Released  yesterday   the film about  long-hidden study from the Henry Ford Health System in Detroit, MI.

comparing the vaccinated to the unvaccinated.

 

https://www.aninconvenientstudy.com/

 

Senate hearing about the same study.

https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/subcommittees/investigations/hearings/how-the-corruption-of-science-has-impacted-public-perception-and-policies-regarding-vaccines/

 

Cue the 'fact checkers'.

So now you're recycling old anti-vaxer nonsense trying to promote a nonsense anti-vaxer film.

 

Here's the reason the cited "document" that's the subject of this thread has never been published anywhere... Note the use of the term "Myths" in the news report below.

Rinse and repeat: US vaccine hearing on unpublished study debates same myths

The Guardian

Wed 10 Sep 2025

 

"Henry Ford Health’s communications office did not respond to a request for comment in time for publication, but later sent over the following statement via a spokesperson: “This report was not published because it did not meet the rigorous scientific standards we demand as a premier medical research institution. Data has consistently shown vaccinations are a safe and effective way to protect children against potentially life-altering diseases.”

...

Zervos and the other authors of the study were not present at the hearing. The study, which has never been peer-reviewed, is not currently available to the public as a pre-print or in any other form.

...

Jake Scott, a clinical associate professor of infectious diseases at Stanford – and the only physician who served as a witness during the hearing – had a different explanation as to why the study was not published.  In his testimony, Scott said that the study was “fundamentally flawed”, adding that its core problem was that “vaccinated children had twice the follow-up time and substantially more healthcare visits than unvaccinated children." [meaning the vaccinated group with more doctor visits was more likely to receive medical diagnoses, making the comparisons invalid]

 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/10/vaccine-hearing-congress-illness-children

 

 

And further:

 

Read the final sentence of the cited document:

 

"Our preliminary findings cannot prove causality and warrant further investigation."  [emphasis added]

 

AND

 

"We lacked information on socioeconomic status, or potentially relevant post birth factors, such as diet or lifestyle..."  [poster's comment - that would make valid comparisons between the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups invalid]

 

https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Entered-into-hearing-record-Impact-of-Childhood-Vaccination-on-Short-and-Long-Term-Chronic-Health-Outcomes-in-Children-A-Birth-Cohort-Study.pdf

 

RFK Jr. ally’s ‘smoking gun’ study on vaccines and chronic illness is fundamentally flawed

Presented at a Senate hearing, the document is riddled with major issues

Sept. 9, 2025

 

"...unveiled a study riddled with the exact flaws that peer review is designed to catch: fundamental study design errors, statistical impossibilities inconsistent with known prevalence, and results that collapse under routine epidemiologic scrutiny. Notably, even this study’s own data showed no association between vaccines and autism, the condition most frequently cited by vaccine critics.

 

That it remains unpublished isn’t suppression, as Siri alleged, but rather quality control. The bitter irony of this hearing’s title — “How the Corruption of Science Has Impacted Public Perception” — is that, as I testified to the subcommittee, the real corruption on display isn’t in journals rejecting flawed studies. It’s in bypassing peer review entirely, shopping for any analysis that supports predetermined conclusions, then presenting it as evidence on a Senate stage. The analysis contains fundamental mistakes that any credible journal would flag."

 

By Jake Scott

Scott is an infectious diseases physician and clinical associate professor at Stanford University School of Medicine and curator of the Controlled Vaccine Trial Database.

 

https://www.statnews.com/2025/09/09/aaron-siri-smoking-gun-vaccine-chronic-disease-study-flaws/

 

Why This Dreadful “Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated” Study Doesn’t Hold Water (or Logic)

September 13, 2025

 

"This recently released small, unpublished study on Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated kids is a load of bol-locks. It is designed to find that vaccinated kids have more health problems than unvaccinated. This is like calling a scribble on a napkin a Picasso — only this one is being waved around in Congress. [emphasis added]

...

