FBI publishes notes on Clinton's use of private email

[Andaman Al]

Ivan, I guess you are trying to get your post count up! Please just you one post instead of 7 with barely a line in some of them.

[MajarTheLion]

4 hours ago, boomerangutang said:

 

And Republicans are good with Nat'l Security?  Who was it that requested the Russkies hack a US private citizen's email account?  His name starts with a T.

 

Who was it that briefed top UN officials in a televised presentation, assuring everyone that Iraq had WMD and special trucks outfitted for that purpose?  Colin Powell.  It destroyed his career, but didn't scathe the men behind the gross mis-statements:  GW Bush, Cheney, and a whole slew of Republican screw-ups.  

 

Who was it who secretly traded with Iranians despite an embargo, in order to fund a clandestine war which Congress expressly denied funding.  Oh yea, that was Reagan, Regan and again Cheney.

 

There's only one political party in the US which is endangering Americans:  Republicans.

 

There are actually 4 candidates for US prez.  I'm voting for Jill Stein.   Note:  Trump is scoring fewer voters in many demographics, .....LOWER THAN THE OTHER 3 CANDIDATES !   ....for young voters, blacks, Latinos, LGTB, and other categories. 

 

Wow, someone asked the Russians to hack someone's email? I gotta hear about this. Where's the quote?

[Credo]

7 hours ago, tifino said:

 

All this hoo-haa 'about' the emails!!!

 

 

All we want - is to 'see' the emails

It ain't going to happen.   Even Clinton herself said they should all be released so that they can be read by everyone rather than cherry-picked for bits and pieces to be used against her.

 

The only thing that has been read, studied, investigated and interpreted more than Hillary is the Bible and the Koran.   

[Ulysses G.]

8 minutes ago, Credo said:

. Even Clinton herself said they should all be released so that they can be read by everyone rather than cherry-picked for bits and pieces to be used against her.

 

She also said that they were all recipes and yoga appointments with no classified information. The woman is a compulsive liar.

[slipperylobster]

9 hours ago, Pinot said:

 

100 posts of trumpeteers in full delusional denial. Imagine getting up every morning and being in full-on HRC hate mode till your head hits the pillow at night?  Welcome to the world of the wingnuts. 

 

I am quite sure you are up all night, reading and counting these post, then.

 

None of the trumpeteers are in full delusional denial.  We are just waiting for Hillary to admit her guilt....apologize....and go on to win the election.  (if that is still possible).

 

No hate involved.

 

[boomerangutang]

2 hours ago, Ulysses G. said:

 

She also said that they were all recipes and yoga appointments with no classified information. The woman is a compulsive liar.

 

Maybe I should feel sorry for Trump supporters.  They try so very hard to find gunk on HRC that will stick, and they continually come up with nothing of substance.  Why don't you get a hobby where you can win?   Maybe solitaire or shooing dogs off your lawn.

[Ulysses G.]

5 minutes ago, boomerangutang said:

 

Maybe I should feel sorry for Trump supporters. 

 

You should feel sorry for Hillary fans that are so deluded that they excuse someone who was caught red handed violating national security and lying to the American people about it.

[Boon Mee]

4 minutes ago, boomerangutang said:

 

Maybe I should feel sorry for Trump supporters.  They try so very hard to find gunk on HRC that will stick, and they continually come up with nothing of substance.  Why don't you get a hobby where you can win?   Maybe solitaire or shooing dogs off your lawn.

Perhaps you Clinton supplicants can define "Ethics" for us por favor?  

[slipperylobster]

Time for some humor....

I hope I don't get banned....it is just a funny video.

Has relevance to the subject matter...but should loosen up the stress here.  It is not a troll....just a funny skit.

 

 

 

 

[Ulysses G.]

3 minutes ago, slipperylobster said:

Time for some humor....

I hope I don't get banned....it is just a funny video.

Has relevance to the subject matter...but should loosen up the stress here.  It is not a troll....just a funny skit.

