video screenshot

 

Newly released emails from convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein show multiple mentions of Donald Trump, raising questions about their relationship. The emails, sent over the past 15 years to Ghislaine Maxwell and author Michael Wolff, suggest Trump spent significant time with an alleged victim of Epstein’s sex trafficking ring. Democrats on the House Oversight Committee released these emails, sparking a political uproar.

 

The emails reveal Epstein's assertions that Trump "knew about the girls" and even hint at Trump's request for Epstein to resign from Mar-a-Lago. Despite the mentions, Trump did not send or receive these emails and is not accused of any criminal activity related to Epstein. In response, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt condemned the release as a politically motivated attack against Trump, dismissing it as a "fake narrative."

 

Michael Wolff, mentioned in the correspondence, expressed uncertainty about the context of his discussions with Epstein. The emails describe conversations about Trump's interactions at Epstein's residences. Epstein's network and past interactions continue to draw attention due to Epstein’s controversial plea deal in 2008 and his suicide in 2019.

 

The release of these emails adds pressure on Congress to further investigate Epstein’s connections. Efforts are underway to compel more information from the US government files on Epstein. We anticipate Rep. Adelita Grijalva's forthcoming support to be significant in this campaign, reported CNN.

 

Emails between Epstein and Wolff from January 2019 further discuss Trump’s Mar-a-Lago comments and Epstein’s membership denial. Trump's association with Epstein, ongoing from the early 2000s, has featured prominently in news coverage, with both support and criticism rendered over the years. Legal actions have accompanied their relations, including Trump's libel suit against the Wall Street Journal over birthday correspondence with Epstein.

 

While Trump has consistently denied wrongdoing, the newly unearthed emails inject fresh scrutiny into his past connections with Epstein. In recent interviews, Ghislaine Maxwell has maintained that Trump's behaviour was always civil in her presence, adding complexity to the discourse surrounding these allegations.

 

 

Key Takeaways

 

• Newly released Epstein emails mention Trump multiple times.
• The House Oversight Committee Democrats released these documents, leading to political fallout.
• Trump has denied any wrongdoing and is not accused in these emails.

 

Related Stories:

Trump Dismisses Epstein File Demands as ‘Democrat Hoax’

Democrats Release Alleged Trump Birthday Note to Epstein

 

  Adapted by ASEAN Now from CNN 2025-11-13

 

 

The only questions about the relationship, are ones that are stirred up by Trump's continuous denials and continuous lies about how close they were. They were best buddies for two decades, there is plenty of evidence to point toward Epstein having visited Trump's office over 100 times, and Trump having visited Epstein's office over 100 times, in addition to Trump visiting the mansion countless times and likely visiting orgy Island many times.

 

Trump is guilty as sin and it's just a question of proving it, however that won't mean anything to his supporters as they've given him a free pass on everything. 

 

 

 

 

 

58 minutes ago, webfact said:

The emails reveal Epstein's assertions that Trump "knew about the girls" and even hint at Trump's request for Epstein to resign from Mar-a-Lago. Despite the mentions, Trump did not send or receive these emails and is not accused of any criminal activity related to Epstein. In response, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt condemned the release as a politically motivated attack against Trump, dismissing it as a "fake narrative."

And this is the crux of the matter no matter what the Trump haters on here will post. Keep in mind that these files were available to be released by the Biden administration but were not and it's the Trump administration (DOJ) that's released 10's of thousands of documents. This is just another Democrat stunt on the eve of the goverment reopening ans to destract from the worthless Democrat shutdown of the government (longest ever) that acheived nothing accept causing widespread dispruption and harm.

6 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Keep in mind that these files were available to be released by the Biden administration but were not

This is a recurring observation, and I have no informed answer

 

... but maybe the fact that the Biden admin had secured 2 federal criminal indictments against (then) private citizen Trump and that was their priority -- not that there might be info embarrassing to Trump but not any criminality state or federal

The woman involved in this email has already testified that to her knowledge Trump behaved professionally and she didn't witness any criminality. This is a red herring given to the press from the Democrats in the House Oversight Committee.

1 hour ago, jerrymahoney said:

This is a recurring observation, and I have no informed answer

 

... but maybe the fact that the Biden admin had secured 2 federal criminal indictments against (then) private citizen Trump and that was their priority -- not that there might be info embarrassing to Trump but not any criminality state or federal

 

If it incriminated Trump, they'd have pasted it all over.

