Jump to content

Visa Agents - Why Should We Be Castigated For Using Them


Recommended Posts

Posted
20 minutes ago, NancyL said:

I have worked out the "Financial Flow-chart" and shared it with what I thought were appropriate people both foreign and Thai.  It really didn't take many sessions of sitting around Imm all day watching the action and talking with a few people.  The retaliation from CM Imm. told me that I was probably accurate in my assessments.  A portion of the fees you pay to all visa agents go to CM Imm to "grease the wheel".  As I mentioned in the Imm. Prom. thread, now hospitals are denied free access for medical extensions and are told to use G4T.  

 

Even small time operators, like a Thai lady who owns a restaurant and helps maybe 2 or 3 expats a month do their retirement extensions has been "called in" and had the "system" explained to her by CM Imm, what portion of her fee is suppose to go to them and if that portion is higher than what she currently charges,  she is advised to raise the fee to her customers.

 

The one "enhancement" they've done recently, is to permit visa agents, at least the bigger ones, to obtain "appointments" rather than having to send out staff to sit in the queue at 5 am.

 

You indicated one of your reasons for leaving was that the CC had thrown in the towel by saying they cannot interfere with custom.  What did they say about the fact that it is illegal for a person from the US, Australia and the UK among others to make facilitation payments....and they can be prosecuted in their home countries if they do.  An example at a high level is Rolls Royce and its facilitation payments but the same laws and penalties apply.

  • Replies 172
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

The real question is: Do you really care what anybody thinks?

 

The answer for me is unequivocally "No", I don't.  Last year after they scrapped the useful on-line queue system I chose to hire an agent.  No waiting in the Zero-Dark-Thirty, hit-or-miss-to-get-a-number, queue line.  Agent called us to give us a time to show up at immigration.  Once there we waited about 15 minutes to be seen.  The agent obviously knew the IOs.  The process was the smooth.  In and out in about an hour for a extension based on marriage.  If the queue system had not been ditched, we would have done it ourselves like we always have done.

This year is still up in the air.  I still don't know if I'll need to process my extension in Chiang Mai.  If I do, and considering that the Airport location is now closed and everyone is being funneled through the Promenade immigration office, I will absolutely be using the same Visa agent again. 

 

For those who wish to stand in line and go it on there own - dandy.  That's their choice.

For those who wish to use and agent - dandy.  That's their choice.

 

It really takes a busy-body to get their kickers in a twist about how someone else chooses to run their life.  But that's life in the expat community of Chiang Mai.  Busy-bodies abound.

Edited by connda
Posted
32 minutes ago, connda said:

For those who wish to stand in line and go it on there own - dandy.  That's their choice.

For those who wish to use and agent - dandy.  That's their choice.

 

That's some profound shit.  

 

Thanks for your lengthy post to explain that you aren't interested.

Posted

Lets fast forward to 2 years time

When hopefully the new immigration building is completed and everything working

Will there be a Visa Agent in the building?

Will a Visa Agent be in the local Area?

We will all have to wait

Posted

A post containing a link to Phuketwan has been removed:

 

26) The Bangkok Post and Phuketwan do not allow quotes from their news articles or other material to appear on Thaivisa.com. Neither do they allow links to their publications. Posts from members containing quotes from or links to Bangkok Post or Phuketwan publications will be deleted from the forum.

Posted

Not sure if I'm allowed to post the same thing to two different threads, but I think it's worth sharing:

 

It's a Quality management issue to design process' & procedures which maximize efficiency for both the organization & the customer. Providing quality will increase customer base & vice versa.  Customers will evaluate the cost vs service quality and decide where to conduct business.  There will of course be decisions in both directions.  Chiang Mai does not have to reinvent the wheel in order to provide it's customers with a better quality experience.  Jomtien Immigration (for the approx 10 years I observed them) provides an excellent benchmark for CM Immigration to learn from and emulate, but it seems that CM Immigration does not have sufficient incentive to do so.

 

My Jomtien experience with 90 day reports has never required greater than a 30 minute wait, usually far less.

