Dangerous foreign nationals dodging deportation from UK to be tagged like terror suspects

[Social Media]

 

Foreign nationals who have avoided deportation by citing human rights laws will now be subject to strict monitoring, including electronic tagging, night-time curfews, and exclusion zones, as part of new measures announced by Home Secretary Yvette Cooper. The move, set to be introduced in the upcoming Border Security Bill, aims to protect the public by imposing controls on individuals deemed "high-harm" threats who cannot be removed from the UK.  

 

The new powers are modeled after terrorism prevention and investigation measures (TPIMs), which allow restrictions to be placed on suspected terrorists. These measures include GPS tagging, curfews, restrictions on phone and internet use, and prohibitions on associating with certain individuals. The system was first introduced in 2011 by the Conservative government to replace Labour’s control orders.  

 

These new regulations could apply to individuals like Abu Wadei, a Palestinian militant recently exposed for advocating violence against Jewish people and posing with an AK-47 in Gaza. The announcement follows reports revealing how foreign-born criminals, including murderers, sex offenders, and violent offenders, have successfully blocked deportation using the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).  

 

The move also coincides with an effort by the Conservative Party to amend the Border Security Bill to prevent migrants from invoking human rights laws to challenge deportation in British courts. If implemented, this change would disapply the Human Rights Act for immigration cases, preventing legal arguments such as those used by criminals to remain in the UK.  

 

A government spokesperson stated, "Any foreign nationals who commit heinous crimes should be in no doubt we will do everything to make sure they are not free on Britain’s streets, including removal from the UK at the earliest possible opportunity. For the foreign criminals whose removal we are pursuing, but that we are presently unable to deport, we are introducing tougher restrictions, including the use of electronic tags, night-time curfews, and exclusion zones. Breaching these conditions would be grounds for arrest, and the individual could face imprisonment."  

 

The new measures have the backing of Attorney General Lord Hermer, who has been working alongside Yvette Cooper to draft the proposal. Ministers believe the restrictions comply with human rights laws, and any breach would carry a maximum penalty of six months in prison. A government source explained, "This is about bringing in TPIM-style restrictions for migrants who pose a risk to public safety."  

 

As of September 2023, 11,800 foreign offenders were eligible for deportation but had been released into the community after serving their sentences. Since July 2024, the Home Office has successfully deported 2,580 foreign criminals—a 23 percent increase compared to the same period the previous year.  

The new measures would enable the government to impose restrictions on members of the Rochdale grooming gang, including ringleaders Adil Khan, 53, and Qari Abdul Rauf, 55. Both men were convicted of child sex offences and sentenced to eight and six years in prison, respectively, but have so far evaded deportation to Pakistan. The rules could also apply to Mada Pasa, who issued a death threat against Reform UK leader Nigel Farage on TikTok despite having no UK convictions.  

 

Other high-profile cases highlighted by The Telegraph would also fall under the new restrictions. One such case involves an Algerian chemist jailed for nine years for contaminating food, as well as knife and battery offences. Despite multiple deportation attempts by the Home Office over more than a decade, he has remained in the UK by arguing that returning to Algeria would result in persecution due to suspicions of Islamist extremism. His appeal was recently upheld by the courts, and he has been granted restricted leave to remain.  

 

The proposed powers could also help prevent further crimes committed by released offenders who should have been deported. In one shocking case, Jamaican national Ernesto Elliott, a prolific offender, avoided deportation in 2020 only to go on to murder a 35-year-old man six months later.  

 

The amendment will be introduced this week as part of Labour’s Border Security, Immigration, and Asylum Bill. Sources indicate that the Home Secretary will have the authority to impose tagging and other restrictions as a condition for granting limited leave to remain. The Home Office will be responsible for determining who falls under these measures, though the criteria will broadly include anyone deemed a threat to public safety or national security.  

 

Under existing law, any foreign national convicted of a crime and sentenced to at least 12 months in prison is considered for deportation under the UK Borders Act 2007. The Home Office has the power to deport individuals under the Immigration Act 1971 if their removal is deemed conducive to the public good, particularly in cases involving serious harm, persistent offending, or threats to national security.  

 

The introduction of these new security measures signals a tougher approach to managing foreign criminals who exploit legal loopholes to remain in the UK. While deportation remains the government’s priority, the new restrictions aim to ensure that those who cannot be immediately removed will be closely monitored to protect the public.

