5 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

No, instead they'll be beaten, stoned, raped and made to disappear with some of those. Treating a woman as an equal doesn't make you feminized but a man, as boys never learn any other ways, and some cultures are always looking at women as objects and second class to be used and basically slaves. Misogyny isn't a positive trait. 

Well, let's face it, you look at all women as narcissists.

You've ranted on about it often enough.

Which I'd say is a particularly nasty form of misogyny.

3 hours ago, rumak said:

You two are not legally married .......... correct ?   

We were married two weeks after meeting.

Valentine's day.

2 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Well, let's face it, you look at all women as narcissists.

You've ranted on about it often enough.

Which I'd say is a particularly nasty form of misogyny.

How do you get that when all I ever said was this Thai one is? If you paid attention to my many posts, you would see I look at women as equals, and have always treated them well, which is the opposite of using, narcissism and misogyny. Assuming comes on this forum in a few here. 

Just now, fredwiggy said:

How do you get that when all I ever said was this Thai one is? If you paid attention to my many posts, you would see I look at women as equals, and have always treated them well, which is the opposite of using, narcissism and misogyny. Assuming comes on this forum in a few here. 

I read your posts, obviously not the book length posts, and they all say the same thing.

Namely, nothings ever your fault Fred ............

4 hours ago, BritManToo said:

She left (bus to Phetchabun) to try an get this money this morning ..

 

Well, at least she's past the age for having affaris, so you're safe there.

3 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

I read your posts, obviously not the book length posts, and they all say the same thing.

Namely, nothings ever your fault Fred ............

Bad choices were my fault. Treating them well was what I did. A person doesn't read constantly for 30 years books and articles on relationships if he's meaning to hurt. If all my posts say the same things, which some do, especially how I feel about women and children, then you shouldn't make such comments. 

14 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

Well, at least she's past the age for having affaris, so you're safe there.

I've never really worried what they do when out of my sight.

That path would lead to depression and madness.

I've never viewed any Asian women as my property, they are free to do what they want to do with whomsoever they wish.

And I enjoy that same freedom.

1 hour ago, BritManToo said:

We were married two weeks after meeting.

Valentine's day.

 

oh, well I had thought you didn't have the Amphur marriage certificate.  hmmm

 

so.... if this thread is truthful (not just a wind up) ,  then the situation is interesting indeed.    LEGALLY,  i THINK  that if the property title was IN HER NAME before your marriage then it would be legally hers only .  Doesn't matter if the land value has appreciated or not imo.     BUT,  if she inherited the land or if her name was added after you were married,  then it would also be 50% yours , shared property. ( i am playing at lawyer here) . 

Of course..... this is Thailand and this stuff is complcated at times... more so when a farang is involved.

1 hour ago, rumak said:

 

oh, well I had thought you didn't have the Amphur marriage certificate.  hmmm

 

so.... if this thread is truthful (not just a wind up) ,  then the situation is interesting indeed.    LEGALLY,  i THINK  that if the property title was IN HER NAME before your marriage then it would be legally hers only .  Doesn't matter if the land value has appreciated or not imo.     BUT,  if she inherited the land or if her name was added after you were married,  then it would also be 50% yours , shared property. ( i am playing at lawyer here) . 

Of course..... this is Thailand and this stuff is complcated at times... more so when a farang is involved.

Not wholly correct.

 

Property and assets acquired by inheritance or gift remain personal property (Sin suan tua) and are not shared. See CCC section 1471.

 

 

 

2 hours ago, BritManToo said:

I've never viewed any Asian women as my property

 

Bit like they don't view their property as your property.

3 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

Bit like they don't view their property as your property.

I don't need anything beyond their smooth slim bodies in my bed at night.

2 hours ago, terryq said:

Not wholly correct.

 

Property and assets acquired by inheritance or gift remain personal property (Sin suan tua) and are not shared. See CCC section 1471.

 

 

 

 

Thanks terry.....  that does seem to make sense .    if this source is correct ( no reason to doubt it) .... this seems to confirm what you say : 

Of course, if the man (or in the odd case the woman) , works and makes a lot of money and new assets during their time together.... that is shared property.    hmmmm

 

Section 1470. Properties of husband and wife except in so far as they are set aside as Sin Suan Tua, are Sin Somros.

Section 1471. Sin Suan Tua consists of:

1. property belonging to either spouse before marriage;
2. property for personal use, dress or ornament suitable for station in life, or tools necessary for carrying on the profession of either spouse;
3. property acquired by either spouse during marriage through a will or gift;
4. Khongman.

2 hours ago, BritManToo said:

I don't need anything beyond their smooth slim bodies in my bed at night.

 

Then why did you get married? 

9 hours ago, Celsius said:

Then why did you get married? 

I wanted a non-white son with my family name.

33 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

I wanted a non-white son with my family name.

Not married and my kid has my last name.