2 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

You know full well anyone advertizing a position or accomodation for Christians only would result in a Lucy Connolly-esq all hands on deck hate crime charge, splashed front page on the Grauniad and Independant.

Stop surrendering your country to muslims. Dont give an inch.

I know nothing of the sort.

Stop imagining what I know or indeed what my country might be.

I think landlords that do not take state money should be able to rent to whomever they like, and refuse anyone they do not like.

8 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

I think landlords that do not take state money should be able to rent to whomever they like, and refuse anyone they do not like.

They own the place, they paid for it, they are comfortable/uncomfortable with certain types of people, they should have the right to decide who they want or don't want to rent it to. Absolutely agree.

25 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

You know full well anyone advertizing a position or accomodation for Christians only would result in a Lucy Connolly-esq all hands on deck hate crime charge, splashed front page on the Grauniad and Independant.

Stop surrendering your country to muslims. Dont give an inch.

Oh look, Sunny has made up something that hasn't happened and then got indignant about the reaction that hasn't happened to the thing that hasn't happened. And then put some drivel about surrendering to Muslims based on his personal hate.

Classic.

13 minutes ago, tomazbodner said:

They own the place, they paid for it, they are comfortable/uncomfortable with certain types of people, they should have the right to decide who they want or don't want to rent it to. Absolutely agree.

As long as they do not accept state money

2 hours ago, NanLaew said:

I was responding to @Fact's silliness.

The advert in the OP is for letting a room in a home. It's safe to assume it's a Muslim home. It would get the part-time anti-Semitism watchdogs in a froth if the add did say what you suggest. But it didn't, so never mind. I spent the last couple of weeks staying in a Catholic home and my agnostic ass didn't create any friction.

The source of the OP is from The Telegraph, the scourge of the Guardian luvvies, and while leading with the broad illegality of it all, it does also point out that "There is a partial exception if a person is renting out a room in their own home and sharing accommodation, such as a kitchen or bathroom, with the tenant." That's legal.

I'm assuming that the bursts of righteous white indignation, outrage and fake news it elicited from @Trippy, @SAFETY FIRST and @JonnyF was because they didn't read the whole article.

As you suggest, probably a storm in a teacup but just watch GBNews and the gobby Reform chaps digging themselves holes over this.

And if you read the full article you'll see the filthy Robert Jenrick is stirring up the division as is his wont.

Robert Jenrick, Reform UK’s economic spokesman, said: “These adverts are disgusting and anti-British. It goes without saying that there would be a national outrage if the tables were turned."

No surprise either that he is talking out of his anus. Just stir up the pot, get his Reformers all riled up, maybe they'll go and hang some more flags. As the article also explains (for those that can be bothered to read it: ie. no one on here who is getting all angry about "The Muslims"), it is not illegal, disgusting or anti-British. I dare say Jenrick better fits that description.

And just for @SunnyinBangrak no doubt these people have all been arrested and thrown in jail, right? Coz, like, they're white Christians!

7 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

And if you read the full article you'll see the filthy Robert Jenrick is stirring up the division as is his wont.

Robert Jenrick, Reform UK’s economic spokesman, said: “These adverts are disgusting and anti-British. It goes without saying that there would be a national outrage if the tables were turned."

No surprise either that he is talking out of his anus. Just stir up the pot, get his Reformers all riled up, maybe they'll go and hang some more flags. As the article also explains (for those that can be bothered to read it: ie. no one on here who is getting all angry about "The Muslims"), it is not illegal, disgusting or anti-British. I dare say Jenrick better fits that description.

And just for @SunnyinBangrak no doubt these people have all been arrested and thrown in jail, right? Coz, like, they're white Christians!

It does not say Christians only.

Would an ad saying close to school, great for students mean students only?

It only means people that do or do not want to be close to a church or school should take note.

2 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

It does not say Christians only.

Would an ad saying close to school, great for students mean students only?

It only means people that do or do not want to be close to a church or school should take note.

That's your interpretation, not mine. A simple Google search brings up tons of Christian only adverts. Also Hindu only (even the article mentions them). Probably Jewish only too if you can be bothered to look.

But as soon as anyone says "Muslim" out comes Jenrick with the outrage.

1 minute ago, josephbloggs said:

That's your interpretation, not mine. A simple Google search brings up tons of Christian only adverts. Also Hindu only (even the article mentions them). Probably Jewish only too if you can be bothered to look.

But as soon as anyone says "Muslim" out comes Jenrick with the outrage.

But you chose one that did not, for whatever reason.

Carry on lefty

2 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

But you chose one that did not, for whatever reason.

Carry on lefty

Ignore the hypocrisy if it makes you feel better, no skin off my nose.

1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

But based on a recent post where you indicated you'd be happy for white people to be eradicated i assume that belief is not based on yor race.