 

 

 

 

 

That was good. What a catchy tune. "It doesn't matter if they prove that they are right. Keep lying and delete it. Delete it!"

[MaxYakov]

14 hours ago, ivan96822 said:

I wish she would be indicted, but her powers supercede those of the FBI.

 

Errrr ... I believe you meant the US DOJ (or maybe the entire World?).

[PTC]

14 hours ago, ivan96822 said:

And here is another point. If you do not follow procedures in life, you get fired.

 

If you work in an office and you are not allowed to send or receive emails from a certain email account, you get fired.

 

Clinton was using her personal account. Unprofessional, reckless, and careless.

 

But she is above the law.

 

Thank you for the viewpoint from the under-class. Clearly you have never held any significant authority or shouldered any significant responsibilities and have been willing to follow orders from your superiors without thought.

 

For those who have held authority and for long time operatives like Hillary Clinton, there is a need to develop defenses from attacks by lesser people. She has had decades of experience. This current beat up of the email thing is a direct result of new, vicious, dirty-fighters taking control of Trump's campaign. The FBI has investigated. The FBI has made a decision. That decision was endorsed by the DOJ. There was not criminality. There are no charges. The whole 'lock her up' refrain is a disgraceful indictment of those Americans who allow their partisanship to blind their consideration for the law.

 

I am sure your characterization of Hillary Clinton will get the attention it deserves. And while the Declaration of Independence says that all people are created equal, they don't stay equal and nobodies don't get to tell somebodies what to do.

[arjunadawn]

9 hours ago, slipperylobster said:

 

I am quite sure you are up all night, reading and counting these post, then.

 

None of the trumpeteers are in full delusional denial.  We are just waiting for Hillary to admit her guilt....apologize....and go on to win the election.  (if that is still possible).

 

No hate involved.

 

The former quote is one of the most darkly funny things I have read in a while; its also typical of the Rules for Radicals playbook- define your opponent by your own weakest characteristic, repeat, ridicule, repeat...

 

The left is always emotional, always personal, and they are always varying degrees of violent- from the personal to crowd violence. Nearly all the modern horrors of state violence against its own have been by such ideologues.

[Jingthing]

As if trump cult followers haven't been emotionally manipulated. That's what con men do and trump is a world class con man. Qualified for president though? Not a chance. It's not complicated. trump could be running against a Chinese dumpling and the dumpling would look really good.

[ClutchClark]

Just now, Jingthing said:

As if trump cult followers haven't been emotionally manipulated. That's what con men do and trump is a world class con man. Qualified for president though? Not a chance. It's not complicated. trump could be running against a Chinese dumpling and the dumpling would look really good.

 

Is there a time that Chinese dumplings do not look good? 

[slipperylobster]

11 hours ago, Credo said:

It ain't going to happen.   Even Clinton herself said they should all be released so that they can be read by everyone rather than cherry-picked for bits and pieces to be used against her.

 

The only thing that has been read, studied, investigated and interpreted more than Hillary is the Bible and the Koran.   

 

omg...

 

Clinton wants "all" her emails released rather than have them "cherry picked"

 

Problem is....she already has thrown out the rotten cherries.

 

[slipperylobster]

On 9/3/2016 at 1:06 PM, bassman said:

 

Emster, ever had a US security clearance?  The (C) does not mean classified it means confidential.  The top and bottom of the original document those paragraphs came from would also be stamped with bold letters spelling out Confidential, which are missing from the original.  Also the remaining paragraphs should have a (U) unclassified or (FOUO) for official use only. 

 

Those documents are cut and pasted from an original that was scrubbed of the other markings, these (C) paragraphs were mistakes made during the adulteration not being complete.

 

Hillary is a crook!

 

bassman is correct.   A paragraph may also have a ts (top secret) or an s (secret).    If even one paragraph out of ten was ts....then the classification at the top and bottom would read Top Secret. Please don't belittle us by claiming she was not familiar with these paragraph markings.

