11 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

I believe they hooked up and she was a willing participant due to the considerable benefits and luxury lifestyle. Later, as her looks faded, the weight piled on and the sex work dried up, she saw the opportunity to extort him and did so quite successfully. 

 

She got $15K to bang him. Sidney Sweeny isnt even worth that

 

Regardless, its a family matter. I got thrown out of the house once.

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

Your right, he could have been put in charge of the latrine burn pits in a Cambodian army encampment before his demotion to anti Israel screeches.

 

If the shoe fits.

There is off topic, really off topic, and then this drivelling nonsense!

2 minutes ago, JAG said:

There is off topic, really off topic, and then this drivelling nonsense!

Im sorry your understanding of analogy is insufficient

1 hour ago, brewsterbudgen said:

Paying an underage person for sex is illegal in the US and most other countries in the world.  Agreed, he denies it so he's not been convicted or charged. 

 

I agree that stripping down the royal family is a good idea.  I truly hope that when William ascends to the throne, he will agree to abdicate and the government of the day can create republic.

Hmm, yes, Tony Blair for President, with (in a sort of grim inevitability) Peter Mandelson as Vice President...

3 hours ago, JonnyF said:

 

His valley girl wife must be bricking it. 

 

Back to being plain old Rachel Ragland, but now too old for Deal Or No Deal or playing the BJ girl in 90210.

There’s that bile of yours again Jonny.

5 hours ago, BritManToo said:

I feel sorry for the poor chap, he's done nothing most of us haven't done.

Charles has also done loads of dodgy stuff which they never publish.

And William seems to have a thing for actresses.

 

I'd prefer him as king to Charles or William.

 

Pull the plug on all of them. Time for a republic.

3 hours ago, BritManToo said:

Yet here you are in Thailand with a much younger woman ............

Selling access to family position ......... I wish!

Shame to family ........ you're in Thailand, and everyone knows why.

Arrogant manner ......... have you ever read your own posts?

 

Would point out to several posters 17 is not underage in the UK and Europe.

Your Puritan US laws doesn't matter to the rest of the world.

 

How do you know who I am with?

I am in Thailand because it is where I am stationed for work. I was in Europe in July and August, and I was just in the USA, for work, so what?   If my posts appear arrogant to you, it is most likely because you are insecure. 

 

Why reference Puritan US laws to me? I have made no reference to US laws. However since you raised the issue, the alleged activities with the young women occurred in the USA and in the US Virgin Islands. As such, the local laws in respect to human trafficking and sex with a minor apply., and the UK courts already accept that. The UK has similar laws in respect to the trafficking of humans for prostitution. 

 

You have assumed that because the age of consent is 16 in England, that Andrew would have been in the clear. Wrong.

The Sexual Offences Act  (SOA) says different.   https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/contents

The SOA recognises the continued vulnerability of 16 and 17year-olds in particular circumstances. One of the listed exceptions is the Sexual exploitation of children (including 16 and 17 year olds). Your attention is directed to  Section 49: controlling a child prostitute and Section 50: arranging or facilitating child prostitution. The SOA offences include offences of child sexual exploitation where a  ‘financial advantage’ is involved, and includes a list of things the victim/offender could receive.   This is why the  plaintiffs provided great detail on  the lavish presents, clothes and trips that the young girls allegedly received.

 

I have always taken the position that Andrew was innocent until proven guilty of a crime. However, the fact is that he has behaved reprehensibly and brought disgrace to the crown. He  has neglected his duties and obligations and betrayed his family. The man is utterly useless and serves no purpose other than take up space. He has no  current job skills.  Now, he will be a burden on Charles who will be stuck supporting this deadbeat.  Charles should have removed the Princess titles from Andrew's daughters as well  as they are just as useless.

9 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

How do you know who I am with?

I am in Thailand because it is where I am stationed for work. I was in Europe in July and August, and I was just in the USA, for work, so what?   If my posts appear arrogant to you, it is most likely because you are insecure. 

"Patong" indicates a certain proclivity to me, and probably everyone else using this forum.

5 hours ago, BritManToo said:

I feel sorry for the poor chap, he's done nothing most of us haven't done.

Charles has also done loads of dodgy stuff which they never publish.

And William seems to have a thing for actresses.

 

I'd prefer him as king to Charles or William.

He's a free loader. 

26 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

He has no  current job skills.

