Sad emoji people

[Harrisfan]

Why do people leave sad emojis and say nothing?

 

Then you have the confused emoji people.

 

Why join a Thai forum if you don't want to discuss Thailand?

 

Let's see how man sad emojis turn up from the miserable people.

 

 

[johng]

I for one use the emojis  as a quick way of expression..many times can't be bothered to write a reply or it's inconvenient  like now

writing on mobile phone...yuck.

Would be much better if we could all see who gave what emoji reactions  as it was for many years before too many became very thin skinned and complained too much to the moderators.

[KhunLA]

I use it quite often, when bored and if I see some silly comment that has no basis, or comes from someone that spews the same silliness over and over.

 

I usually won't comment, as the person will repeatedly comment, with even more silliness, and my commenting is wasted time, in my life, for no reason, and I'll never get that time back. 

 

I have far better things to do.  I don't think I use the confused, as I'm not, or if the poster is, pointing it out probably won't help anyone.

 

As an aside, I gave everyone on my ignore list (4+ pages) a reprieve, except for 2, as I do miss some of the comic relief that they provide.   So I'm using the laughing emoji a lot more.

 

I usually just ignore the topics or threads, but coming in on 'new comment' page, I do get to see the funny last comments.

[fredwiggy]

18 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

Why do people leave sad emojis and say nothing?

 

Then you have the confused emoji people.

 

Why join a Thai forum if you don't want to discuss Thailand?

 

Let's see how man sad emojis turn up from the miserable people.

 

 

Sometimes an emoji says it all in an easy response. Sometimes they don't understand what one has said so disagree with an emoji because they don't have enough knowledge on a subject to disagree further. Some hate you because you've proven them wrong before so just use an emoji because you don't know who used it and some, like sheep, follow because they agree with the poster for some reason. Some are just lazy. Some don't have the time to reply so just add an emoji to voice their opinion because they have to leave somewhere. The same goes for the confused ones. Some don't understand so they use a confused emoji. Some understand but can't fathom why another posted something so stupid so add a confused emoji. By the way, why join a Thai forum if you want to post things on Trump? For some they're just bored with whatevers out today. Others because Trump is their hero and they just can't resist. And maybe Trump's daily decisions are funny enough to post on.

[dinsdale]

23 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

Why do people leave sad emojis and say nothing?

 

Then you have the confused emoji people.

 

Why join a Thai forum if you don't want to discuss Thailand?

 

Let's see how man sad emojis turn up from the miserable people.

 

 

Trolls who do not have the brains to argue against a poster's point. I am in agreeance with @johng and I've been saying for ages, get rid of the anonymiser.  Go back to the days when posters couldn't hide behind an anonymous emoji. 

[Yagoda]

4 minutes ago, johng said:

I for one use the emojis  as a quick way of expression..many times can't be bothered to write a reply or it's inconvenient  like now

writing on mobile phone...yuck.

Would be much better if we could all see who gave what emoji reactions  as it was for many years before too many became very thin skinned and complained too much to the moderators.

Who complains? The Trump Hate Madness sufferers who get offended when you set forth the truth, or ask them to justify, with facts and or questions, their foul and vile putrid hate spews against Trump, Jews, America, Western Civilization, etc?

 

I view sad/confused emojis as both a badge of honour and, in the case of confused ones,  indicative of the utter stupidity of a human who could be confused by simple statements. 

 

However, in view of the Mob nature of the Socialists, Sock puppets and Trolls, it is interesting to note that certain folks here get together in emoji campaigns...I call them the Emojinauts. Watch and see.

[dinsdale]

2 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

Sometimes an emoji says it all in an easy response. Sometimes they don't understand what one has said so disagree with an emoji because they don't have enough knowledge on a subject to disagree further. Some hate you because you've proven them wrong before so just use an emoji because you don't know who used it and some, like sheep, follow because they agree with the poster for some reason. Some are just lazy. Some don't have the time to reply so just add an emoji to voice their opinion because they have to leave somewhere. The same goes for the confused ones. Some don't understand so they use a confused emoji. Some understand but can't fathom why another posted something so stupid so add a confused emoji. By the way, why join a Thai forum if you want to post things on Trump? For some they're just bored with whatevers out today. Others because Trump is their hero and they just can't resist. And maybe Trump's daily decisions are funny enough to post on.

I would put money on the majority of the negative emojis are from the looney leftists on here.

[fredwiggy]

2 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

I would put money on the majority of the negative emojis are from the looney leftists on here.

Why are people who want social equality loonies?

[ColeBOzbourne]

5 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Trolls who do not have the brains to argue against a poster's point.

Some people do not enjoy arguments. It's a waste of time, and rarely has a positive outcome. For others, arguing seems to be a hobby. They search for it and thrive on it.

[Ralf001]

38 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

Why do people leave sad emojis and say nothing?

 

Then you have the confused emoji people.

 

Why join a Thai forum if you don't want to discuss Thailand?

 

Let's see how man sad emojis turn up from the miserable people.

 

 

🤣🤣🤣

[KhunLA]

12 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

Why are people who want social equality loonies?

OK, I'll bite ... who isn't socially equal ? 

 

I'll probably agree with part of your reply, but I find it usually comes down to people's choices..

 

I know who isn't treated equal.  Those that earn more money, and are taxed at a higher rate.

[BangkokReady]

4 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

Why are people who want social equality loonies?

 

I think you're confusing lefty-loonies with loony-leftists.

