Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Epstein’s Victims Feel Ignored as UK Prioritizes State Interests

Featured Replies

Survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse express frustration as British police prioritize state-related cases. Former prosecutor Nazir Afzal highlighted that while figures like former prince Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and ex-cabinet minister Peter Mandelson were arrested for allegedly sharing information with Epstein, victims feel their cases lack attention.

Investigations and Allegations

Six UK police forces are reviewing flights associated with Epstein, allegedly transporting trafficked women, and two others are examining claims of sexual assault. Despite these efforts, there has been no full investigation into the harm against women.

Get the latest headlines in your email subscribe.png


Afzal stated, “When the state is the victim, action is swift. But when women are alleged victims, urgency is lacking.” He recounted a woman's story of being sent to the UK by Epstein and subsequently assaulted.

Unified Response Urged

Neil Basu, the former head of counter-terrorism, criticized the delayed response, urging quick and thorough investigations for justice. Afzal advocated for a centralized national team, such as the National Crime Agency, to lead the complex cases of sexual assault and trafficking.

The National Police Chiefs’ Council has set up a coordinating committee, meeting twice in preparation for more allegations as additional documents become available. The UK police are dependent on the US Department of Justice for original unredacted documents.

Accountability and Justice

Basu emphasized the challenges of prosecuting historical allegations, underlining the necessity of comprehensive evidence. Penny East of the Fawcett Society stressed that accountability requires a robust criminal justice response, beyond just losing titles or jobs.

Natalie Fleet, Labour MP for Bolsover and a grooming victim, highlighted the importance of maintaining focus on victims’ voices. She underscored the courage of women who came forward and called for thorough police action at every level.

Current Investigation Efforts

The investigation into Mountbatten-Windsor includes completed searches in Berkshire. Forces such as Norfolk, Essex, and Police Scotland are addressing claims related to Epstein's activities in their areas.

The National Police Chiefs’ Council reaffirms its commitment to driving all investigations by evidence, ensuring thorough and robust procedures. This comes as police brace for a potential influx of allegations involving Epstein's connections to Britain.

Efforts include recruiting a high-level detective to aid coordination, with expectations of significant developments as new documents are examined. Advocates argue for a unified national approach to ensure justice for victims and maintain public confidence in the investigative process.

Join the discussion? creat-account.png

Already a member? comment on this.png


image.png
  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 24 Feb 2026


View full article

  • Popular Post
2 hours ago, ASEAN NOW News said:

Afzal stated, “When the state is the victim, action is swift. But when women are alleged victims, urgency is lacking.”

Indeed.

As in the case of the Pakistani rape gangs, where a national inquiry was actively blocked by the Labour government for fear of losing a certain voter base.

  • Popular Post

This situation is a clear Catch‑22 for Epstein’s victims in the UK.

The British police cannot advance their investigations without unredacted documents, yet they remain dependent on the DOJ, which controls both the timing and the content of disclosures.

By selectively releasing certain files that are more damaging to foreign parties and those deemed hostile to the Trump administration first, while holding back others closer to home for as long as possible, the DOJ effectively dictates the pace of justice.

For UK victims, this clearly means being sidelined once again, as state interests and bureaucratic protocols take precedence over the immediate need for true accountability.

It's far from clear at this point just who was culpable for what crimes related to Epstein. It will take time before any charges will be made.

  • Popular Post
4 hours ago, JonnyF said:

Indeed.

As in the case of the Pakistani rape gangs, where a national inquiry was actively blocked by the Labour government for fear of losing a certain voter base.

Absolutely, a national disgrace , for which Starmer should be in prison, Perverting the course of justice, without doubt,

These women can give exact names who bopped them. Where are these names? Isn't government wonderful, honest

and trustworthy?

2 minutes ago, koolkarl said:

These women can give exact names who bopped them. Where are these names? Isn't government wonderful, honest

and trustworthy?

I'm sure they can, that however is not the issue, the issue is was a crime committed in the UK.

If a crime was committed in the UK it's a matter for the police and the justice system nothing to do with the government.

Is a crime committed in Pattaya or Bangkok every time a barfine and the girl is paid after sex.............possibly. But the police would have a hard time rounding the thousands of punters up.

The girls know what they're getting into and I expect Epstiens girls did as well.

  • Popular Post
36 minutes ago, Bannoi said:

I'm sure they can, that however is not the issue, the issue is was a crime committed in the UK.

If a crime was committed in the UK it's a matter for the police and the justice system nothing to do with the government.

Is a crime committed in Pattaya or Bangkok every time a barfine and the girl is paid after sex.............possibly. But the police would have a hard time rounding the thousands of punters up.

The girls know what they're getting into and I expect Epstiens girls did as well.

Using the term victim is a little over the top. Seems to me they were very willing participants.

  • Popular Post
5 minutes ago, emptypockets said:

Using the term victim is a little over the top. Seems to me they were very willing participants.

Quite agree it looks like Epstein was running what amounted to a brothel for rich or influential clients who paid if not with cash with insider information as for the girls they certainly didn't look like they were being forced into it and I expect were well paid.

As for the British police they are concentrating on the fact that Ex-Prince Andrew and & Mandelson may have committed a crime in giving away confidential or secret government information.

6 hours ago, JonnyF said:

Indeed.