Are over 65 year olds supposed to still have 'job skills'?

How many people that age are still working as commercial helicopter pilots?

11 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

He's a free loader. 

They all are!

But I'd be happy to sit with him over drinks in a girly bar, or have a coffee with him up in sunny Chiang Mai. I don't think a night out with Charles or William would be much fun.

Harry and Megan might be OK for a morning coffee as well.

2 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

They all are!

But I'd be happy to sit with him over drinks in a girly bar, or have a coffee with him up in sunny Chiang Mai. I don't think a night out with Charles or William would be much fun.

Kick em all out! 

4 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

And there we have it.

 

A mind hopelessly lost in a maze of its own making.

 

I’d ask what triggered that outburst, but it won’t be anything rational.

Crayoning all over the thread - he does it all the time.

4 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

He's a free loader. 

How is that, him being in line for the throne of England...? 🤔

3 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

Kick em all out! 

Your envy is showing, and remember, he will never have to frequent 7/11 as you do, eh....

2 minutes ago, transam said:

How is that, him being in line for the throne of England...? 🤔

You worship freeloaders lol

 

5 hours ago, BritManToo said:

I feel sorry for the poor chap, he's done nothing most of us haven't done.

Charles has also done loads of dodgy stuff which they never publish.

And William seems to have a thing for actresses.

 

I'd prefer him as king to Charles or William.

He used to be the handsome hero everyone looked at, not because he was good looking, but his image was heroic after the Falkland Island war. 

 

Even the war was a good example of David against Goliat where David lost it was an prime example of power. 

 

I feel sorry for Epsteins victims, not him, and you can say he is victim of the circumstances like many men who visited Thailand,  who think they can do and take whatever in the candy shop without any consequences which obviously it is for most. Very few have to meet any consequences for their action in Thailand with to young girls. 

1 minute ago, transam said:

Sorry, I am not religious or hang about outside 7/11..........😬

100,000 posts soon. Loser of the century.

3 minutes ago, Hummin said:

My best guess by time being, most on Falkland was happy for the Uk`s victory, and for time being, I believe they still are 

Full of poms. It's next to Argentina. Belongs to them. Give the residents citizenship.

Just now, Hummin said:

The The Katzenjammer Kids on An 😄 

What a sad retirement he has. No friends in real life. 

Vile, lying entitled scrote and much enjoying his downfall, but still no idea what was illegal with his visiting a 17yr old hooker. 

 

3 hours ago, Yagoda said:

She got $15K to bang him. Sidney Sweeny isnt even worth that

 

Regardless, its a family matter. I got thrown out of the house once.

You are so wrong as usual.  Sidney Sweeny is definately worth that much,  jesus i would pay double that for Sweeny

2 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

What a sad retirement he has. No friends in real life. 

Sounds a bit like you, eh.......😪.................😬

3 hours ago, brewsterbudgen said:

agree that stripping down the royal family is a good idea.  I truly hope that when William ascends to the throne, he will agree to abdicate and the government of the day can create republic.

And who do you suggest would be a suitable president ? There would no doubt be plenty of contenders, all of which would be totally unsuitable. 

I am no fan of the royals but the king or queens hereditary  position as head of state ensures that position never falls into the  hands of the likes of Blair or any other washed up ex government minister  or god forbid a wannabe reality TV star  

4 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

And who do you suggest would be a suitable president ? There would no doubt be plenty of contenders, all of which would be totally unsuitable. 

I am no fan of the royals but the king or queens hereditary  position as head of state ensures that position never falls into the  hands of the likes of Blair or any other washed up ex government minister  or god forbid a wannabe reality TV star  

Vote for President.

Just now, Harrisfan said:

Vote for President.

That's how the UK selects its government and prime minister,   further proof of the failures of that system is hardly necessary.   We do not need a president

54 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

There’s that bile of yours again Jonny.

 

Factually correct.

 

But I understand you have a difficult and often complicated relationship with the truth. 😄

6 hours ago, BritManToo said:

he's done nothing most of us haven't done.

Speak for yourself,

And i have done a fok of alot.

16 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

That's how the UK selects its government and prime minister,   further proof of the failures of that system is hardly necessary.   We do not need a president

David Beckham

Multiple flame posts removed 

 

@Harrisfan

 

Replies removed 

 

@transam

 

@Hummin

 

There's too much bickering.

 

It's a very good idea to stop, otherwise sanctions may occur