 

A layman may be forgiven...however, Hillary was running the Department of State.  She would be intensely involved in all matters relating to her office....and should know what is classified and what is not.   

 

She just wanted convenience...over National Security.   An Ego Trip.  Each time one of these documents was handled by her "home brewed server"...it put our country at risk.

 

 

[slipperylobster]

I should point out, as an example.., my own personal experiences with not following the rules.

 

At the age of 17, I was given a TS based on an Extended Background Investigation.  One day, I left the communication center with an almost empty roll of yellow teletype paper. There was nothing on it at all.  It was discarded and replaced with a new roll of blank paper.  I took the nearly used up roll back to my room and used it to type letters to my mom.

 

OSI came in and ransacked my room.  I almost went to jail for taking the blank yellow roll of paper out of the secured building.   They used that as evidence and I almost lost my clearance.

 

Double standard?   They said I should of known better.   Hillary violated almost every single procedure put in place to safeguard our Nations secrets.   She failed miserably, lied, and destroyed evidence that belongs to the United States.

 

 

[Jingthing]

She knew. She prefers to look dim in this case rather than culpable. Think -- dumping.

[Boon Mee]

Post #132 in this here thread doesn't seem to have gleaned any attention.

I wonder why? 

[PTC]

51 minutes ago, Boon Mee said:

Post #132 in this here thread doesn't seem to have gleaned any attention.

I wonder why? 

 

You imply that Democrats will have a different definition of Ethics than Republicans.

 

As usual, your baiting is self serving. Perhaps people are just bored with this factually-challenged schtick.

 

Clinton and the Democrats play by the same rules as the Republicans. All of these people are either trained in law or have legions of lawyers to cover their backsides from the endless nit-picking of US Administrative Law. It's only congenitally stupid who actually become CONVICTED FELONS. Like Tom DeLay. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/24/AR2010112400545.html

 

Citizens United has created the framework for campaign finance that currently operates. Don't blame Clinton if she is more successful at playing this game than others. Ethics has nothing to do with it. It is a paltry, subjective and loaded diversion intended to bait people into taking you seriously. Clinton's record is for her to defend but it certainly is not defined by those who attack her.

 

Clintons record as a Senator http://correctrecord.org/the-points/attack-right-wing-ignores-hillary-clintons-achievements-as-senator/

Clintons record as Sec State http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2013/12/was-hillary-clinton-a-good-secretary-of-state-john-kerry-2016-100766

 

Nothing to do with Ethics. Politics is the Art of the Possible. She is an experienced politician and will make an excellent President.

[Jingthing]

1 hour ago, Jingthing said:

She knew. She prefers to look dim in this case rather than culpable. Think -- dumping.

OK, I meant dumpling, but interesting Freudian-wise anyway.

[ivan96822]

2 hours ago, PTC said:

 

Thank you for the viewpoint from the under-class. Clearly you have never held any significant authority or shouldered any significant responsibilities and have been willing to follow orders from your superiors without thought.

 

For those who have held authority and for long time operatives like Hillary Clinton, there is a need to develop defenses from attacks by lesser people. She has had decades of experience. This current beat up of the email thing is a direct result of new, vicious, dirty-fighters taking control of Trump's campaign. The FBI has investigated. The FBI has made a decision. That decision was endorsed by the DOJ. There was not criminality. There are no charges. The whole 'lock her up' refrain is a disgraceful indictment of those Americans who allow their partisanship to blind their consideration for the law.

 

I am sure your characterization of Hillary Clinton will get the attention it deserves. And while the Declaration of Independence says that all people are created equal, they don't stay equal and nobodies don't get to tell somebodies what to do.

Oh, wow. You are so clever!

 

I will not bother describing my credentials. To be short, I have been professionally employed at the state level and have a Master's degree to boot.

 

So simply put, you suck, Clinton sucks, and you are my guest in supporting that scumbag. Sounds you two are two peas in a pod!

[MaxYakov]

2 hours ago, Boon Mee said:

Post #132 in this here thread doesn't seem to have gleaned any attention.

