2 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

No one is saying that it is. You are the ones complaining that he "violated" the constituion.

Where did I say that?

4 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Got it. So Trump may be legally correcgt, at at a minimum, since the issue is not settled, he didnt violate anyhting. Are you saying the interpretation of the administration is legally untenable.

Do you ever check what you write...............?  😏

9 minutes ago, transam said:

Do you ever check what you write...............?  😏

Do you know how to read? You surely dont write very well

2 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Do you know how to read? You surely dont write very well

You're dyslexic then, go back and read your post .....s l o w l y.........................🤐

22 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

So its not settled. So Trumps interpretaion may be correct. So how did he violate the constituion if its not settled LOL.

 

Your ignorance is showing again LOL. Tell us how Wong Kim Ark settles the issue. 

 

Two federal courts so far have blocked the order.

On 10/11/2025 at 12:07 PM, Patong2021 said:

 

Disgusting, but then you sympathize with Hamas and hezbollah don't you? You obviously have no respect for Congress or the US Constitution.

 

You mean the respect like Donald has?

3 hours ago, Will B Good said:

Purges of this nature inevitably scream 'weak leader.'...........but in this case I'd go with very weak leader, well out of his depth.

 

Weak leaders allow the Russkies to attack on their watch.  Hamas terrorists, too.

 

Some go on book tours to 'splain why it's somebody else's fault that they lost.

 

 

3 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Well I doubt any of them could beat him in push ups.

Or a drinking contest

11 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

Where did I say that?

Cool. So you dont think that Trumps exec order ending birthright citizenship violates the constitution?

28 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

 

Two federal courts so far have blocked the order.

So what

47 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

Whats your point?

8 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

So what

If I recall, the word used originally was respect and not violate.

9 minutes ago, Hawaiian said:

If I recall, the word used originally was respect and not violate.

The intent is the same. How is the executive order not respect.

On 10/11/2025 at 11:13 AM, Yellowtail said:

Should generals in the Pentagon that are afraid of losing a job really be generals in the Pentagon?

 

 

Better be doing 200 sit ups and 200 pushups daily.........

1 hour ago, CallumWK said:

 

Two federal courts so far have blocked the order.

DT is having more and more issues with Federal Court decisions on his orders........interesting times.   

3 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Cool. So you dont think that Trumps exec order ending birthright citizenship violates the constitution?

 

Where did I say that?

9 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

Where did I say that?

 

Forgive the little Cambodian for his confusion, by now he probably has sucked on that bong so much that he hardly knows anymore what day it is, and much less what he is writing and/or reading 

Just now, CallumWK said:

 

Forgive the little Cambodian for his confusion, by now he probably has sucked on that bong so much that he hardly knows anymore what day it is, and much less what he is writing and/or reading 

 

 

Wow!! 

 

You can tell there's difference before and after.....impressive......555

 

 

6 hours ago, Hawaiian said:

For one thing it is bad policy to have so many top brass in one place at one time.

So, but for that he is competent? 

 

I and much of the "top brass" was not there.

6 hours ago, Hawaiian said:

Birthright citizenship for one.

The court will decide birthright citizenship, and we have no reason to believe Trump will not go along with the whatever the court decides. 

 

Birthright there are strong arguments that birthright citizenship is not guaranteed by the Constitution. I do not think the Administration will win, but there is nothing wrong with challenging it. 

 

There is nothing unconstitutional about challenging the Constitution. 

8 hours ago, Tug said:

Well just what do you think a lucid patriotic American would think about someone who posts what you post?

Same could be said for you Tug

On 10/11/2025 at 7:41 AM, blaze master said:

 

How democratic of you. You must be a democrat. 

Well, the democrats have been promoting violence since Obama was in office.  Even more so since Trump has been in office during his second term.

19 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

I do not have a silo.

 

So why do you guys regurgitate the same lies over and over? 

They never let facts get in the way of distorting the truth.

18 hours ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

Wow!! 

 

You can tell there's difference before and after.....impressive......555

 

 

As opposed to you, always posting stupidity without the need of a bong

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

As opposed to you, always posting stupidity without the need of a bong

 

So you confess you do post stupidity....but only after a quick puff.....at....8am?

4 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

So you confess you do post stupidity....but only after a quick puff.....at....8am?

Nice try, stalking troll.

1 minute ago, Yagoda said:

Nice try, stalking troll.

 

 

Cheers.

On 10/12/2025 at 7:45 AM, impulse said:

 

Weak leaders allow the Russkies to attack on their watch.  Hamas terrorists, too.

 

Some go on book tours to 'splain why it's somebody else's fault that they lost.

 

 

Russia is attacking under Trump watch. Trump actually gave it a helping hand several times.

On 10/12/2025 at 1:34 AM, NanLaew said:

 

You mean the respect like Donald has?

 

A different issue and should not be used to excuse or justify inappropriate activity of advocating for a military coup. There are still checks and balances ona president that are in effect. 

AI quickie (Gemini):

 

President Trump signed Executive Order 14160, "Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship," on January 20, 2025, which aims to restrict birthright citizenship.

 

Current Status (as of October 2025):
The executive order is not currently in effect and its implementation is blocked by multiple nationwide preliminary injunctions issued by federal judges.

 

The Trump administration has formally requested that the U.S. Supreme Court review the legality of the Executive Order, but is not seeking an expedited hearing. Legal experts anticipate a final ruling may not be issued until early to mid-2026.