Jump to content

Trump Joins the Axis. NATO Dead. WW111 Imminent?


Recommended Posts

Posted
5 hours ago, ChicagoExpat said:

Please back up the Mossad allegation.  That's interesting.

 

Plenty online about CIA setting up SAVAK.  Not much available on MOSSAD. 

 

A few interesting tidbits in wiki...........a general Schwarzkopf, yes that very same Stormin' Norman's daddy, helped set it up.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAVAK

 

An Iranian site has a bit of info

https://irdc.ir/en/news/26/how-cia-mossad-helped-form-savak

Posted
6 minutes ago, brianburi said:

Not many condo's in Phetchabun, 18 years now in the same Soi & house.

anything you need to ask about living here in TH,  just ask.

No, I would ask somebody who gets out more.

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
On 2/19/2025 at 10:48 PM, KireB said:

How can a country in war hold elections? 

Like this:

https://babel.ua/en/texts/107260-is-it-possible-and-necessary-to-hold-elections-during-war-we-explain-using-the-examples-of-the-usa-great-britain-canada-and-israel

 

And then there's this:

"Ukraine’s constitution holds that the country may not hold parliamentary elections until martial law, in effect since February 24, 2022, is lifted, and for six months thereafter."

"President Zelensky has stated that he will not hold elections on credit, nor will he “take money from weapons and give it to elections.” Instead, he has suggested that Western countries, especially the United States, that are pressing Ukraine to hold elections could help fund them, in this way sharing the financial risk. With funding and security assured, the country could potentially develop a legal framework to hold elections during wartime, he implied."

 

https://www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/wartime-ukraines-election-dilemma

 

Guess me misplaced the $300+ Billion the US already gave him as well as the additional $16 Billion that USAID gave him last year. :whistling:

  • Confused 3
  • Haha 1
Posted
On 2/21/2025 at 1:02 PM, Lacessit said:

The poster you are responding to is ignorant of Ukrainian history.

 

During WW2, the Germans were greeted as liberators by Ukrainians. Kiev surrendered without firing a shot.

 

It didn't take long for the Ukrainians to realize they had only exchanged a Russian jackboot for a German one. A number of resistance groups formed which fought on one side or the other.

 

It suited Putin's book to label all Ukrainians as Nazis and collaborators. However, history is a lot more complex than a Kremlin lie.

 

 

 

 

As a kid, I knew an old boy at the footie supporters club, Gregory. He was a Ukrainian. I suspect he joined the German forces. He was no Nazi though. Nice bloke. Hated the Communists though.

 

In WW2, Ukrainian and Belarussians took the brunt of deaths, not the Russians.

 

Yes, probably a fair few of those Partizans were just as opposed to Soviet rule as they were German rule. Its not really clear why Crimea was transferred to Ukraine in 1954. I suspect there was a tacit acknowledgement that Ukrainians were very justified to be hostile to Stalin, and there was genuine gratitude  for how they ultimately in the end, sided with Stalin.

  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
On 2/21/2025 at 11:11 AM, xylophone said:

What a load of old cobblers, hogwash and nonsense..........and you are proud to say this???? I haven't laughed so much since granny got her tits caught in the mangle!!!!!

 

 

 

Hes using a code and recycling an old trope. He's referencing the Ukrainian Leader's faith. Used the same term in other posts, and needs to be challenged on it.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

on the contrary no ww3 possible with US, Russia and China become friends again! it is biden who wants ww3 by allying with countries together and NATO to threaten against Russia and China, isn't it 

WW1and WW2 starts with one group against another group?

  • Confused 1
Posted
53 minutes ago, Jim Blue said:

If he was such a dictator then there would be signs of it by now......zilch so far . 

 

 

I think an odd pidgeon English phrase like "invent of the internet" says enough, that he's probably not in Bangrak.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
7 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

1)he wears a Hillary/Kim Jong pant suit.

 

Well Sunny if you really want to go there I know someone in a similar political position of power who wears a silly Mao like  cult linked red  cap  !

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Trump is honoring an old partnership with commies.

US went to bed with Russia in WWII.

Was that necessary? Maybe. Maybe not. Many smaller countries got raped by Russia and lost independency.

Russian son in law, who was reading secret docs over Donny's shoulder, may be Putin mole?