My Jomtien experience with renewing retirement visa is like an assembly line, consistently as follows:

I wait approx 2 minutes to be served by one of the young female volunteer college interns to look over my paperwork, & she hands me a number.  I wait 5-10 minutes to see an official employee who verifies that my paperwork is indeed in order.  He hands me a number and tells me to return at a later time to pick up my completed passport (either later the same day or the following day depending on what time I was there).  So far this has never taken me more than 30 minutes, one time I timed it at 7 minutes total.  

When I return at the later time, with my number to pick up the completed passport, the efficiency is also evident.  Again a very short wait to see the official employee, but an extra minute or two are required because they may take a picture of you when you pick up the passport.  Again, this has never taken me more than 30 minutes, one time I timed it at 10 minutes total.

 

Edit: PS, there are a hell of a lot of customers flowing in & out quickly..  So there can be no valid argument that Jomtien has fewer customers or I just had a lucky day.  Also, there were only one or a few employees working at the different desks providing the different services Immigration offices provide.  It was the quality process' / procedures they  have designed making it a very tolerable experience.

Posted (edited)

When I worked at an International school near Chonburi, the school hired one of the Thai staff members to basically be the school's “agent.” This job assignment rotated every couple of years. Some of the Thai staff liked the assignment. Others hated it. It involved filling out hundreds of pages of forms, dotting every eye, keeping track of money, etc. It also involved smoozing with immigration officials in Sri Racha. For many years immigration officers came to the school. Visa extensions, re-entry permits, work permit updates all seemed seamless. You just approached a table, signed a couple of times, and viola. The immigration department charged the school for this. They had to bring in off-duty agents to fill their shoes in the office while they went to our school. I knew 2 of the staff members who worked with immigration and both made it clear there was a tip on top of covering the extra staff's pay. When the fee was raised by a large percent, the school gave up, forcing teachers to make the trip to immigration.

 

I've often wondered what will happen when visa agent suddenly double their prices.

 

On another note, it seems US immigration is forcing more and more foreigners entering the US to give up passwords to social media and smartphones. Yesterday, a friend's relative was denied US entry and forced to fly back to NZ after an agent spotted photos purported to show him working in the US without a green card. The law seems pretty clear that US citizens can reject the request, but foreigners not.

Edited by luther
Posted

I had Breakfast with my 97 year old friend resident of CM since 1960.

Back then Immigration was  at Mae Teng 40 kms north of CM.

Same old Poo then. Told one tale by one official and next visit all change.

Thai Government Officials are doing a job, some are typical Thai and helpful, others get abused by their customers, so the next customer gets the run around.

They still get same miserable pay at end of month.

Strange Thailand does score high on this list of Corrupt counties. 85 in fact.

