Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Tug said:

Don’t know about that but I would say they might be concerned about systems support from the USA with trump or any maggot type in charge.whos to know if they would continue to support any system unless they supported whatever the maggots are pushing at the moment.no sane country should give up control over something so important to their survival.

What world do you live in? The world of Diptera larvae?

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thumbs Down 6
Posted
1 minute ago, TedG said:

 

Helicopters are outdated on today's battlefield. 

Still for efficient for transport and also picking up wounded out from the battlefield, or close by

Posted

What a stupid way to bash Trump and the USA lol. An article based on what some Korean  congressman says LOL.

 

And the conclusion, from the article

 

"A final note here is that often times pundits and the media will portray something as totally irrelevant or relevant. This binary, ‘black and white’ positioning makes for a good headline, but it usually isn’t anywhere near representative of the nuanced reality we live in. The AH-64 and other attack helicopters still have their uses and are an important component of combined arms strategy today, but that does not mean expanding their fleet size or even maintaining the current fleet size is logical. A reduced force balanced against new capabilities can be a prudent solution and this can be realized over time as the existing force needs deep upgrades and overhaul. On the other hand, if the force is too small it won’t be operationally relevant and it will be very costly to maintain for its size. So a balance is needed here, as well."

  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted
6 hours ago, novacova said:

What world do you live in? The world of Diptera larvae?

 

Its an accidental misspell of an increasingly common homophone, MAGATs. Internet analysis shows interest or usage of the term in a political context  started in July 2024.

 

  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted

Maybe the South Koreans resent President Trump's tough stance on trade? Well, if so, it's worth paying that price to help President Trump achieve the goals of America First

  • Thumbs Down 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
On 7/9/2025 at 9:11 AM, annotator said:

Maybe the South Koreans resent President Trump's tough stance on trade? Well, if so, it's worth paying that price to help President Trump achieve the goals of America First

Is it still America first or MIGA and mega coverups ?

 

I'm sure Kim is raking up production of drones.

Posted
On 7/8/2025 at 8:49 PM, Hummin said:

Still for efficient for transport and also picking up wounded out from the battlefield, or close by

as a VN vet, I will always revere helicopters and their pilots.  Just check out any VN vet for sure if the Whup Whup sound can be heard and they will be looking skyward for that craft.  The heros for sure of that conflict IMHO

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...