Liverpool Lou Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 4 hours ago, wozzlegummich said: That is mainly because they don't want to mess up their hair. ...on the back of a motorbike!
pacovl46 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago Personally I don’t see the problem. Earth is overpopulated anyway and there’s tons of Darwin Awards that need to get handed out. So, it’s swapping to flies with one hit! 2
Liverpool Lou Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 4 hours ago, spidermike007 said: ... I don't need a seatbelt to drive 3 km. ...not yet, Mr Invincible. 2
richard_smith237 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago Just now, Liverpool Lou said: 4 hours ago, wozzlegummich said: That is mainly because they don't want to mess up their hair. ...on the back of a motorbike! Nevertheless its true... I've known Western women who won't wear a helmet on the back of a Motorcycle-Taxi because it messes their hair... Gallactically idiotic ! 2
Popular Post DualSportBiker Posted 4 hours ago Popular Post Posted 4 hours ago 8 hours ago, EVENKEEL said: How did we survive pre seat belt buzzers, before car seats for kids? Ignoring the inconvenient fact that the severity of injuries are significantly down since pre seatbelt/safety seat days... Car seats for kids have been around since the 30s. Not popular, but around in various forms. In that same period, driving has changed beyond all recognition. We drive faster, and we drive heavier vehicles. They are quieter on the inside which ofter promotes slightly faster driving due to the feeling of quiet suggesting slower speeds. City roads are an order of magnitude busier than 'before'. So when you ask 'how did we survive'? you seem to be ignoring all those changes and simply think that 'we managed before, why can't we just manage now like we used to?' Well we can't. We have moved on. Most of us that is... 1 2
SLOWHAND225 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 1 hour ago, newbee2022 said: I didn't even know that this kind of tool exists. But, hey, we're in Thailand🤣 Its not just a Thai thing at all. They've been around as long a seatbelt buzzers have, so what, 40 yrs ? They've been available on Amazon and EBay.
connda Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago If Somchai and Nok want to win Darwin Awards, why complain. It's their lives. "Up to you!" 1
newbee2022 Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 2 minutes ago, SLOWHAND225 said: Its not just a Thai thing at all. They've been around as long a seatbelt buzzers have, so what, 40 yrs ? They've been available on Amazon and EBay. I'm surprised . I wouldn't even think to risk my life by using that.
NE1 Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 26 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said: Putting the seat belt on disables the chime much more effectively. Not if it is already disabled it doesn't . Because you don't hear the chime at all.
Liverpool Lou Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 1 minute ago, NE1 said: 25 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said: Putting the seat belt on disables the chime much more effectively. Not if it is disabled it doesn't . Because you don't hear the chime at all. You probably won't here the sound of your head smashing through the windscreen or the side window, either. 1 1
Samh Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 10 hours ago, Ralf001 said: Yeah they are a thing. Seat belt chimes are annoying. You could wear ear defenders.
Ralf001 Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 1 minute ago, Samh said: You could wear ear defenders. I doubt that would be legal.
Ralf001 Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 53 minutes ago, lordgrinz said: Plus most Thais don't believe in travelling safely or legally. thats what makes it fun.... This morn on the way to work had a little Suzuki swift run into the side of my pickup at 140km/h, I chuckled heartily as they hit my RH rear wheel which protrudes 3inches... no damage to me but they munted the LH mirror and door nicely on their car. I just kept on driving.
BusyB Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 10 hours ago, Aussie999 said: many didn't Those who did were frequently crippled and became a burden for their nearest and dearest as well as society for the rest of their usually shortened lives. 1
BusyB Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago What many don't realize is that seatbelts' second most important task is to keep a car's occupants INSIDE the car in a smash up. Survival rates of those ejected in a crash are essentially zero. It's why it pays to wear a belt especially in a bus as well - those windows are big enough to get thrown through when broken, even if structural damage and speed is not too excessive such as during a rollover or side-on impact. The idea that you can stop yourself from hitting the dashboard with your arms is like saying you can jump out of a third story building and land safely on your hands. You can't. Disabling safety devices and alarms is about as stupid as humans get. 1
Grusa Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 10 hours ago, Sophon said: These devices have their uses. We use them when we take our dogs to the vet, as we lay down the back rest of the rear seats to give enough room for the dogs. When the dogs stand/lay on the back rest, it puts enough pressure on the seat base to set off the seat belt alarm. We also use them when buying dog food, 80 kg of dry food on the back seat is more than enough to set off the alarm. Obviously, we don't use them when people are actually sitting in the seats. Have you thought about the effect of 80kg of unrestrained dog food on the front seat occupant in the event of a crash? Possibly rather worse than a human baby accelerated into YOUR neck! 1
Ralf001 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 34 minutes ago, BusyB said: What many don't realize is that seatbelts' second most important task is to keep a car's occupants INSIDE the car in a smash up. Survival rates of those ejected in a crash are essentially zero. I do not plan to live more than a year or two... if darwin gets me first so be it.
richard_smith237 Posted 43 minutes ago Posted 43 minutes ago 11 hours ago, EVENKEEL said: How did we survive pre seat belt buzzers, before car seats for kids? Survivorship fallacy is when people only look at successful cases while ignoring failures, leading to dumb conclusions. It’s basic common sense that those who didn’t survive can’t share their experience.... so acting like success is the whole story is just ignorant. By focusing only on survivors, you have failed to see the full picture and that has lead to a flawed comment based on fundamentally flawed reasoning.
markus Posted 17 minutes ago Posted 17 minutes ago 13 hours ago, hotsun said: Didnt know these were a thing. Surely everyone must realize that all cars have seatbelts for a reason, right? so instead of just using their seatbelt, thais would rather spend money on something just so that they dont have to use their seatbelt? These parts are used in car workshops.
richard_smith237 Posted 8 minutes ago Posted 8 minutes ago 10 minutes ago, markus said: These parts are used in car workshops. I don't even know why they'd bother with that... they could just do the seatbelt up and sit over it. They're a solution to a problem that doesn't exist outside of the mind-numbingly idiotic.
NorthernRyland Posted 6 minutes ago Posted 6 minutes ago 14 hours ago, Georgealbert said: Pongprom emphasised the dangers of this practice, stating: • Many Thai drivers use these inserts to silence the seatbelt alarm, unknowingly putting their own lives at risk. Did he seriously say that? Thai drivers think that if they made the beeping go away with an insert then that's the same as wearing the seatbelt in terms of safety? This is next level cargo-cult voodoo thinking .
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now