15 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

For sure there is an entity that is responsible for short term memory. A memory of less than a second. A special type of cell perhaps. Outside of brain activity.

 

All to do with preservation. Fight or flight.

 

When we walk, we don't say, as we go, now put the left foot forward, now the right. We do it automatically. But is this action the domain of the brain. or have the cells in the moving limbs remembered?

 

 

 

 

You familiar with Universal Consciousness?

6 minutes ago, transam said:

Perhaps not when you get to old age, when things do go awry.............🥸

For sure there is a lack of coordination. But, I don't think it's necessarily the brain. As we age the brain runs slightly in front of the body, IMO.

 

That's why, when we know there could be a problem we have to say to ourselves; 'watch the step'.

2 minutes ago, Bacon1 said:

 

You familiar with Universal Consciousness?

I'm aware. Seems strange. Completely undecided.

1 minute ago, Stiddle Mump said:

For sure there is a lack of coordination. But, I don't think it's necessarily the brain. As we age the brain runs slightly in front of the body, IMO.

 

That's why, when we know there could be a problem we have to say to ourselves; 'watch the step'.

I have a couple of friends in LOS I have known for near 20 years, we have had many laughs together over those years.

But, today, one cannot control his bows or waterworks or sign his name, the other has to be guided by his wife, to put his left foot forward, he cannot cross a road without help.

 

Me, when I get up in the morning, it is without thinking I go and sit on the toilet, it all happens without a single thought from me, except to sit properly, I hope that never changes for me...........😟....😀.......

32 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

For sure there is an entity that is responsible for short term memory. A memory of less than a second. A special type of cell perhaps. Outside of brain activity.

 

All to do with preservation. Fight or flight.

 

When we walk, we don't say, as we go, now put the left foot forward, now the right. We do it automatically. But is this action the domain of the brain. or have the cells in the moving limbs remembered?

 

 

 

Perhaps this (at least partially) relates to what we call 'instinct'? Take domesticated cats, for example, they will sometimes behave like their ancestors did in the wild, though they have never been in contact with the wild themselves and this behaviour was neither taught nor learnt, it is just there, embedded in them (for example, a cat will not cry when in pain, purportedly because its instinct dictates not to attract potential predators).

In the 9th conference of 14 Bechamp discusses the genesis of the cell which is created by the microzyma.  His observation is confirmed by experiment.

 

Bechamp, "Nothing is more controversial among physiologists than the origin of the organized cell.  I profess the opinion that it is an error to believe that there can exist living substances and to not define them.  All the experiments contained in these lectures prove that there is life only in a substance complex by its chemical composition and structured, the microzyma, is the last histological element of any living form."  Histological mean the microscopic study of cells or tissue."

 

"We should have an exact idea of what living matter is.  By observing my experiments we see what happens when the conditions are such that new cells are formed.  The appearance of the bacteria excludes the formation of the cells themselves, and vice versa." So if the microzyma do not ferment bacteria the new cell can form.

 

Bechamp defines Polymorphism is the quality of a being or a body that presents itself to us in several forms or states.  The tadpole and frog.  The caterpillar and butterfly are examples. "By destroying itself the cell puts its microzymas in freedom and only then can they emerge if the conditions allow for it."

 

Bechamp now describes his multiple different experiments on the genesis of the cell and what he observed to reach his conclusions.

 

"It is here that the theory of cell formation by microzyma finds its first application to the development of the organism.  The conclusion is forced, it is the living microzyma that make the cells."

 

"Thus, I firmly believe that it is demonstrated that the microzymas create the cells, that these microzymas multiply, mature, and become free again by their destruction."

 

Bechamp goes on to describe the development of cells into tissue.

 

"There is no need to hesitate because in all this work we find the microzyma behaving as we have seen them behave.  They come together, pack themselves in the form of a sphere and thus united secrete an envelope and thus the cell is constituted.  I repeat, this is the result of direct observation, not not the result of a preconceived system.  Microzymas create cells."

 

"The cell is not the permanent histogenic element, its existence being  transitory, it can not be considered the vital unit.  Beyond the cell there is the microzyma, this one forms  the cell and the microzyma remains when the cell is destroyed.  The microzyma is immanent when compared to the cell it is the support of the vital action of life.  It is the primoidal organized element of life."

 

 

 

 

In the 10th conference of 14 Bechamp continues describing his direct observations on how the microzyma is responsible for creating new living cells.

 

Bechamp, "The doctrine which I have been expounding since the beginning, it is necessary to insist more in order to penetrate you well of the truth, which so many facts bring out, namely that the microzyma is the only permanent anatomical element of the organism, the one in which is concentrated all the physiological and chemical activity, and to say it all in a word, the vital activity of the organism."

 

"I can pose the following postulate, which so many demonstrated theorums make legitimate, namely,  microzymas are at the beginning and at the end of any organization.  The microzyma are what make an organism, a cell, a tissue alive.  Even more generally, any organism is reducible to the microzyma."

