Jump to content

Fun Quiz > Covid-19 mRNA Vax harm denial - At which stage are you?


Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, transam said:

Spot on chap...............:clap2:

 

oh boy......... who left the door open ??

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
31 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

Benefits outweigh the risks

Are you sure. Maybe this isn't the case when it comes to healthy people being vaccinated against what's essentially a mild viral infection with a "vaccine" that has the ability of inflicting serious damage to the body. It's no longer recommended for healthy people. Why would this be if the benefits outweigh the risks?

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, KhunLA said:

That's one opinion ... certainly not mine.

 

There is NO proof the save lives.  As no way to tell if the vaccines helped anyone recover, any better than those unvaccinated.  No real way to tell .... IMHO

Indeed! I'll go further.

 

No one has ever been 'saved' from anything by having any vaccine. 

 

The evidence is overwhelming that they are not 'safe', 'effective' or necessary.

 

http://www.canyoucatchacold.com

 

All the answers you need. And for those still alive after the covid shot; get well soon'.

 

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
Just now, Stiddle Mump said:

Indeed! I'll go further.

 

No one has ever been 'saved' from having any vaccine. 

 

The evidence is overwhelming that they are not 'safe', 'effective' or necessary.

 

http://www.canyoucatchacold.com

 

All the answers you need. And for those still alive after the covid shot; get well soon'.

 

 

Look at stats on just the Polio vaccine. Of course proof means nothing to some.

  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
Just now, fredwiggy said:

Look at stats on just the Polio vaccine. Of course proof means nothing to some.

There is no proof Fred bud.

Just made up nonsense.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
1 minute ago, dinsdale said:

Are you sure. Maybe this isn't the case when it comes to healthy people being vaccinated against what's essentially a mild viral infection with a "vaccine" that has the ability of inflicting serious damage to the body. It's no longer recommended for healthy people. Why would this be if the benefits outweigh the risks?

There's no telling just who needed a vaccine or who didn't. Some took them from fear or not being able to travel otherwise. Some needed them and many didn't, as Covid only kills a small percentage anyway. Better safe than sorry, taking the side effects risk is what I and many did. Side effects, most of them, are still better than death, which happened to many who didn't vaccinate. Most deaths are still from those who didn't. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Stiddle Mump said:

There is no proof Fred bud.

Just made up nonsense.

If you say so, although you might be alive because of your parents willingness to have you jabbed.

Posted
4 minutes ago, rumak said:

 

oh boy......... who left the door open ??

I don't know, I hope you are safe.............😧

  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
1 minute ago, fredwiggy said:

If you say so, although you might be alive because of your parents willingness to have you jabbed.

Jabbed against what? Can't you see it's all fake?

Posted
1 minute ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Jabbed against what? Can't you see it's all fake?

Most children had many vaccines as toddlers, as you may have, depending on your parents.Polio isn't fake, nor are many other ailments.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

When it's proven that the vaccines had something to do with them, it's evidence. Many make opinions and they don't count. 

So if excess deaths, myocarditis in young males, turbo cancers  have risen  since 2021 and the only difference in day to day life between 21 or previous years was a world wide vaccines.... would you think its climate change or think logically that it could possibly be those very same vaccines?

  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

No one has ever been 'saved' from having any vaccine. 

 

While I fully support the right to hold and express an opinion, each time you make such an outlandish statement, you plunge to such depths of ignorance that it renders you impossible to take seriously in any other discussion – no matter the topic.

 

Your blatant disregard for well-established, rigorously proven scientific facts betrays a fundamental lack of comprehension and critical thinking.

 

The tragic irony is that the very medical advances you sneer at – vaccines – are likely the reason you’re even alive to spread this nonsense. Without them, the odds of you surviving infancy, let alone childhood, would have been drastically reduced. To stand here denouncing vaccines is the intellectual equivalent of shooting yourself in the foot – and bragging about your aim.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

Most children had many vaccines as toddlers, as you may have, depending on your parents.

They did indeed.

 

People are more aware at this moment in time. I doubt if any here would let their precious kids be jabbed bow;  given whet we now know.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, frank83628 said:

So if excess deaths, myocarditis in young males, turbo cancers  have risen  since 2021 and the only difference in day to day life between 21 or previous years was a world wide vaccines.... would you think its climate change or think logically that it could possibly be those very same vaccines?

