August 23, 2025Aug 23 5 hours ago, SABloke said: Not a good example since she is very rich. Her omelletes sell for 1,500 THB each and she (without permission) sold the customer a 4,000 THB one! So overcharged 2,500. Was only slapped with a 2,000 fine in the end. Overpricing 1 omelette is much less than the billions that Thaksin and his family have not paid on taxes for the Thaicom satellite many years ago....and the damage he does for this country by making troubles with Hun Sen and for which people at the Cambodian/Thai border are the victims
August 24, 2025Aug 24 On 8/22/2025 at 2:37 PM, webfact said: The court found that the video clips used as evidence were incomplete and lacked the full context needed for conviction. On 8/22/2025 at 2:37 PM, webfact said: the prosecution failed to produce the original, unedited footage. Based on evidence and not political agenda or bias the court decision was correct. One has to ask why the prosecution failed to produce the obvious as evidence. It makes prosecution more of a political smear than a justified nonpolitical crime.
August 24, 2025Aug 24 5 hours ago, Srikcir said: One has to ask why the prosecution failed to produce the obvious as evidence. It makes prosecution more of a political smear than a justified nonpolitical crime. In other words, what was the point of the whole exercise? Just to keep us all entertained for a few weeks or months? To what end?
Create an account or sign in to comment