Jump to content

SURVEY: Should Donald Trump get the Nobel Peace Prize?


Scott

SURVEY: Should Donald Trump receive the Nobel Peace Prize?  

378 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, klauskunkel said:

yes, he should get it. Because if he doesn't, he'll start a war.

Bully's like swamp king readily rely on the fear of the people he chooses to dump on. When anyone stands up to him or any coward bully they usually retreat.  IMO any/all cost to rid the world of this detestable poor excuse of a man is welcomed. And that is not a political statement of partisanship. I care a/b decency/truth/compassion/ freedom and why I detest this degenerate. He has done more for violence/hatred/fascism than he ever could for peace. 

cousins.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Brunolem said:

And conveniently enough, this sudden change of attitude happened right after North Korea mastered the art of flying long range ballistic missiles, while having formerly secured nuclear technology.

Errrmmm , this happened right after NK testing site exploded and blew up .

It was quite clear to NK that the World (led by Trump) would no longer just sit back and watch them fire missiles all over the place .

    NK became a nuisance to China and they lost Chinas support

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only prize this bozo should receive is the prize for the most lies of any US president in history--an average of 6.5 lies a day.  Soooo embarrassing to have this jerk as president.  Pretty bad when his wife won't even hold hands with him, let alone do anything else--guess she has his number.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, sanemax said:

Errrmmm , this happened right after NK testing site exploded and blew up .

It was quite clear to NK that the World (led by Trump) would no longer just sit back and watch them fire missiles all over the place .

    NK became a nuisance to China and they lost Chinas support

Here is the latest from the future (incoming!!!) Nobel laureate:

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/anger-france-over-trump-comments-bataclan-attacks-184754595.html

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, welovethailand said:

Obamama was not even eligable yet. You have to be what, 6 months or 1 year as President to be eligable? he was not. And he still isn't a legal American. Opps...

Uh...you don't have to be president of the United States (or any country) to be 'eligable' (sic) for the Nobel Peace Prize. :saai:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sanemax said:

I do recall Trump publicly saying to China "Either you sort North Korea out , OR I will" , said as the U.S. Navy was sailing towards  NK 

Trump certainly has a large mouth and says a lot of things but he isn't exactly action man as he pretends to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, sanemax said:

China gave NK a talking to after Trump gave a Xi a talking to

I don't believe Trump has the cojones to give Xi a talking to or to take him on.

Anyway, we could dance around this until the cows come home, so let's just agree to disagree.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, liberator6996 said:

ALL credibility was lost when it was awarded to Obama. Some credibility can be regained by awarding it to President Trump.

Sent from my SM-G610F using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
 

Yed indeed , because he is loved and respected around the world.

I can just see the worldwide celebrations :tongue: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, sirineou said:

Yed indeed , because he is loved and respected around the world.

I can just see the worldwide celebrations :tongue: 

After he wins the Nobel prize, he will be invited to open car parades around the world so that the people can express their love and admiration for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, toolpush said:

Credibility you say??? Say it ain't so. let's see: Obama, Gore, the Indian Railroad Engineer......

personally I don't understand why Trump supporters would crave a price from an organisation they have so litle respect for .

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, sirineou said:

Regardless of if deserved or not ,and I don't think any serious minded person believe he does.  If they nominated Trump the Nobel organisation would lose all credibility, and I don't believe they are stupid enough to do that. 

  But then again I did not believe Americans were stupid enough to elect him president.......

Obama won it, at least Trump has done something towards world peace bringing Nth and Sth Korea together for peace talks and being on the verge to ending the war. What did Obama do to win it. 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, maximillian said:

 

Nobel organisation has lost its credibility already by giving the peace price to Obama.

Maybe has lost some for that and many other reasons. obviously it must have some or you and the rest of the trumpeteers would not be salivating over the prospect. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, cat handler said:

Obama won it, at least Trump has done something towards world peace bringing Nth and Sth Korea together for peace talks and being on the verge to ending the war. What did Obama do to win it. 

I never said that Obama deserved it, I simply said that Trump deserves it less

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sanemax said:

There has been a 100 % change in NK's attitude , that is substantial .

Indeed... perhaps because NK has now attained the bomb, and can go into negotiations as an equal, instead of as an underdog with no bite to its bark.

 

if that is so, then it follows that by attaining parity, NK has now decided that it can proactively use that power to force peace on the area... ergo... Kim jung un is the one who deserves the Nobel peace prize

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, freebyrd said:

I don't believe Trump has the cojones to give Xi a talking to or to take him on.

Anyway, we could dance around this until the cows come home, so let's just agree to disagree.

As you are anti-Trump , you will never agree with anything he says or does and you will never give him credit for anything he does .

    *Everything that he does is wrong and if he does anything right, he didnt do it, someone else did *

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, farcanell said:

Indeed... perhaps because NK has now attained the bomb, and can go into negotiations as an equal, instead of as an underdog with no bite to its bark.

if that is so, then it follows that by attaining parity, NK has now decided that it can proactively use that power to force peace on the area... ergo... Kim jung un is the one who deserves the Nobel peace prize

Giving a peace prize to someone who builds a nuclear bomb and threatens to attack other countries with that nuclear bomb ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where is the Peace when somebody threatens to incinerate a much smaller country with his massive amount of nuclear weapons. There is no Peace in that proposition. Give him the Nobel Dumb Prize or the Nobel Golf Prize or the Nobel Extremely Offensive Prize. But let us reserve the Peace Prize for actual premeditated attempts to create Peace. If he can sort out Syria give him something then, and only then.

His rubbish statements about France and guns at the NRA convention ....fat lot of good guns did anybody when that mental case shot all those people in Las Vegas. But the Great Orange One conveniently forgot to mention that to his darling NRA.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...