Like I said earlier, vaccines cause side effects, and also save lives that might have been lost without them. All vaccines.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, KhunLA said:

And remember, it's 'safe & effective' and stops you "from getting & spreading covid" :cheesy:

 

 

 


Yet the jab-pushers here will now deny (over and over) that anybody ever said that.  
 

They’ll conveniently forget/deny the coercion and anything questionable in the way the pandemic was handled.  

 

They’ll also continue to ask for proof/links….and even when supplied with data from either VAERS and Pfizer themselves (in their data dump), they will play dumb and ask for the same data again and again if only to try to frustrate us in their usual manipulative ways so that we just go away.

 

 

 

 

 

IMG_2350.png

  • Love It 2
Posted
Just now, Stiddle Mump said:

They did indeed.

 

People are more aware at this moment in time. I doubt if any here would let their precious kids be jabbed bow;  given whet we now know.

I think most of us would, as we care about our children's lives.

Posted
1 minute ago, rumak said:

 

oh boy.......... who left the door open ??  🤪

I don't know, I hope you are safe...........😱

Posted
6 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

There's no telling just who needed a vaccine or who didn't. Some took them from fear or not being able to travel otherwise. Some needed them and many didn't, as Covid only kills a small percentage anyway. Better safe than sorry, taking the side effects risk is what I and many did. Side effects, most of them, are still better than death, which happened to many who didn't vaccinate. Most deaths are still from those who didn't. 

You have deflected well but failed to answer a direct question. Why is the jab no longer recommended for healthy people? 

Posted
Just now, Red Phoenix said:

 

I can find a hundred links, and have actually posted them here before, of how the Polio vaccine saves thousands. That you dismiss it means nothing.

  • Agree 1
  • Heart-broken 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

You have deflected well but failed to answer a direct question. Why is the jab no longer recommended for healthy people? 

Immunity from time.And I don't deflect but offer evidence and also want answers. I'm not a conspiracy theorist and know what I've seen over many years of what vaccines have done for some. If you save millions, some will die also.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Airalee said:


Yet the jab-pushers here will now deny (over and over) that anybody ever said that.  
 

They’ll conveniently forget/deny the coercion and anything questionable in the way the pandemic was handled.  

 

They’ll also continue to ask for proof/links….and even when supplied with data from either VAERS and Pfizer themselves (in their data dump), they will play dumb and ask for the same data again and again if only to try to frustrate us in their usual manipulative ways so that we just go away.

 

 

 

 

 

IMG_2350.png

Those vids were hard to find, as Google has scrubbed so much, it's mind bobbling.  

 

Along with so many other vids, that warned about what is happening now, with spike proteins in bodies.   And so much more, all happeing, and all warned about, and told would happen.

 

More will come true in the next decade as the stats will prove.  Maybe one day, decades from now, they actually admit, be confirmed, what they did.  

 

Weaponized a virus for profit at least, or population control at worst ... IMHO

  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Red Phoenix said:

 

Keep trying, or better still, take up model aeroplane making, or stamp collecting.......🤭

  • Agree 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

If those vaccines didn't come out, many thousands if not more would have died, especially the ones with previous illnesses. There is hard evidence other vaccines have also saved lives, although your conspiracy experts will also disagree, even if they are living proof vaccines they have gotten could be why they are alive now.

Perhaps those with previous illness should have had the vax and isolated and leave the healthy to continue as normal

 

  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

Your blatant disregard for well-established, rigorously proven scientific facts betrays a fundamental lack of comprehension and critical thinking.

Fake data.

 

Unscientifiv  nonsense. Unrigorous, unproven unscientific thinking.

 

You seem to be incapable of seeing the truth Richard mate. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted
1 minute ago, dinsdale said:

You have deflected well but failed to answer a direct question. Why is the jab no longer recommended for healthy people? 

Dunno, tell us, from a non-dodgy source like the OP.............:whistling:

Posted
1 minute ago, fredwiggy said:

Immunity from time.

What does this even mean? It's certainly not an answer as to why jabs are no longer recommended for the vast majority of populations.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

Like I said earlier, vaccines cause side effects, and also save lives that might have been lost without them. All vaccines.

They are not 'side effects' Fred. They are direct effects.

 

It's all nonsense Fred bud. The body will look after itself.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

Perhaps those with previous illness should have had the vax and isolated and leave the healthy to continue as normal

 

This is precisely what should have happened. It didn't because money was the prime motive. Not health care.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...