Jump to content

NACC expects assets probe result against Yingluck and 4 ex-ministers middle next year


webfact

Recommended Posts

NACC expects assets probe result against Ms Yingluck and 4 ex-ministers middle next year

11-12-2557-14-56-11-wpcf_728x413.jpg

BANGKOK: -- The National Anti-Corruption Commission is expected to conclude its findings on the rice pledging scheme against former prime minister Yingluck Shinawatra and her four ministers early or middle of next year.

Mr Narong Ratah-amarit, a member of the NACC, said Thursday that the commission was yet to summon the five former cabinet ministers to give their statements. However, they were already notified to clarify in writing to the commissioin regarding their assets.

In his capacity as chairman of the assets examination panel, Mr Narong said that the panel had doubt about some items of assets acquired by the ministers while they were put in charge of the rice pledging scheme.

Apart from Ms Yingluck, the other ex-ministers under investigation are former deputy prime minister Niwatthamrong Bunsongphaisan, former commerce minister Boonsong Teriyaphirom, former deputy commerce minister Yanyong Puangrach and former deputy commerce minister Poom Saraphol.

Source: http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/nacc-expects-assets-probe-result-ms-yingluck-4-ex-ministers-middle-next-year

thaipbs_logo.jpg
-- Thai PBS 2014-12-11

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok NACC, let me explain how it works.

Well done for the announcement of the timing to the middle of next year....

Now, to be in line with the new trend those days, you need to make another announcement tomorrow explaining you changed the date to 24th December becos blababla, it is trendy smile.png

Edited by CantSpell
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They want the findings to conclude just several months before the next election...that way its bad press for the Redshirt candidates.

NO election next Year. The PM already announced that the election will be postponed til; 2016. I prefer the "delay & forget if she behaves" option.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt that they will get those billions washed clean via bank transfers anywhere in the world. the tracking of funds is one of the most closely monitired activities of any banking/personal transactions. Cash is their only chance to launder the vast sums involved and the bulk volume of those vast sums would take a truck caravan long enough to stretch around the world. ok maybe a sleight spoof, but not much.

Abscounder thaksin found to his deismay that some of his launder ed monies were being monitored and when moved into a British bank, the crown said thank you, we retain for our use unless you can explain/prove the legality of your retaining ownership of same. He failed the test as he has many others.

The worlds private sector and some governments are quite astute and convincing when it comes to converting/turning some real experts/knowledgable people in this field into policemen. It takes a thief to catch a thief and it would be a miracle for any Thai conman to have any orginal idea/thoughts. those waiting and tracking are the ones with patent right and book rights to all scams..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmhh - I thought they wanted to indict Yingluck during the month of December.

Orders from the top to the NAAC. Postpone the case and if YS promises to stay out of politics she is free to go any way she likes.

Different cases I think.

This one is looking at assets. The other one (due any day now) is dealing with negligence in allowing the rice scheme to continue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about probing the unnatural assets of the generals. Nah, not a chance. Not in their self serving agenda.

Here is a thought for you to ponder.

How about staying on topic and if you really want a thread about your thoughts of the generals unnatural assets, why not open that thread yourself.

Who knows somebody may even read it.

Until then could you please try to stay on topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about probing the unnatural assets of the generals. Nah, not a chance. Not in their self serving agenda.

Here is a thought for you to ponder.

How about staying on topic and if you really want a thread about your thoughts of the generals unnatural assets, why not open that thread yourself.

If you are not the moderator, please shut your trap. You don't dictate what I write.

Who knows somebody may even read it.

Until then could you please try to stay on topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about probing the unnatural assets of the generals. Nah, not a chance. Not in their self serving agenda.

Here is a thought for you to ponder.

How about staying on topic and if you really want a thread about your thoughts of the generals unnatural assets, why not open that thread yourself.

If you are not the moderator, please shut your trap. You don't dictate what I write.

Who knows somebody may even read it.

Until then could you please try to stay on topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about "probing" the funds used to purchase an island off the coast of Montenegro? Sweet innocent sister with multiple diplomatically-exempt suitcases/stacks of 1000 baht banknotes now exported and washed into numerous black-box accounts? Is that alleged thievery too controversial for discussion?

Edited by Captain_Bob
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...
""