80
Mongolia
39
38
36
80
Morocco
39
37
37
85
Burkina Faso
38
38
38
85
India
38
36
36
85
Jamaica
38
38
38
85
Peru
38
38
38
85
Philippines
38
36
34
85
Sri Lanka
38
37
40
85
Thailand
38
35
37
85
Trinidad and Tobago
38
38
39
85
Zambia
38
38
37
94
Armenia
37
36
34
94
Colombia
37
36
36
94
Egypt
37
32
32
94
Gabon
37
34
35
94
Liberia
37
38
41
94
Panama
37
35
38
100
Algeria
36
36
34
100
China
36
40
39
100
Suriname
36
36
37
103
Bolivia
35
34
34
103
Mexico
35
34
34
103
Moldova
35
35
36
103
Niger
35
34
33
107
Argentina
34
34
35
107
Djibouti
34
36
36
107
Indonesia
34
32
32
110
Albania
33
31
33
110
Ecuador
33
35
32
110
Ethiopia
33
33
33
110
Kosovo
33
33
34
110
Malawi
33
37
37
115
Côte d´Ivoire
32
27
29
115
Dominican Republic
32
29
32
115
Guatemala
32
29
33
115
Mali
32
28
34
119
Belarus
31
29
31
119
Mozambique
31
30
31
119
Sierra Leone
31
30
31
119
Tanzania
31
33
35
119
Vietnam
31
31
31
124
Guyana
30
27
28
124
Mauritania
30
30
31
126
Azerbaijan
29
28
27
126
Gambia
29
28
34
126
Honduras
29
26
28
126
Kazakhstan
29
26
28
126
Nepal
29
31
27
126
Pakistan
29
28
27
126
Togo
29
29
30
133
Madagascar
28
28
32
133
Nicaragua
28
28
29
133
Timor-Leste
28
30
33
136
Cameroon
27
25
26
136
Iran
27
25
28
136
Kyrgyzstan
27
24
24
136
Lebanon
27
28
30
136
Nigeria
27
25
27
136
Russia
27
28
28
142
Comoros
26
28
28
142
Uganda
26
26
29
142
Ukraine
26
25
26
145
Bangladesh
25
27
26
145
Guinea
25
24
24
145
Kenya
25
27
27
145
Laos
25
26
21
145
Papua New Guinea
25
25
25
150
Central African Republic
24
25
26
150
Paraguay
24
24
25
152
Congo, Republic of
23
22
26
152
Tajikistan
23
22
22
154
Chad
22
19
19
154
Congo, Democratic Republic of
22
22
21
156
Cambodia
21
20
22
156
Myanmar
21
21
15
156
Zimbabwe
21
21
20
159
Burundi
20
21
19
159
Syria
20
17
26
161
Angola
19
23
22
161
Guinea-Bissau
19
19
25
161
Haiti
19
19
19
161
Venezuela
19
20
19
161
Yemen
19
18
23
166
Eritrea
18
20
25
166
Libya
18
15
21
166
Uzbekistan
18
17
17
169
Turkmenistan
17
17
17
170
Iraq
16
16
18
171
South Sudan
15
14
#N/A
172
Afghanistan
12
8
8
173
Sudan
11
11
13
174
Korea (North)
8
8
8
174
Somalia
8
8
8

To learn more about the results and view the confidence intervals, you can read our FAQ and download an XLS of the results.


 


 

CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX 2014 BROCHURE

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
1
Denmark
92
91
90
2
New Zealand
91
91
90
3
Finland
89
89
90
4
Sweden
87
89
88
5
Norway
86
86
85
5
Switzerland
86
85
86
7
Singapore
84
86
87
8
Netherlands
83
83
84
9
Luxembourg
82
80
80
10
Canada
81
81
84
11
Australia
80
81
85
12
Germany
79
78
79
12
Iceland
79
78
82
14
United Kingdom
78
76
74
15
Belgium
76
75
75
15
Japan
76
74
74
17
Barbados
74
75
76
17
Hong Kong

 

