.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png.8488ab72b8bb2e508209bfe3211b6e08.png)
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
Announcements
-
Topics
-
-
Latest posts...
-
315
Is Earth round or flat❓
There is loads of evidence the earth isn't' flat look at the pictures from the ISS and learn some math. A school friend of mine has been in the ISS. Google Andre Kuipers. -
23
The Pelicot Rape
I live in Thailand, needed to google what this what about as it isn't news in all countries. Your stupid insult says a lot about you though. -
61
Watch: Graphic Inmate's Fatal Beating by NY Officers Sparks Outrage
A guy to choke him with a cloth. -
315
Is Earth round or flat❓
This is a very cleverly worded interpretation of phenomenons to fit your desired model. -
41
Tax on the poor?: What's the cause of USA inflation?
In other words: The "state " give me everything" and I give nothing back, The richer I am, the less I give back to society. Things are looking good, don't they? -
43
Deterioration of Dining Quality and Experience
I have to laugh! Actually got that very meal today. Had them put it all in take-home bag and made several trips to the salad bar. I just now ate the baked potato! 🙂 -
315
Is Earth round or flat❓
I can assure you there is a political and philosophical component in the so-called “science”. I consider myself to be Socratic, in that I follow evidence and then I decide what makes sense. French sage and physicist Pierre Duhem explained in To Save the Phenomena how modern “science” interprets data to fit into pre-existing models and concepts to explain and “save” the observable phenomena. In other words, observational data is twisted to fit the models. When data showed that the Earth did not move, the science industry strived to “save the phenomena”. This is where Einstein came into play as the theory of relativity actually kept Copernicus’ theory alive, saving centuries of “science”. Ref: Lincoln Barnett, The Universe and Dr. Einstein. The fact is, nobody in history has ever proven that the Earth moves in space (don’t take my word for it, I have added a few relevant quotes to conclude this text). From Aristarchus to Galileo, no actual proof of heliocentrism exists, only theories. And stories are told repeatedly to impose those theories as facts in the collective mind. For example, contrary to popular belief, Galileo was never actually persecuted during the 17th century for his dissemination of the heliocentric model. In fact, serious study shows he was funded by the Church, celebrated and given 2 days of public honor in Rome… His views were philosophical, not scientific, and they were used because they suited a particular endeavour at a given time. Plenty of experiments were made during the 18th and 19th century, such as by François Arago, which disproved the heliocentric model, but they were memory-holed. A few quotes: “… nor has any physical experiment ever proved that the Earth actually is in motion.” Lincoln Barnett (in The Universe and Dr. Einstein, 2nd rev. edition, 1957, p. 73) “Thus, even now, three and a half centuries after Galileo… it is still remarkably difficult to say categorically whether the earth moves, and, if so, in what precise sense.” Julian B. Barbour (in Absolute or Relative Motion, Cambridge University Press, 1989, p. 226) “So, which is real, the Ptolemaic or the Copernican system? Although it is not uncommon for people to say that Copernicus proved Ptolemy wrong, that is not true… One can use either picture as a model of the universe, for our observations of the heavens can be explained by assuming either the earth or the sun to be at rest.” The Grand Design, Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow, 2010, pp. 41-42 -
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
Recommended Posts