 

Based on a report by The TYelegraph  2025-03-11

 

 

 

 

[jippytum]

Really. Is a  ankle bracelet likly to prevent  a known terrorist from planting bombs and killing people. 

Politicians need to wake up to the terrorist threat from mass Muslin illegal immigration of  potentially radical young men. 

[baansgr]

Foreign garbage shouldn't even be there..kick the 30 million foreigners.and their hanger ons out..

[Kinok Farang]

Like putting a plaster on an amputated limb.

Utterly useless.

[topt]

3 hours ago, Social Media said:

have successfully blocked deportation using the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

This seems to be the major problem.

When deportation falls within UK law but overruled by ECHR then either ECHR laws need to be reviewed or perhaps the UK needs to review its "membership"........

[Watawattana]

3 hours ago, topt said:

This seems to be the major problem.

When deportation falls within UK law but overruled by ECHR then either ECHR laws need to be reviewed or perhaps the UK needs to review its "membership"........

Agree.  If Europe wants to protest their human rights then they should keep everyone who might come across on a boat, and any that make must get sent immediately back to France.

[proton]

So this middle aged white woman in the photo is one of these dangerous Islamic pests is she? 🙃

[JellyBabies]

10 minutes ago, Watawattana said:

Agree.  If Europe wants to protest their human rights then they should keep everyone who might come across on a boat, and any that make must get sent immediately back to France.

 

Also to be considered is that EU law states that all asylum seekers arriving in the EU must register in the first country they arrive in

 

France ignores this and lets them sit on the English Channel awaiting a rubber boat, then refuse to take them back

 

If France and other EU countries followed their own laws correctly then control sets could be set up allowing a proportion of those registering to travel to the UK

 

But they don't and then blame the UK for the problem, hypocrisy at its best

[Watawattana]

16 minutes ago, JellyBabies said:

 

Also to be considered is that EU law states that all asylum seekers arriving in the EU must register in the first country they arrive in

 

France ignores this and lets them sit on the English Channel awaiting a rubber boat, then refuse to take them back

 

If France and other EU countries followed their own laws correctly then control sets could be set up allowing a proportion of those registering to travel to the UK

 

But they don't and then blame the UK for the problem, hypocrisy at its best

Done a bit of research - I decided I don't entirely blame France; it's a wider European Union issue.

 

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1095022/immigrants-arrived-by-sea-and-by-land-in-europe-by-country-of-arrival/

 

Seems most migrants are landing in southern Europe, with some traveling through numerous countries to get to France.  But saying that, the illegal entries to the UK are mostly from France, so France should sort it out with their Euro Union friends.  

[JonnyF]

29 minutes ago, proton said:

So this middle aged white woman in the photo is one of these dangerous Islamic pests is she? 🙃

 

Yvette Cooper is far more dangerous to Britain than that. 

[JellyBabies]

2 minutes ago, Watawattana said:

Done a bit of research - I decided I don't entirely blame France; it's a wider European Union issue.

 

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1095022/immigrants-arrived-by-sea-and-by-land-in-europe-by-country-of-arrival/

 

Seems most migrants are landing in southern Europe, with some traveling through numerous countries to get to France.  But saying that, the illegal entries to the UK are mostly from France, so France should sort it out with their Euro Union friends.  

 

Agreed, but its up to France to tell its EU partners to follow the laws as I said

 

But as usual its easier to ignore the issue and hope that there are enough rubber boats for hire

[JonnyF]

4 hours ago, Kinok Farang said:

Like putting a plaster on an amputated limb.

Utterly useless.

 

The police wouldn't follow up on any breach anyway.

 

Just like they don't investigate burglaries. Just turn up to give you a report for the insurance company. They'd rather be back at the station with a cuppa, scrolling through X for hurty words. 

[Kinok Farang]

1 hour ago, proton said:

So this middle aged white woman in the photo is one of these dangerous Islamic pests is she? 🙃

Yanks haven't quite mastered sarcasm yet but good try.

Leave it to the Brits,they invented it.

[Chomper Higgot]

7 hours ago, proton said:

So this middle aged white woman in the photo is one of these dangerous Islamic pests is she? 🙃

Mum issues?

[Chomper Higgot]

6 hours ago, JonnyF said:

 

The police wouldn't follow up on any breach anyway.

 

Just like they don't investigate burglaries. Just turn up to give you a report for the insurance company. They'd rather be back at the station with a cuppa, scrolling through X for hurty words. 

Off you go again with your misrepresentation of inciting violence and hatred online.