Foreign currency account
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
Popular Contributors
-
Latest posts...
-
24
Anyone bought a (decent) office chair from Lazada?
Does IKEA ship everywhere in Thailand? -
76
Western Allies Warn Israel Over Gaza Offensive as Fragile Talks Resume in Doha
We all know your dislike of Jews and hatred for Israel. So one should not be surprised when you present; 1. An opinion without factual basis from Fatima Bhutto an activist opposed to Israel and, 2. An unsubstantiated claim in an obscure Albanian muslim media outlet. What's neext? Quoting from the Iranian Propaganda ministry or Aryan Brotherhood?- 1
-
-
5
Report Health Minister Somsak Blocks Punishment of Doctors in Thaksin Hospital Case
...and you know the details of the investigation? Do tell... -
13
90 days reporting - Can I do it online ?
No immigration office in Thailand will accept an online report after the due date. The 7 day grace period must always be done in person. -
76
Western Allies Warn Israel Over Gaza Offensive as Fragile Talks Resume in Doha
Checking for weapons and explosives , suicide vests and knives- 1
-
-
76
Western Allies Warn Israel Over Gaza Offensive as Fragile Talks Resume in Doha
Your bias is showing. Some parts of Gaza are densely populated, but parts of it are not. HRW watch has stated that white phosphorous was used in Gaza on October 11, 2023. What you don't mention is that the munition was an isolated use, at the Port of Gaza. The Port is not a densely populated location. It was a port that was used to load and unload military equipment and munitions for the benefit of military groups in Gaza. Neither HRW nor Amnesty claim that the munition was used elsewhere in Gaza. The Port of Gaza was a center of military supplies and logistics. The IDF neutralized munitions and arms depots as well as supply infrastructure when it attacked a legitimate military target at the Port. This was not an attack on civilians, nor a densely populated locale. You reference that burning wedges fell in an area between 125 and 250 meters. The photos presented as evidence are taken at an angle such that the the location of use is misrepresented. The angle is a far shot, and gives the impression that large structures were in close proximity. You can easily verify the proximate distances by looking at the satellite images of the layout of the port. Even Google maps shows that the phosphorous burst was not close to a residential area. Both HRW and Amnesty International were careful in their choice of words. They did not say the munitions were used in a residential area. They stayed silent. Had there been a use, they would have been the first to claim that.- 1
-
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now