Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Trump Vows Retaliation After Islamic State Slaying 3 Americans

Featured Replies

GettyImages-2251112211-1-6612268.png

 

 

 

Three Americans — two U.S. service members and an American civilian interpreter — were killed in a deadly ambush by an Islamic State gunman in Palmyra, central Syria on December 13, 2025, prompting U.S. President Donald Trump to promise “very serious retaliation” if U.S. forces are targeted again. The lone attacker was killed by partner forces, and three other U.S. troops were wounded in the incident. 

 

U.S. Central Command said the ambush occurred in a part of Syria not fully controlled by the Syrian government, where American and allied forces are conducting ongoing counter-ISIS operations. President Ahmed al-Sharaa of Syria, whose government has moved closer to Washington, expressed anger and devastation over the attack. This marks the first lethal assault on U.S. personnel in Syria since the overthrow of Bashar al-Assad in late 2024. 

 

At the White House and on social media, Trump called the shooting an “ISIS attack against the U.S. and Syria” and stressed that the three wounded troops “seem to be doing pretty well.” Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Pentagon officials warned that the U.S. will pursue anyone who harms American forces and vowed consequences for future attacks. Syrian officials confirmed that the gunman fired during a joint U.S.–Syrian operation and was neutralized. 

 

The incident highlights the persistent threat of Islamic State remnants despite the group’s territorial defeat in 2019 and underscores ongoing risks for coalition forces in eastern and central Syria. It could complicate the evolving U.S.–Syrian security relationship and influence future counter-terrorism strategies. Analysts note that Trump’s retaliation pledge may lead to intensified operations against IS elements or shifts in U.S. military posture in the region. 

 

Looking ahead, the U.S. is expected to consult with regional partners on how to respond operationally while balancing diplomatic engagement with Syria’s interim government. The Pentagon is likely to review force protection measures for deployed troops, and policymakers in Washington may weigh additional military or strategic actions against Islamic State networks that remain active across Syria and Iraq. 

 

Key Takeaways

 

Three Americans, including two U.S. soldiers, were killed in an ISIS ambush in Syria on December 13, 2025, leading Trump to vow serious retaliation. 

 

The attack occurred in central Syria where U.S. and allied forces are engaged in counter-terrorism operations against Islamic State remnants. 

 

U.S. officials warn that future attacks on American personnel will be met with force, potentially shaping upcoming military and diplomatic actions. 

 

 

image.png  Adapted by ASEAN Now from The Express 2025-12-13

 

 

image.png

 

image.png

 

  • Popular Post

The way to solve all problems: violence. What are Yanks doing there anyway?

  • Popular Post

This wouldn't have happened if Trump was President.

 

Oh wait!!!!!!!!!

  • Popular Post

I thought ISIS has been wiped out out by Trump. What happened? 

  • Popular Post
13 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

I thought ISIS has been wiped out out by Trump. What happened? 

Perhaps the next generation.............🤫

  • Popular Post

I wonder if Venezuela will retaliate?

What the hell does he expect after taking $400 million of extremist Israeli, Miriam Adelson and husband, and  sending 20,000 lb bombs that killed 25,000 children in Gaza.

Did he learn nothing from unjust wars resulting in the formation of Al Queda and 9/11. Why was Hezbollah formed? Hamas? All to do with US supporting crimes in ME. Supporting illegal settlements in West Bank, separate roads for Jews etc

Get the hell out of the middle east, it's got nothing to do with USA.

 

 

  • Popular Post
43 minutes ago, JimCM said:

What the hell does he expect after taking $400 million of extremist Israeli, Miriam Adelson and husband, and  sending 20,000 lb bombs that killed 25,000 children in Gaza.

Did he learn nothing from unjust wars resulting in the formation of Al Queda and 9/11. Why was Hezbollah formed? Hamas? All to do with US supporting crimes in ME. Supporting illegal settlements in West Bank, separate roads for Jews etc

Get the hell out of the middle east, it's got nothing to do with USA.

 

 

 

   There is MORE to life than Israel .

The whole World doesn't revolve round Israel

  • Popular Post
41 minutes ago, JimCM said:

. Why was Hezbollah formed? Hamas?

 

You can find the answers in the  covenants of the two groups.  Both groups were formed  to destroy Israel and create an Islamic state under Sharia law in what had been Israel and the Palestinian Territories.

 

From  the Hamas Covenant of 1988:

 

"Allah is its target, the Prophet is its model, the Koran its constitution: Jihad is its path and death for the sake of Allah is the loftiest of its wishes."

 

"It" in the above quote refers to the Islamic Resistance Movement, the official name of Hamas.

 

Article One:

The Islamic Resistance Movement: The Movement's programme is Islam. From it, it draws its ideas, ways of thinking and understanding of the universe, life and man. It resorts to it for judgement in all its conduct, and it is inspired by it for guidance of its steps.

