Jump to content

Behind the fatal Trump flaw MAGA can't even defend


Recommended Posts

Posted
50 minutes ago, xylophone said:

And the sad thing is that even if all that was true..........ah another fan of the felon/compulsive liar/charity funds stealer/pu$$y grabber and trump university con man. All proven!!

 

And of course he has reneged on his promises, is being played by Putin and is dumb, and not knowing just how dumb he is, is a fatal flaw, but Magas cannot/will not see it, so perhaps this will help.....

 

image.png.9c4ca94454b253f370048078a07add6d.png

 

 

FB_IMG_1743303740312.jpg

  • Haha 2
Posted
3 hours ago, BritManToo said:

Same for the Bidens.

And probably the Clinton's.

In Clinton's defence, he did actually balance the budget.

Posted
4 minutes ago, candide said:

Oh shut up! This has been debunked. :biggrin:

FD-2023 anyone?

I said, “Nah, I’m not going to—or, we’re not going to give you the billion dollars.” They said, “You have no authority. You’re not the president.” The president said—I said, “Call him.” I said, “I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars.” I said, “You’re not getting the billion. I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.” I looked at them and said, “I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.” Well, son of a bitch. He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time.

 

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/biden-reportedly-bragged-about-the-firing-of-a-prosecutor-who-was-investigating-his-sons-firm/

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, NoDisplayName said:

 

You left out the most important........proven woman beater.

Grabbed 'em by the ballot box.

Heck, they let 'em do it.

 

Trump won the Electoral College with 304 votes compared to 227 votes for Hillary Clinton.

 

As Trump secured 295 electoral votes to Harris' 226

All that proves is that there are more dumb people in America than was previously thought.

Compulsive liars will lie and dumb followers will follow – – sad but true.

 

And the very same poorly educated dumb followers will be hardest hit by he dumb decisions of this clown.

  • Heart-broken 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
31 minutes ago, NoDisplayName said:

I said, “Nah, I’m not going to—or, we’re not going to give you the billion dollars.” They said, “You have no authority. You’re not the president.” The president said—I said, “Call him.” I said, “I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars.” I said, “You’re not getting the billion. I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.” I looked at them and said, “I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.” Well, son of a bitch. He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time.

 

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/biden-reportedly-bragged-about-the-firing-of-a-prosecutor-who-was-investigating-his-sons-firm/

 

 

He was not investigating, that was the issue. This has been done to death, even fox realizes this. Only anonymous posters keep repeating nonsense.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, frank83628 said:

Debunked by who cnn and WIPO... get real, its all on video.

Lets not even mention the photos off hunters laptop and the money laundering throught his paintings.

If that had been Tumps & son you be screaming about it from the top of your lungs daily

Debunked first by the GOP Semate Committee investigation, and then by the miserably failed House Committee investigation. :biggrin:

  • Heart-broken 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, NoDisplayName said:

I said, “Nah, I’m not going to—or, we’re not going to give you the billion dollars.” They said, “You have no authority. You’re not the president.” The president said—I said, “Call him.” I said, “I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars.” I said, “You’re not getting the billion. I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.” I looked at them and said, “I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.” Well, son of a bitch. He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time.

 

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/biden-reportedly-bragged-about-the-firing-of-a-prosecutor-who-was-investigating-his-sons-firm/

 

 

You forgot a detail : because the prosecutor was not investigating. So the U.S. and the IMF did freeze the money.

 

This ridiculous claim has been debunked first by the GOP Semate Committee investigation, and then by the miserably failed House Committee investigation. :biggrin:

 

 

  • Heart-broken 1
Posted
6 hours ago, simple1 said:

The most recent absurdity, following Jeff Bezos giving Melania Trump $40 million for rights to Amazon to produce a fawning “documentary” about her (so much for the anti-trust and labor law enforcements against Amazon), is Trump’s suggestion this week that Warner Brothers/Discovery could escape his FCC’s ire if they gave Don Jr. his very own hunting show.

 

Behind the fatal Trump flaw MAGA can't even defend | Opinion

With trump it is all about money....and his foray into crypto speaks volumes esp as he had previouly called it a scam before bringing David Sacks on to his team.