 

Next Bechamp describes why the 2 accepted theories on cell formation are not accurate based on his observations.  And he describes why.  Bechamp says "The current two cell theories is not a statement of experimental truth.  It is an hypothesis which has not been verified to its full extent, by observation." 

 

Bechamp also described all the partial successes of other scientists findings regarding cell formation, but the big mistake was ignoring the microscopic granulations, the microzyma, and blaming the germs of the air for the bacteria and cell destruction.

 

"I was therefore ill prepared for the construction of a new theory, to discover the primitive, organized element, the one from which all cells proceed.  The microzyma.  So it is, little by little, by deduction, that the new doctrine, that I continue to develop before you has developed. The microzyma governs the cell."

 

"Have confidence, and be reassured that many, led by Mr Pasteur, reject microzymas only to mislead the opinions of the indifferent, and to appropriate the ideas and facts; for they already call microzyma by various different names; they impose them on those who do not go back to the sources.  This would be a denial of justice if they did not mix in serious and dreadful errors."

 

"In the course of all these lectures, I have reasoned the microzyma are organized and structured.  And the pleonasm is required. It is necessary to maintain, as a proven fact, that there is only life in what is organized. That living matter is organized matter. And the microzyma is responsible."

 

 

In the 11th conference of 14 Bechamp continues embarassing Pasteur's amateur theories and lack of professionalism. In a nutshell Bechamp has discovered the eternal creator of life, the microzyma, and Pasteur disregards it as unimportant.

 

Bechamp "My experiments show the microzyma possess an independent existence with a powerful physiologic activity."  This means the microzyma have the power to control whether you are healthy or not. " Which were confused by Pasteur and his associates, under the name molecular granulations, amorphous matter without form or structure or life, which Mr. Pasteur was only concerned with declaring their insignificance, which did not hold any value in their doctrinal theory.  The microzyma impose themselves even to those like Mr Pasteur's preconceived systems that they disturb.  While explaining my experiments on the microzyma Mr. Pasteur left without explanation."

 

"By researching the origin of the microzyma, I may be able to clear up the misunderstanding that is in the minds of many scients, who, unlike Mr. Pasteur, seek the truth without bias."

 

Bechamp was clearly aware of the catastrophic consequences that Pasteur's germ theory posed on society.

In the 12th conference of 14 Bechamp begins, "Everyone knows what a living being is, but few people have the idea to know what organization is, in its essence.  We have a vague notion of the thing, without being able to specify, which are in the living organism, the parts from which the vital action starts.  In the same way, we have the idea of health or disease, without being able to define exactly what the one and the other consist in."

 

"We must conclude that it is in something which is not simply chemical matter, but which is organized, living, that we must look for what can become sick, that is to say, what can undergo some modification in its way of being and its function."

 

"In the healthy and living organism, one never notices the bacterial evolution of the microzyma."

 

Now Bechamp discusses human urine ferments and fermentations in the physiological state and in the pathologic state.  Multiple pages of this process are discussed by Bechamp that are indepth and scientific. This is my attempt to simplify Bechamp's observations.

 

Bechamp, "From the point of view of microzyma theory, it is necessary that you have a clear idea of what urine is.  Urine ferments by itself. Mr. Pasteur, of course, neglected the study of human urine and did not pay attention that the composition of urine was extremely variable. My observations of male/female urine, collected under the same conditions, exposed to the air under the same conditions, on the same day, undergoes different fermentations."

 

"I will tell you what happens when we observe urine fermentations of the microzymas from the physiological perspective. It is necessary to use the microscope.  Outside the bladder, the urine constitutes an excellent nutritive medium of cultures for the microzymas. An evolutionary phenomena can be observed. The microzyma gather and multiply under the aspect of a string of grains then they lengthen. I have often seen all the isolated microzyma disappear into the chains.  And finally when the urine is aged, there comes a time when all the microzyma chains become individual microzyma again."

 

"When urine undergoes fermentation, with or without Mr. Pasteur's approval, decomposition of the urea takes place, and simultaneously another fermentation takes place in parallel.  But what had happened to the microzyma contained in the fermented human urine?  Mr. Pasteur gave the string of microzyma a different name and ignored them as unimportant.  No bacteria was contained in the aging fermented urine.  It is undeniable that human urine ferments in multiple ways."

 

"When a doctor, for a diagnosis to be made, collects a human urine sample, for analysis he needs to follow correct procedures.  In the physiological theory, the fermentable matter of an organized ferment,  is an organic substance which can serve as food for it.  Fermentation under these conditions is an organic substance that can serve as food for it. Fermentation is  a phenominen of nutrition."

 

Bechamp devoted a great deal of his book to discussing human urine and its affects on human health and nutrition.  This is an important clue where the power is.

