Discovery would be interesting and she would, as her defence have to go through exactly how she met Trump and prove Epstein wasn’t involved and never went to an Epstein party.

Hunter is the son Trump wishes he had

 

 

Wonder if Hunter is back on the pipe.

To the usual suspects around here trolling like 14-year-olds, thinking they are accomplishing something, and that we can't see right through it.  This is how adults do it.

 

 

 

Also, nobody on the left gives a FF about Hunter Biden or that dumb laptop conspiracy of yours that only a brain-dead idiot would believe.  We never did.  But keep beating that dead horse if it makes you happy and Faux News keeps telling you it's a thing.

Hunter Biden gives blunt two-word response to Melania Trump’s threats of $1 billion defamation lawsuit

 

...

Let the trial proceed. Hunter's lawyer can subpoena all the Epstein files to see if Melania's name is mentioned. It certainly could answer a lot of questions. It would be interesting to see how Trump's attorney Bondi responds.

1 hour ago, EVENKEEL said:

Wonder if Hunter is back on the pipe.

When people get old and senile, they lose perspective. Little meaningless things take on greater significance, while more critical matters are ignored.

 

Case in point: Hunter never did, and never will have access to the nuclear codes. He's as significant as Chelsea Clinton or Jenn Bush, maybe a lot less.

 

OTOH, Trump---a man who said he stopped the 7,000,000 person genocide (sic) in Rwanda in 1994, at a time when he was declaring bankruptcy, and a man obsessed with windmills, Arnold Palmer's junk, and sinking electric boats in shark-filled waters---does have the nuclear codes and literally can single-handedly set Armageddon into motion.

 

Those who still retain all of their mental faculties think the latter person is of much greater import.

Bad move by that woman. She brought attention back on to Epstein, and for what?

 

Whatever his flaws, Hunter is clever enough to note the introduction story by attributing it to someone else (author Michael Wolfe). Repeating what someone else said, and stating specifically where you gleaned it, leaves Hunter in the clear. It's like Trump saying he "heard" Barack Obama was born in Kenya. Hunter just pulled a Donny.

 

Still, if the case comes to court, it will have Epstein in the news every single day of the trial. The deposition of Ms Trump, under oath, would be quite amusing.

 

This is Hunter 1, Trumps 0. That's like losing to the 1962 NY Mets.

Did hunter imply the (First Lady) was one of Epsteins girls and preshous Donnie is having epsteins sloppy seconds??just asking for a friend……wow!popcorn at the ready!

 

9 hours ago, shdmn said:

Also, nobody on the left gives a FF about Hunter Biden or that dumb laptop conspiracy

Is the laptop real? 

9 hours ago, shdmn said:

To the usual suspects around here trolling like 14-year-olds, thinking they are accomplishing something, and that we can't see right through it.  This is how adults do it.

 

 

 

Also, nobody on the left gives a FF about Hunter Biden or that dumb laptop conspiracy of yours that only a brain-dead idiot would believe.  We never did.  But keep beating that dead horse if it makes you happy and Faux News keeps telling you it's a thing.

Keep the hope alive. 

6 minutes ago, sharot724 said:

 

Keep the hope alive. 

6 minutes ago, Mike_Hunt said:

Is the laptop real? 

I know you never watched  the video, as Hunter included it.

maga Exposed again lol

10 hours ago, Wingate said:

Bad move by that woman. She brought attention back on to Epstein, and for what?

 

Whatever his flaws, Hunter is clever enough to note the introduction story by attributing it to someone else (author Michael Wolfe). Repeating what someone else said, and stating specifically where you gleaned it, leaves Hunter in the clear. It's like Trump saying he "heard" Barack Obama was born in Kenya. Hunter just pulled a Donny.

 

Still, if the case comes to court, it will have Epstein in the news every single day of the trial. The deposition of Ms Trump, under oath, would be quite amusing.

 

This is Hunter 1, Trumps 0. That's like losing to the 1962 NY Mets.

That's the trap. Instead of hushing up the issue, it will increase its coverage by the media! 🤣

3 hours ago, Mike_Hunt said:

Is the laptop real? 

Careful we don't want the World News forum closed down again🤣

As a non American and not. exactly a supporter of Trunp I can say that Hunter  Biden is  nuts ! 