[fredwiggy]

2 minutes ago, KhunLA said:

Or to the looney leftie's posts.  I find them to be a very sad, ignorant, no life lot.  

 

Imagine a life of posting 2-3-4-500 anti Trump posts in a week ...

 

I'm thinking some here don't understand what leftist politics really means, and only dismiss them because they are full on right thinking, which has been proven to be wrong in some things.It's always best to research the real meaning of something before a stance is taken against it............https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left-wing_politics.

[Yagoda]

5 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

Why are people who want social equality loonies?

Because their view of "social equality" usually ends with folks lying shot in ditches.

[fredwiggy]

1 minute ago, BangkokReady said:

 

I think you're confusing lefty-loonies with loony-leftists.

I'm not confused at all. I see things just how they are and don't take sides, as both sides are good and bad in ideas.

[fredwiggy]

Just now, Yagoda said:

Because their view of "social equality" usually ends with folks lying shot in ditches.

Read the definition, fully, to understand what their thinking involves, and see if you can't agree with much of what they believe in.

[fredwiggy]

3 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

I think you're confusing lefty-loonies with loony-leftists.

There's loonies on both sides.

[Yagoda]

Just now, fredwiggy said:

I'm thinking some here don't understand what leftist politics really means, and only dismiss them because they are full on right thinking, which has been proven to be wrong in some things.It's always best to research the real meaning of something before a stance is taken against it............https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left-wing_politics.

Yeah thats where I do my non science research, Wikipedia. Right.

 

I graduated grammer school already, I can read a source and form my own opinion.

 

 

[fredwiggy]

2 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Yeah thats where I do my non science research, Wikipedia. Right.

 

I graduated grammer school already, I can read a source and form my own opinion.

 

 

And your source can also be an opinion, as politics has many biased because of that hero worship. The definitions of things are easily researched, in various links, and definitions aren't meant to be biased but factual.Here's another..........https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/leftist.

[worgeordie]

6 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Because their view of "social equality" usually ends with folks lying shot in ditches.

When did this happen ? , please enlighten me ....

 

regards worgeordie

[Harrisfan]

Like I ask about bars or Ayuthaya and that gets sad emojis. Why? These people must be stalkers. They see a name and straight away put an emoji on.

 

I figure these emoji freaks must never do anything in Thailand. Hate Trump then dish out 50 sad emojis.

[BangkokReady]

1 minute ago, fredwiggy said:

I'm not confused at all. I see things just how they are and don't take sides, as both sides are good and bad in ideas.

 

You are confused, otherwise you wouldn't have made your previous post.

 

Looney-lefties = a subset of lefties who are loonies

 

Lefty-loonies = lefties who someone considers to all be loonies.

 

11 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

Why are people who want social equality loonies?

 

When someone says loony-lefty, they aren't talking about every lefty.  So it isn't accurate to say that people are claiming that all who want social equality are loonies.

 

Actually, a lot of people who are labelled as "right-wing" or "conservative" are actually pretty left-wing on most issues.  They simply object to something like gender issues or immigration, and are deliberately mislabelled in an attempt at silencing.

 

You don't understand what "looney-left" means, therefore you are confused.  Or, to be more accurate, incorrect.

[Yagoda]

Just now, Harrisfan said:

Like I ask about bars or Ayuthaya and that gets sad emojis. Why? These people must be stalkers. They see a name and straight away put an emoji on.

 

I figure these emoji freaks must never do anything in Thailand. Hate Trump then dish out 50 sad emojis.

Thats exactly what they do. A whole gang of them. I even know who, since one of their number dimed them hahahahaha

[fredwiggy]

1 minute ago, Harrisfan said:

Like I ask about bars or Ayuthaya and that gets sad emojis. Why? These people must be stalkers. They see a name and straight away put an emoji on.

 

I figure these emoji freaks must never do anything in Thailand. Hate Trump then dish out 50 sad emojis.

This is why I don't put anyone on ignore, as anyone, no matter how little they know about certain subjects, can be an expert on another.

[Social Media]

@SMIAI a flame and baiting post has been removed. You need to stop now!

[Yagoda]

4 minutes ago, worgeordie said:

When did this happen ? , please enlighten me ....

 

regards worgeordie

Are you really confessing to being that ignorant, or just being a troll?

[Harrisfan]

1 minute ago, Yagoda said:

Thats exactly what they do. A whole gang of them. I even know who, since one of their number dimed them hahahahaha

Emoji gangs 

 

 

[SMIAI]

If you are using those terms, you are feeling those emotions. The hatred is coming from you.

[Yagoda]

7 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

And your source can also be an opinion, as politics has many biased because of that hero worship.

Well duh, most folks research that too. If you dont understand who the author of a book is, how can you evaluate their arguments?

[fredwiggy]

1 minute ago, BangkokReady said:

 

You are confused, otherwise you wouldn't have made your previous post.

 

Looney-lefties = a subset of lefties who are loonies

 

Lefty-loonies = lefties who someone considers to all be loonies.

 

 

When someone says loony-lefty, they aren't talking about every lefty.  So it isn't accurate to say that people are claiming that all who want social equality are loonies.

 

Actually, a lot of people who are labelled as "right-wing" or "conservative" are actually pretty left-wing on most issues.  They simply object to something like gender issues or immigration, and are deliberately mislabelled in an attempt at silencing.

 

You don't understand what "looney-left" means, therefore you are confused.  Or, to be more accurate, incorrect.

I'm not confused. I understand what looney lefty means, as opposed to lefty loonies. I responded to him, thinking he meant they all were loonies. Incorrect response.