Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Pretti: Maybe Not So Peaceful And Innocent

Featured Replies

Here's some recently released footage. Is it Petti? The claim is that the BBC ran this through their facial recognition technology and came back with a confirmed 97% of accuracy. What do you think. Was it him? BTW it sure seems like he's armed. If this is Pretti, and sure seems like it is, I'm assuming this is the incident he got his rib broken. I guess if this was Pretti he should've been arrested there and then for criminal damage to federal property and he'd be alive today.

  • Replies 101
  • Views 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Still trying to discredit a murdered bloke, I see...........😒 Talk about low and scraping the barrel, just to protect Trump's Gestapo.....🙄 There seems to be something seriously wrong with you........

  • dinsdale
    dinsdale

    He's clearly an agitator and he took a gun and two high capacity magazines to agitate. He was involved with IceWatch and there's pretty good evidence he was in the massive and highly organised Signal

  • I'm a gun nutter, or I've been told. Having too many, 30+ at one time, whittled down to 16, for years, and didn't even hunt. Of course you can never have too many for home defense, along with 1000s of

I have this topic going in the Soapbox too but you were first :)

  • Popular Post
On 1/29/2026 at 6:52 AM, dinsdale said:

Here's some recently released footage. Is it Petti? The claim is that the BBC ran this through their facial recognition technology and came back with a confirmed 97% of accuracy. What do you think. Was it him? BTW it sure seems like he's armed. If this is Pretti, and sure seems like it is, I'm assuming this is the incident he got his rib broken. I guess if this was Pretti he should've been arrested there and then for criminal damage to federal property and he'd be alive today.

Still trying to discredit a murdered bloke, I see...........😒

Talk about low and scraping the barrel, just to protect Trump's Gestapo.....🙄

There seems to be something seriously wrong with you..........🤕

  • Author
26 minutes ago, transam said:

Still trying to discredit a murdered bloke, I see...........😒

Talk about low and scraping the barrel, just to protect Trump's Gestapo.....🙄

There seems to be something seriously wrong with you..........🤕

He's clearly an agitator and he took a gun and two high capacity magazines to agitate. He was involved with IceWatch and there's pretty good evidence he was in the massive and highly organised Signal group. This isn't discrediting. It's who he was. A leftist agitator who impeded federal law enforcement operations.

  • Popular Post
1 minute ago, dinsdale said:

He's clearly an agitator and he took a gun a two high capacity magazines to agitate. He was involved with IceWatch and there's pretty good evidence he was in the massive and highly organised signal group. This isn't discrediting. It's who he was. A leftist agitator who impeded federal law enforcement operations.

Of course, you know it all, the AN guesser strikes again, go away, you are embarrassing....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_of_Alex_Pretti

  • Author
3 minutes ago, transam said:

Of course, you know it all, the AN guesser strikes again, go away, you are embarrassing....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_of_Alex_Pretti

Did you watch the linked video where he spits at ice, kicked off the right tail light assembly and had a gun holstered on his right hip? No guessing needed.

  • Popular Post
5 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Did you watch the linked video where he spits at ice, kicked off the right tail light assembly and had a gun holstered on his right hip? No guessing needed.

Spits at ICE, was it a .44 magnum spit, and what was the ICE bloke doing, slapping a bird about.........? 😂

Was he licensed to carry a holstered weapon....? 🤗

You are just clutching at straws, scraping the barrel, embarrassing yourself, though you are not the only one...😒

  • Popular Post
22 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Did you watch the linked video where he spits at ice, kicked off the right tail light assembly and had a gun holstered on his right hip? No guessing needed.

Only the events at the murder needs to be considered. If a prosecutor tried to introduce this as evidence it would be rejected.

Are you trying to suggest the gestapo ICE agents knew of the prior incident when they murdered him without cause?

I'm a gun nutter, or I've been told. Having too many, 30+ at one time, whittled down to 16, for years, and didn't even hunt. Of course you can never have too many for home defense, along with 1000s of rounds, scopes, 30 rd mags.

With that, I would never attack & damage a law enforcement (ICE) vehicle, as that's just stupid. Then as vid showed, they obvious detained or charged him, and if not, knew exactly who he was. He was in their grasp, so they wouldn't let him slide with a finger wave.