4 minutes ago, Jim Blue said:

As a non American and not. exactly a supporter of Trunp I can say that Hunter  Biden is  nuts ! 

So are you 

Ignoring the politics, it was an interesting interview with essentially a private citizen, expressing opinions, like we all do, on the world at large, based on what he reads and hears. There was some interesting insight.

 

I feel in the middle he touched on the whole nub of this Epstein thing; people knew, a lot of people knew. And he's right to pour cold water on the whole "pedo conspiracy" nonsense. The act of pedophillia is a solitary act, in private. But these pedophiles make the private act public, and get away with it.

 

You go back to Gary Glitter (Paul Gadd); no one was actually that surprised that when he dropped off his laptop to be fixed, it would be full of disgusting image. "Everyone" knew he was a wrong 'un, but never talked about it. He was fat and balding, and wore a wig, hanging out with underage groupies. But then he was caught, went to prison, got out, and promptly "came out", in liking, this time, very young girls. It isn't sexual desire to commit obscene acts against 10 year old girls. Its much more insidious; its an act that's not driven by hormones, but by psychology. And he's completely unapologetic, genuinely living without regret, or personal insight.

 

Jimmy Savile; even more people knew. They knew about his activities concerning the corpses of children. Pedophile is the wrong word; like Glitter, there was no love there, except maybe love of oneself. That final interview with Louis Theroux; the mask slipped, and he knew, and clearly took pleasure at the idea that even when he was himself, he was basically untouchable.

 

There are hints of that extending to this forum. Richard Burrows, aka Peter Smith of Phuket. There were many people in the expat who knew. Some probably thought they knew his well. I'd include members of the forum, who wouldn't admit to it. Burrows was a housemaster, I suppose a sort of teacher, though who knows if he had any actual qualifications. He spent over 3 decades abusing boys. I have no doubt moving to Thailand did not put a stop to that. I wouldn't be surprised if he's sitting now in his OAP prison thinking about how he got away with 25 years of abuse in Thailand. At his trial, true to form, he admitted t 43 offences, but denied 54 others. He tried to justify his actions to his brother. In Thailand, he didn't live the life of a gay man, proving that buggering schoolboys was nothing to do with sexuality, but a power trip. I suspect its no coicidence that he wormed his way into a prominant job in Phuket, where he became known on the social set.

 

And Epstein. I think the nub of the story is that Trump, and other, all knew. And they all did nothing about it. The overriding question is why? Biden referred to his brother prosecuting a notorious doctor. People complained about him, but nothing was done. People knew, and were, in a way complicit. Savile ruined the reputation of the BBC (some people might be pleased with that. Epstein and Savile seem very similar. Savile got a Papal Knighthood. Epstein had the Dalai Llama come to stay. He'd surround himself with the great the good, and derive pleasure from  the fact they knew, but did nothing, could do nothing.

 

If this is indeed what happened, Trump could completely diffuse things by ordering a Presidential Truth and Reconciliation Commission, that might broaden out to other industries to shatter the security that those in power enjoy. That includes the churches, education, the entertainment industry, the sports industry, industry, politics. It would be a very brave thing to do, go on camera and admit, you knew, you didn't do enough, as a parent. But it won't happen; look at the British Royal Family, a 1200 year old institution now probably irretrievably damaged because of one man. Which is probably why an institution a mere 250 years old is so guarded about shining too much light on this matter.

 

 

MicroB

Insightfull and provides a way of making any sense out of all this.

 

According to recordings made by Michael Wolff of Jeffrey Epstein...

 

 

Jeffrey Epstein described himself as Donald Trump’s “closest friend” and claimed intimate knowledge of his proclivity for sex, including cuckolding his best friends, according to recordings obtained exclusively by the Daily Beast. The convicted pedophile even boasted of his closeness to Trump and his now-wife Melania by claiming, “the first time he slept with her was on my plane,” which was dubbed the Express.

 

https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU08/20250227/117951/HHRG-119-JU08-20250227-SD006-U6.pdf

 

I'm looking forward to her "lawsuit" progressing.

 

Be Best.

 

On 8/15/2025 at 5:58 AM, sharot724 said:

her defence have to go through exactly how she met Trump and prove Epstein wasn’t involved and never went to an Epstein party.

Does a court normally require anyone to prove a negative? Why show that Epstein wasn't involved when the obvious one is to prove he was - which Hunter should prove.