In short, the “hidden vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study” lacks corroboration in academic, regulatory, or media archives. It’s not proof of suppression, but proof of a claim that is not yet backed by credible evidence. I have reviewed it, and it is a load of crap. 

...

My verdict: The analytic choices are not fit for the causal question as framed. There are major, unresolved biases (especially ascertainment/health-care utilisation bias, immortal-time/time-varying exposure bias, selection & residual confounding, and outcome misclassification & multiplicity) that are likely sufficient to generate the reported hazard ratios—even if the true effect were null. The results, therefore, cannot be interpreted causally and should not be used to infer vaccine harm."

 

(more)

 

https://diplomaticimmunity.blog/dreadful-study-vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated/

 

Dr. Helen Petousis-Harris

"I’m a vaccinologist at the University of Auckland in New Zealand, where I’ve spent over two decades researching, teaching, and myth-busting all things vaccine-related. If there’s a vaccine misconception out there, chances are I’ve seen it—probably more than once!"

 

Why a study claiming vaccines cause chronic illness is severely flawed – a biostatistician explains the biases and unsupported conclusions

...

"As the head of biostatistics at the University of Pennsylvania’s Perelman School of Medicine, when I encounter new scientific claims, I always start with the question “Could this be true?” Then, I evaluate the evidence.

 

I can say definitively that the study by Henry Ford Health researchers has serious design problems that keep it from revealing much about whether vaccines affect children’s long-term health. In fact, a spokesperson at Henry Ford Health told journalists seeking comment on the study that it “was not published because it did not meet the rigorous scientific standards we demand as a premier medical research institution.” [emphasis added]

...

Bottom line

The Henry Ford data could be helpful if the study followed both groups of kids to the same ages and took into account differences in health care use and background risks. But as written, the study’s main comparisons are tilted. The follow-up time was short and uneven, kids had unequal chances for diagnosis, and the two groups were very different in ways that matter. The methods used did not adequately fix these problems. Because of this, the differences reported in the study do not show that vaccines cause chronic disease."

 

(more)

 

By Jeffrey S. Morris

Professor of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Pennsylvania

 

https://theconversation.com/why-a-study-claiming-vaccines-cause-chronic-illness-is-severely-flawed-a-biostatistician-explains-the-biases-and-unsupported-conclusions-265470

 

 

 

 

 

Ohh hit a nerve with the 'fact checkers'    this inconvenient study certainly has.

 

So this study is flawed (yes it has flaws) even though the lead author says it couldn't have been done better  but  he will not publish it because it would end his career  and he has enough to contend with already.

 

Why are they not doing these studies  on the multiple data sets they have worldwide...why have all these great minds  not come up with a study that will compare once and for all the vaccinated with the unvaccinated ?

IMHO  they have already done these studies  and the results are not to their liking  so  have buried, ignored, suppressed and threatened the authors  or whistleblowers of any such studies.

as we can see  in the torrent of AI generated  blowback above.

9 minutes ago, johng said:

Ohh hit a nerve with the 'fact checkers'    this inconvenient study certainly has.

 

So this study is flawed (yes it has flaws) even though the lead author says it couldn't have been done better  but  he will not publish it because it would end his career  and he has enough to contend with already.

 

Why are they not doing these studies  on the multiple data sets they have worldwide...why have all these great minds  not come up with a study that will compare once and for all the vaccinated with the unvaccinated ?

IMHO  they have already done these studies  and the results are not to their liking  so  have buried, ignored, suppressed and threatened the authors  or whistleblowers of any such studies.

as we can see  in the torrent of AI generated  blowback above.

 

Everything is fine, this is not a disaster at all, it's like nothing happened, the people who took the vaccine were right and they are in better health than those who didn't. They don't have any reason to worry.

An insightful post by British funeral director John O'Looney:

 

I did a funeral for a young person in their 40s.

A parent of multiple young kids

A sudden unexpected death.

I watched as the family fell apart giving their memories and tributes in the church.

The person was married and clearly this was a real tight family unit, the devastation and pain were upsetting to watch and I felt my throat tightening up, a tear forming and I dug my tongue into the roof of my mouth to remain composed.

