Jump to content

French scientist denied US entry after phone messages critical of Trump found


Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

That's good, foreigners in the USA shouldn't be covered by the US constitution, it should be for citizens only.

The UK also doesn't allow people who write stuff they don't like to enter or even pass through UK airports (Roosh V).

That’s surprising considering that guy is arab

  • Confused 2
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
6 hours ago, gargamon said:

Right wing nonsense.

----

Do Non-Citizens have Constitutional Rights?

On Behalf of Maniatis Law PLLC | Aug 22, 2018 | Immigration

There is a misconception that the U.S. Constitution applies only to U.S. citizens. Some passages and phrases in our laws explicitly state only “citizens” are afforded certain rights, such as the right to vote. When the terms “resident” or “person” is used instead of citizen, the rights and privileges afforded are extended to protect citizens and non-citizens alike. Moreover, protections under the 14th Amendment ensure that no particular group is discriminated against unlawfully.

Bill of Rights

Nowhere in the first 10 amendments to the Constitution is the word “citizen.” Often it is written “The right of the people…” The Bill of Rights protects everyone, including undocumented immigrants, to exercise free speech, religion, assembly, and to be free from unlawful government interference.

The only exception is a resident, comes down to more or less the same. The only other exception is that you have equal rights if you were prosecuted in USA, or on a USA territory. This has nothing to do with right wing at all in the first place.

 

It's no different here either, if you talk about domestic politics and i file a complaint, your ass will be whooped here too. Section 112 remember.

  • Confused 2
Posted

All the articles about this are all referencing other sources - such excellent reporting. It's all hearsay from what I can see - nobody is actually providing what was found on the person's phone/computer. However, one article states "image.png.a1fa10fe588efd2824d4e1d26edb6f42.png

I doubt that he only wrote "I hate Trump" or similar if they described it as "terrorism" - then again, this same news outlet is quoting "a source", so this could also be BS.

image.png

image.png

image.png

  • Agree 1
Posted

Too much missing info about the "French" scientist and the nature of his criticism.

 

The Orwellian thing is that they can demnd to go through your cell phone, but that precedes Trump by decades.

 

  • Agree 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

I think you'll find sensible people will be avoiding the USA, as a paranoid, hate-ridden s##thole.

 

Expect the US tourist industry to have slim pickings. just another example of the Law of Unintended Consequences.

 

Boycotts don't only apply to exports.

And the sad thing is that the poster you quoted and many others are ok with this.

  • Love It 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Zaphod Priest said:

 

Definitely time for France to reclaim the Statue of Liberty.

Rolling back time to Lafayette won't help, in the US they don't remember much of what happened before June 6, 1945.

  • Haha 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

I think you'll find sensible people will be avoiding the USA, as a paranoid, hate-ridden s##thole.

 

Expect the US tourist industry to have slim pickings. just another example of the Law of Unintended Consequences.

 

Boycotts don't only apply to exports.

Sensible people would also abstain to watch any US media produced after 2016. There is plenty of great stuff produced in the free world.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, ChaiyaTH said:

The only exception is a resident, comes down to more or less the same. The only other exception is that you have equal rights if you were prosecuted in USA, or on a USA territory. This has nothing to do with right wing at all in the first place, idiot.

 

It's no different here either, if you talk about domestic politics and i file a complaint, your ass will be whooped here too. Section 112 remember.

Section 112 specifically applies to the Royal Family in Thailand. In the US, King Trump has yet to be crowned.

  • Thanks 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, Ben Zioner said:

Tell me.

 

I see only a story reported by two great newspapers, The Guardian and Le Monde. None of the Murdoch rubbish..

Well perhaps you should try again:

United States ex rel. Knauff v. Shaughnessy, 338 U.S. 537 (1950)

 

Your choice of news is telling.

 

What if he had Hamas stuff on his phone?

  • Confused 1
Posted

Oh looky,

 

Look at the difference between "could be" and "can be". Look how they simply LIE about everything. Like what rights he has.

 

Maybe he was one of those snide gigglers, like we get here, smarmily and snarkily making comments about violence without coming right out and saying it. Maybe saying supportive things about Hamas or the Musk attackers. Wonder why he was singled out, his anti American activities in France?

 

Great job DHS! Its my house and I dont want a**holes showing up to drink my booze.

  • Confused 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...