Obviously I'm not that bothered about race ....... Except ......

England is a white country, and the government (at all levels) should be run and operated by white christian English heterosexual men. And welfare should only be for white English citizens, and property only owned by white English people.

Just like all other countries outside the west.

How many white people operating the government in China?

How many non Thais operating the government in Thailand?

How about Pakistan, India, Serbia, Ukraine, Iran, Iraq?

Governments and their employees and land ownership should be restricted to native citizens.

Anything else is madness!

As for Islam, as far as I can see it's a religion open to all races, but at odds with our civilization, so should not be permitted in our home countries.

9 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Obviously I'm not that bothered about race ....... Except ......

England is a white country, and the government (at all levels) should be run and operated by white christian English heterosexual men. And welfare should only be for white English citizens, and property only owned by white English people.

I do have to give you credit - most racists try and pretend they're not because deep down they are ashamed of it. You just say it straight.

9 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Just like all other countries outside the west.

How many white people operating the government in China?

How many non Thais operating the government in Thailand?

How about Pakistan, India, Serbia, Ukraine, Iran, Iraq?

You do realise that China didn't colonise huge parts of Africa, the Caribbean, the Subcontinent? So of course they don't have tons of immigrants from their former colonies.

You also realise that there are more than 50 ethnicities in China, nearly all of them represented in Government in some way. Just because they all kind of look the same....seems you only define it by colour and nothing else. Stupid reasoning.

You do realise Thailand has Chinese Thais and Indian Thais. 2nd, 3rd, 4th generation immigrants, just like our brown and black people that you don't feel should be in England. It's exactly the same, just that they are a similar colour.

Ever taken a look at Singapore? Where did they all come from?

Sorry your logic is weak.

On 4/23/2026 at 1:57 PM, unblocktheplanet said:

There's diet to consider. I'm a vegetarian and would not tolerate a tenant cooking meat and soiling my fridge, stove, pots, dishes & cutlery with dead animals.

I think kosher and halal households would be much the same.

How about couples "living in sin" setting a bad example for the kiddies?

Even in a separate suite, there will be issues of 'household management' meaning respect for traditional practices.

Frankly, I support this right for any belief.

The best case scenario is that living with a couple who are "living in sin" could open somebody's mind to the possibilities that life offers beyond a life led within an incredibly small box of convention, tradition and ritual.

Kudos to all the "sinners" of the world.

4 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

The best case scenario is that living with a couple who are "living in sin" could open somebody's mind to the possibilities that life offers beyond a life led within an incredibly small box of convention, tradition and ritual.

Kudos to all the "sinners" of the world.

Keep telling yourself that brother

51 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Obviously I'm not that bothered about race ....... Except ......

England is a white country, and the government (at all levels) should be run and operated by white christian English heterosexual men. And welfare should only be for white English citizens, and property only owned by white English people.

Just like all other countries outside the west.

How many white people operating the government in China?

How many non Thais operating the government in Thailand?

How about Pakistan, India, Serbia, Ukraine, Iran, Iraq?

Governments and their employees and land ownership should be restricted to native citizens.

Anything else is madness!

As for Islam, as far as I can see it's a religion open to all races, but at odds with our civilization, so should not be permitted in our home countries.

“Governments and their employees and land ownership should be restricted to native citizens”

You’ll have to be a bit more specific, lots of native British citizens are Muslims, Hindu, Sikh, Cristian, Buddhist, Black, White, Brown (insert race, ethnicity, religion) many are mixtures of various combinations of the above.

32 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

I do have to give you credit - most racists try and pretend they're not because deep down they are ashamed of it. You just say it straight.

You do realise that China didn't colonise huge parts of Africa, the Caribbean, the Subcontinent? So of course they don't have tons of immigrants from their former colonies.

You also realise that there are more than 50 ethnicities in China, nearly all of them represented in Government in some way. Just because they all kind of look the same....seems you only define it by colour and nothing else. Stupid reasoning.

You do realise Thailand has Chinese Thais and Indian Thais. 2nd, 3rd, 4th generation immigrants, just like our brown and black people that you don't feel should be in England. It's exactly the same, just that they are a similar colour.

Ever taken a look at Singapore? Where did they all come from?

Sorry your logic is weak.

You missed America,

How did all the immigrants work out for the Native Americans?

How about Australia, how did that diversity help the aboriginals?

What about Rome, the Mongols sure helped their diversity.

Mass immigration destroys civilisations.

Name one country with mass immigration where the native population benefited from all the diversity?

And to be clear, I have no problems with many non whites living in white countries, if they want to run corner shops, the London underground, sell kebabs, why not. But we are now in a situation where Pakistani men can bring their Pakistani women to the UK, but British citizens can't bring their Thai wives to the UK.