I wonder why? 

 

I believe John Huston gave us clue to that in TTOTSM years ago:

 

Ethics. We ain't go no ethics. We don't need no ethics. I don't have to show you no stinkin' ethics!

[Credo]

3 hours ago, slipperylobster said:

I should point out, as an example.., my own personal experiences with not following the rules.

 

At the age of 17, I was given a TS based on an Extended Background Investigation.  One day, I left the communication center with an almost empty roll of yellow teletype paper. There was nothing on it at all.  It was discarded and replaced with a new roll of blank paper.  I took the nearly used up roll back to my room and used it to type letters to my mom.

 

OSI came in and ransacked my room.  I almost went to jail for taking the blank yellow roll of paper out of the secured building.   They used that as evidence and I almost lost my clearance.

 

Double standard?   They said I should of known better.   Hillary violated almost every single procedure put in place to safeguard our Nations secrets.   She failed miserably, lied, and destroyed evidence that belongs to the United States.

 

 

So you broke the rules and you 'almost lost your clearance.'   She broke the rules, and she almost got into trouble.   I don't see the relevance of your situation.   By the way, I also had a high level security clearance.    I got mine well after the age of 17 though.   

[PTC]

1 hour ago, ivan96822 said:

Oh, wow. You are so clever!

 

I will not bother describing my credentials. To be short, I have been professionally employed at the state level and have a Master's degree to boot.

 

So simply put, you suck, Clinton sucks, and you are my guest in supporting that scumbag. Sounds you two are two peas in a pod!

 

Masterful retort. Such eloquence.

 

I can see that the Nation's secrets were safe in your hands at the Podunk Branch of the Mississippi DMV.

 

Clinton's emails are an arcane administrative matter, not criminal. The FBI has investigated and ruled on this. A simple matter really. Don't need an advanced degree to work it out.

[JHolmesJr]

On September 4, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Boon Mee said:

You know it's getting bad for Crooked Hillary when even CNN (the Clinton News Network) doesn't pull the mike on the following exchange:

 

Liberal CNN Guest Skewers Clinton: Pretending to Be 'Village Idiot' on Email

 

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/brad-wilmouth/2016/09/03/liberal-cnn-guest-skewers-clinton-pretending-be-village-idiot#.V8uh_S3qFE4.twitter

 

Crooked hillary and slimy jeffrey toobin got pwned. 

 

However someone should investigate this law prodessor....putin could have put him up to it. 

 

 

[slipperylobster]

1 hour ago, Credo said:

So you broke the rules and you 'almost lost your clearance.'   She broke the rules, and she almost got into trouble.   I don't see the relevance of your situation.   By the way, I also had a high level security clearance.    I got mine well after the age of 17 though.   

 

You missed the point?

Hillary was Secretary of State.   Many people have been punished for breaking security rules.  Hillary has been grossly negligent.  Destroying government emails....lying to investigators and the public, and tampering with evidence (destroying her phones). 

 

Perhaps now you get it.   There is a double standard. Hillary gets away with everything.  However..I think you already know what I am talking about...and you are just deflecting...as democrats always do.

 

[JetsetBkk]

On Saturday, September 03, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Hayduke said:

Clinton said she was unfamiliar with the meaning of the letter "c'' next to a paragraph and speculated that it might be "referencing paragraphs marked in alphabetical order." That particular email had been marked as classified at the confidential level

 

You can't fix stupid, but you can vote for it to be POTUS.

 

[JetsetBkk]

On Sunday, September 04, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Boon Mee said:

You know it's getting bad for Crooked Hillary when even CNN (the Clinton News Network) doesn't pull the mike on the following exchange:

 

Liberal CNN Guest Skewers Clinton: Pretending to Be 'Village Idiot' on Email

 

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/brad-wilmouth/2016/09/03/liberal-cnn-guest-skewers-clinton-pretending-be-village-idiot#.V8uh_S3qFE4.twitter

 

CNN: The Clinton News Network, rap style: