Trump raises possibility of delaying November U.S. presidential election

[Tie Dye Samurai]

12 minutes ago, Stadtler said:

Are you an accountant?  Can you account for this statement?  20,000 lies? Are you able to document 1000?  How about 500?  Perhaps 100?

 

Do prove your statement.

Hopefully "The Stadtler" approves and doesnt just chortle and waddle away disapprovingly: 

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/07/13/president-trump-has-made-more-than-20000-false-or-misleading-claims/

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jul/13/donald-trump-20000-false-or-misleading-claims

https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/fact-checker-analysis-president-trump-has-made-more-than-20000-false-or-misleading-claims/

 

P.S. Quit stealing The Rock's shtick....he is the Great One, you are not.

 

[Phoenix Rising]

7 minutes ago, Stadtler said:

Are you an accountant?  Can you account for this statement?  20,000 lies? Are you able to document 1000?  How about 500?  Perhaps 100?

 

Do prove your statement.

Are you serious???

https://www.factcheck.org/person/donald-trump/

 

Database link: In 1,267 days, President Trump has made 20,055 false or misleading claims

 

There you go. Anything else I can help you with?

 

[Phoenix Rising]

3 minutes ago, Stadtler said:

 

 

You can say that again. Did you say it?  If not, say it again, or write it again.

 

There is a difference between mail in ballots and absentee. 

 

Google it if you don't believe Stadtler. 

 

You should always believe Stadtler.

OK, troll alert.

[johnnybangkok]

12 minutes ago, Stadtler said:

Are you an accountant?  Can you account for this statement?  20,000 lies? Are you able to document 1000?  How about 500?  Perhaps 100?

 

Do prove your statement.

You're obviously new to this so we will be gently with you. The Washington Post has been keeping a score since he got into office. 

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/trump-claims-database/?utm_term=.27babcd5e58c&itid=lk_inline_manual_2&itid=lk_inline_manual_2

 

 

[johnnybangkok]

1 hour ago, Tippaporn said:

I'd recommend studying some human psychology.  How the human mind works.  It would explain a lot to you.  Perception is reality.  That's a clue.

 

As far as backing someone else.  Who?  Biden?   What characteristics does he exhibit to you?  I doubt if there's ever been an election cycle with as many loser candidates as the Dems put up this time around.  20 of them.  Tell me, who?

What's that even supposed to mean? It's just more of the usual vague, Trump apologist nonsense that we have come to expect from your ilk. What is it then? He's such a genius that he appears to be an absolute baffoon just so everyone's guard will then be down and he can then pounce with his genius to grab the deal that no one was expecting? That the perception of being clueless is just a cunning ploy so he can hoodwink us all and suddenly dazzle us with his genius....again.

Well if that is the case then he needs to get a hurry up as he's running out of time with an approval level in it's early 30's, a legacy that shows nothing done in 3 1/2 years other than give himself and his rich buddies a huge tax cut (at the expense of $2 trillion on the national debt), a pandemic that's completely out of hand and an economy in free-fall.  

And yes Biden. An honest, up-front, scandal free patriot who has served America faithfully for 50 years with hardly a blemish on his character and certainly nothing anywhere close to the scandal that follows Trump. I know you'll not be convinced, coming up with some predictable nonsense about his son or the 'sleepy Joe' moniker Trump has levelled at him, but if you cannot see the difference in moral character between the two men then may I suggest you turn that human psychology on yourself because that's where there is something wrong.   

[Scott]

Off-topic, troll posts and replies reported and removed. 

 

Stay on topic.

 

[thaibeachlovers]

9 hours ago, Tippaporn said:

I'd recommend studying some human psychology.  How the human mind works.  It would explain a lot to you.  Perception is reality.  That's a clue.

 

As far as backing someone else.  Who?  Biden?   What characteristics does he exhibit to you?  I doubt if there's ever been an election cycle with as many loser candidates as the Dems put up this time around.  20 of them.  Tell me, who?

Indeed. It's a bit rich of them lambasting those of us that support Trump over Biden when Biden is such an awful candidate that Trump is, IMO, a better choice.

Had they found an actual decent candidate there would be nothing for me to debate about. I prefer Trump only because I fear for the western world if Biden is elected. Find a decent candidate and they'll win for sure, IMO. That doesn't mean Warren or any of those that contested the primary- all as bad as Biden in their own way, IMO.

[Scott]

Discussion of sources is off-topic.   Post removed.  

 

[Chomper Higgot]

2 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Indeed. It's a bit rich of them lambasting those of us that support Trump over Biden when Biden is such an awful candidate that Trump is, IMO, a better choice.

Had they found an actual decent candidate there would be nothing for me to debate about. I prefer Trump only because I fear for the western world if Biden is elected. Find a decent candidate and they'll win for sure, IMO. That doesn't mean Warren or any of those that contested the primary- all as bad as Biden in their own way, IMO.