 

2 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

If it incriminated Trump, they'd have pasted it all over.

 

Nothing even now to suggest anything incriminating statute limitations if nothing else.

10 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

If it incriminated Trump, they'd have pasted it all over.

 

So release the files.

2 minutes ago, stevenl said:

So release the files.

This is happening. The Dems had these files but didn't release them. You would think that if there was anything substantially incriminating against Trum the Dems surely would have released this prior to the election.

15 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

The woman involved in this email has already testified that to her knowledge Trump behaved professionally and she didn't witness any criminality. This is a red herring given to the press from the Democrats in the House Oversight Committee.

Ghislaine Maxwell? The woman who is seeking a pardon or commutation of her sentence for human trafficking?

 

Do you think in any way she might be motivated to only say nice things about the one person on the planet Earth who could give her freedom, so she doesn't have to spend the rest of her miserable life in jail?

 

Why was she moved from a real prison to a country club prison? Maybe that was just a taste of showing her how things could go if she played nice?

 

Do you think she isn't motivated after seeing that, inter alia, a major money launderer (the crypto king), terrorists who stormed the Capitol, beat and bear sprayed 140 police and searched for the Vice President to hang him, and all those involved in the attempt to overturn democracy and the results of Trump's 2020 defeat by Biden received pardons from Trump?

 

This isn't a red herring; it's a rancid bottom feeder rotting in the mid day summer sun.

4 minutes ago, Wingate said:

Ghislaine Maxwell?

Wrong person. This email concerns a victim. If you want to know who then do some homework.

3 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

This is happening. The Dems had these files but didn't release them. You would think that if there was anything substantially incriminating against Trum the Dems surely would have released this prior to the election.

And the fact the Speaker refused to seat the newly elected Dem Rep, who would be the deciding vote to release the files, is just because the little guy was adamant about following Roberts Rules of Order?

 

The Epstein Estate turned over 23,000 emails. It does take a little time to go through all of them, plus Dems had to grow a pair in order to go around the Speaker's restrictions on disclosure. Note that a lot of the "defense" and spin the WH is putting on this is that the Dems had no right to disclose. Too bad, Trump and Leavitt.

 

Michelle Obama once said "When they go low, we'll go high".

 

Not anymore. It's time for a race to the bottom. If Trump had nothing to fear, the Republicans wouldn't have held up the release. As for "What about Joe", his Administration (belatedly, due to the pity appointment of weakling Garland as AG) had Trump dead to rights for the theft of, and lying about, all those highly classified documents, plus the GA "Just find me...11,780 votes", plus NY and AG James, plus the Capitol Insurrection.....and look how co-opted judges handled those.

Love to see and hear thr real truth one day,whatsever that is.Love to see the grifter nailed to the wall if it is involved. The for once and all the worlds biggest con may finally get the 20 years in jail.

3 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

The only questions about the relationship, are ones that are stirred up by Trump's continuous denials and continuous lies about how close they were. They were best buddies for two decades, there is plenty of evidence to point toward Epstein having visited Trump's office over 100 times, and Trump having visited Epstein's office over 100 times, in addition to Trump visiting the mansion countless times and likely visiting orgy Island many times.

 

Trump is guilty as sin and it's just a question of proving it, however that won't mean anything to his supporters as they've given him a free pass on everything. 

Did you happen to read the released Emails? 

8 minutes ago, Wingate said:

And the fact the Speaker refused to seat the newly elected Dem Rep, who would be the deciding vote to release the files, is just because the little guy was adamant about following Roberts Rules of Order?

 

The Epstein Estate turned over 23,000 emails. It does take a little time to go through all of them, plus Dems had to grow a pair in order to go around the Speaker's restrictions on disclosure. Note that a lot of the "defense" and spin the WH is putting on this is that the Dems had no right to disclose. Too bad, Trump and Leavitt.

 

Michelle Obama once said "When they go low, we'll go high".

 

Not anymore. It's time for a race to the bottom. If Trump had nothing to fear, the Republicans wouldn't have held up the release. As for "What about Joe", his Administration (belatedly, due to the pity appointment of weakling Garland as AG) had Trump dead to rights for the theft of, and lying about, all those highly classified documents, plus the GA "Just find me...11,780 votes", plus NY and AG James, plus the Capitol Insurrection.....and look how co-opted judges handled those.