 

Trump had previously called crypto a “scam” but at a US$50,000-a-ticket event, a handful of crypto executives convinced trump to get behind it and he changed his mind. I wonder why!!?

 

"Amid economic uncertainty, critics fear that David Sacks, who was heavily invested in crypto before divesting for his White House role, will usher in an industry-led free-for-all, leaving consumers vulnerable to scams and volatility. Customers lost more than US$8 billion in deposits when the crypto exchange FTX imploded in 2022".

 

“There’s no reason to think that he won’t be bringing a view that is ‘corporations first’ as opposed to America or Americans first,” said Rick Claypool, research director of Public Citizen, a money-in-politics watchdog group. “It’s a tragedy for the American people who rely on the federal Government to protect them.”

Posted
4 hours ago, Trippy said:

All the Trump haters have no one to blame besides the Democrat party. If they would have had a competent, moderate candidate running through the primaries they could have beat Trump. 

 

I would agree in many respects......if they stand a chance they must field a white, middle aged, heterosexual, married man with three of four kids and no previous.......the only type of candidate that stands a chance......or even better Obama.

  • Haha 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Cameroni said:

 

This is fanastic news. "Vietnam just announced they’re going to facilitate a billion-dollar Trump resort "

 

Another luxury resort for us to go to in Vietnam.

 

Trump just keeps making the world better and better and better.

He only chose Vietnam because Netanyahu told him to "FO" when he suggested taking over the Gaza Strip as his "Riviera" resort!

Posted
17 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

For once, it's true.

 

However he made much more money by overcharging accommodation for his Secret Service detail, rooms rented by foreign countries and office space rented by the CCP.

 

https://apnews.com/article/travel-business-donald-trump-carolyn-maloney-137ff64160fa894ac8c0821bb5f0e7f8

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2023/04/10/china-paid-trump-millions-in-rent-then-he-left-the-white-house/

  • Agree 1
  • Heart-broken 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

I would agree in many respects......if they stand a chance they must field a white, middle aged, heterosexual, married man with three of four kids and no previous.......the only type of candidate that stands a chance......or even better Obama.

OR a candidate that just uses common sense. I'd vote for Stephen A Smith.  

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, candide said:

For once, it's true.

 

However he made much more money by overcharging accommodation for his Secret Service detail, rooms rented by foreign countries and office space rented by the CCP.

 

https://apnews.com/article/travel-business-donald-trump-carolyn-maloney-137ff64160fa894ac8c0821bb5f0e7f8

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2023/04/10/china-paid-trump-millions-in-rent-then-he-left-the-white-house/

He could have made much more blackmailing and extorting CCP chiefs, Russian mayors and influential Ukrainians and laundered the $$$ through webs of LLCs. But he didn't. That was your guy. Incredible how Biden bros are suddenly so hot on (imaginary) corruption after steadfastly denying thrir own guys deeds. Leaving a papertrail and a laptop behind was a major cockup.

  • Heart-broken 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Trippy said:

OR a candidate that just uses common sense. I'd vote for Stephen A Smith.  

 

 

Again, I would agree in principle, but going off the last election common sense (or any sense) doesn't seem to hold any great sway with a US electorate....at least the one's that are prepared to get off their backside's and vote.

Posted
2 hours ago, xylophone said:

All that proves is that there are more dumb people in America than was previously thought.

Compulsive liars will lie and dumb followers will follow – – sad but true.

 

And the very same poorly educated dumb followers will be hardest hit by he dumb decisions of this clown.

 

Supporters like this, who thought long and hard at the ballot box?

 

image.jpeg.47c9bb1e9eb0718cfd2d88b4cfa63287.jpeg

  • Love It 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

He could have made much more blackmailing and extorting CCP chiefs, Russian mayors and influential Ukrainians and laundered the $$$ through webs of LLCs. But he didn't. That was your guy. Incredible how Biden bros are suddenly so hot on (imaginary) corruption after steadfastly denying thrir own guys deeds. Leaving a papertrail and a laptop behind was a major cockup.

And now you are making stuff up again. It didn't last long....:biggrin:

  • Heart-broken 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
50 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Well I am not a Biden bro/supporter and if you really think that trump would give that much money away without some form of recompense from elsewhere then you truly are one of trump's poorly educated Maga goobers. LOL!