Well you did at least say ‘IMO’.

 

Your posting history suggests a wider set of reasons why you ‘prefer Trump’.

[Berkshire]

4 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Indeed. It's a bit rich of them lambasting those of us that support Trump over Biden when Biden is such an awful candidate that Trump is, IMO, a better choice.

Had they found an actual decent candidate there would be nothing for me to debate about. I prefer Trump only because I fear for the western world if Biden is elected. Find a decent candidate and they'll win for sure, IMO. That doesn't mean Warren or any of those that contested the primary- all as bad as Biden in their own way, IMO.

"Had they found an actual decent candidate...."  Anti-Biden people keep saying this.  But when asked to name just ONE such candidate, they can't.  If you would just say that you support Trump no matter what, you'd have more credibility. 

[johnnybangkok]

5 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Indeed. It's a bit rich of them lambasting those of us that support Trump over Biden when Biden is such an awful candidate that Trump is, IMO, a better choice.

Had they found an actual decent candidate there would be nothing for me to debate about. I prefer Trump only because I fear for the western world if Biden is elected. Find a decent candidate and they'll win for sure, IMO. That doesn't mean Warren or any of those that contested the primary- all as bad as Biden in their own way, IMO.

I think your 'neutral' status has been well and truly over for a long time Mr. Lover of Beaches. The dems could have put up Jesus Christ himself and you would have still found fault and voted for Trump. 

I think it's time you just fess up and simply admit you're a Trump fan despite any and all evidence that proves he is amoral, without compasion and generally just terrible at being POTUS. 

It's the more honest thing to do.

[Jingthing]

43 minutes ago, Berkshire said:

"Had they found an actual decent candidate...."  Anti-Biden people keep saying this.  But when asked to name just ONE such candidate, they can't.  If you would just say that you support Trump no matter what, you'd have more credibility. 

Pretty much but sometimes they say that creepy lady from Hawaii Tulsi Gabbard who was supported by almost zero democrats. 

[stevenl]

51 minutes ago, Berkshire said:

"Had they found an actual decent candidate...."  Anti-Biden people keep saying this.  But when asked to name just ONE such candidate, they can't.  If you would just say that you support Trump no matter what, you'd have more credibility. 

I am not anti Biden, but he doesn't have much appeal. Unfortunately that does give Trump still a chance to win this.

 

Will he make a decent president, yes, I think so.

[Berkshire]

7 minutes ago, stevenl said:

I am not anti Biden, but he doesn't have much appeal. Unfortunately that does give Trump still a chance to win this.

 

Will he make a decent president, yes, I think so.

There's enough deep hatred of Trump nationwide to get people excited enough to vote.  On the other side, there's not too much hatred for Biden.  Let's face it, how can anyone hate their grandfather.  He may have lost a step, but he's still a nice, honest, and decent old man.  And that's all America wants right now after 3+ years of lying, nastiness, and corruption from Trump.     

[johnnybangkok]

6 minutes ago, Berkshire said:

There's enough deep hatred of Trump nationwide to get people excited enough to vote.  On the other side, there's not too much hatred for Biden.  Let's face it, how can anyone hate their grandfather.  He may have lost a step, but he's still a nice, honest, and decent old man.  And that's all America wants right now after 3+ years of lying, nastiness, and corruption from Trump.     

I agree. He's a safe bet and that's exactly what the Dems wanted. They couldn't risk putting a woman up (America still not ready for that) never mind a gay candidate, so they went with the safe 'old and white' formula. It's not particularly inspiring but at least it does what needs to be done which is get rid of Trump.

[Eric Loh]

16 minutes ago, Berkshire said:

There's enough deep hatred of Trump nationwide to get people excited enough to vote.  On the other side, there's not too much hatred for Biden.  Let's face it, how can anyone hate their grandfather.  He may have lost a step, but he's still a nice, honest, and decent old man.  And that's all America wants right now after 3+ years of lying, nastiness, and corruption from Trump.     

Concurred with polls that placed Biden way ahead of Trump on personal traits like honesty, empathy, good role model and even temper. 

[heybruce]

2 minutes ago, orphanbrown said:

"Went missing"? Really? And when somevoters don't show up at the polls to vote,is their failure to vote also a cause for alarm? Obviously "missing" is a misnomer. What those ballots obviously should be called is "uncast'.

Oh My God, I hadn't thought of that!  Voters who don't vote are missing.

 

Quick, organize a search party!

[stevenl]

46 minutes ago, Berkshire said:

There's enough deep hatred of Trump nationwide to get people excited enough to vote.  On the other side, there's not too much hatred for Biden.  Let's face it, how can anyone hate their grandfather.  He may have lost a step, but he's still a nice, honest, and decent old man.  And that's all America wants right now after 3+ years of lying, nastiness, and corruption from Trump.     

I hope so.