8 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

So Socialist: Confronted with the actual provision in the US Attys manual, you continue to lie.

 

Admit it: You have no idea WHAT evidence was presented to the Grand Jury. You have no idea whether the Govt provided Brady material to the Grand Jury. You just talk through your butt.

 

I wonder which banned anti Trumper troll you were previously

Where in that provision was the Brady rule invoked? Or even mentioned? It wasn't because the Brady Rule doesn't apply. Your invocation of it was based on your misunderstanding. The Brady rule applies to criminal trials where the prosecution withholds significant evidence from the defense.  The specifics of the evidence provided by Halligan has nothing to do with the Brady Rule  because it was a grand jury proceeding. There is no defense to provide exculpatory evidence to.

3 hours ago, Yagoda said:

All right little fellow let me help you out here. among other things, Brady material is that relevant information that is favorable to the defendant. It must be turned over by the government to the defense. Was Brady material or information presented to this grand jury?

What defendant?

2 minutes ago, Alan Zweibel said:

Where in that provision was the Brady rule invoked? Or even mentioned? It wasn't because the Brady Rule doesn't apply. Your invocation of it was based on your misunderstanding. The Brady rule applies to criminal trials where the prosecution withholds significant evidence from the defense.  The specifics of the evidence provided by Halligan has nothing to do with the Brady Rule  because it was a grand jury proceeding. There is no defense to provide exculpatory evidence to.

Mumbling and stumbling LOL. Keep going, this is great. You better think about a new identity after this total humilation. Obviouly, you have never been near a Grand Jury

Just now, Yagoda said:

Mumbling and stumbling LOL. Keep going, this is great. You better think about a new identity after this total humilation. Obviouly, you have never been near a Grand Jury

You have no answer for the fact that there is no defendant in a grand jury proceeding. So the Brady Rule can not apply. That's why you refuse to engage with that simple fact. 

5 minutes ago, Alan Zweibel said:

You have no answer for the fact that there is no defendant in a grand jury proceeding.

I dare you to repeat that with a straight face. Please. This is great. 

 

Your total ignorance is on full display! What a fun morning LOL.

Next.... 

 

 

He denied that she ever lied to him. Chavitz ,do you need a referral  from Congress to investigate her statements under oath? Comey ,acknowledged . Chavitz ,you'll have one.

 

 

On 9/26/2025 at 5:58 PM, SunnyinBangrak said:

Watch the whole house of cards come crashing down when Comey starts singing like a canary to try saving his neck.😅

Man i gotta calm down this is too much

Have you calmed down yet?