Jump to content

Woman loses historic case against Phya Thai 1 hospital due to legal technicality


webfact

Recommended Posts

Woman loses historic case against Phya Thai 1 hospital due to legal technicality

BANGKOK: -- The Supreme Court has rejected an appeal of a disabled man seeking a 57 million baht in compensation from Phya Thai 1 hospital and two doctors for negligence leading to his disability.


The Supreme Court’s ruling had ended one of the longest legal disputes in history which started in 1991 when the plaintiff, 23-year old Mr Pitakwong Lorsermwattana, was still a minor and the case was lodged on his behalf by his mother, Mrs Priyanant Lorsermwattana.

The court ruled that the statue of limitations of the case had already expired because the plaintiff failed to appeal within one month after the Appeals Court refused to accept the case which was a duplication of a case for which the Supreme Court has already acquitted the three defendants namely Phya Thai 1 hospital, Dr Yanyong Mangklavirat and Dr Santi Sutthipinthawong.

Mrs Priyanant faulted her lawyer arranged for her by the Justice Ministry for the failure to appeal the Civil Court’s ruling within one month causing the statute of limitations of the case to expire.

As determined as ever, she said that she would explore what else she could do to seek justice for her disabled son.

She said that she was sorry that her case failed to set a precedent due to legal technicaliaty.

Source: http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/woman-loses-historic-case-phya-thai-1-hospital-due-legal-technicality

thaipbs_logo.jpg
-- Thai PBS 2014-12-11

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The court ruled that the statue of limitations of the case had already expired because the plaintiff failed to appeal within one month after the Appeals Court refused to accept the case which was a duplication of a case for which the Supreme Court has already acquitted the three defendants namely Phya Thai 1 hospital, Dr Yanyong Mangklavirat and Dr Santi Sutthipinthawong.

Mrs Priyanant faulted her lawyer arranged for her by the Justice Ministry for the failure to appeal the Civil Court’s ruling within one month causing the statute of limitations of the case to expire.

A bit confused here, if the supreme court had acquitted the defendants in the same case as the civil, why would appealing a civil courts ruling do FA?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Criminal law and civil law are practiced here as in the States. The hospital et al. could win the criminal case but lose the civil case. Remember OJ Simpson back in the States? He was found not guilty in criminal court, but lost in civil court which pretty much cost him everything.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I searched on the son's name to find out what the case what about, and why it would be a (an?) historic ruling, but I only found a few new stories talking about the case being dropped on technicality. There article in the BP mentions a tiny bit about it, but that's all (I would post the link, but I understand we can't do that for the BP?).

If anyone has more information, please post the link. I am curious and would like to read more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The Supreme Court’s ruling had ended one of the longest legal disputes in history which started in 1991 when the plaintiff, 23-year old Mr Pitakwong Lorsermwattana, was still a minor and the case was lodged on his behalf by his mother, Mrs Priyanant Lorsermwattana."

If that's his right age '23-year old Mr Pitakwong Lorsermwattana' wasn't born in 1991!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The Supreme Court’s ruling had ended one of the longest legal disputes in history which started in 1991 when the plaintiff, 23-year old Mr Pitakwong Lorsermwattana, was still a minor and the case was lodged on his behalf by his mother, Mrs Priyanant Lorsermwattana."

If that's his right age '23-year old Mr Pitakwong Lorsermwattana' wasn't born in 1991!

Try your maths again BSJ.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remedy: Sue the Lawyers They did not do their Jobs

Have you ever tried suing the police, a lawyer or a member of the medical profession in any country?

These people the world over are virtually a law among themselves, they are even self regulated by their own industry. Rarely are people successful when suing police, doctors and lawyers for negligence

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remedy: Sue the Lawyers They did not do their Jobs

Have you ever tried suing the police, a lawyer or a member of the medical profession in any country?

These people the world over are virtually a law among themselves, they are even self regulated by their own industry. Rarely are people successful when suing police, doctors and lawyers for negligence

Not so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A potentially historic case, but apparently not one worth ThaiPBS actually reporting what gave rise to the case itself, apart from just talking about the legal technicalities.

No need to mention even in the slightest what the hospital and two doctors allegedly did or didn't do that led to the litigation. whistling.gif

Math is not my strong suit.... but if the case began in 1991 as the article says and the alleged victim is 23 years old now, that would seem to suggest whatever happened happened at birth or soon thereafter.

Edited by TallGuyJohninBKK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...