Supreme Court: Suspending Parliament was unlawful, judges rule

[DannyCarlton]

2 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

QUOTE: I'm sure all the Africans who have piled into Britain to exploit our standard of living are fine with that, but I am not

 

......he said, without the slightest racism in his so called mind.

And I'm sure that he thinks tha Brexit will prevent "all the Africans who have piled into Britain to exploit our standard of living" from coming here. A comedian for sure.

[tomacht8]

33 minutes ago, Thingamabob said:

Amazing. 11 judges all agree that what Boris did was 'unlawful'. But if you listen closely to the case put forward by the spiderwoman you will quickly realize there's not a shred of evidence to support this. I fear Britain's judiciary is now totally 

You can still emigrate and settle in one of the other 27 EU states with better judges.

[evadgib]

2 hours ago, DannyCarlton said:

A video produced by Lester Taylor, a UKIP (not Brexit party) councellor and failed UKIP MEP candidate.

 

UKIP is now accepted by most as an extreme right wing group with Tommy Robinson (ex Wandsworth goal) as a paid advisor. Even Farage deserted them when they accepted ex NF and TR into their fold.

 

Can you please stop posting nonsense by extreme right wing facists and racists? You are insulting people's intelligence.

Having once again put the poster to the sword (with dubious poppycock) what did you make of the content?

Edited September 25, 2019 by evadgib

[RuamRudy]

35 minutes ago, Thingamabob said:

Amazing. 11 judges all agree that what Boris did was 'unlawful'. But if you listen closely to the case put forward by the spiderwoman you will quickly realize there's not a shred of evidence to support this. I fear Britain's judiciary is now totally corrupt.

Under Scot's Law, the Court of Session reached an entirely reasonable conclusion based upon the evidence submitted. The evidence most lacking was that from the PM himself; he had the opportunity to defend himself and he chose not to take it. There is nothing whatsoever corrupt about the Scottish Court's judgement. 

[nauseus]

31 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

What because you didn’t get the ruling you wanted?!

Now where have I heard that one before? 

[JamesBlond]

13 hours ago, Bruntoid said:

Where on the paper did it say ‘unconditionally if necessary’ ? 

In the same section where it said 'only on condition of a 'deal'.

Nobody had preconceptions of 'a deal' at the time and it cannot retrospectively be made conditional by the losers.

In any case, I and many others have actually advocated leaving with no deal because the ultimate aim is to dismantle the EU altogether and replace it with a rational trade bloc, rather than some leftist multicultural dystopia.

Trade deals will come, and without strings. Hold your nerve.

[oldhippy]

17 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

QUOTE: I'm sure all the Africans who have piled into Britain to exploit our standard of living are fine with that, but I am not

 

......he said, without the slightest racism in his so called mind.

And not a single brexiteer to distance himself from this racist remark.

 

Is it any wonder that some people say all brexiteers are racists?

 

[Why Me]

Lordie, from an Empire on which the sun never set to a Government taken down by a little Asian lady.

[blazes]

18 hours ago, welovesundaysatspace said:

Maybe Brexiteers want to reconsider Brexit now and instead aim for leaving the UK? Freed from the shackles of all those constitutional laws, the Supreme Court and those bureaucrats in parliament. Adopt a North Korea model where people don’t have anything to eat, the rule of law doesn’t exist, and votes can be manipulated with lies and propaganda.  

 

you are, of course talking about Corbyn's England, right?

[evadgib]

2 hours ago, Basil B said:

Suppose she will get a new nickname   ...Marmite "you either love her or hate her"

 

My vote... ????

 

I hope one day she is rewarded with a seat in the Lords...

Waiting for yesterday's ruling was akin to waiting for a VAR decision from the chairman of the losers @ an FA Cup Final.

[DannyCarlton]

5 minutes ago, JamesBlond said:

Nobody had preconceptions of 'a deal' at the time and it cannot retrospectively be made conditional by the losers.

Correct, I wish your fellow brexiteers undrestood the first part of your sentence. It was always conditional. If parliament decides (the holders of democracy in the UK) decide that after 3 going on 4 years, due to changing conditions, it's no longer in the best interests of the UK to leave them they can decide that we stay in the EU. At least it appears that they are going to respect your Mickey Mouse "peoples democracy" and give you a confirmatory vote. More than you deserve IMHO.

[billd766]

35 minutes ago, Blue Muton said:

No, it was your post that I quoted :

 

 

Posted 3 hours ago

  3 hours ago, JonnyF said:

 

These individuals are supporting the majority of UK citizens that voted to Leave. Not trying to over-ride the Democratic vote like the HOC, the Civil service and the House of Lords.

Multiple convictions of electoral fraud prove it was not a democratic vote, stop pretending otherwise. 