The Islamic Resistance Movement's Relation With the Moslem Brotherhood Group:

Article Two:

The Islamic Resistance Movement is one of the wings of Moslem Brotherhood in Palestine. Moslem Brotherhood Movement is a universal organization which constitutes the largest Islamic movement in modern times. It is characterised by its deep understanding, accurate comprehension and its complete embrace of all Islamic concepts of all aspects of life, culture, creed, politics, economics, education, society, justice and judgement, the spreading of Islam, education, art, information, science of the occult and conversion to Islam.

https://avalon.law.yale.edu/21st_century/hamas.asp

 

From the Hezbollah  manifesto of 1985:

"We obey the orders of one leader, wise and just, that of our tutor and faqih (jurist) who fulfills all the necessary conditions: Ruhollah Musawi Khomeini."

 

It also states:  "Therefore our struggle will end only when this entity is obliterated. We recognize no treaty with it, no cease fire, and no peace agreements, whether separate or consolidated. We vigorously condemn all plans for negotiation with Israel, and regard all negotiators as enemies, for the reason that such negotiation is nothing but the recognition of the legitimacy of the Zionist occupation of Palestine."

https://ict.org.il/UserFiles/The Hizballah Program - An Open Letter.pdf

 

19 minutes ago, Evil Penevil said:

 

You can find the answers in the  covenants of the two groups.  Both groups were formed  to destroy Israel and create an Islamic state under Sharia law in what had been Israel and the Palestinian Territories.

 

From  the Hamas Covenant of 1988:

 

"Allah is its target, the Prophet is its model, the Koran its constitution: Jihad is its path and death for the sake of Allah is the loftiest of its wishes."

 

"It" in the above quote refers to the Islamic Resistance Movement, the official name of Hamas.

 

Article One:

The Islamic Resistance Movement: The Movement's programme is Islam. From it, it draws its ideas, ways of thinking and understanding of the universe, life and man. It resorts to it for judgement in all its conduct, and it is inspired by it for guidance of its steps.

The Islamic Resistance Movement's Relation With the Moslem Brotherhood Group:

Article Two:

The Islamic Resistance Movement is one of the wings of Moslem Brotherhood in Palestine. Moslem Brotherhood Movement is a universal organization which constitutes the largest Islamic movement in modern times. It is characterised by its deep understanding, accurate comprehension and its complete embrace of all Islamic concepts of all aspects of life, culture, creed, politics, economics, education, society, justice and judgement, the spreading of Islam, education, art, information, science of the occult and conversion to Islam.

https://avalon.law.yale.edu/21st_century/hamas.asp

 

From the Hezbollah  manifesto of 1985:

"We obey the orders of one leader, wise and just, that of our tutor and faqih (jurist) who fulfills all the necessary conditions: Ruhollah Musawi Khomeini."

 

It also states:  "Therefore our struggle will end only when this entity is obliterated. We recognize no treaty with it, no cease fire, and no peace agreements, whether separate or consolidated. We vigorously condemn all plans for negotiation with Israel, and regard all negotiators as enemies, for the reason that such negotiation is nothing but the recognition of the legitimacy of the Zionist occupation of Palestine."

https://ict.org.il/UserFiles/The Hizballah Program - An Open Letter.pdf

 

Disgracefully misleading quoting a Hamas 1988 Charter when you know very well it was changed more recently.

 

Also Hezbollah was formed partly due to the US

 

US military presence (1982–1984)

After Israel invaded Lebanon in 1982, the US led a Multinational Force (MNF)

How it was perceived locally:

  • The US Marines were not neutral

  • They were seen as protecting Israel’s gains and supporting Lebanon’s Christian-led government

  • US naval forces bombarded Muslim and Druze areas

For many Lebanese Shiites, this looked like foreign military control, not peacekeeping.

 

1 minute ago, JimCM said:

Disgracefully misleading quoting a Hamas 1988 Charter when you know very well it was changed more recently.

 

 

   What was it changed to ?

34 minutes ago, JimCM said:

Disgracefully misleading quoting a Hamas 1988 Charter when you know very well it was changed more recently.

 

Your question in this thread regarded the formation of Hamas, which occurred in December, 1987.  Clearly it's the original covenant from 1988 and not a revision thirty years later that would explain the reason for its formation.  

 

In May, 2017, Hamas issued a document titled Hamas Principles and Policies, in which it revised the language of the original covenant to get rid of some blatantly antisemitic references and make it read more as a political manifesto and less as a religious fatwa.  However, Hamas never withdrew nor repudiated the original covenant.  The 2017 revision contains the same references to destroying Israel and replacing it with an Islamic state.

 

The revision states:

"Palestine symbolizes the resistance that shall continue until liberation is accomplished, until the return is fulfilled and until a fully sovereign state is established with Jerusalem as its capital."

 

"There shall be no recognition of the legitimacy of the Zionist entity. Whatever has befallen the land of Palestine in terms of occupation, settlement building, Judaization or changes to its features or falsification of facts is illegitimate. Rights never lapse."

 

"Hamas believes that no part of the land of Palestine shall be compromised or conceded, irrespective of the causes, the circumstances and the pressures and no matter how long the occupation lasts. Hamas rejects any alternative to the full and complete liberation of Palestine, from the river to the sea." 

 https://www.wilsoncenter.org/article/doctrine-hamas 

 

 

Hard to say much. Americans with"boots on the ground" was never a presidential promise.