Now after that little act of stupidity, I certain wouldn't return almost 2 weeks later to confront them, yet again, unless I had something else in mind.

As nutty as I am, and stupid situations, that I may or may not have put myself in, carrying a firearm, I never .... never ... never, needed to bring 2 full mags (20-30 rounds) more with me. Can't imagine why I would or anyone, unless planning on putting myself in a situation where I may actually need them. Wonder what that would be ....

Let that sink in ... who the hell goes to a protest (to help), with a firearm and 2 extra mags. That's what cops carry, and they expect to get shot at, maybe, at some point in their career.

Really just a nice peaceful guy.

  • Popular Post
39 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Did you watch the linked video where he spits at ice, kicked off the right tail light assembly and had a gun holstered on his right hip? No guessing needed.

And you believe that your "guess" is an excuse for murder?

  • Author
8 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

And you believe that your "guess" is an excuse for murder?

And you believe he was a peaceful protester and it was murder. You do realize that murder is a specific legal term that needs to be proven I hope. Hopefully the bodycams will show what actually happened. If the agents are shown to have been in the wrong then they should face the consequences. BTW what "guess" are you referring to? That he was an activist? That he was armed? That he was impeding a federal law operation (a federal offence) x2 that's so far been caught on video ? That he spat at a federal officer (a federal offence)? That he willfully damaged federal property (a federal offence)? This all happened and it's there for all that are not blinded by ideology and leftist reporting and commentary to see.

  • Author
5 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

Read your own post!

No guesses there that I can see. Maybe you can point it out. In my OP it wasn't at that point confirmed that it was Pretti although as I said BBC's facial recognition technology put it at a 97% likelihood but since then his parents have confirmed it was him.

  • Popular Post
2 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

No guesses there that I can see. Maybe you can point it out.

Why should I waste my time teaching you how to read?

  • Popular Post
1 hour ago, dinsdale said:

He's clearly an agitator and he took a gun and two high capacity magazines to agitate. He was involved with IceWatch and there's pretty good evidence he was in the massive and highly organised Signal group. This isn't discrediting. It's who he was. A leftist agitator who impeded federal law enforcement operations.

Ooh, there are a lot of knee-jerk buzzwords in there! Define 'agitator'--I say peaceful protestor protected by the Constitution. First amendment. All you gun-nuts should be cheering his right to concealed carry with extra ammo, you know...just in case of armed thugs. Second amendment.

Meaning, Pretti was attacked in both cases by a massive and highly organised gang of masked armed men yet he never pulled his gun in either incident. Sure looks to me like his murder is retribution for impeding Federal law enforcement agents?

AFAIK, Signal isn't banned (yet). My tech friends tell me it's not secure and can be monitored by govt.

Thank you, IceWatch. Make it even more massive and even more organised. Chase the marauders out! Protecting our citizens, friends, workers and neighbours. Thank you, thank you.

  • Popular Post

I was way, way more impressed with how one of these very professional and trained ICE agents tackled him like a s__t college linebacker, fell over, got up, dragged him about, knocked his cap and pulled his jacket off, while his soft mates pepper-sprayed bystanders, let off smoke bombs, didn't arrest him for at least two, witnessed Federal felonies and basically ran away, probably "in fear of their lives" again.

There's a word for these ICE guys, starts with w and sounds like anchor.

  • Author
9 minutes ago, unblocktheplanet said:

peaceful protestor protected by the Constitution.

Peaceful protesting isn't impeding or physically engaging with any type of law enforcement on any type of law enforcement operation. Impeding federal law enforcement is a federal offence and not protected by the First Amendment. Petti was not peacefully protesting. He wasn't on the sidewalk with a sign he was in ICE's face with a concealed weapon and two fully loaded high capacity magazines. Let me add that spitting at officers and damaging police property is also not peacefully protesting and once again is not protected by the First Amendment.

  • Popular Post
1 minute ago, dinsdale said:

Impeding federal law enforcement is a federal offence

When did it become punishable with on the spot death penalties?

  • Author
7 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

I was way, way more impressed with how one of these very professional and trained ICE agents tackled him like a s__t college linebacker, fell over, got up, dragged him about, knocked his cap and pulled his jacket off, while his soft mates pepper-sprayed bystanders, let off smoke bombs, didn't arrest him for at least two, witnessed Federal felonies and basically ran away, probably "in fear of their lives" again.