Did you read the Emails the democrats released?   Not much there. 

https://kalshi.com/markets/kximpeach/president-impeached

From Shakespeare...Methinks the lady doth protest too much

 

On Wednesday, "for SOME reason", Trump called Rep Lauren Boebert to the White House to try to get her to remove her name from the Epstein Discharge Petition, which would force a vote in the House to release the Epstein files.

 

Boebert refused, and with the swearing in of new Rep Grijalva, the required 218 votes are now there. Speaker Johnson now must bring a vote to the floor as to whether the files will be released.

 

One has to wonder why the WH and Trump were so adamant about halting the release. Coming on the day a few of the 23,000 Epstein emails were released by the House Dems, this action by Trump certainly makes one wonder.

There are a number of women who claim to have been used by Epstein and co.  Why doesn't the media ask them?  

1 hour ago, dinsdale said:

The woman involved in this email has already testified that to her knowledge Trump behaved professionally and she didn't witness any criminality. This is a red herring given to the press from the Democrats in the House Oversight Committee.

This isn’t one email, it’s thousands.

 

1 hour ago, Fact said:

Did you happen to read the released Emails? 

Doesn't matter what they revealed. Don is guilty. It is just who he is. It is his nature. 

1 hour ago, dinsdale said:

This is happening. The Dems had these files but didn't release them. You would think that if there was anything substantially incriminating against Trum the Dems surely would have released this prior to the election.

So you back the full release of the Epstein Files?

 

Make you mind up quickly, Congress are now going to be asked to vote on the matter and Speaker Johnson can no longer stop that vote taking place.

 

Who votes yay/nay shall be a matter of public record.

13 minutes ago, koolkarl said:

There are a number of women who claim to have been used by Epstein and co.  Why doesn't the media ask them?  

So that they can become the targets of credibility attacks?

 

Let’s have the documents in the files.

 

Do you support the full release of the Epstein Files? 

4 hours ago, dinsdale said:

And this is the crux of the matter no matter what the Trump haters on here will post. Keep in mind that these files were available to be released by the Biden administration but were not and it's the Trump administration (DOJ) that's released 10's of thousands of documents. This is just another Democrat stunt on the eve of the goverment reopening ans to destract from the worthless Democrat shutdown of the government (longest ever) that acheived nothing accept causing widespread dispruption and harm.

Ok, if they are a hoax and Trump is not implicated by them, RELEASE THEM!

4 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Do you support the full release of the Epstein Files? 

 

I certainly do.

 

Biden didn't.

 

I wonder why...

2 hours ago, dinsdale said:

The woman involved in this email has already testified that to her knowledge Trump behaved professionally and she didn't witness any criminality. This is a red herring given to the press from the Democrats in the House Oversight Committee.

Of course, he behaved professionally, and she didn't witness any criminality because she wasn't invited.............😂

The protection of your hero is reading a bit thin, Dinsy............🤫

4 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

I certainly do.

 

Biden didn't.

 

I wonder why...

Do you have a link to Biden stating his views on the release of the Epstein Files?

Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

Do you have a link to Biden stating his views on the release of the Epstein Files?

 

Do you?

 

Biden had plenty of chance to release them. Like Trump, he didn't but only now are the Liberals outraged. The syndrome runs as strong as the hypocrisy.  

3 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Do you?

 

Biden had plenty of chance to release them. Like Trump, he didn't but only now are the Liberals outraged. The syndrome runs as strong as the hypocrisy.  

 

Perhaps Biden didn't want to upset Bill Clinton, Bill Gates and all his other pals who feature in the files!  It's an Establishment thing.  I didn't expect your Trump blinkers to put you on their side!

1 minute ago, brewsterbudgen said:

 

Perhaps Biden didn't want to upset Bill Clinton, Bill Gates and all his other pals who feature in the files!  It's an Establishment thing. 

 

Agree. An awful lot of Democrats and Democrat supporters in those files, maybe even Biden himself but since he kept them under wraps we don't know. 

 

1 minute ago, brewsterbudgen said:

I didn't expect your Trump blinkers to put you on their side!

 

A pathetic strawman even by your standards C. 😀

12 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

You realize you're using the patented MAGA excuse, when all else fails and Trump can't be defended. How lame. 

 

So why didn't Biden release them.

 

Serious question. Any theories? Maybe he protecting MAGA?