Jump to content

WHO head defends handling of coronavirus pandemic against Trump criticism


Recommended Posts

Posted

A post with content from an unapproved YouTube source has been removed, the following forum rule applies to YouTube as well:

 

18) Social Media content is not to be used as  source material unless it is from a recognized or approved news media source,  the source of any such material (Twitter, Facebook  etc.) should always be shown.

Posted
36 minutes ago, DoctorG said:

Surprised to learn this morning that membership costs Australia 9mAUD and that they contribute another 57mAUD as a voluntary contribution.

Nowhere near what the US and other larger countries contribute, but certainly far too much. My federal MP will be receiving an email shortly.

I am very sure that he is expecting it...

Posted
14 minutes ago, Peterw42 said:

W.H.O. is a scientific body, they correlate, act on, and report real scientific data from real scientific sources. They dont act on facebook posts, opinion, or anything not scientifically proven. (no matter how many are saying otherwise)

The day they had scientific evidence of human to human transmission is the day they made a statement of human to human transmission.

 

 

 

 

Science?  Bad science then. The UN is known for bad science.

  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, UbonThani said:

99% to blame China. 1% others.

although it's likely that seeing as WHO and CCP together might title 'blame'

 - they are really applying % gullibility

  • Like 1
Posted

May took his diversion and deflection bait and look the other way from his lackadaisical handling of the pandemic. He failed his own people. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, stevenl said:

Yes, the term scientific evidence is difficult. 

Half an ounce of common sense reqd really.

 

WHO are idiots. But we knew that before with their dodgy food science.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, UbonThani said:

Half an ounce of common sense reqd really.

 

WHO are idiots. But we knew that before with their dodgy food science.

Thanks for proving the point made.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...