The majority of UK citizens most certainly did not vote to Leave, as you put it, that is a lie. 17.4 million people out of over 60 million is a majority now?

 

I have highlighted the part where you wrongly stated that the majority of UK citizens voted to leave, you remember, the since deleted bit that you now lie about having written.

quote from your post "The majority of UK citizens most certainly did not vote to Leave, as you put it, that is a lie. 17.4 million people out of over 60 million is a majority now?

 

If you want to quote figures, please back them up with links or references otherwise it is just your guess, and you were 5,648,000 people out which makes your figures incorrect.

 

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/bulletins/annualmidyearpopulationestimates/mid2016#main-points

 

The population of the UK at 30 June 2016 is estimated to be 65,648,000 people.

 

Actually of those 60 odd million people only 46,500,001 were registered to vote.

 

Of the 46,500,001 people registered to vote, 12,948,108 could not be bothered to vote.

 

If you cannot be bothered to vote, then you must accept the fact that you have no voice in the vote and accept the outcome.

 

Of the rest 17,410,742  51.89% voted to Leave and 16,141,241  48.11% voted to Remain.

 

Therefore the Leave vote won the day.

 

Therefore the Remain side should accept the result.

 

That is called democracy.

 

Sadly it appears that they are unwilling or cannot accept the result. That is why over 3 years later the UK is in the state it is now.

 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_United_Kingdom_European_Union_membership_referendum

 

Results
Votes    %
Leave    17,410,742    51.89%
Remain    16,141,241    48.11%
Valid votes    33,551,983    99.92%
Invalid or blank votes    25,359    0.08%
Total votes    33,577,342    100.00%
Registered voters/turnout    46,500,001    72.21%
 

[JamesBlond]

13 minutes ago, DannyCarlton said:

And I'm sure that he thinks tha Brexit will prevent "all the Africans who have piled into Britain to exploit our standard of living" from coming here. A comedian for sure.

Exiting the EU will certainly contribute to tightened immigration policy, if only by helping to quash the deeply misguided PC mindset that is the cornerstone of EU social policy that has already contributed to disastrous social dislocation in many countries.

 

You are saying that no Africans have gone to Britain to exploit our standard of living? Very well, I apologise, I should be more accurate: it's not just Africans.

 

[DannyCarlton]

4 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

And not a single brexiteer to distance himself from this racist remark.

 

Is it any wonder that some people say all brexiteers are racists?

 

We've never wondered. Have you only just cottoned on? 555

[billd766]

6 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

And not a single brexiteer to distance himself from this racist remark.

 

Is it any wonder that some people say all brexiteers are racists?

 

Then you would be completely wrong as usual with nothing to back you up.

[Blue Muton]

5 minutes ago, billd766 said:

quote from your post "The majority of UK citizens most certainly did not vote to Leave, as you put it, that is a lie. 17.4 million people out of over 60 million is a majority now?

 

If you want to quote figures, please back them up with links or references otherwise it is just your guess, and you were 5,648,000 people out which makes your figures incorrect.

 

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/bulletins/annualmidyearpopulationestimates/mid2016#main-points

 

The population of the UK at 30 June 2016 is estimated to be 65,648,000 people.

 

Actually of those 60 odd million people only 46,500,001 were registered to vote.

 

Of the 46,500,001 people registered to vote, 12,948,108 could not be bothered to vote.

 

If you cannot be bothered to vote, then you must accept the fact that you have no voice in the vote and accept the outcome.

 

Of the rest 17,410,742  51.89% voted to Leave and 16,141,241  48.11% voted to Remain.

 

Therefore the Leave vote won the day.

 

Therefore the Remain side should accept the result.

 

That is called democracy.

 

Sadly it appears that they are unwilling or cannot accept the result. That is why over 3 years later the UK is in the state it is now.

 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_United_Kingdom_European_Union_membership_referendum

 

Results
Votes    %
Leave    17,410,742    51.89%
Remain    16,141,241    48.11%
Valid votes    33,551,983    99.92%
Invalid or blank votes    25,359    0.08%
Total votes    33,577,342    100.00%
Registered voters/turnout    46,500,001    72.21%
 

Sadly not a single one of you will accept the fact that the Leave campaign commeted electoral fraud, nor have you had the decency to say that it's wrong or the honesty to say that you're ok with it. Once again, nobody should accept a result achieved through fraud, that's democracy.

[evadgib]

5 minutes ago, DannyCarlton said:

We've never wondered. Have you only just cottoned on? 555

I thought the boards were supposed to argue with other people?

[DannyCarlton]

1 minute ago, JamesBlond said:

Exiting the EU will certainly contribute to tightened immigration policy, if only by helping to quash the deeply misguided PC mindset that is the cornerstone of EU social policy that has already contributed to disastrous social dislocation in many countries.