80
Mongolia
39
38
36
80
Morocco
39
37
37
85
Burkina Faso
38
38
38
85
India
38
36
36
85
Jamaica
38
38
38
85
Peru
38
38
38
85
Philippines
38
36
34
85
Sri Lanka
38
37
40
85
Thailand
38
35
37
85
Trinidad and Tobago
38
38
39
85
Zambia
38
38
37
94
Armenia
37
36
34
94
Colombia
37
36
36
94
Egypt
37
32
32
94
Gabon
37
34
35
94
Liberia
37
38
41
94
Panama
37
35
38
100
Algeria
36
36
34
100
China
36
40
39
100
Suriname
36
36
37
103
Bolivia
35
34
34
103
Mexico
35
34
34
103
Moldova
35
35
36
103
Niger
35
34
33
107
Argentina
34
34
35
107
Djibouti
34
36
36
107
Indonesia
34
32
32
110
Albania
33
31
33
110
Ecuador
33
35
32
110
Ethiopia
33
33
33
110
Kosovo
33
33
34
110
Malawi
33
37
37
115
Côte d´Ivoire
32
27
29
115
Dominican Republic
32
29
32
115
Guatemala
32
29
33
115
Mali
32
28
34
119
Belarus
31
29
31
119
Mozambique
31
30
31
119
Sierra Leone
31
30
31
119
Tanzania
31
33
35
119
Vietnam
31
31
31
124
Guyana
30
27
28
124
Mauritania
30
30
31
126
Azerbaijan
29
28
27
126
Gambia
29
28
34
126
Honduras
29
26
28
126
Kazakhstan
29
26
28
126
Nepal
29
31
27
126
Pakistan
29
28
27
126
Togo
29
29
30
133
Madagascar
28
28
32
133
Nicaragua
28
28
29
133
Timor-Leste
28
30
33
136
Cameroon
27
25
26
136
Iran
27
25
28
136
Kyrgyzstan
27
24
24
136
Lebanon
27
28
30
136
Nigeria
27
25
27
136
Russia
27
28
28
142
Comoros
26
28
28
142
Uganda
26
26
29
142
Ukraine
26
25
26
145
Bangladesh
25
27
26
145
Guinea
25
24
24
145
Kenya
25
27
27
145
Laos
25
26
21
145
Papua New Guinea
25
25
25
150
Central African Republic
24
25
26
150
Paraguay
24
24
25
152
Congo, Republic of
23
22
26
152
Tajikistan
23
22
22
154
Chad
22
19
19
154
Congo, Democratic Republic of
22
22
21
156
Cambodia
21
20
22
156
Myanmar
21
21
15
156
Zimbabwe
21
21
20
159
Burundi
20
21
19
159
Syria
20
17
26
161
Angola
19
23
22
161
Guinea-Bissau
19
19
25
161
Haiti
19
19
19
161
Venezuela
19
20
19
161
Yemen
19
18
23
166
Eritrea
18
20
25
166
Libya
18
15
21
166
Uzbekistan
18
17
17
169
Turkmenistan
17
17
17
170
Iraq
16
16
18
171
South Sudan
15
14
#N/A
172
Afghanistan
12
8
8
173
Sudan
11
11
13
174
Korea (North)
8
8
8
174
Somalia
8
8
8

To learn more about the results and view the confidence intervals, you can read our FAQ and download an XLS of the results.


 


 

CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX 2014 BROCHURE

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Lizard2010 said:

Lets fast forward to 2 years time

When hopefully the new immigration building is completed and everything working

Will there be a Visa Agent in the building?

Will a Visa Agent be in the local Area?

We will all have to wait

A dedicated shop front no doubt, perhaps a bakery offering additional services.

 

 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, amexpat said:

That's some profound shit.  

 

Thanks for your lengthy post to explain that you aren't interested.

"It really takes a busy-body to get their kickers in a twist about how someone else chooses to run their life."

If the shoe fits.....    And thanks for providing an example.  :thumbsup:

Edited by connda
Posted (edited)

I see PI is rated the same as Thailand.  ....

 

Believe itor not the Bureau of Immigration in PI started using the "Good Guys in Bad Guys out" in early 2014. :)

 

My father remarked that anywhere the Spanish colonised they installed the Three C's.....Catholocism, Corruption, and the Clap.

 

in 2007-9 I was doing contract work at NAIA and Centennial Airports in Manila.  There was a huge party when the Bureau of Immigration was ranked 86 for corruption in a listing of all goverment departments.  Later I found out that  the previous year tthey were 87.  That the lower the rank the cleaner the agency, and that only 88 agencies were ranked ....

 

It was so bad there a while that in the departure hall before you clear Immigration there were mobile phone blockers installed so that "agents" could not contact officers and know which queue to go to for a good run.  Immigration officers would collect people at the drop off, carry their bags, check them in without the airline even seeing the passenger, and then walk them through immigration direct to the relevant departure lounge.

 

By comparison, like a lot of things Thailand Immigration is just a piss poor effort all round.  At least in the PI there was sometimes a facade of decency and contrition.  Here, with many agencies there is not even a half arsed effort.  Look athe amount of videos that are shown of BIB soliicting and taking bribes and still going strong as salary supplement, let alone the man at the top with his "consultancy" services for the beer conglomerates..  

 

End of rant..start of lunch...it is still all good in CM.

Edited by mamborobert
Posted
3 minutes ago, mamborobert said:

I see PI is rated the same as Thailand.  ....