  • Heart-broken 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, xylophone said:

Well I am not a Biden bro/supporter and if you really think that trump would give that much money away without some form of recompense from elsewhere then you truly are one of trump's poorly educated Maga goobers. LOL!

If you have any evidence to support that, feel free to share. Otherwise like most posts about Trump it's more silly conspiracy theories. Insults after plopping down yet another conspiracy is certainly not required, thank you.

  • Haha 1
Posted
7 hours ago, save the frogs said:

I just read the first couple of lines of the article.

The writer has worked for some NGOs in Africa.

Probably holding a grudge due to the budget cuts by DOGE.

 

The fact is, no matter who is in power, some people might benefit more than others. 

It's only normal that one president might decide to re-allocate budget to another area, etc ...

Just because this guy lost his funding for his NGO, that's not my problem. 

And speaking of corruption, I worked for a major NGO. There's a lot of graft going on, mismanaged funds. 

Where on earth are you getting this from? Thom Hartmann is a "radio personality, author, businessman and progressive political commentator." He hasn't been involved with international relief work since the 1970’s and doesn't have an NGO. He used to work with Salem International which is a German charitable organisation and has nothing to do with the US government.

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thom_Hartmann

Posted
4 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Otherwise like most posts about Trump it's more silly conspiracy theories.

Keep drinking the Kool Aid as I have never posted a "conspiracy theory" about the convicted felon, compulsive liar, multi bankrupt, charity thief, University scammer and grifter (still wearing your gold sneakers?) because the truth is out there and is plain to see. Touche.

  • Heart-broken 1
Posted
20 hours ago, frank83628 said:

Oh shut up, Biden is on video bragging about it.

Hunter didint have any experience in the energy sector but got a job on the board. Pull your head out for F's sake

Why do you think Biden's bragging about it is incompatible with the fact that Shokin was fired because of his failure to prosecute corrupt actors?

 

"It wasn't because Shokin was investigating a natural gas company tied to Biden's son; it
was because Shokin wasn't pursuing corruption among the country's politicians, according to
a Ukrainian official and four former American officials who specialized in Ukraine and
Europe.
Shokin's inaction prompted international calls for his ouster and ultimately resulted in his
removal by Ukraine's parliament.
Without pressure from Joe Biden, European diplomats, the International Monetary
Fund and other international organizations, Shokin would not have been fired, said Daria

Kaleniuk, co-founder and executive director of the Anti Corruption Action Centre in Kiev."

https://www.congress.gov/116/meeting/house/110331/documents/HMKP-116-JU00-20191211-SD440.pdf

 

"It is true, Archer said, that in December 2015, Zlochevsky and Burisma were under a lot of pressure. But Shokin was not a cause of that pressure, he testified — Shokin was an asset..."

https://archive.ph/b6w9k

 

"In 2015, Shokin became the prosecutor general, inheriting the investigation. The Obama administration and other governments and non-governmental organizations soon became concerned that Shokin was not adequately pursuing corruption in Ukraine, was protecting the political elite, and was regarded as "an obstacle to anti-corruption efforts".[27][44] Among other issues, he was slow-walking the investigation into Zlochevsky and Burisma and, according to Zlochevsky's allies, using the threat of prosecution to try to solicit bribes from Mr. Zlochevsky and his team – to the extent that Obama officials were considering launching their own criminal investigation into the company for possible money laundering.[42]"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_Shokin

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
23 hours ago, Ralf001 said:

 

I think you may be correct.

image.png.8270e59de043823183a946dece811633.png

image.png.324e230af7f5a8ad811c2d80da85c79c.png

image.png.10ed4a0152bf2109d26457dbbcec4d53.png

image.png.8fc98831eefd8e25c34dc252dc6f09b3.png

 

And they are all reasonable posts about a deranged and extreme man, who is causing untold damage to the US and the world. 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
Just now, spidermike007 said:

And they are all reasonable posts about a deranged and extreme man, who is causing untold damage to the US and the world. 

My life is the same as 12 months ago. You Dems really are drama queens.

  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...