I found this article from Al Jazeera very interesting.  It's an editor's analysis of why Netanyahu doesn't want a ceasefire and has blown up (pun intended) all attempts at a brokered solution.

 

Attacking Qatar shows Israel doesn’t want a Gaza ceasefire

Netanyahu keeps changing his position on a Gaza ceasefire, using different ploys to keep the war going.

 

For almost two years, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has gone out of his way to avoid agreeing to a ceasefire.

 

Attacking Qatar shows Israel doesn’t want a Gaza ceasefire | Israel-Palestine conflict News | Al Jazeera

Al Jazeera, conflict of interest?

It's very simple. 

 

To continue the genocide 

 

 

Israel had not missed opportunity of Kirk death to bomb civilian areas. At this point not even using Hamas ruse. Actually,  was a joke even a year ago. 

 

Just cold blooded murder 

1 minute ago, ozfarang said:

Al Jazeera, conflict of interest?

 

It's a better news source than western media. It's lost dozens of journalist.. .murdered

 

Just not reliable reporting on Arab politics.

35 minutes ago, ozfarang said:

Al Jazeera, conflict of interest?

Doesn't change facts. Want to dispute the conclusion based on the facts?

Why? Because Israel's leader will do anything to keep out of prison for his corrupt actions of recent decades.

16 minutes ago, stevenl said:

Doesn't change facts. Want to dispute the conclusion based on the facts?

Did I mention anything about facts?

1 hour ago, ozfarang said:

Did I mention anything about facts?

You mentioned a conflict of interest. So i presume you want to challenge the conclusion? If not, why mention it at all.

On 9/15/2025 at 7:25 AM, JBChiangRai said:

Attacking Qatar shows Israel doesn’t want a Gaza ceasefire

 

   Those responsible for Oct 7 th terror attack still need to be bought to justice .

   They can stick any badge on them they like (Press , Aid worker, Journalist, negotiator) , but they still need to be held responsible for their actions and killed

Egypt has had enough of Israel.

 

In his speech in Doha on Monday, al-Sissi said: "Our positions must change the enemy's view of us, so that it can see that any Arab country extends from the ocean to the Gulf."

 

Diaa Rashwan, the head of the State Information Service, Egypt's official media organization, said that this is the first time an Egyptian head of state used the word "enemy" to describe Israel since 1977, when former president Anwar Sadat visited Jerusalem.

 

Two years later, Egypt became the first Arab country to sign a peace treaty with Israel.

Rashwan told Extra News broadcaster late Monday that "a friend does not threaten your national security" and Egypt considers the threat of forced displacement of Palestinians outside Gaza as a "red line."

 

Egypt's leader calls Israel 'enemy' for first time since peace treaty

 

 

Egypt's President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi speaks with Russian President Vladimir Putin (not pictured) during their meeting at the Kremlin. -/Kremlin/dpa© DPA International

10 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   Those responsible for Oct 7 th terror attack still need to be bought to justice .

   They can stick any badge on them they like (Press , Aid worker, Journalist, negotiator) , but they still need to be held responsible for their actions and killed

 

You can say most of that, but you can't say "and killed", that's not your decision,

53 minutes ago, JBChiangRai said:

 

You can say most of that, but you can't say "and killed", that's not your decision,

It is Israel's decision. They will go after them and kill them if they can.

On 9/15/2025 at 7:30 AM, ozfarang said:

Al Jazeera, conflict of interest?

The same would apply to the majority of Israeli news sites as well.

1 hour ago, JBChiangRai said:

 

You can say most of that, but you can't say "and killed", that's not your decision,

What he NEVER says, is that Netanyahu, his Zionist criminal war cabinet and ALL the members of the IDF involved in the slaughter and starvation of over 64,000 Palestinian men, women, children and babies must also be punished to the full extent of the international law.

 

The "I was only obeying orders", is not a legal defence anymore.