There's a word for these ICE guys, starts with w and sounds like anchor.

Yes he should have been arrested at the above incident. Clear federal offences. Maybe the ICE agents had bigger fish to fry. If local law enforcement were allowed to collaborate they could have arrested him and he'd be alive today. Instead he decided to continue the "resistance" and chose to go and get into ICE's face while armed, not declare he was a concealed carrier and actively agitate, impede and physically resist.

  • Popular Post
3 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Peaceful protesting isn't impeding or physically engaging with any type of law enforcement on any type of law enforcement operation. Impeding federal law enforcement is a federal offence and not protected by the First Amendment. Petti was not peacefully protesting. He wasn't on the sidewalk with a sign he was in ICE's face with a concealed weapon and two fully loaded high capacity magazines. Let me add that spitting at officers and damaging police property is also not peacefully protesting and once again is not protected by the First Amendment.

Disagree. Yes, spitting on anyone is plain nasty. But no news report said Pretti did that. Did any other of the protestors.

Both sit-ins, people chains and other forms of blockade have always been part of nonviolent protest. Yes, of course, expect to be arrested. That's what brings home the issue to the public.

Leaving the holy taillight aside, Pretti was not the one challenging, impeding, or physically engaging. Oh, you must mean those ICE goons.

You must want to repeal the 2nd Amendment. Me, too, and confiscate all weapons. In the UK, most police are still not armed.

  • Author
5 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

When did it become punishable with on the spot death penalties?

When you have a weapon and put yourself in a situation where take on others who have weapons the chances of being shot are pretty high.

  • Author
1 minute ago, unblocktheplanet said:

Disagree. Yes, spitting on anyone is plain nasty. But no news report said Pretti did that.

He did in the previous encounter to which I was referring. Not the action of a peaceful protester. As for spitting on a federal officer this is a federal offence. 3rd degree assault. Bit more than just "plain nasty".

7 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

When you have a weapon and put yourself in a situation where take on others who have weapons the chances of being shot are pretty high.

When you have a weapon which is not in plain sight or being used in any threating manner and put yourself in a situation where take on others who have weapons the chances of being shot are pretty high if they are ICE agents in the USA!.

  • Author
Just now, scottiejohn said:

When you have a weapon which is not in plain sight or being used in any threating manner and put yourself in a situation where take on others who have weapons the chances of being shot are pretty high if they are ICE agents in the USA!.

Any law enforcement officer.

  • Popular Post
11 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Yes he should have been arrested at the above incident. Clear federal offences. Maybe the ICE agents had bigger fish to fry. If local law enforcement were allowed to collaborate they could have arrested him and he'd be alive today. Instead he decided to continue the "resistance" and chose to go and get into ICE's face while armed, not declare he was a concealed carrier and actively agitate, impede and physically resist.

How do you know he didn't declare he was a licensed concealed weapon carrier? After they ripped his jacket off and pulled his fleece up, everyone could see he was packing heat. Everyone could also see he didn't make any effort to reach for it, same as happened the next time. Why didn't some of those "in fear of their life" ICE types just pump him full of lead right there and then?

Despite Noem and other idiots claiming otherwise, the Second Amendment doesn't say anything about the right to bear arms being revoked when in the presence of law enforcement. You have the legal rights to carry your piece to Walmart, to ball games, to street protests including to "actively agitate, impede and physically resist", and your mom's Sunday lunch.

  • Popular Post
16 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

He did in the previous encounter to which I was referring. Not the action of a peaceful protester.

Yup, it's right up there with the lefties 'hurty words' that are so often ridiculed by those afflicted with a certain red-capped blindness.

  • Popular Post

I don't care if he spit on an ICE agent and kicked out a tail-light. That's not an excuse to murder him in cold blood.

  • Author
39 minutes ago, connda said:

I don't care if he spit on an ICE agent and kicked out a tail-light. That's not an excuse to murder him in cold blood.

I'm not saying the shooting in and of itself is justified or not. What I'm pointing out is he wasn't the peaceful good guy that the left is purporting him to be. He was clearly an agitator and he was clearly armed whilst agitating.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.