are doing what they need to do, and I think they’ll make good progress on it. 

 

It’s just a shame they have to deal with all the frivolous lawsuits by activists judges, but I think that will stop after the midterms.

5 minutes ago, mogandave said:

You’re the one that keeps deflecting and blaming Trump and the GOP. 

 

I think Trump and Co. are doing what they need to do, and I think they’ll make good progress on it. 

 

It’s just a shame they have to deal with all the frivolous lawsuits by activists judges, but I think that will stop after the midterms.

Absolutely not. I have replied to your question, and I have explained why it was not enough, by citing facts.

 

Then it's you discarding facts and replying with the usual political discourse.

 

Tell me what the current administration plans to do to recover more money and fines, and I will gladly give my opinion about it.

55 minutes ago, candide said:

Absolutely not. I have replied to your question, and I have explained why it was not enough, by citing facts.

 

Then it's you discarding facts and replying with the usual political discourse.

 

Tell me what the current administration plans to do to recover more money and fines, and I will gladly give my opinion about it.

They’re going to spend two years trying to get a bipartisan bill passed that funds their donors NGOs.