Jump to content

Man who ate $120,000 banana at art show says 'I'm not sorry'


Recommended Posts

Posted

The artist should file suit. He probably has a better chance of getting money from the gallery and the consumer than Unsworth does out of Musk.

  • Haha 2
Posted

Nice to see an article that can bring all political persuasions together for a change.  We can all agree that a banana duct-taped to the wall is not art and madness is reigning in the world at a fever pitch.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Tippaporn said:

Nice to see an article that can bring all political persuasions together for a change.  We can all agree that a banana duct-taped to the wall is not art and madness is reigning in the world at a fever pitch.

The real question is whether it was all a set up between "artist" and diner to get publicity. Only an insane person would actually pay that sort of money for a banana and duct tape.

The guy that preserved a shark in formaldehyde was also conning the chattering classes, IMO.

  • Like 1
Posted

????  One artist eating another artists work as a piece of performance art.

I wonder what a $120K banana tasted like ??  ???? ????

I might go and have a 50c one myself right now.

 

Posted
3 hours ago, webfact said:

A performance artist who ate a banana taped to a wall that was an artwork valued at $120,000 said his actions were not vandalism and he does not regret his snack at Art Basel in Miami Beach, Florida.

Of course you don't, it's good PR.

Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

The real question is whether it was all a set up between "artist" and diner to get publicity. Only an insane person would actually pay that sort of money for a banana and duct tape.

The guy that preserved a shark in formaldehyde was also conning the chattering classes, IMO.

The banana is changed on a regular basis and the art piece remains as was...not sure how that works [there's some sort of certificate that allows this, without affecting value of the piece], but I'm not the artist or "purchaser" who "paid" $120,000.

 

However I am checking my vegetable storage to see what strikes me as art...

Edited by Bluespunk
  • Haha 2
Posted (edited)
30 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

 Only an insane person would actually pay that sort of money for a banana and duct tape.

 

 

Or someone with $120,000 to invest/gamble on the near certainty that such pieces appreciate at an "insane" rate.

 

It is a commodity market and nothing to do with the cultural or aesthetic value of any object.

 

It makes as much "sense", to the vast majority, as does Bitcoin.

 

And as with Bitcoin, while the majority of us look on, many thinking it's all nonsense, people get rich(er).

 

Who's "insane"?

 

 

Edited by Enoon
Posted (edited)
22 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

The banana is changed on a regular basis and the art piece remains as was...not sure how that works [there's some sort of certificate that allows this, without affecting value of the piece], but I'm not the artist or "purchaser" who "paid" $120,000.

 

However I am checking my vegetable storage to see what strikes me as art...

 

It's not the object that is valued.

 

It is the "artist", the provenance they provide, the previously achieved sale value of the "piece" that matter.

 

You have no "name", no track record, you are probably too old to be regarded as having "potential", so nothing in your larder is now worth what you paid for it.

 

Sorry.

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Enoon
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Enoon said:

 

It's not the object that is valued.

 

It is the "artist" and the provenance they provide.

 

You have no "name", so nothing in your larder is now worth what you paid for it.

 

Sorry.

 

 

Ah, but you haven't seen this amusingly shaped turnip I've found.

 

My brother is an artist with sales to his name...hmm wonder if we could collaborate on this...

Posted
7 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

Ah, but you haven't seen this amusingly shaped turnip I've found.

Was it like the Turnip in the Blackadder sketch??

 

If so there could be takers.........

  • Haha 1
Posted

If it was worth $120,000 when it was taped to the wall then surely it must be worth far more now it is " Art in action"  !  No photos of the "supposed buyer" !!

Posted
8 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

The real question is whether it was all a set up between "artist" and diner to get publicity. Only an insane person would actually pay that sort of money for a banana and duct tape.

The guy that preserved a shark in formaldehyde was also conning the chattering classes, IMO.

That particular parasite’s name is Damien Hirst. Someone should duct tape him to a wall and leave him there.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...