Is that reason Donny's firing many in justice department? Something was going on...

 

 

 

  • Agree 1
Posted
On 2/20/2025 at 11:27 AM, johng said:

 

His mandated /elected term ended a long time ago,  by his dictate there are  no more elections,  so he is now the unelected "leader".

I have read that all Ukraine's political parties agreed to allowing Zelenski to stay in power while the war continues.

Posted
On 2/20/2025 at 11:11 AM, bannork said:

Zelensky, the democratically elected leader, is Jewish.

He is what ever they say he is a "puppet" is more becoming 

Posted
On 2/20/2025 at 12:09 PM, Dan O said:

What internet would that be? The internet running at the homes and towns that have been destroyed?  

Apparently the latest in the news in about the internet in Ukraine. It seems that they are getting Starlink for free there supplied by the US. 

The Us has sent billions to them in weapons and supplies under Biden. Now in the news Trump wants that reimbursed with minerals to compensate the governments expenditures. He said that if Ukraine does not want to repay the money with minerals then the US would cut the countries access to Starlink effectively leaving them in the dark with the world. 

The Biden admin has dumped so much money into the Ukraine without anything to show for it. Win or lose the US/Ukraine posture does not change. It seems feasible that if the Ukraine war continues they will be begging the US for more and again without any reimbursement. Those are American taxpayers money used to supply the Ukraine war for the last 3 years. With nothing in return except their hands out for more. 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, thesetat said:

Apparently the latest in the news in about the internet in Ukraine. It seems that they are getting Starlink for free there supplied by the US. 

The Us has sent billions to them in weapons and supplies under Biden. Now in the news Trump wants that reimbursed with minerals to compensate the governments expenditures. He said that if Ukraine does not want to repay the money with minerals then the US would cut the countries access to Starlink effectively leaving them in the dark with the world. 

The Biden admin has dumped so much money into the Ukraine without anything to show for it. Win or lose the US/Ukraine posture does not change. It seems feasible that if the Ukraine war continues they will be begging the US for more and again without any reimbursement. Those are American taxpayers money used to supply the Ukraine war for the last 3 years. With nothing in return except their hands out for more. 

 

I don't suppose for one nano second the US was giving the miltary aid for free and was expecting some pay back eventually.

Posted
7 hours ago, thesetat said:

Apparently the latest in the news in about the internet in Ukraine. It seems that they are getting Starlink for free there supplied by the US.

 

 

Poland is the biggest contributor of Starlink terminals, and is also paying Ukraine;s subscription to the service.

 

https://www.voanews.com/a/poland-pays-for-ukraine-s-starlink-subscription- users subscribing to the service.

says-its-deputy-pm/7984648.html

 

SpaceX has a commerical relationship with the Polish government. It is not a servent of the US government. The US government might regard "Starlink" as a controlled export, but they have made no indication they will block Russian subscribers.

 

Posted
On 2/21/2025 at 7:31 PM, PuiPuiHarry said:

How you want to organise an election with millions displaced in their own country or abroad, locked in occupied areas, and the country under siege ? Did the USA hold elections during the independence war, as later, never any territory was under occupation. 

During WW2 there were NO elections in Norway, Denmark, Netherlands, Belgium, Luxemburg, France, Tsjechoslowakia, Poland etc, so all "governemts" were illegal ?

Only an American, with close to zero knowledge about the history of other countries can come on such ideas.

Hummm, According to 3 years of MSM coverage Ukraine have been winning this war from day 1 and Russia was on its arse... but now elections are mentioned the country is under siege and millions displaced. Seems like a bit of a flip-flop to me.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
On 2/22/2025 at 4:19 PM, SunnyinBangrak said:

Is it possible the invent of the internet could facilitate an election? Not really a like for like comparison to 80 years ago, is it. If little Z wanted to end his de facto dictatorship he could easily hold an election.

 

Deliberate mis-spelling of a name . Reported.

Posted
On 2/20/2025 at 10:51 AM, Old Croc said:

He is placing personal wealth, power or embarrassment before world order.

 

He is placing power or embarrassment before world order?

 

Which is it?

Power?

Or...

Embarrassment?

 

Let's make up our minds here.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member





×
×
  • Create New...