 

In the 1880's, prior to the rollout of our current system of megahospitals and pharmaceuticals, urine therapy was  commonly practiced throughout the world.

 

Urine was considered a panacea.  Our body contains an internal laboratory creating a custom made and designed product which, if used correctly, keeps the human body healthy and fully operational. Urine can fix every ailment by oral ingestion and topical application and keeps the body at peak health or can return the body to perfect health.  It was also consumed orally for nutrition.

 

The World Health Organization discontinued allowing doctors to recommend urine therapy in 1940, 57 years after Bechamp wrote his book describing the powerful physiological abilty and nutritional value of our own essence.

 

Multiple books are available on the urine therapy topic and The Water of Life, by John Armstrong is the best.  It is good to have this knowledge for the tool box.  It works exceptionally well. 

2 hours ago, Mark Nothing said:

Bechamp devoted a great deal of his book to discussing human urine and its affects on human health and nutrition.  This is an important clue where the power is.

 

In the 1880's, prior to the rollout of our current system of megahospitals and pharmaceuticals, urine therapy was  commonly practiced throughout the world.

 

Urine was considered a panacea.  Our body contains an internal laboratory creating a custom made and designed product which, if used correctly, keeps the human body healthy and fully operational. Urine can fix every ailment by oral ingestion and topical application and keeps the body at peak health or can return the body to perfect health.  It was also consumed orally for nutrition.

 

The World Health Organization discontinued allowing doctors to recommend urine therapy in 1940, 57 years after Bechamp wrote his book describing the powerful physiological abilty and nutritional value of our own essence.

 

Multiple books are available on the urine therapy topic and The Water of Life, by John Armstrong is the best.  It is good to have this knowledge for the tool box.  It works exceptionally well. 

The modern day urine therapy expert is Amandha Vollmer.

 

https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/a-conversation-on-shivambu-with-dr-amandha-vollmer/id1692638333?i=1000666834900

 

Amandha Dawn Vollmer, affectionately known as ADV, is a renowned health expert and best-selling author with an impressive breadth of knowledge on natural healing and holistic wellness practices. With over 20 years of experience in the field, ADV is a sought-after speaker and educator who has inspired countless individuals to take control of their health and live vibrant, thriving lives.

 

 

 

In the 13th of 14 conferences Bechamp begins, "In the last lecture, I suggested the possibility of founding a new physiological theory of disease of which the theory of the microzyma would be the basis.  To achieve this, I will first gather, in the form of propositions, the experimental truths and observations that we have acquired.  I will the draw from them the main idea which will be the foundational basis for all pathology."  The study of causes and affects of disease.

 

Bechamp now summarizes 24 main points about the microzyma and their role in health and disease discussed in the prior 12 seminars as the basis for his doctrine. 

 

Bechamp now discusses the concept of injection of bacteria into a test subject to discover the actual affects via observation.  "I am disturbed by the fact that I do not observe the injected bacteria I have innoculated reproducing.  But in the microzyma theory, the innoculated bacterium does not multiply, but by its introduction into the subject it determines a change of environment at the innoculated point, and it is thanks to this change in the microzyma which evolve into bacteria, each according to its species, but as a result of this change, the foriegn bacterium undergoes the law of regression and can become microzyma again then to evolve into another form."

 

"By injecting a rotting substance into the blood, in this way a discrasia (the study of blood disorders) is caused which is favorable to the evolution of the subjects microzyma into bacteria, and the disorders which are the consequences.  The belief in the primitively morbid germs of the air, as Hippocrates would have said, has become almost superstitious.  Mr. Pasteur's mistaken belief that diseases are caused by the germs of the air is a superstition." Defined by Oxford dictionary as an irrational belief or practice which is not based on reason or science.

 

"I must convince you by proof, and my large scale experiments, to permanently remove the positively morbid concept that the germs of the air are responsible for disease. This assertion, made by Mr. Pasteur is purely imaginary.  Air does not contain morbid germs.  In fact, no direct experiment could be produced to show that the germs of the air communicated a disease."

 

Now Bechamp describes the 4 proofs required for the germs of the air to be responsible for disease. " 1) Introduce the germ taken from the earth, into an organism and find it multiplied there. 2) Isolate it from the sick organism, study it thus isolated, and prove that it is itself,  or a form of its evolution. 3) After isolating it, again inject it into the animal,  and prove that it again multiplies into the same disease.  4) To demonstrate that under its influence the microzymas of the sick organism remained indifferrent.  Which has not been done because it can not be done. Bechamp reports Pasteur's germ theory is false."