As in the case of the Pakistani rape gangs, where a national inquiry was actively blocked by the Labour government for fear of losing a certain voter base.

I wonder, should we start referring to the Epstein, Maxwell rape gang by the ethnicity/religion of its leaders and backers?

4 hours ago, Jim Waldron said:

This situation is a clear Catch‑22 for Epstein’s victims in the UK.

The British police cannot advance their investigations without unredacted documents, yet they remain dependent on the DOJ, which controls both the timing and the content of disclosures.

By selectively releasing certain files that are more damaging to foreign parties and those deemed hostile to the Trump administration first, while holding back others closer to home for as long as possible, the DOJ effectively dictates the pace of justice.

For UK victims, this clearly means being sidelined once again, as state interests and bureaucratic protocols take precedence over the immediate need for true accountability.

Correct.

The coverup is in the US by the Trump administration.

What the UK can act on is crimes where clear evidence has been released.

There will be more to come.

I personally think investigations into secrets being handed to Epstein is far more likely to uncover the bigger question of who Epstein was working for.

Notwithstanding the resident AN deflectors and victim blaming Trump sycophants, it’s blatantly obvious that justice for the victims of Epstein’s grooming gang has stalled because of the redactions in the, so far, released files.

This is the reason plain and simple.

They’re gonna getcha Donny.

Tick tock Donny. Tick tock.

I'm a victim? I missed out on the whole experience.

1 minute ago, VocalNeal said:

I'm a victim? I missed out on the whole experience.

This statement profoundly disrespects the women who endured oppression at the hands of wealthy men. It's crucial to empathize with their experiences and genuinely understand the pain they have felt. Only then can we foster a deeper awareness of their struggles and advocate for justice.

2 minutes ago, nick supreme said:

This statement profoundly disrespects the women who endured oppression at the hands of wealthy men. It's crucial to empathize with their experiences and genuinely understand the pain they have felt. Only then can we foster a deeper awareness of their struggles and advocate for justice.

Did the so called oppressed women refuse to take the money at the time?

Asking for a friend.

17 minutes ago, VocalNeal said:

Did the so called oppressed women refuse to take the money at the time?

Asking for a friend.

Oh you missed out on the money.

What price do you charge to raped by one of Epstein’s chums?

Asking for a friend.

9 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Oh you missed out on the money.

What price do you charge to raped by one of Epstein’s chums?

Asking for a friend.

Well that is the question nobody seems to wish to ask. Did the women participate without their consent?

45 minutes ago, Red Forever said:

Notwithstanding the resident AN deflectors and victim blaming Trump sycophants, it’s blatantly obvious that justice for the victims of Epstein’s grooming gang has stalled because of the redactions in the, so far, released files.

This is the reason plain and simple.

They’re gonna getcha Donny.

Tick tock Donny. Tick tock.

The problem is that there is nothing illegal about most people's contacts with Epstein. The media are desperately trying to create a lurid sex story out of very little. There are, however, a lot of questions about the nature of Epstein's finances.

26 minutes ago, VocalNeal said:

Well that is the question nobody seems to wish to ask. Did the women participate without their consent?

Minors have no competence in law to consent to sex with adults.

What’s your asking price?

Asking for a friend.

21 minutes ago, Thingamabob said:

The problem is that there is nothing illegal about most people's contacts with Epstein. The media are desperately trying to create a lurid sex story out of very little. There are, however, a lot of questions about the nature of Epstein's finances.

There is something definitely illegal about withholding the Epstein files and redacting names of anyone who was not a victim.

This query is in response to kooks who insist that Epstein was an asset and it's only a matter of time before it is revealed.

If you’re dealing with people who insist “it’s only a matter of time,” you’re running into a very common pattern in conspiracy thinking — unfalsifiability.

Using Jeffrey Epstein as the example:


1️⃣ The “It Will Eventually Be Proven” Move

That claim has a built-in shield:

  • If no evidence appears → “It’s still classified.”

  • If investigations find nothing → “They’re covering it up.”

  • If years pass → “These things take decades.”

That structure makes the claim immune to disconfirmation.
A belief that cannot, even in theory, be proven wrong stops being a testable claim and becomes a conviction.


2️⃣ What History Suggests

When major government conspiracies have existed, they eventually produced:

  • Documents

  • Whistleblowers

  • Rival political exposure

  • Internal memos

  • Financial trails

Examples like Watergate scandal, Iran-Contra affair, and MKUltra all surfaced through leaks, hearings, or declassification — and none required 20–30 years of total silence across changing administrations and political enemies.

Seventeen years since the 2008 plea deal — spanning Bush, Obama, Trump, and Biden — with no documentary proof is not trivial.


3️⃣ The Burden of Proof Principle

The person asserting:

“He was an intelligence asset.”

…has the burden to provide evidence.

It’s not on skeptics to disprove an unfalsifiable claim.


4️⃣ Why This Case Attracts Certainty

Epstein’s story has:

  • Elite connections

  • A controversial plea deal

  • A jail death

  • Institutional failures

Ambiguity + power + moral outrage = fertile ground for grand narratives.

Humans are uncomfortable with:

  • Random incompetence

  • Bureaucratic failure

  • Messy corruption

A coordinated master plan feels psychologically cleaner than chaotic dysfunction.


Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.