And you have no problem with a Muslim Pakistani lady running the home office banning a Latino woman that doesn't like Islam entering the country.

While you are also happy with an Egyptian Muslim that openly hates white folk being welcomed to the UK by the Labour prime minister.

5 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

“Governments and their employees and land ownership should be restricted to native citizens”

You’ll have to be a bit more specific, lots of native British citizens are Muslims, Hindu, Sikh, Cristian, Buddhist, Black, White, Brown (insert race, ethnicity, religion) many are mixtures of various combinations of the above.

You choose to live in Thailand, how many of those groups you specified run Thailand?

The US used to be called the "melting pot"

Now we're the "salad bowl".

Without assimilation, we resort to tribalism, which is where we are now.

19 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

You choose to live in Thailand, how many of those groups you specified run Thailand?

Yes I live in Thailand, where a significant proportion of the people running Thailand are the descendants of recent Chinese immigrants.

2 hours ago, BritManToo said:

How many non Thais operating the government in Thailand?

How many Thais of Chinese descent own and otherwise control the largest Thai banks and several huge multinational businesses?

If they are a born Thai, but go 'home' to China to sweep the graves of their ancestors every year, are they truly Thai?

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

The US used to be called the "melting pot"

Now we're the "salad bowl".

Without assimilation, we resort to tribalism, which is where we are now.

It certainly appears that the MAGA tribe are kicking ass right now as the myth of American exceptionalism slowly dies by its own hand.

If I want to visit the US, I must be a white Christian?

3 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

If they are a born Thai, but go 'home' to China to sweep the graves of their ancestors every year, are they truly Thai?

If they are muslim "refugees" who fled in terror from their home country to live a life on benefits in the UK yet go back "home" to vacation every year, are they really "refugees"?

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

It does not say Christians only.

Would an ad saying close to school, great for students mean students only?

It only means people that do or do not want to be close to a church or school should take note.

"Only Christian brothers who are near and conscientious".

1 hour ago, BritManToo said:

But we are now in a situation where Pakistani men can bring their Pakistani women to the UK, but British citizens can't bring their Thai wives to the UK.

We can all thank the white, non-socialist, English Christian lady formerly running the home office who eventually became Prime Minister for that bit of legal discrimination.

The creeping Islamification of society continues and they have the lefties on their team now for cover. This is exactly what happened in Iran leading up to the clerics taking power and getting rid of the Shah... then they "disappeared" all the lefties that helped them because they are completely incompatible bedfellows with polar-opposite values/beliefs, and ta-da, you get a new caliphate of intolerance. Same MO being served up in Europe now... good luck muppets and the trans and gays will be the first to go off the nearest building.

Oh look, Sunny has made up something that hasn't happened and then got indignant about the reaction that hasn't happened to the thing that hasn't happened. And then put some drivel about surrendering to Muslims based on his personal hate.

Classic.

Taken in the context of everything else going on in the UK, perhaps they're just upset that there's yet another carve-out to tolerate illegal behavior on the part of one demographic, when all of the others are being held to account?

There'd be an uproar if it was Jews or Christians or Whites or Gingers breaking the laws, too. Just from different camps.

They don't call him 2 Tier Kier for nothing...

4 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

If they are muslim "refugees" who fled in terror from their home country to live a life on benefits in the UK yet go back "home" to vacation every year, are they really "refugees"?

How frequently do you make pilgrimage back to your home?

3 minutes ago, Sir Dude said:

The creeping Islamification of society continues and they have the lefties on their team now for cover. This is exactly what happened in Iran leading up to the clerics taking power and getting rid of the Shah... then they "disappeared" all the lefties that helped them because they are completely incompatible bedfellows with polar-opposite values/beliefs, and ta-da, you get a new caliphate of intolerance. Same MO being served up in Europe now... good luck muppets and the trans and gays will be the first to go off the nearest building.

Trope central today, aren't we? How does one manage to become so determinedly and obstinately unable to argue your viewpoint without endlessly regurgitating the same old hyperbole and cliché?

2 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

Trope central today, aren't we? How does one manage to become so determinedly and obstinately unable to argue your viewpoint without endlessly regurgitating the same old hyperbole and cliché?

Don't need to explain myself to you. Look it up and you'll find out that that's what happened. Oh, and stop reading the Guardian too.

4 minutes ago, Sir Dude said:

Don't need to explain myself to you. Look it up and you'll find out that that's what happened. Oh, and stop reading the Guardian too.

Oops! There you go with the well-worn and unimaginative "Guardian reader" trope. It wouldn't be so bad if it wasn't so bloody boring, but I guess you lot just can't help yourselves. Paddling frantically over there in the shallow end must leave very little time for developing something remotely debatable.