 

You are saying that no Africans have gone to Britain to exploit our standard of living? Very well, I apologise, I should be more accurate: it's not just Africans.

 

People from outside the EU will migrate to the UK in the same way as they do now. Either via Heathrow (the majority) or by crossing the Channel (a tiny minority). There are no planned changes to Immigration rules to affect those coming via Heathrow. For those crossing the Channel, they will probably find it easier as I expect far less co-operation between British immigration officers and their French counterparts.

 

So, for the race of immigrants that appear to be your pet hate, post Brexit expect to see more black faces in your street, not less.

[Thaifriends]

Blondie is a shameless liar and he will not resign until forced out of PM office. He had no plans for Brexit as he use the upper floor of his head only when misleading citizens. ????

 

More trouble likely after Brexit and one organization collapsed already, more to come, more to be bail out and more tax money in retiring executives pocket. After all UK follows whatever US do with their tax money.

 

Instead of paying to EU the obligation payments, politicians will pay the sinking corporations. Its my personal assesment, sorry no intensions to offend anyone.

[evadgib]

5 minutes ago, Blue Muton said:

Sadly not a single one of you will accept the fact that the Leave campaign commeted electoral fraud, nor have you had the decency to say that it's wrong or the honesty to say that you're ok with it. Once again, nobody should accept a result achieved through fraud, that's democracy.

Didn't the latest case against Arron Banks & Co also collapse yesterday?

Edited September 25, 2019 by evadgib

[DannyCarlton]

1 minute ago, evadgib said:

I thought the boards were supposed to argue with other people?

Is this another alt right conspiracy theory? Who put that in your head? Your hero Robin (NF) Tilbrook?

[Bruntoid]

9 hours ago, Loiner said:

Who knows best - the govt top lawman, or a bunch of judges dabbling in politics?

 

Do I need to point out the irony in that or is it blindingly obvious to everyone else as well ? 

 

The judges didn’t take one foot into the world of politics, they simply applied the law based on the facts presented as THE most senior/knowledgeable ‘lawmen/women’ in the land. (Remember BoJo and his fellow clowns were asked repeatedly for more evidence to help their case but they arrogantly refused thinking they were home and dry already!). 

 

They outrank your ‘top lawman’ in both stature, knowledge (clearly) and superiority - oooh by about 11-0 !

[DannyCarlton]

4 minutes ago, Thaifriends said:

Blondie is a shameless liar and he will not resign until forced out of PM office. He had no plans for Brexit as he use the upper floor of his head only when misleading citizens.

The upper floor of his head is Cummings' crib. Roumour has it that he's being evicted. Anyone looking for a very posh empty room?

[stevenl]

10 minutes ago, billd766 said:

Then you would be completely wrong as usual with nothing to back you up.

Nothing to back up? There was a clearly racist post without any brexiteers distancing themselves from it.

[Blue Muton]

16 minutes ago, evadgib said:

Didn't the latest case against Arron Banks & Co also collapse yesterday?

That's already been covered in this thread, yesterday's news was relating to a criminal investigation that in no way negates the previous findings of the Electoral Commission.

[evadgib]

9 minutes ago, stevenl said:

Nothing to back up? There was a clearly racist post without any brexiteers distancing themselves from it.

What % of the board(s) are married to the very people for which you feign victimhood?

[stevenl]

1 minute ago, evadgib said:

What % of the board(s) are married to the very people for which you feign victimhood?

Huh?

[evadgib]

3 minutes ago, Blue Muton said:

That's already been covered in this thread, yesterday's news was relating to a criminal investigation that in no way negates the previous findings of the Electoral Commission.

Appreciated, It wasn't something for which I felt the need to follow in any detail.

[JamesBlond]

24 minutes ago, DannyCarlton said:

People from outside the EU will migrate to the UK in the same way as they do now. Either via Heathrow (the majority) or by crossing the Channel (a tiny minority). There are no planned changes to Immigration rules to affect those coming via Heathrow. For those crossing the Channel, they will probably find it easier as I expect far less co-operation between British immigration officers and their French counterparts.

 

So, for the race of immigrants that appear to be your pet hate, post Brexit expect to see more black faces in your street, not less.

Seems that you want to welcome them all in. Would you care to clarify your position on that?

I'm not talking about the desperadoes who float in on bits of cardboard. I'm talking about the end of the social mindset - as promoted by the EU- that takes a soft stance on cultural identity. That will have a telling effect, as it is already, for the UK's immigration policy is already in the process of being changed.

[bangrak]

2 hours ago, Basil B said:

I think I know more about her than you if you think she is happy about the currant situation.

blackcurrant?