Jump to content

Voice TV ban ‘an attack on media freedom’


webfact

Recommended Posts

Voice TV ban ‘an attack on media freedom’
By Kasamakorn Chanwanpen
The Nation

 

6470cc2d8ba950fe6732b9ab01bbd132-sld.jpe

 

Groups urge NBTC to review station’s 7day suspension

 

BANGKOK: -- PROFESSIONAL media associations voiced support yesterday for Voice TV and urged the broadcasting regulator to review its decision to ban the station for seven days. 

 

The National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission (NBTC) on Monday suspended the digital channel’s licence over repeated misconduct after it broadcast harsh criticism of the military many times.

 

In a joint statement signed by the Thai Journalists Association and Thai Broadcast Journalists Association, they said the order violated media freedom and could harm all media outlets.

 

It was unfair to ban the whole station as only some programmes and anchors violated the junta’s orders, they said in a statement. Many other staff were not involved but had been affected by the decision, it said.

 

While Voice TV has had programmes banned several times since the military coup in 2014, suspension of a station’s operating licence is very rare. 

 

The NBTC was supposed to be a state agency to protect media freedom from intervention, the associations’ statement continued. “The decision to ban the media due to complaints from the junta reflect the fact that the NBTC has failed to act independently.” So, the decision also affected the credibility of the media regulator, it said.

 

The decision to ban the TV station was also against the spirit of the referendum-approved charter, which guarantees freedom of expression, it said. 

 

Thailand is still under a provisional charter issued by the junta after the coup in May 2014, which empowered it to restrict media freedom. The new charter, which was endorsed in a referendum last year, is awaiting royal endorsement.

 

Executives at Voice TV held a meeting yesterday to discuss getting programmes aired via online platforms, a source said. They had yet to take legal action against the regulator, as the station was still assessing the situation and preparing documents before taking the matter to court, the source said.

 

Thepchai Yong, president of the Thai Broadcast Journalists Association, said while it was accepted that the country was under extraordinary rule and media control was prevalent, the NBTC order could raise questions on whether the country could return to normality as promised in the junta’s road map to democracy.

 

Meanwhile, Voice TV fans hit back at broadcasting officials over the seven-day ban. They denounced the move as a curb on the media and claimed that its reports were the truth – and vowed to follow the station online.

 

Facebook live coverage of the station’s press conference received mostly “angry” emoticons as station executive Mekin Petchplai clarified Voice TV’s next moves after its suspension.

 

Viewers also gave moral support, encouraging Voice TV staff to keep up their work so audiences can still watch shows via Facebook and its website.

 

Voice TV is partly owned by Panthongtae and Pintongta Shinwatra, the son and daughter of fugitive former prime minister Thaksin. 

 

Supinya Klangnarong, a former NBTC member, wrote on Facebook on Monday that the penalty imposed on the embattled station was disproportionate. The move showed the tendency to limit freedom of expression in the media, she said. Such a selective action would lead to more conflict, she feared.

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/news/national/30310597

 
thenation_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright The Nation 2017-03-29
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, webfact said:

Voice TV is partly owned by Panthongtae and Pintongta Shinwatra, the son and daughter of fugitive former prime minister Thaksin. 

 

Supinya Klangnarong, a former NBTC member, wrote on Facebook on Monday that the penalty imposed on the embattled station was disproportionate. The move showed the tendency to limit freedom of expression in the media, she said. Such a selective action would lead to more conflict, she feared.

The junta seems to be taking the low road to reconciliation .    This just looks like obvious harassment of a political foe.   Thailand is starting to look like a slow motion train wreck.  Shame on those who wanted the coup.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, webfact said:

“The decision to ban the media due to complaints from the junta reflect the fact that the NBTC has failed to act independently.”

Talk about intellects. It took almost 3 years since May 2014 for them to figure out that NBTC beholds itself to the government's censorship efforts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, edwinchester said:

Seems today's lesson is "don't talk about soldiers killing teenage activists".

They had a good article in that newspaper that we are not allowed to name on this topic issue March 23 2017 page 2. They tarred this kid as a drug dealer out lining their case in great detail. They sure went out of their way to convince us this kid was evil. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, yellowboat said:

The junta seems to be taking the low road to reconciliation .    This just looks like obvious harassment of a political foe.   Thailand is starting to look like a slow motion train wreck.  Shame on those who wanted the coup.  

 

Of course they should be allowed to send (freedom of expression),  but I sincerely doubt that the often 'extremist' red and yellow TV and radio stations really contribute to reconciliation, instigating violence and telling blatant lies about 'the other side' does not help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, wakeupplease said:

Freedom whats that?

 

I keep seeing this 'freedom', primarily related to speech in other countries, predominantly the US, and when I first arrived here over 20 years ago I'd hadn't really noticed the lack thereof, excepting of course to the holy institution, and it hadn't bothered me so much. But as time has worn on, I've seen the effects on what should by now be a more progressive society, with the free exchange of ideas. This country has been regressing for some years now and is at the point of No Return. There is no going forward with this particular junta. Whomsoever may have led this country where it should be had been strangled at birth in 1932. It truly is sad in 'what might have been', now never will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, longtom said:

 

Of course they should be allowed to send (freedom of expression),  but I sincerely doubt that the often 'extremist' red and yellow TV and radio stations really contribute to reconciliation, instigating violence and telling blatant lies about 'the other side' does not help.

As soon as the PM gets his "The media is in my hip pocket" bill past all these worries will cease to exist. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...
""