.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png.8488ab72b8bb2e508209bfe3211b6e08.png)
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
.thumb.jpeg.d2d19a66404642fd9ff62d6262fd153e.jpeg)
-
-
Latest posts...
-
39
Chinese penis size matters: Cheeky joke blows up into beach brawl
The penis gets you head but it's the B*#LS that get you Ahead. 😁 -
953
Thai tax tangle: Expats warned of new rules on overseas income
However I did not fill in or sign any forms at all in the TRG office, which means that I do not have a TIN. -
953
Thai tax tangle: Expats warned of new rules on overseas income
I hope that I am on the TRD radar. I asked they provide me a TIN and they denied me one. I hope that they remember such. -
62
UK Exodus of Millionaires Highlights Concerns Over Labour’s Tax Policies
The meager tax they pay may as well be no tax. I did use the words "their fair share." I accept "some" tax may be paid, but nowhere near what they should be paying. Even the royals were mentioned in The Paradise Papers. -
198
Banged up: Thai prison nightmare exposed by British tourist
The two state solution has been rejected by the Palestinian side on numerous occasions , Palestinians want the who land for themselves and no Israel state on the land . The only war crimes have been those committed by the Palestinians . Israel left Gaza about 20 odd years ago, unoccupied Gaza , although Gaza will need to be occupied again by someone now as they cannot be trusted to live in peace -
953
Thai tax tangle: Expats warned of new rules on overseas income
I discovered mostly (but not totally) the same. I think (re; the tax code) "exempt for the purpose of income tax calculation" means non assessable (in the words of 'non-Thai' expatriates) ... and even just 'tax exempt' is considered 'non assessable' in the view of many (similar in some cases to 'exempt for the purposes of income tax calculation' even if not specifically stated ... which I note, does appear to be supported by what looks to be a deliberate omission (by the Thai RD) of different categories of common exempt income that is tax exempt, as note in Royal Decrees (such as LTR), in ministerial instructions (such as por.161/162) and in selected DTAs. Why would the RD DELIBERATELY (caps intended by me to make a point) omit an exempt entry field in a tax return form, if a DTA ,or if a Royal Decree or a ministerial exemption says such can be an exempt deduction? Why? IMHO that clearly suggests such exempt income is not to be reported. It disappointing to see the lack of clarity and confusion here. I do believe that anyone who reports remitted income that is 100% exempt tax (due to DTAs) on their tax return, or remitted income that is 100% exempt tax (due to por.161/162) on their tax return, or remitted income that is 100% tax exempt (due to Royal Decree) on their tax return, will still be mistakenly taxed on such because there is no place on the tax returns to list such as an exemption. This is true for the 2023 Thai tax return in English language and this is true for the 2024 tax return in Thai language. I speculate that those who put such exemptions in the tax return, in the wrong field (and there is no good field), will I believe have such exemptions denied, and will pay tax on income that is tax exempt. Then one is into appeal territory. And good luck with that.
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now