What does Circus goon didn't realize was that unconditional support for the extremist elements within the Israeli state was going to have repercussions. It's a decade old concept called blowback, likely something Trump knows nothing about because he never reads a document. 

 

The Peace president is mouthing off again, ooh those guys must be quaking in their boots. 

  • Popular Post

Another example of the complete hypocrisy of the man whose face is the same color as the BS he spews. Three americans tragically killed in Syria and he threatens immediate revenge, but in his own country two people die in a shooting in Brown university which he calls “a terrible thing” and “a shame” . It’s clear to read between the lines how he loves to appear the tough guy making idle threats, yet he’s too weak, and gutless, to address the use of guns in America involved in killing innocent kids and students. The man is an utter wanksplash of a human being.

1 minute ago, IsaanGuy said:

Another example of the complete hypocrisy of the man whose face is the same color as the BS he spews. Three americans tragically killed in Syria and he threatens immediate revenge, but in his own country two people die in a shooting in Brown university which he calls “a terrible thing” and “a shame” . It’s clear to read between the lines how he loves to appear the tough guy making idle threats, yet he’s too weak, and gutless, to address the use of guns in America involved in killing innocent kids and students. The man is an utter wanksplash of a human being.

Ah yes, take the guns says the left.

On 12/14/2025 at 12:45 PM, unblocktheplanet said:

The way to solve all problems: violence. What are Yanks doing there anyway?

The attack occurred in central Syria where U.S. and allied forces are engaged in counter-terrorism operations against Islamic State remnants. 

 

16 hours ago, Terry Juhlin said:

The attack occurred in central Syria where U.S. and allied forces are engaged in counter-terrorism operations against Islamic State remnants. 

Yep, American world police. I suppose that's how arms companies pay taxes. And 'allies' who America has bullied to join.

On 12/15/2025 at 3:41 PM, Terry Juhlin said:

The attack occurred in central Syria where U.S. and allied forces are engaged in counter-terrorism operations against Islamic State remnants. 

Oh, that makes it okay. /s What ever happened to Un peacekeepers as in Cambodia?

On 12/15/2025 at 2:50 PM, Yellowtail said:

Ah yes, take the guns says the left.

Do you need a gun for anything??? Miss it here in the Land of Smiles? Anybody who thinks the US (and, apparently, Australia) should let the populace collect their arsenals is...just daft!

6 hours ago, unblocktheplanet said:

Do you need a gun for anything??? Miss it here in the Land of Smiles? Anybody who thinks the US (and, apparently, Australia) should let the populace collect their arsenals is...just daft!

What does need have to do with anything?

On 12/17/2025 at 2:54 PM, unblocktheplanet said:

Oh, that makes it okay. /s What ever happened to Un peacekeepers as in Cambodia?

They're busy in Lebanon, where the IDF terrorists are breaking all laws.

 

 

On 12/14/2025 at 4:32 AM, JimCM said:

US military presence (1982–1984)

After Israel invaded Lebanon in 1982, the US led a Multinational Force (MNF)

How it was perceived locally:

  • The US Marines were not neutral

  • They were seen as protecting Israel’s gains and supporting Lebanon’s Christian-led government

  • US naval forces bombarded Muslim and Druze areas

For many Lebanese Shiites, this looked like foreign military control, not peacekeeping.

Did this come from the HAMAS wiki?

On 12/17/2025 at 2:57 AM, unblocktheplanet said:

Do you need a gun for anything??? Miss it here in the Land of Smiles? Anybody who thinks the US (and, apparently, Australia) should let the populace collect their arsenals is...just daft!

Why is it daft? 

On 12/14/2025 at 4:32 AM, JimCM said:

Disgracefully misleading quoting a Hamas 1988 Charter when you know very well it was changed more recently.

 

Also Hezbollah was formed partly due to the US

 

US military presence (1982–1984)

After Israel invaded Lebanon in 1982, the US led a Multinational Force (MNF)

How it was perceived locally:

  • The US Marines were not neutral

  • They were seen as protecting Israel’s gains and supporting Lebanon’s Christian-led government

  • US naval forces bombarded Muslim and Druze areas

For many Lebanese Shiites, this looked like foreign military control, not peacekeeping.

 

There is a lot more to the history of Lebanon before 1982 than you want to portray.   There seems to be a trend, where the Palestinians are, there is war. 

 

The Lebanese Civil War started in April 1975 with clashes between Christian militias (Phalangists) and Palestinian groups, triggered by an attack on a bus of refugees following an earlier Palestinian attack on Christian leadership. However, this was the spark, igniting deeper issues: Lebanon's sectarian political system, unequal power distribution, economic disparity, and the presence of armed Palestinian factions operating outside state control. 

 

 

https://www.iss.europa.eu/sites/default/files/EUISSFiles/Alert_21_Lebanon_civil_war.pdf 

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.