It was f*cking grim to behold in honesty.

What made it a much darker experience for me personally was the fact I had pulled out endless amounts of white fibrous clots from the arteries during embalming preparing this deceased, it was clearly what killed them.

They were covid vaccinated and boosted.

They trusted these f*cking disgusting scumbags in governments - they all know.

Anyway I stood there watching this family fall apart - knowing that truth.

I looked at the coffin and knew there was a murder victim in it.

A murder that will never be solved or even acknowledged.

There is no one to tell, nowhere to go with it and it isn't the sort of thing you can tell a family.

The coroners wont admit it outside closed doors.

The police have orders and won't police it, all our MP's are compromised liars.

Privately they will admit it, but only privately.

No one even wants to discuss it.

Every new murder upsets me.

So I stood there watching their grief and I too felt grief for them.

I looked around the church, it was packed and I was trying to process the fact that I was the only one in there who knew that this person had been murdered, the only one.

They were all blissfully unaware and mourning what they thought was just terribly bad luck.

None of them knew and if they did there is nothing they can do, even if they were told.

They will never see any justice in this life and there is nothing I can do that I haven't done.

Its f*cking heartbreaking I can tell you.

I hope you had a better day than me.

 

https://substack.com/@vieshalewand/note/c-165125264?r=1ok4s4

2 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

the people who took the vaccine were right and they are in better health than those who didn't. They don't have any reason to worry.

'Safe and effective'   ™  ® ©

Similar in nature to VAXXED 11. This time with solid evidence behind the horrific injuries.

 

Thanks @johng for bringing us 'An Inconvenient Study.'

 

I would call it' An inconvenient truth' for those supping from the Big Pharma $$$$$.

 

VAXXED ----- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhY3LnThbG4

 

VAXXED 11 ----- https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/videos/vaxxed-2/

 

 

When you're head over heels in love, the shortcomings disappear.

8 minutes ago, gamb00ler said:

When you're head over heels in love

well as those world renowned conspiracy theorists sang

"all you need is love" rinky dinky doo 😋 

3 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

 

Thanks @johng for bringing us 'An Inconvenient Study.'

I also wish to thank john with providing the perfect hook and bait to reel in the loonies.  It's very useful to know who they are.

13 hours ago, gamb00ler said:

I also wish to thank john with providing the perfect hook and bait to reel in the loonies.

 

I suppose you didn't watch the film ?

3 hours ago, johng said:

 

I suppose you didn't watch the film ?

The pro-vaxxers on the forum, probably didn't.

 

I did, and found it very enlightening. Notice also, that it is the first item on the 'hot news' page on www.CanYouCatchaCold.com

 

This film simply must go on release all over the world. The message is that important.

 

My view is that the 'germ theory' was founded on the $$$$$, and continues the same today. And vaccines are the king-pin in it all.

3 hours ago, johng said:

 

I suppose you didn't watch the film ?

Don't you ever rate a movie based upon the reputation of the person(s) lauding it?

21 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

The pro-vaxxers on the forum, probably didn't.

 

I did, and found it very enlightening. Notice also, that it is the first item on the 'hot news' page on www.CanYouCatchaCold.com

 

This film simply must go on release all over the world. The message is that important.

 

My view is that the 'germ theory' was founded on the $$$$$, and continues the same today. And vaccines are the king-pin in it all.

I see you have maybe 5 different posts that you make regarding infectious diseases.  I suggest you assign the #'s 1-5 to them.  You can save yourself a lot of effort... just post the # next time.

@gamb00ler

 

So that's a no then ?

 

Why don't you watch it and then make up your own mind ?

28 minutes ago, johng said:

@gamb00ler

 

So that's a no then ?

 

Why don't you watch it and then make up your own mind ?

Unlike many AN posters I have a heavy schedule of educational commitments already.

4 hours ago, gamb00ler said:

I have a heavy schedule of educational commitments already.

Excuses excuses  ,the dog ate my homework..and I'm washing my hair tonight.

