.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png.8488ab72b8bb2e508209bfe3211b6e08.png)
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
Announcements
-
Topics
-
-
Latest posts...
-
2
Renew Retirement Visa (Bank Book question)
Thanks. I assume you're saying a full year of statements will suffice, and the bank book won't be an issue? -
1
Controversy Over ‘Mx’ Titles: Young Pupils and Gender-Neutral Teachers
Seriously? The only excuse for not identifying as male or female is being a hermaphrodite. How much longer are sane people going to put up with this moronic stupidity? -
1
Watch: Biden Struggles to Navigate Delaware Beach & Stumbles Multiple Times
If Biden was judged unable to be the next POTUS, why is he judged worthy to still be in that position? This whole fiasco exposes the US political system to be completely broken and a disaster in the making. One hopes that no crisis arises before January 20 that requires a functioning human being in charge. -
62
DTV or retirement visa ?
Health insurance is not required for the DTV. -
268
Liberal Meltdown Thread
If you've got 5 minutes to spend on a hilarious liberal meltdown article, have a look at some examples: Universities are decrying President-elect Donald Trump’s victory and offering a swath of therapeutic safe-space activities to help students cope with their emotions. Several universities are offering counseling services and special post-election debriefing events on campus, while professors canceled classes and called for a rise against the future administration, according to emails obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation. Just one example: https://dailycaller.com/2024/11/11/safe-spaces-therapy-colleges-help-students-cope-kamala-harris-loss-2024-election/ Where was all the compassion for conservative students after 2020? Or is it just the lefties that are frail and unstable? Scary if these are the people that plan to run the country in the future. -
1
Controversy Over ‘Mx’ Titles: Young Pupils and Gender-Neutral Teachers
In a recent shift, some schools in Scotland have introduced the gender-neutral title "Mx" for teachers, with children as young as four now being encouraged to use this term when addressing staff. This change aims to create a more inclusive environment for non-binary individuals and those who do not identify strictly as male or female. However, the use of gender-neutral titles in classrooms has sparked a broader debate about the appropriateness of discussing gender identity with very young students. According to figures from Scottish councils, at least 86 educators, including teachers, teaching assistants, and aides, have adopted the "Mx" title instead of traditional titles like Miss, Mrs, Ms, or Mr. Of these, 13 are in primary schools, and 73 work in secondary schools. Edinburgh has the highest concentration, with 44 staff members recorded as using a gender-neutral title. However, actual numbers may be higher, as some councils do not track this data. Supporters argue that using gender-neutral titles in schools reflects a progressive approach to inclusion, recognizing non-binary identities and fostering respect among students. However, critics have raised concerns about introducing such concepts to young children. Scottish Conservative spokesperson for children and young people, Roz McCall, stated that focusing on these "fringe issues" diverts attention from core educational goals, arguing that this shift may leave some children feeling uncomfortable or confused. Campaign groups such as For Women Scotland and Parent Watch Scotland have also expressed opposition. Marion Calder, of For Women Scotland, argued that introducing non-binary concepts in classrooms can be confusing for young children, likening the emphasis on gender identity to "astrology" and urging teachers to avoid bringing personal ideologies into their professional roles. She voiced concerns over the trustworthiness of teachers in students' eyes, asking, “How are children to believe anything a teacher says if they lie about something so fundamental?” This sentiment was echoed by Parent Watch Scotland, which claimed titles like "Mx" often require explanations that could serve as conversation starters about gender identity, a topic some feel is inappropriate for younger students. In addition to the debate over titles, critics also point to broader issues related to gender identity in Scottish schools. Some teaching materials reportedly include discussions of multiple gender identities, with lessons suggesting there are at least 17 genders. These approaches have raised questions about parental involvement, with critics arguing that parental consent is often overlooked when affirming students’ gender identities. A significant shift in Scotland’s approach to gender issues in education occurred after the Cass Review, an assessment of gender services in England, called for more thorough research on the impact of puberty blockers and other gender-affirming treatments for youth. As a result, Scotland has paused the prescription of puberty blockers for young people, signaling a cautious approach to medical interventions for gender dysphoria in response to the findings. The ongoing discourse around titles like "Mx" underscores a growing debate on the role of schools in addressing gender identity and inclusivity. As schools strive to balance inclusivity with developmental appropriateness, the debate is likely to continue, raising complex questions about the role of education in shaping young minds. Based on a report by Daily Mail 2024-11-12 -
1
