-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
Latest posts...
-
354
So Long And Thanks For All The Fish - Ukraine bombs Russian Nuclear Bombers
Going to be a long summer for Vladimir P. -
121
The Boy Who Cried Wolf aka TACO
You can find your answer at the 2:45 mark of this video....ha ha ha ....talk about eating $hit sandwiches, Kamala really does love eating them. t s -
98
Trump Doesn't Understand How Stock Market Works
I'd be the first to say that Trump doesn't understand anything but selfishness. However, I do think the stock market's ups and downs due to his implementing and then withdrawing tariffs are very useful and advantageous to his billionaire buddies. They can sell when the market is high and buy when the market is low, knowing it will go up again soon. All they need is a little warning in advance. -
354
So Long And Thanks For All The Fish - Ukraine bombs Russian Nuclear Bombers
Seems you’ve served up a word salad of logical errors: post hoc, circular reasoning, cherry-picking, suppressed evidence, ad hominem, motive fallacy, false dilemma, appeal to certainty, and contextomy — all tossed together and served like it makes a coherent case. Assertions aren’t arguments. Repeating “very obviously” doesn’t make something true. That’s appeal to certainty — a shortcut for when evidence is missing. Sequence isn’t causation. Johnson visited. Talks ended. That’s post hoc — assuming A caused B just because B came after A. It’s a timestamp, not a chain of cause and effect. Assumptions aren’t proof. You start with “Zelensky must be lying,” then use that assumption to reject anything he says. That’s circular reasoning — the argument eats itself. Selective quoting isn’t analysis. You cherry-pick one line from Arakhamia, but ignore the part where he said Ukraine didn’t trust Russia and saw their offer as vague. That’s not oversight — that’s suppressed evidence. Ignoring Bucha isn’t strategy — it’s evasion. You skip over mass graves, civilian executions, and a collapse in trust like they’re background noise. That’s contextomy — removing what breaks your narrative. Speculating on motives isn’t a rebuttal. Claiming “Zelensky just wants to look good” is textbook ad hominem and motive fallacy — attacking the man because the facts don’t help you. False dilemmas don’t strengthen weak arguments. Saying Ukraine had “no choice” but to fight is a false dichotomy — as if public outrage, national will, and agency all vanished overnight. If you’re going to claim someone “ended peace talks,” you need to show how — not just when. You’re not making a case. You’re defending a belief — stitched together from selective fragments, imagined motives, and logic errors. Until then, you’re not proving a thing — you’re just trying to put lipstick on a pig.- 1
-
-
354
So Long And Thanks For All The Fish - Ukraine bombs Russian Nuclear Bombers
Except for no ships, no island, no harbor, and no pearls. But most important, Putin is already deeply engaged in a horrific war of territorial aggression of his own making. So It more resembles a Hiroshima of drones. End stage finding out. -
354
So Long And Thanks For All The Fish - Ukraine bombs Russian Nuclear Bombers
Except for no ships, no island, no harbor, and no pearls. But most important, Putin is already deeply engaged of a horrific war of territorial aggression of his own making. So It more resembles a Hiroshima of drones. End stage finding out.
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now