 

Believe itor not the Bureau of Immigration in PI started using the "Good Guys in Bad Guys out" in early 2014. :)

 

My father remarked that anywhere the Spanish colonised they installed the Three C's.....Catholocism, Corruption, and the Clap.

 

in 2007-9 I was doing contract work at NAIA and Centennial Airports in Manila.  There was a huge party when the Bureau of Immigration was ranked 86 for corruption in a listing of all goverment departments.  Later I found out that  the previous year tthey were 87.  That the lower the rank the cleaner the agency, and that only 88 agencies were ranked ....

 

It was so bad there a while that in the departure hall before you clear Immigration there were mobile phone blockers installed so that "agents" could not contact officers and know which queue to go to for a good run.  Immigration officers would collect people at the drop off, carry their bags, check them in without the airline even seeing the passenger, and then walk them through immigration direct to the relevant departure lounge.

 

By comparison, like a lot of things Thailand Immigration is just a piss poor effort all round.  At least in the PI there was sometimes a facade of decency and contrition.  Here, with many agencies there is not even a half arsed effort.  Look athe amount of videos that are shown of BIB soliicting and taking bribes and still going strong as salary supplement, let alone the man at the top with his "consultancy" services for the beer conglomerates..  

 

End of rant..start of lunch...it is still all good in CM.

Who was 88?

Posted

Also remember some of the Elderly Expats who have lived here a long time

Are Military Veterans

Plus some expat are I'm a fixed pension that has not changed over many years

Some need help and may require  a visa agent or someone to help them with their Immingrstion Matters

Posted
6 hours ago, NancyL said:

 

 

The one "enhancement" they've done recently, is to permit visa agents, at least the bigger ones, to obtain "appointments" rather than having to send out staff to sit in the queue at 5 am.

 

perhaps 12 to 15 months ago, you posted on this board ,a list of  items  which you were going to straighten out with  the C/mai Immgr Dept in your crusade  against them

 

one  item was for all visa agents, to  queue the same as all expats (early morning starts), which will stop  the  back door jobs and a short time later you posted on the board,that my previous visa agent, had been told to do so,and from experience a little later, that was  indeed the case

Now

you are posting that  ,going back to the oringnal format(back door jobs) is a ENHANCEMENT!!!!!

gosh Nancl L , you are so hypercritcal

its a laugh of the day late afternoon to all

 

 

Posted
21 hours ago, pgrahmm said:

Our time - our money - our choice -

 

No castigating due - or warranted...

 

Have done it both ways over the years & I prefer to use an agency...

Exactly. I choose NOT to use visa agents. It's my choice no debate required

Posted
7 minutes ago, evenstevens said:

perhaps 12 to 15 months ago, you posted on this board ,a list of  items  which you were going to straighten out with  the C/mai Immgr Dept in your crusade  against them

 

one  item was for all visa agents, to  queue the same as all expats (early morning starts), which will stop  the  back door jobs and a short time later you posted on the board,that my previous visa agent, had been told to do so,and from experience a little later, that was  indeed the case

Now

you are posting that  ,going back to the oringnal format(back door jobs) is a ENHANCEMENT!!!!!

gosh Nancl L , you are so hypercritcal

its a laugh of the day late afternoon to all

 

 

Pray tell exactly what YOU have attempted to do to deal with immigration problems?

Posted
16 minutes ago, ThaiPauly said:

Pray tell exactly what YOU have attempted to do to deal with immigration problems?

absoulately nuffin cobber

as E/S posted  on this board, a day or so ago, i have no axe to grind with C/mai Immgr Dept  at all  , over many yrs,  E/S  easily adjusts to the flavour of the day, they have in place ,when i do business with them,      G4T visa agency ,  is presently my jockey,   and so far they have snuggly fitted in my saddle,

Its a Doors early evening to all

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted
57 minutes ago, evenstevens said:

perhaps 12 to 15 months ago, you posted on this board ,a list of  items  which you were going to straighten out with  the C/mai Immgr Dept in your crusade  against them

 

one  item was for all visa agents, to  queue the same as all expats (early morning starts), which will stop  the  back door jobs and a short time later you posted on the board,that my previous visa agent, had been told to do so,and from experience a little later, that was  indeed the case

Now

you are posting that  ,going back to the oringnal format(back door jobs) is a ENHANCEMENT!!!!!

gosh Nancl L , you are so hypercritcal

its a laugh of the day late afternoon to all

 

 

From my experience, exactly the opposite has happened. When I used G4T a year ago, they were able to provide me with an appointment on the day I visited them. When I used them a couple of months ago, they needed to know when I was coming so they could get someone to sit in the queue in the morning.