😋

18 hours ago, gamb00ler said:

Don't you ever rate a movie based upon the reputation of the person(s) lauding it?

Closed minds don't belong on this sub-forum...

17 hours ago, gamb00ler said:

Unlike many AN posters I have a heavy schedule of educational commitments already.

But you do have time to dismiss what you didn't look into.  

Hope your 'educational commitments' are of a higher caliber than your ignorant posts here.

On 10/13/2025 at 3:25 AM, rattlesnake said:

A sudden unexpected death.

Heart disease?  Or Suicide? 

7 hours ago, Fact said:

Heart disease?  Or Suicide? 

 

Answer provided six lines below.

 

On 10/13/2025 at 9:25 AM, rattlesnake said:

What made it a much darker experience for me personally was the fact I had pulled out endless amounts of white fibrous clots from the arteries during embalming preparing this deceased, it was clearly what killed them.

 

Ah, yes, but John O'Looney 'is not a virologist'… 'quack medicine'… discredited'… 'factchecker says'… 'fringe website'… 'not educated'… 'fearmongering'… 'crackpot'…

5 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

 

Answer provided six lines below.

 

 

Ah, yes, but John O'Looney 'is not a virologist'… 'quack medicine'… discredited'… 'factchecker says'… 'fringe website'… 'not educated'… 'fearmongering'… 'crackpot'…

Heart disease. 

On 10/13/2025 at 3:25 AM, rattlesnake said:

An insightful post by British funeral director John O'Looney:

 

I did a funeral for a young person in their 40s.

A parent of multiple young kids

A sudden unexpected death.

I watched as the family fell apart giving their memories and tributes in the church.

The person was married and clearly this was a real tight family unit, the devastation and pain were upsetting to watch and I felt my throat tightening up, a tear forming and I dug my tongue into the roof of my mouth to remain composed.

It was f*cking grim to behold in honesty.

What made it a much darker experience for me personally was the fact I had pulled out endless amounts of white fibrous clots from the arteries during embalming preparing this deceased, it was clearly what killed them.

They were covid vaccinated and boosted.

They trusted these f*cking disgusting scumbags in governments - they all know.

Anyway I stood there watching this family fall apart - knowing that truth.

I looked at the coffin and knew there was a murder victim in it.

A murder that will never be solved or even acknowledged.

There is no one to tell, nowhere to go with it and it isn't the sort of thing you can tell a family.

The coroners wont admit it outside closed doors.

The police have orders and won't police it, all our MP's are compromised liars.

Privately they will admit it, but only privately.

No one even wants to discuss it.

Every new murder upsets me.

So I stood there watching their grief and I too felt grief for them.

I looked around the church, it was packed and I was trying to process the fact that I was the only one in there who knew that this person had been murdered, the only one.

They were all blissfully unaware and mourning what they thought was just terribly bad luck.

None of them knew and if they did there is nothing they can do, even if they were told.

They will never see any justice in this life and there is nothing I can do that I haven't done.

Its f*cking heartbreaking I can tell you.

I hope you had a better day than me.

 

https://substack.com/@vieshalewand/note/c-165125264?r=1ok4s4

 

Substack ... LOL.

Substack is even worse than AN.

Anyone can type just about anything on there. 

 

 

 

11 hours ago, save the frogs said:

Substack ... LOL.

Substack is even worse than AN.

Anyone can type just about anything on there. 

 

It's called Freedom of Speech. 

And you better get used to it as the mainstream media are continually losing their audience and influence due to not allowing any dissenting opinion (or facts) challenging the 'accepted narrative'.  Their role as Ministry of Truth is over... 

11 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

Their role as Ministry of Truth is over... 

 

Yes, that's a good thing.

 

But you assume the average person is nothing but "Truth" ...

 

The Ministry of Confusion is now everywhere. 

 

 

7 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

The Ministry of Confusion is now everywhere. 

Time to bring back

scary poppins Nina Jankowicz

at the ministry of 'truth'