Jump to content

Blair tells Labour: change or face dustbin of history


Recommended Posts

Posted

A post containing trolling representations of people's names has been removed.  If you do not want your post to be removed, then please spell people's name correctly. 

Posted

Whether you like Tony Blair or not, he is 100% correct to say that Labour will never win another election with current policies. 

He has always been villified for supporting George Bush and therefore the Iraq war but still remains the only Labour leader to have won a general election since Harold Wilson back in 1976. In fact 3 successive elections, 2 of which were by record margins.

Meaning that the country will support Labour again but not until it chooses an electable leader with policies that appeal to the majority and not the few.

An uphill task considering the rabid tight wing press and the apparent partiality of the BBC, once respected for it's fairness to all sides but rightly criticised for it's perceived impartiality during the recent election.

  • Sad 1
Posted
13 hours ago, Denim said:

Ah.....its been said before but JC was the best leader the Tories have ever had.

 

Johnson was gifted a victory at the polls because Cornbyn and his friends failed to understand that hard left policies just won't wash with the home owning , holiday abroad, two car working class families any more.

 

 

I was not aware that Jesus was ever a conservative, an mp, or a prime minister?

Posted
7 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

It's not that they won that was the problem, the problem was that they wasted all the money and involved the country in a war they should not have been in. In short, they did not leave the country better than they found it.

That isn't the discussion at all in terms of this thread. It is about winning General Elections and Blair delivered on that. Looks like some Labour supporters would rather talk about something else.

Posted
7 hours ago, terryw said:

The thick stupid working class people in the North and Midlands voted Tory and all the Metropolitan Labour Elite can do is go around in circles blaming everyone but themselves.

Have you considered moving South?

  • Haha 2
Posted

 

       Who will be the chosen one ,  to lead the Labour party , out of this massive defeat .?

         A very short , short list .

       My shilling is on Keir , a good socialist name ...

 

 

Posted

Yes the Labour party could go like the Social Credit party of Canada. Yes, yes there used

to be a Social Credit party, but not any more. same as the CCCPs. Oh the memories.

Geezer

Posted
On 12/19/2019 at 1:27 AM, thaibeachlovers said:

Why? He committed the UK to a war based on deceit, and didn't leave when the lies were exposed. Every British soldier that died is down to him. As PM, the responsibility lies with him.

governments are behind violance all the time, they do what they fancy whenever they fancy regardless of deaths in the wake

nothing special with this ME affair

 

Posted
23 hours ago, puipuitom said:

I remember another PM, Chamberlain, who really thought he succeeded to get "peace in our times".

Imagine, the US /UK coalition forces found weapons of mass destruction just-in-time… how all other western leaders would have looked then...

It was pretty obvious to me, and many others at the time that the US was trying to make the facts fit the war Bush wanted, and probably a load of BS. I never believed that Iraq could launch missiles that could hit western countries in half an hour or whatever BS they were telling us.

Even when they sent the unfortunate general out to BS the UN it looked dodgy to me.

Bush the younger wanted a war in Iraq and didn't care how he got it.

Blair's shame is that he became Bush's poodle, and dragged Britain into it, wasting 10 years in which he could have transformed Britain into a great country, then running away and leaving Gordon to carry the can to defeat.

  • Like 2
Posted
31 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

It was pretty obvious to me, and many others at the time that the US was trying to make the facts fit the war Bush wanted, and probably a load of BS. I never believed that Iraq could launch missiles that could hit western countries in half an hour or whatever BS they were telling us.

Even when they sent the unfortunate general out to BS the UN it looked dodgy to me.

Bush the younger wanted a war in Iraq and didn't care how he got it.

Blair's shame is that he became Bush's poodle, and dragged Britain into it, wasting 10 years in which he could have transformed Britain into a great country, then running away and leaving Gordon to carry the can to defeat.

 

"Blair's shame is that he became Bush's poodle, and dragged Britain into it, wasting 10 years in which he could have transformed Britain into a great country, then running away and leaving Gordon to carry the can to defeat."

 

are you an empire seeker/builder?

 

UK ain't great now (I assume that because the barstool occupants always ramble about Britain and great again)

had it not been for Blair and his follies Britain would have more than ripples to rule at this stage!

 

angrit bah!

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Posted

General election results for Labour over the last 40 years.

 

Defeat Callaghan

 

Defeat Foot

 

Defeat Kinnock

 

Defeat Kinnock

 

Win Blair  

 

Win Blair

 

Win Blair

 

Defeat Brown

 

Defeat Milliband

 

Defeat Corbyn

 

Defeat Corbyn

 

 

Spot the pattern.

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...