Posted

I think poster TP has it right, it's a matter of personal choice for reasons that are personal, neither side should be applauded or condemned for their choice.

Posted
1 minute ago, Mark123456 said:

From my experience, exactly the opposite has happened. When I used G4T a year ago, they were able to provide me with an appointment on the day I visited them. When I used them a couple of months ago, they needed to know when I was coming so they could get someone to sit in the queue in the morning.

It might gave something to do with the Immigration Officers who are here from Bangkok

Things have changed

Thanks for your post

We are now getting different reports now

Posted

Its all about money,and as long as it keeps flowing in,I cannot

see anything changing.it seems more and more restrictions

come into force,like the scrapping of the online booking,more

forms,so those that are afraid of filling in forms,and dont want

to get up at dawn to obtain a number in the queue ,are in away,

forced to use agents,would Immigration like more people to use

agents,sure they would,makes their life easier,and is a nice earner.

 

I will still be getting up at dawn ,it's only once a year ,so no big deal,

they should reinstate the online booking,if only for those that  are far away,

or are very elderly,how hard would it be ? insurmountable it seems. 

 

regards worgeordie

 

Posted
12 minutes ago, Mark123456 said:

From my experience, exactly the opposite has happened. When I used G4T a year ago, they were able to provide me with an appointment on the day I visited them. When I used them a couple of months ago, they needed to know when I was coming so they could get someone to sit in the queue in the morning.

going in on the 27 feb (from memory)they are going to ring me 24/2 to confirm my appointment,and time i have to be there,

will give a full update on my experiences extending my retirement visa with G4T visa agency

its a  Fabian good evening to all

Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, evenstevens said:

going in on the 27 feb (from memory)they are going to ring me 24/2 to confirm my appointment,and time i have to be there,

will give a full update on my experiences extending my retirement visa with G4T visa agency

its a  Fabian good evening to all

If they can confirm on the Friday, that would suggest they no longer have to queue again. I don't suppose it makes any difference from our point of view as customers/clueless applicants :)

Edited by Mark123456
Posted
25 minutes ago, Mark123456 said:

If they can confirm on the Friday, that would suggest they no longer have to queue again. I don't suppose it makes any difference from our point of view as customers/clueless applicants :)

Busted?

Posted
12 hours ago, FolkGuitar said:

 

Let's look at it from a different perspective.

We know that no other Immigration Office has the problems seen here in the Chiang Mai office. We know this. We've heard it a dozen times from a dozen different regions. WE know... 

 

That presupposes that the rest of Thailand Immigration knows about the problem. It's very visible. So... Is this problem due to corruption? Or is it simply bad management?

1. Does the rest of Thailand Immigration support some sort of corruption? And if so, why isn't it going on at any other Immigration offices?

2. If it does NOT support corruption, why does it continue in Chiang Mai?

I suggest that this problem is NOT caused by corruption, but by management issues, and staffing problems exacerbated by a overly-large case load.

 

If you disagree, please show us the Financial Flow-chart to support your theory.

 

Sincerely,

 

Guy who has lived in Thailand for a long time, doesn't get it,  and never will.

Posted
27 minutes ago, LarryBird said:

 

Sincerely,

 

Guy who has lived in Thailand for a long time, doesn't get it,  and never will.

 

Possibly.

Or... a guy who doesn't see conspiracies where none exist.

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, FolkGuitar said:

 

Possibly.

Or... a guy who doesn't see conspiracies where none exist.

 

Jeez,,,you are no fun.

 

With that sort of common sense, objectivity and, reasoning this thread would not have lasted a millisecond.

 

 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...