 

"I will now prove to you that huge wounds can be exposed to the air without absorbing the germs of the air as is Pasteurs superstitious belief.  What is indisputable is that Mr. Pasteur has neglected to understand the microzyma and it actions contained in the pus of the wound.  My clinical observations agrees with my experiments to show at the beginning of the formation of the pus the microzymas contained in the cells pack and coat themselves with membranes which surround themselves with small islands.  We do not find the germs of the air contained in the pus. When there is a purilent infection, it is not the airborn germs that are guilty, but the morbid evolution of the microzyma. Everything contradicts Mr. Pasteur's germ theory."

 

The 14th and final conference Bechamp begins, "Illness is borne in us and of us. Only that which is organised and endowed with life is susceptible to disease and death.  This is the formula for true medicine.  The medical doctrine, the theory of the microzyma, constitutes the true basis for pathology. Which has been confirmed by experts in France and abroad. A great number of experiments have been performed to confirm our observations into doctrine."

 

"That what we call disease germs under various names, are only microzyma ferments.  Illness results from various causes which determine a functional change in the microzymas of a given center of activity. These microzymas exist primitively in the cells of the sick organism.

 

"A physiologically healthy organism is the one whose microzymas, in all centers of activity, are most in conformity to the ideal type, "

 

"Microzymas are sensitive to the variations to the quality of the environment they are in.  The very forms of the microzymas, which are the fruit of their evolution, undergo the consequences.  Naturally an organism should not become ill, since there are no morbid microzymas in it, or the air.  But as a result of various influences, depending on the environment, and on individual causes, a state of physiological misery can be created.  There are many observed cases where an insignificant cause became the starting point of this misery."

 

"Mr. Pasteur did not know how to see the microzyma. Under the microscope, I pointed out the microzyma to Mr. Pasteur and he declared that he could not see them.  In all the experiments I have conducted, it is the basis of my observations, that the microzyma and not Mr. Pasteur's germs of the air, which has been the seat of all virulence."

 

Now Pasteur's theory of preventative innoculations is discussed by Bechamp.  "My observations make me worry about the future of Mr. Pasteur's innoculations.  He does not know anything about bacteria, except that they are innoculable and provide immunity. But what about the distant aftermath?  I say Mr. Pasteur does not know what he is doing.  For I have a right to say it.  Mr. Pasteur does not even know what happens during the innoculation process that provides immunity.  Let us not impose the obligation to vaccinate.  Isn't this appalling.  Everything does not depend on the vaccine, but on the microzymas.  These innoculation experiments of Mr. Pasteur are dangerous because it modifies the microzyma of the vaccinated which is harmful."

 

Virulence is defined by oxford dictionary as the harmful capacity to generate disease.  Bechamp begins, "What is virulence.  We do not know.  The microzyma theory does not know what virulence consists of  either.  But it has indicated the path that must be followed to discover it. During health as well as disease, healing is easily conceived. " 

 

Bechamp knows exactly the cause of virulence but chooses to remain silent.

 

 

Antoine Bechamp held a varity of high profile positions.  He held a doctorate of science degree in both chemistry 1853 and medicine 1856.

 

Bechamp employment.

 

1854 to 1876, Montpelier University, Faculty of Medicine. Bechamp was a professor of medical chemistry and pharmacy.

 

1876 to 1888, First Dean of the Faculty of Medicine in Lille.

 

1889 to 1899, semi-retired but ran a small laboratory in Paris.

 

1883 presented his new medical doctrine to revolutionize medicine in his book.  Which was rejected by Pasteur and Napolean III.

 

After pulverizing Pasteur's unobservable and unproven germs of the air theory, why did Bechamp not discuss the concept of virulence further?  He held multiple doctorate degrees, and was a medical university Dean.  He stood up to Pasteur and Napolean III.  Why would he not further disect the cause of disease?  Could it be his training made him unable to be qualified to discuss it?  Does that mean the cause of disease is not medical or scientifically derived?  

 

Are we consulting the wrong experts to correct our health ailments?  

1 hour ago, Mark Nothing said:

After pulverizing Pasteur's unobservable and unproven germs of the air theory, why did Bechamp not discuss the concept of virulence further?  He held multiple doctorate degrees, and was a medical university Dean.  He stood up to Pasteur and Napolean III.  Why would he not further disect the cause of disease?  Could it be his training made him unable to be qualified to discuss it?  Does that mean the cause of disease is not medical or scientifically derived?  

 

All doors were probably closed to him once the medical establishment decided to back Pasteur, with the aim of implementing the vaccination industry which would ensue. Pasteur was credited with inventing the rabies vaccine in the 1880s.

 

This is really similar to the way Copernicus and the heliocentric model were coopted and promoted, with storytelling elements added in order to provide the public with a smooth and flawless legend, printed in every school book across the world.

Bechamp's medical doctrine of health is summarized by his 24 microzyma postulates which were confirmed by experimental observation and professional peer review.  Microzyma are the primoidal microscopic granulations that are present at the formation of life and remain after the subject is deceased.

 

Some of them are complicated and scientific.  Here are the simple ones.

 

There is no spontaneous creation of living beings.  Scientists can not organize chemicals into a living being.

 

What we call germs in the air, in the water, in the earth are simply microzyma.  Some microzymas are shapeshifted ferments, others not.

 

All human tissue contains microzymas.  Milk, blood, urine contain microzymas.

 

Microzymas are what, by evolution, become bacteria.  Microzyma are not germs.

 

Microzymas are what we call ferments.

 

Microzyma are cell factors.

 

Microzymas are endowed with formative powers of the living organism.

 

The microzyma is the living organism contained within itself.  The organism itself can be reduced to the microzyma.

 

Some natural formations and natural tissue developments of the organism can only be formed by the microzymas.

 

An organism, a tissue, a cell, by physiological regression, can be reduced to the microzyma.

 

From the total physiological destruction of the organism, the microzyma remain.

 

What we call germs of the air, of the waters, of the earth, are really just microzymas coming from disappeared organisms.

 

The microzymas, in their normal environment, remain identical to themselves.

 

Microzymas change their function during the development of the organism.  They are functionally different in the different activity centers of the organism.   And they keep their acquired activity when separated from their center.

 

It is not said, and it can not be said, that a chemical compound becomes sick and dies. Only that which is organized and endowed with life is susceptible to disease or death. 

 

The microzyma, being what is primitively alive in the organised being, in which life persists after death,the microzymas become the starting point of disease.  Primitively, therefore the disease germs can not originate in the atmosphere.

 

Microzymas can change functionally, can become morbid and transmit acquired mobidity.  A morbid microzyma can become healthy again.

 

Therapeutics is the science of finding ways to return the morbid microzyma back to their normal functioning mode of health.

 

It is such a pleasure reading the works of Antoine Bechamp.  A true breathe of fresh air.

2 hours ago, Mark Nothing said:

It is such a pleasure reading the works of Antoine Bechamp.  A true breathe of fresh air.

 

I do appreciate your regular updates on the matter. This thread already contains a wealth of knowledge.

Bechamp dedicated 30 years of his life to discover the microzyma,  observe them, and create a doctrine of true health.  At the same time Bechamp rendered Pasteur's germ theory false, as the observations of experiments did not confirm the doctrine.

 

The wealth of information he conveyed in his book required a total commitment and super human dedication on his part. We only have to spend a few hours reading to get the meat of his 30 years of knowledge.   

 

 Next up is virluence and therapeutics.  What causes the microzyma to ferment into disease? Which Bechamp labeled virulence. And better yet, how do we return morbid microzyma back to fully functiong health?  Which Bechamp labeled therapeutics.

 

 

142 years ago Louis Pasteur and Antoine Bechamp, two French chemists, were trying to discover what caused illness and how to prevent and treat them. They both arrived at a doctrine.

 

Pasteur created the germs of the air theory and preventative innoculation theory. In this theory germs were contained in the air and could infiltrate and sicken people. So an innoculation was required to strengthen against the germs of the air to fight them off with immunity.   This is considered undisputed fact today by the medical system and taught in school to children as fact.  Though they have rebranded to virus and vaccination.  So much so that other theories are no longer even studied or considered.  

 

Antoine Bechamp, in his 1883 book, described how he refuted Pasteur's theories point by point.  Experiment after experiment, observation after observation, Pasteur's germs theory and preventative innoculation theory were obliterated as false doctrines by Bechamp. It was embarassing even.  The observations of Bechamp's experiments did not confirm Pasteur's doctrine.   The meticulous scrutiny Bechamp studied the issue was extemely professional. Bechamp constantly belittled Pasteur's lack of professionalism, shortcuts, and his trying to manipulate facts and ignore info that contradicts his preconceived  germ and preventative innoculation theories.

 

But during this scrutiny of Pasteur's theories, Bechamp unexpectedly arrived at his own health doctrine based on his indepth experiments and actual observations.  This is called the microzyma doctrine.  Microscopic granulations, called microzyma, which are eternal, appeared all over the environment and within the human being.  He noted ferments in the microzyma that could shapeshift and ferment leading to disease in the human body. Bechamp confirmed via experiment that the germs of the air were not responsible.  Bechamp mentioned how chemical action requires a provoking cause. Ferments do not happen without cause. He conducted multiple experiments to invoke fermentatiin and cease fermentations of the microzyma.  Bechamp was notably vague and nonspecifically indepth on what human actions caused the microzyma to ferment and shapeshift.  Terms such as internal environment and food intake were mentioned.  Leading me to believe he felt unqualified to discuss what really causes the bulk of the morbid microzyma and what returns them to health.

I think the entire framework of Bechamp's microzyma doctrine is related to the Biblical concept of health and he is scientifically proving that it works spectacularly well.

 

The metaphysical implications of Bechamp's microzyma doctrine are profound.  They are eternal and contain the secret to health and disease, and even defines what life is.

 

But Bechamp did not dig deeper into this metaphysical concept of virulence and the origin of the microzyma, in the 11th conference and states, "About this question on the origin of the microzyma, I do not want to raise a metaphysical discussion.  I will remain in the field of experience and observation while searching with you where the atmospheric microzyma come from."

 

Pasteur might be responsible for Bechamp's reluctance to enter and discuss the metaphysical realm relating to his microzyma doctrine.  In 1887, While inagurating the new Pasteur Institute, Pasteur said, "In each one of us, there is the scientist, and the man of faith, or of doubt.  These two spheres are separate and woe unto those who want to make them encroach on one another in the present state of our knowledge." 

 

Pasteur, by telling us what not to do is revealing the secret of what we should do. 

 

So what does the most read, best selling metaphysical book in the history of the world, the Holy Bible, have to say on this topic?  

 

These verses use the term dust, instead of microzyma and are from the chapters authored by Moses.

 

Genesis 2:7 says human beings are formed by the dust of the earth and animated with life by the Divine breathe.

 

Genesis 3:19 says man came from dust and to dust he shall return.

 

Exodus 8:16-19 says the dust can turn into plague.

 

Leviticus 14:41 says the dust can lead to purity or impurity.

 

Numbers 5:17 says you shall take Holy water in a vessel and of the dust he shall put it in the Holy water.

 

In Deuteronomy chapter 28 the dust appears in the context of blessing or of curse.  Follow truth, or follow abomination.  Get health and vitality, or get sickness and destruction.

 

The microzyma within us are responsible.  The internal fermentation of the microzyma to bacteria is the result of metaphysical forces, not physical forces resulting in health ailments we suffer.  This is the virulence, the cause of disease, that Bechamp did not discuss.

 

The Holy Bible warns us to not be ensnared in the trap of abomination, such as believing in and implementing Pasteur's germ theory and preventative innoculation theory.

 

 

pseudo-scientific tripe – what is disturbing is that more gullible people are being taken in by this sort of thing – the "buy one get them all" syndrome. It's lazy thinking without any academic rigour, a series of cherry-picked references that don't bear close examination... Béchamp’s pleomorphic theory is now effectively disproved in mainstream biology, not by a single refutation but by the overwhelming success of germ theory since the mid-19th century. Pasteur’s swan-neck flask experiments in the 1860s demonstrated that microbes do not arise spontaneously from “terrain” but come from pre-existing organisms in the environment, undermining a core assumption behind Béchamp’s microzyma concept. By the 1870s, Pasteur and others had shown microbial specificity—that particular microbes cause particular processes and diseases—directly contradicting the idea that microbes are merely shape-shifting byproducts of bodily conditions. While Béchamp’s ideas persisted in alternative medicine, pleomorphism had been rendered scientifically obsolete by the late 19th century and has not been supported by subsequent microbiology, genetics, or cell biology.

Bechamp further discussed virulence, defined as what causes disease, in his microzyma doctrine, "Naturally we should not become ill, since there are no morbid microzyma in us or in the air.  We should only die of old age."

 

"There are those people who know how to avoid the degrading passions of the human species.  This noble and beautiful nature gives rise to health in mind and body, that resist the causes of disease and they only die of old age.  Unlike those with faltering wills who succumb to their inclinations."  

 

Now Bechamp gets to a very concerning cause of disease, "My observations cause me to worry for the future of Mr. Pasteur's preventative innoculations.  Mr. Pasteur does not know anything about bacteria, except that they are innoculable and provide immunity.  But what about the distant aftermath?  Mr. Pasteur does not know what he is doing. Mr. Pasteur is innoculating microzymas with a morbidity, which is unknown, into the vaccinated people, to which the vaccine imparts a given morbidity to the microzyma. These experimental innoculations of Mr. Pasteur are dangerous because it modifies, in a harmful way, the microzymas of the innoculated."

 

Bechamp concludes, "The primary cause of illness is within us and that if external influences have some part in the production of the affliction, it is only because they put this cause into action by producing some modification in the living being via innoculation. Yes this medicine in the  preventative innoculation has been observed in sick men."

 

In simple terms follow Divine Law, and if you do, those like Mr. Pasteur and his followers masquerading as experts will be easy to identify and avoid.  

 

By the way, Louis Pasteur, the creator of germ theory and preventative innoculation theory was not even a PhD trained doctor.

After reading Antoine Bechamp's 1883 book, it appeared that his nemesis, Louis Pasteur had significant mental dificiencies almost to the point of mental retardation.  So I did a google search on his health ailments. The 2020 book Neurosciences and History detailed Pasteur's affliction.

 

In October 1868, Louis Pasteur suffered a series of 30 strokes, the bleeding type, in a 24 hour period, at the age of 46 years old, that left him partially paralyzed on the left side.  

 

His left arm felt like lead, and his left hand fingers were forced shut and unusable rendering his left hand impotent.  He had difficulty walking and dragged his left leg behind him for the rest of his life.

 

But the most concerning aspect was the difficulty with speech he had called aphasia. This means brain damage caused by stroke that affects reading, writing, speaking, making effective communication almost impossible. How do you refute a brain damaged stroke victim's theories, who is backed by Emporer Napolean III, and a concensus of high profile scientists like German Robert Koch, English Joeseph Lister and many of Pasteur's former students working for him without looking like a horrible human being?  

 

Still 142 years later the false doctrine of abomination reigns.

 

 

Therapeutics is the process of returning a morbid microzyma bacteria ferment (disease) back to pure microzyma (health).  Under Bechamp's microzyma doctrine, the primoidal, eternal component of life and health is the microzyma, the microscopic granulations that define life and can shapeshift between health and disease.

 

Bechamp reported it is easy to conceive the process, but does not elaborate fully, as it is outside the scope of his chemistry profession.

 

Bechamp reports urine is a powerful physiological agent and source of nutrition to the microzyma.  This means the natural organic substance will shapeshift the morbid microzyma bacteria back to healthy microzyma.  And by default, eliminate the ailment.

 

The Holy Bible contains a treasure chest of beneficial  recommendations on health designed to therapeutically stimulate the signal of the Divine hand to benefit the microzyma.  Bechamp alluded to Biblical concepts, but very covertly, to avoid the wrath of Pasteur.  The Divine signal of the Divine hand is strengthened by specific actions, which returns the morbid microzyma back to the healthy state.  The fear of God is the beginning of wisdom and departure from evil is the beginning of understanding.  This means the Divine hand is responsible for shapeshifting the morbid microzyma back to health.  And avoiding the poisonous cult of abomination and their practices will allow the morbid microzyma to return to health.

 

Follow Divine Law as detailed in the 1st 5 books of the Holy Bible which returns the morbid microzyma back to health.

 

Combine the physical world with the metaphysical realm in a ritual ceremony.  Whiz in a glass, say a thankful  prayer of health, and drink up.  It takes 1 minute daily.  The affects are incredibly powerful on the morbid microzyma, returning them back to the natural healthy state.  One by one the ailments shapeshift back to health.

 

Daily prayer is very powerful to the microzyma.  The response of the microzyma is very positive.  Repetition helps.  Eventually you obtain the ability to shapeshift the morbid microzyma on demand. This is essentially preventative maintenance preventing the microzyma from fermenting into bacteria and suffering the ailments created.

 

Fasting is powerful.  It humbles the proud and allows the morbid microzyma to return to healthy.

 

This is the system I selected to follow as it results in total and complete, permanent success.  Bechamp is a genius who scientifically proved the Holy Bible's concept of health.  Simultaneously he disproved the cult of abomination's doctrine as false. 

Antoine Bechamp made it clear that Louis Pasteur was not a scientist, but rather a pseudoscientist. 

 

The definition of science is the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation, experimentation and the testing of theories against the evidence obtained.  A professional scientist follows this definition, but a pseudocientist does not.

 

If you reverse engineer the science definition, great pains were required by Pasteur to exactly reject science to arrive at pseudoscience. 

 

Pasteur rejected the evidence of experimental observation and instead force fed a preconceived system based on superstition and imaginary observations to arrive at the false germ and preventative innoculation theory.

 

How could this obvious error occur? Pasteur had help by powerful colleagues.   At the time political upheaval was occuring in France.  In 1852, Napolean III proclaimed himself Emporer of France.  One of his top men, Jean Baptiste Dumas who held multiple high ranking ministerial positions, to include controlling the money, Master of the French Mint and also heavily involved in monetary policy matters.   Dumas prior to this was also a university science professor of Louis Pasteur, who funded the creation of a preconceived system of pseudoscience rather than authentic science.  And ramrodded it through.  And still to this day it is accepted as truth.

 

 

 

What causes disease, at the core, is actually a metaphysical discussion, not a scientific analysis.

 

It is helpful to step out of the physical world and enter the metaphysical realm to analyze the profound differences in  the Pasteur germ and preventative innoculation theory VS Bechamp's microzyma theory.

 

One follows the Holy Bible, and the other is the inversion of the Holy Bible into abomination.

 

The culprit responsible for disease is the man who rejects or ignores Divine Law.  This rejection results in a diminished signal from the Divine hand resulting in the microzyma in the human being fermenting into bacteria which is the cause of disease.  By learning and fully implementing this Divine Law, the signal emanating from the Divine Hand remains strong preventing the microzyma from fermenting.  Once you realize God in heaven is responsible for cursing you with destruction, it becomes obvious that it is mandatory to learn and follow Divine Law to stay healthy.  This is why the fear of God is the beginning of wisdom. He is responsible for pulling back the Divine hand.  Timing is interesting. He is patient, but not tolerant.  The ailment comes at the time and place of his choosing and is a warning to take corrective action and change what you are doing.

 

Louis Pasteur claimed to be a religious man, but his actions did not confirm his talk.  His theories directly contradict the Holy Bible.  My analysis indicates Pasteur was intimately familiar with the Holy Bible, but not for the positive benefis, but to shortcircuit it and recommend theories which are the exact inverse, leading to catastrophic health ailments to those who believe in and implement his theories of preventative innoculation and germs of the air.

 

Bechamp reported finding microzyma everywhere, in the air, water, soil, animals, plants, and human beings.  This is the network of microzyma under the control of the Divine Hand.  This Divine Hand can transfer morbidity to the microzyma in humans.

 

Bechamp says scientifically disease should not exist in humans who live correctly.  By following the Divine Law in the Holy Bible and implementing it, the abomination of Pasteur's germs and preventative innoculation theories can be rejected. 

In the preface to Antoine Bechamp's 1898 final book, The Blood and it's 3rd Element, the Microzyma, Bechamp describes that in 1633 Galileo Galilei was persecuted by the Church for his heliocentric model of the solar system which differed from the Biblical model.

Bechamp reported in the same preface that he was persecuted by an unusual, unexpected source for his Microzyma Doctrine of health. He wouldn't state it, but it can be inferred that the church elders were against his microzyma doctrine. How could church elders be against scientifically proving the Biblical version of health?

Galileo tried disproving the Holy Bible and was persecuted by the church.

Bechamp proved the Holy Bible and was persecuted by the church.

Something is fishy.

Multiple Biblical accounts show what happens when an evil king takes control and disregards authenticity and favors abomination. Puppets are installed in positions of power. Authentic teaching is discontinued. Those who fail to play ball are fired.

An authentic church should have been Bechamp's best, closest ally. He should have brought in expert Biblical scholars, to confirm his doctrine, but didn't.

Why do our present day church elders not end this theoretical germs of the air and preventative innoculation nonsense by doing their job and revealing truth? Or are they partners splitting the gigantic profits?

The difference between Bechamp's Microzyma Doctrine and Pasteur's germ theory and preventative innoculation theory at the core is a metaphysical discussion at the belief level.

Who do you believe? Do you believe Divine Law or do you believe mandated science? One gigantic difference between the two is human urine and it's intended purpose.

Pasteuer disregarded human urine and ignored the fermentations completely in his theory. Bechamp labeled urine as a powerful physiological and nutritional agent to the microzyma, which is one of the key aspects to his microzyma doctrine. This means it keeps you healthy. Human urine prevented fermentation of the microzyma into bacterial morbidity, resulting in complete health, free of afflictions, in the human body.

The oxford medical dictionary definition of urine is the waste liquid excreted by the kidneys which contains many of the body's waste products. Doctor's advise against drinking urine because it is a waste product containing toxins.

The Holy Bible labels living water as God's gift to humanity and to drink up. Claiming rivers of living water flow from your belly. Moses's name means, from out of the water, as he was discovered by the pharoah's daughter floating in a basket on the Nile river. Moses is the only Biblical man to hold face to face communication with God. He had a perfect connection to the signal of the Divine Hand. This resulted in the firsthand acquisition of Divine Law contained in the first five books of the Holy Bible. Combining this allegory of hidden meaning into usable data, living water is the connecting bridge used to amplify the signal between us and the Divine Hand. This keeps the microzyma in the human body functioning properly, with no bacterial fermentation, resulting in an ailment free human body.

Bechamp used Moses writings in the Holy Bible as inspiration to perfect his microzyma doctrine. Pasteur, on the other hand, went the opposite way, and learned the Holy Bible's concept of health inside and out, and subverted it into abomination, resulting in catastrophic consequences to humanity.

The options are simple. Which belief in the metaphysical world is appropriate to adopt and implement?

Learn and adopt Divine Law as presented by Moses in the Holy Bible, which results in health by default, rendering hospitals and pharmaceuticals unecessary.

Or.

Adopt and implement Pasteur's germ theory and preventative innoculation theory, which are in direct contradiction to the Holy Bible, that is designed specifically to dramatically increase the odds of catastrophic health ailments kicking in, requiring the present day system.

The results will be an unexpected pleasure should you make the prudent choice. Then you will understand the benefits of selecting authentic truth instead of the curse of abomination.

The health minister of USA

And yes, the video is real!

On 11/24/2025 at 9:58 PM, rattlesnake said:

 

'Nonsense' is a subjective and questionable concept to say the least. What is 'nonsense' today may not be tomorrow.

 

Do you think the Covid vaccine saved millions of lives?

Unlike you..... I'm fully aware that my opinions in fields where I am strictly a layman.... are worthless. Also unlike you, I respect the capable AN members enough to spare them my ignorance.