Watch: Biden Struggles to Navigate Delaware Beach & Stumbles Multiple Times
President Joe Biden stumbled several times on a Delaware beach near his vacation home, needing assistance from First Lady Jill Biden to keep his balance, as shown in recent footage. The 81-year-old president was seen grappling with the unstable, sandy terrain at Rehoboth Beach on Sunday afternoon, just days after Vice President Kamala Harris lost a presidential race to former President Donald Trump, who will be returning to the White House. The Delaware visit is the latest in a series of public appearances that have led to renewed concerns about Biden’s mental and physical fitness. Over his term, he has faced mounting questions about his ability to manage the demands of the presidency, particularly as he has made several verbal missteps and occasionally seemed disoriented. His performance in a debate with Trump earlier this summer, marked by noticeable lapses and missed opportunities, intensified scrutiny from both political allies and opponents. With his faltering campaign, Biden eventually decided to step back from a potential re-election bid, throwing his support behind Vice President Kamala Harris. Yet, the pressure from within the Democratic Party following his debate performance underscored the challenges he faced in proving his stamina and focus. Now, with a meeting between Biden and Trump on the horizon, attention on the president’s condition remains heightened as he navigates the final period of his term. Based on a report by NYP 2024-11-12 -
0
A High-Stakes Gamble: How the $1.9 Trillion American Rescue Plan Backfired on Democrats
Nearly four years ago, the Biden administration and Congressional Democrats placed a massive $1.9 trillion wager on the American Rescue Plan (ARP), aiming to steer the nation through the pandemic's economic turmoil. Their goal was to avoid under-stimulating the economy, yet the scale of the ARP may have tipped the scales too far in the other direction, leading to inflation that discontented voters across the nation. The outcome of this gamble has reshaped economic policy discussions and could influence how future governments approach recession recovery. The ARP was designed to push the economy forward quickly, addressing not only the crisis but the perceived missteps of the 2010s, when, after the Global Financial Crisis, high unemployment lingered for years. As part of their strategy, Democrats believed the risk of insufficient action was greater than that of excess. They aimed to avoid a prolonged recovery by providing direct financial relief: $1,300 checks to families already sitting on pandemic savings, extended unemployment benefits even as businesses started rehiring, and additional funds for state governments already stable. This ambitious stimulus, enacted after former President Trump’s $2.7 trillion pandemic relief package, raised concerns among centrist and conservative economists who warned that such extensive aid could lead to inflationary pressures. One of the most outspoken critics, Larry Summers, wrote in May 2021, "In general, increases in inflation disproportionately hurt the poor and are associated with reductions in trust in government." He warned progressives about the historical role inflation played in political shifts, reminding them that inflation concerns contributed to the election of Richard Nixon in 1968 and Ronald Reagan in 1980. The spike in inflation that began in 2021 was indeed a global phenomenon, fueled by pandemic-related disruptions in supply chains and labor shortages, as many people opted to stay home. Even countries with limited fiscal intervention experienced similar issues, showing that inflation’s roots extended beyond U.S. policy alone. Nonetheless, the ARP’s scale likely had an inflationary impact. Analysis by the San Francisco Federal Reserve estimated that fiscal policy contributed around three percentage points to the total U.S. inflation rate in 2021, which reached 7%. Had the stimulus been more restrained, inflation may have peaked at a lower rate, reducing the Federal Reserve's need for such aggressive interest rate hikes and mitigating some of the recent economic pain. The ARP’s benefits, including the direct payments, were largely forgotten as inflation took center stage in public sentiment. As inflation remained high, the connection between the Democrats’ policies and the cost-of-living increases became more apparent to voters. Although the U.S. experienced a rapid recovery, thanks in part to the ARP, inflation overshadowed these gains. By 2024, cumulative price levels were around 21% higher than in 2020, and many Americans felt this impact more than they appreciated the falling inflation rate, which had slowed to 2.4%. In hindsight, the Biden administration has touted the ARP’s role in promoting fast economic growth and falling inflation rates. But for many Americans, especially those whose wages did not keep pace with inflation, these achievements seemed irrelevant in the face of rising costs. A “high-pressure” labor market and “running the economy hot” were the rallying cries of liberal economists at the time of the ARP’s inception, but for many, the resulting surge in inflation felt like a betrayal. As the Biden administration faced the 2024 election, the memory of high inflation lingered more strongly with voters than the rapid recovery the stimulus intended to fuel. Based on a report by Axios 2024-11-12
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
.thumb.jpeg.42eea318e3350459f0aaaa5460326bca.jpeg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now