2 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

You quote the attitude from the loony "progressive" woke left very well. Well done. Dig in and accept no resposibility even though the hate rhetoric coming out of the left is well documented. This young lad obviously had some mental problems and his mind was poisoned by the hate rhetoric from the left.

Yes, because the rethoric coming from MAGA isn't hateful at all. Got it!🤣

11 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

Are you being dense on purpose? The governor wrote that Tylor Robinson was radicalised in a short period of time. So they know how  and who radicalised him. And since he killed a far right influencer we know he wasn't radicalised from the right.

 

Since we have his anti-fascist messages on the bullets we also know that he was into ANTIFA symbols and messages, so it is very, very clear that he was radicalised by the left.

 

What kind of a stupid comment was that?

How does the Governor know the killer was radicalized in a short period of time?

 

 

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

How does the Governor know the killer was radicalized in a short period of time?

 

 

Do non radicalized people assassinate people? 

4 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

This is a bout "Media Bias." That's not the same as "Hate Speech." 

This is deflection. The Atlantic is a far left "media" organisation. Using The Atlantic to support the comment that Trump uses hate speech daily does not hold legitimacy. I once again call for examples of Trump's daily use of "hate speech". From the left this is of course very easy to document. Remember the "Neo Nazi" political rally at Madison Square Garden. Trump is the new Hitler. 

3 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

Yes, because the rethoric coming from MAGA isn't hateful at all. Got it!🤣

Give us some examples.

Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

How does the Governor know the killer was radicalized in a short period of time?

 

 

 

Exactly Chomps. Exactly! 

 

That is the question.

 

I'll tell you how, their investigation has unearthed far more than they're telling us. Including how Tylor Robinson was radicalised.

 

But the governor is terrified that massive public unrest like after the police choking that fraudster could be unleashed. So they're keeping quiet about the extent of Robinson's ANTIFA and LGBT radicalisation.

 

Why are they not telling us the message that was on the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk? The killer engraved messages on all his bullets. But they're keeping quiet about the message on the bullet that killed Charlie. So as not to unleash public anger.

15 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

What kind of a stupid comment was that?

Obviously a question too deep for your mind. Social media and those with vested interests like yourself will paint a picture of him with wide brush strokes to fit their agendas now that a killing of a youthful mouthpiece of the extreme right has occurred. Facts won't matter how you do this.

11 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

This young lad obviously had some mental problems

 

Yes he obviously had mental issues, in that he was an alt - right Trump supporter

5 minutes ago, Hamus Yaigh said:

Obviously a question too deep for your mind. Social media and those with vested interests like yourself will paint a picture of him with wide brush strokes to fit their agendas now that a killing of a youthful mouthpiece of the extreme right has occurred. Facts won't matter how you do this.

 

Stop posting verbal porridge.

 

Tylor Robinson was an ANTIFA leftist radical killer.

 

We have the bullets that prove it.

 

 

1 minute ago, CallumWK said:

 

Yes he obviously had mental issues, in that he was an alt - right Trump supporter

 

Liar. 

 

Why would a Trump supporter kill one of Trump's greatest assets?

 

You're full of lies today.

2 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

 

Yes he obviously had mental issues, in that he was an alt - right Trump supporter

 

Source?

6 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

10 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

Yes, because the rethoric coming from MAGA isn't hateful at all. Got it!🤣

Give us some examples.

Sure! Here are just a few... https://www.politico.eu/article/15-most-offensive-things-trump-campaign-feminism-migration-racism/

It's so good to see that the desire to understand the opposing point of view and the spirit of reconciliation is alive and thriving on AN.

10 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

Sure! Here are just a few... https://www.politico.eu/article/15-most-offensive-things-trump-campaign-feminism-migration-racism/

 

Thanks WDSsmart. 

 

Had a look, not many are actually that offensive.

So many arguing over a man's thinking when all they have to go on is what's already released to the public, which can be truth,  lies or exaggerations. Why not wait until everything actually comes out?

 

We all had our theories about who and why, but no one besides the shooter knows exactly why he did this. All the facts we have is that he was a radical, and mentally ill, as no one in their right minds kills anyone just because they disagree with them.

 

He may have written these things on the ammo, and they do show some hatred towards others, but hatred isn't a reason alone to end a life.

 

Was he acting alone or by himself? Was he a Trump, Republican hater or just a Kirk hater? Only when they interview him , and if he tells the whole truth, will we get the true picture .

 

He told his family Kirk was going to be speaking at the rally before he went, so it could be he just didn't like what Kirk says, as is seen with others who disagree with him, including people here.

 

Everyone here has their theories of why he did this, and it had nothing to do with being a "gun nut", which is how some have labeled him. 99%+ of American gun owners aren't out shooting people but are legitimate owners, hunters and target shooters, and will never use a gun in a crime. He used one because it was easier than getting up close and trying another method, and more likely he would have been instantly caught. 

2 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

Thanks WDSsmart. 

 

Had a look, not many are actually that offensive.

I have no doubt you think that!

 

https://www.newsbreak.com/buzzfeed-1592444/4228295962228-maga-supporters-are-demanding-revenge-after-charlie-kirk-s-death-and-it-is-very-scary

1 hour ago, TDCNINJA said:

The point being he shared the same ideology as you and the person who killed Charlie Kirk.

OK so you didn't understand what your quote said.

He said the Leftists of his day did not have a right to use the word Socialism.

"The Marxians have stolen the term and confused its meaning."

He said we are gonna use the term but we mean something different.

He was distancing his party from Marxism and international Socialism.

27 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

How does the Governor know the killer was radicalized in a short period of time?

