Jump to content

Police gather evidence for civil lawsuit against tycoon


webfact

Recommended Posts

Police gather evidence for civil lawsuit against tycoon

By THE NATION

 

c30ff0f5fd9ef820f1ae0c08e68d2835.jpeg

 

PUBLIC PROSECUTORS have suggested that police collect evidence to file a civil suit against a high-profile construction tycoon for allegedly damaging the ecology and environment in Thung Yai Naresuan Wildlife Sanctuary, where he had allegedly been poaching.

 

Deputy national police chief Pol General Srivara Rangsibhramanakul said prosecutors wanted to seek financial compensation from Premchai Karnasuta, president of Italian-Thai Development firm.

 

4057a487880e5babb9980ffaab4476f7.jpeg

 

The Wildlife Protection office estimated the damage to be at least Bt3 million.

 

Police will invite Wichian Shinwong, chief of the wildlife sanctuary in Kanchanaburi province, who led the raid and arrested Premchai at his campsite in early February, to give information to police concerning estimates about the damage.

 

A civil lawsuit would be the first faced by Premchai, who has already been charged on numerous criminal counts including poaching, attempted bribery, and possessing illegal guns and elephants’ tusks without a proper permit.

 

Srivara spoke after interviewing Premchai and his three companions, who were also charged after being arrested with him in the sanctuary.

The four suspects have insisted they are innocent of all the charges and denied damaging the ecosystem.

 

Premchai refused to talk to reporters as he left the police station.

 

d49c0ec450c98d39ea4eeb09c127ab32.jpeg

 

All four were released on bail of Bt150,000 each. The investigation into allegations has expanded to include Premchai’s family members, as his wife has also been charged with possessing elephant tusks and his sisters accused of allegedly acquiring land illegally in northern provinces.

 

Srivara said the collection of evidence for the civil suit was expected to be finished within a few days and public prosecutors would decide whether to file charges against Premchai.

 

He added that police had handed over tusks and a musket seized from Premchai’s house to Customs officials to check their registration information.

 

The Customs Department has been asked to investigate because DNA from the tusks showed they originated from Africa, not domestic elephants as mentioned in a permit. 

 

The musket is believed to be an antique that originated in Britain.

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/national/30341441

 
thenation_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright The Nation 2018-03-22
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I sure hope Premchai can handle the financial burden of the fine he's probably going to get....probably going to be between Bt500 to Bt10,000.   He might have to trim costs on his next hunting trip to offset that fine.  

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Pib said:

I sure hope Premchai can handle the financial burden of the fine he's probably going to get....probably going to be between Bt500 to Bt10,000.   He might have to trim costs on his next hunting trip to offset that fine.  

he probably had bail in his pocket as loose change..

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, edwinchester said:

If an old couple can get 12 years for picking mushrooms in a National Park this guy should be doing serious jail time.

 

The old couple were never accused nor convicted of picking mushrooms. They were convicted of illegal logging. The mushrooms and firewood defense failed. Time to consider just maybe they were guilty as charged.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

L

31 minutes ago, farcanell said:

?????? he must have driven into the campsite on a fleet of bulldozers ????

You are overlooking the cost of creating the conditions for the wildlife he destroyed to recover, Bt100 mil at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, canopy said:

 

The old couple were never accused nor convicted of picking mushrooms. They were convicted of illegal logging. The mushrooms and firewood defense failed. Time to consider just maybe they were guilty as charged.

 

No they weren't. I researched this case some years ago and it was a clear case of police scapegoating.

It started with a police/ranger force going after a group of illegal loggers. The loggers escaped and the police picked up the mushroom pickers as scapegoats. The police filed illegal logging charges against them. The mushroom pickers, not knowing what they were up against,  were advised by a crooked or incompetent lawyer to plead guilty as that would halve any sentence. They got 30 years from the court, halved to 15. Subsequently their sentence has been reduced further due to activists and a little more intelligent judges.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...