 

 

Possibly because he has access to information that is not available to the general public who can only speculate here with their predetermined biased opinions!

17 minutes ago, TDCNINJA said:

 

Source?

 

ONE CREDIBLE source was already posted in a related thread by another poster, but there are plenty available on the internet.

Normally you guys are very good at googling sources to slander and flame the democrats, so I'm sure you will find them now also

12 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

How many Trump supporters do you think HATED Charlie?

Laura loomer for starters. How many followers does she have?

A post that concluded in a contemptuous remark to another member was removed. Please debate the topic and refrain from nastiness towards each other. Thank you. 

6 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

 

ONE CREDIBLE source was already posted in a related thread by another poster, but there are plenty available on the internet.

Normally you guys are very good at googling sources to slander and flame the democrats, so I'm sure you will find them now also

 

So you have no source.

 

Ok.

6 minutes ago, stevenl said:

Laura loomer for starters. How many followers does she have?

 

 

“The best way President Trump can reinforce Charlie’s legacy is by cracking down on the left with the full force of the government,” wrote Laura Loomer, a far-right political activist. “Every single left wing group that funds violent protests needs to be shut down and prosecuted.”

 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/11/charlie-kirk-shooting-death-trump-reaction

21 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

Liar. 

 

Why would a Trump supporter kill one of Trump's greatest assets?

 

You're full of lies today.

 

 

It isn't clear that Tyler Robinson is a Trump supporter. It is possible that he's a follower of Nick Fuentes and was radicalized by the Alt-Right.

 

Fuentes has denounced Trump for not being racist enough and too soft on minorities and immigrants. Fuentes and his Gropyers had a particular animus for Charlie Kirk for these reasons. They are Alt--Right and not Trump supporters.

 

Again, it is telling that his MAGA family have not stated that his radicalization was by leftists or leftist ideology. Governor Cox, also a Republican, hasn't attributed Tyler's radicalization to the Left. I'm sure that if Tyler was radicalized by the left, his MAGA family would have said so and Governor Cox would have also mentioned it. It's a glaring omission

15 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

 

“The best way President Trump can reinforce Charlie’s legacy is by cracking down on the left with the full force of the government,” wrote Laura Loomer, a far-right political activist. “Every single left wing group that funds violent protests needs to be shut down and prosecuted.”

 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/11/charlie-kirk-shooting-death-trump-reaction

Yes, that's what she said after, vehemently deleting her earlier SM posts calling him a traitor.

5 hours ago, angryguy said:

Looks like the leftist media is the responsible party

“I think it is worth to have the cost of unfortunately some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the second Amendment to protect our other Second Amendment rights”. - PBS Newshour video of Charlie Kirk speaking. Left wing media?

Just now, Wrwest said:

“I think it is worth to have the cost of unfortunately some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the second Amendment to protect our other Second Amendment rights”. - PBS Newshour video of Charlie Kirk speaking. Left wing media?

Is it worth having some automobile deaths each year to have automobiles? 

 

Is it worth having some deaths due to alcoholism each year to so people can enjoy alcohol? 

 

Is it worth having some deaths due to rock climbing each year to so people can enjoy rock climbing? 

 

Is it worth having some deaths due to fishing each year to so people can enjoy fishing? 

 

Like Sowell says. "There are no solutions, only tradeoffs."

 

 

11 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

So many arguing over a man's thinking when all they have to go on is what's already released to the public, which can be truth,  lies or exaggerations. Why not wait until everything actually comes out?

 

We all had our theories about who and why, but no one besides the shooter knows exactly why he did this. All the facts we have is that he was a radical, and mentally ill, as no one in their right minds kills anyone just because they disagree with them.

 

He may have written these things on the ammo, and they do show some hatred towards others, but hatred isn't a reason alone to end a life.

 

Was he acting alone or by himself? Was he a Trump, Republican hater or just a Kirk hater? Only when they interview him , and if he tells the whole truth, will we get the true picture .

 

He told his family Kirk was going to be speaking at the rally before he went, so it could be he just didn't like what Kirk says, as is seen with others who disagree with him, including people here.

 

Everyone here has their theories of why he did this, and it had nothing to do with being a "gun nut", which is how some have labeled him. 99%+ of American gun owners aren't out shooting people but are legitimate owners, hunters and target shooters, and will never use a gun in a crime. He used one because it was easier than getting up close and trying another method, and more likely he would have been instantly caught. 

 

No, people in their right minds do not kill people just because they disagree with them.   People who are not in their right minds, who are susceptible to propaganda, who believe it when they are told someone is literally Hitler or a Fascist will see it as a moral duty to assassinate that person.   Who is it that has been labelling the likes of Trump and Charlie Kirk far-right, fascist, destroyers of democracy and Hitler do you think and who have both been victims of assassination attempts recently?  Coincidence?  I think not.   

 

What is fundamentally clear and without question though is that quite a lot of ghouls on the left are celebrating this murder.  This in itself will turn a lot of sensible leftists away from the left as who on earth would want to be on the same side as those who celebrate the killing of a young father of 2 who simply expressed his opinion and welcomed and encouraged debate?   The left is revealing itself after this and cannot hide their glee that someone who had influence on the right has been permanently silenced.   Truly evil.  I'm glad I'm not on "that side" and if I was then this would be the turning point.

31 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

You do realise you can search the internet to prove yourself wrong don't you? What's coming out is he was radicalised from the left. He hated Kirk. How many Trump supporters do you think HATED Charlie? Your comment is yet another example of the puerility and ignorance of the sydrome suffers on here. 

 

He was a Gyroper, and they are radicalized right, not radicalized left