Billionaire Bloomberg to spend $100 million in Florida to help Biden

[Morch]

4 hours ago, TopDeadSenter said:

 How desperate does one side need to be to ruin any chance of a credible and timely election result? It will be sheer chaos. Luckily Trump has been very vocal over this impending fiasco, so hard to blame it on him. 

 

Indeed...

 

Roger Stone to Donald Trump: bring in martial law if you lose election

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/sep/13/roger-stone-to-donald-trump-bring-in-martial-law-if-you-lose-election

 

Trump keeps telling people to vote twice, even though that’s a crime

https://www.vox.com/2020/9/12/21434020/trump-keeps-telling-people-to-vote-twice-even-though-thats-a-crime

[Morch]

3 hours ago, Boon Mee said:

Ha! It'll take a lot more than 100 million to get Florida to vote for Biden. He's already lost the Latino voters. They aren't ready for his brand of Socialism 

 

MAGA 

 

You quite obviously have no idea what Socialism is.

[Isaan sailor]

Failed Democratic Presidential candidate thinks he can deliver super-sized results in Florida.  That won’t happen.

[Morch]

2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Bloomberg is keeping the promise he made.

 

He’s widely choosing to spend his money at the time it has the biggest impact.

 

Meanwhile Trump has yet to spend any of his own money on his financially failing campaign.

 

Unless mistaken, comments about Trump's campaign in 2016 being run on a relatively low budget, while highlighting funds available to HRC were a thing back then. Could be that on this score, Trump's side is not as daft or careless as some wish. No point spending in places you won't win, and maybe better to conserve energy and use it nearer to the end of the race.

[Morch]

2 hours ago, TopDeadSenter said:

Sure I read recently that intentionally misleading statements and lies presented as fact are not allowed on this forum? And here we have another howling untruth presented as fact to bash the President. For the record, Trump has never filed for personal bankruptcy. Not once, not twice, and not your 5 times. 

 

I agree that it's a pity some posters read stuff, but don't take it to heart or change their ways. Now, about posting "intentionally misdealing statements and lies presented as fact...."

[Morch]

1 hour ago, Henryford said:

Wouldn't it be cheaper to just buy Creepy Joe a new brain.

 

I dunno, if they'd just put it a brain that can only come up with such 'classy' one liners then it's waste. The name is Joe Biden. No need to copy each and every bad behavior exhibited by the President.

[spidermike007]

3 hours ago, Boon Mee said:

Ha! It'll take a lot more than 100 million to get Florida to vote for Biden. He's already lost the Latino voters. They aren't ready for his brand of Socialism 

 

MAGA 

Hogwash. Biden is as centrist as they come. 

 

Make America great again. Vote Trump out! 

[rumak]

I asked bloomberg for a paltry 5 million......... no reply.   humpffffff

[Chomper Higgot]

41 minutes ago, Morch said:

 

Unless mistaken, comments about Trump's campaign in 2016 being run on a relatively low budget, while highlighting funds available to HRC were a thing back then. Could be that on this score, Trump's side is not as daft or careless as some wish. No point spending in places you won't win, and maybe better to conserve energy and use it nearer to the end of the race.

Except Trump has been spending ‘bigly’ in NY and DC, two places he hasn’t a cat in Hell chance of winning.

 

His campaign are milking the donations while feeding Trump stuff he likes to see/hear.

 

The post election investigation into campaign finance crimes is going to be an eye popper.

Edited September 14, 2020 by Chomper Higgot

[Chomper Higgot]

41 minutes ago, Isaan sailor said:

Failed Democratic Presidential candidate thinks he can deliver super-sized results in Florida.  That won’t happen.

The Dems don’t need a supersized result in Florida, they just need more votes than the Republicans.

 

The polls indicate Florida is up for grabs.

[rumak]

Gonna be fun to see the  good Bydens (how much longer can he stand?) ......  fighting with the Dump the Trumpers.     

Heraclitus said the only thing that is constant is change .  Obviously he had not witnessed the american political cistern for the last 50 years.    Same old same old.   Well,  maybe net worth of the politicians is a lot higher than before...............  other than that, Nada.

[DaftToPutRealName]

5 hours ago, TopDeadSenter said:

 How desperate does one side need to be to ruin any chance of a credible and timely election result? It will be sheer chaos. Luckily Trump has been very vocal over this impending fiasco, so hard to blame it on him. 

 Many of his most vocal critics around the Chinese Flu are the same ones which called him racist earlier in the year for suggesting that they close flights to China and which said the WHO showed no evidence of it being dangerous....

Unfortunately these days they will find literally any reason to blame him for something - regardless of the facts. When the media gets their weekly buzzword it's a sight to behold how coordinated each and every outlet seems to be with stuffing it in every key sentence, and then it's just a matter of repeating it over and over again to make it truth.

Edited September 14, 2020 by DaftToPutRealName

[Morch]

32 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Except Trump has been spending ‘bigly’ in NY and DC, two places he hasn’t a cat in Hell chance of winning.

 

His campaign are milking the donations while feeding Trump stuff he likes to see/hear.

 

The post election investigation into campaign finance crimes is going to be an eye popper.

 

Maybe it's a scam, maybe not. I'm just saying that issues regarding the way his campaign spends funds were discussed last time around, and we all know how that went. I hope that the election results would make an investigation such as this possible. Kinda doubt it'll happen (or if anything will come out of it) if he wins again.

[watthong]

33 minutes ago, DaftToPutRealName said:

6 hours ago, TopDeadSenter said:

 How desperate does one side need to be to ruin any chance of a credible and timely election result? It will be sheer chaos. Luckily Trump has been very vocal over this impending fiasco, so hard to blame it on him. 

 Many of his most vocal critics around the Chinese Flu are the same ones which called him racist earlier in the year for suggesting that they close flights to China and which said the WHO showed no evidence of it being dangerous....

Unfortunately these days they will find literally any reason to blame him for something - regardless of the facts. When the media gets their weekly buzzword it's a sight to behold how coordinated each and every outlet seems to be with stuffing it in every key sentence, and then it's just a matter of repeating it over and over again to make it truth.

File the above quote under: "Another day, another troll is born".

 

It's the thief sounding the alarm, or the robber calling 911. ie Trump M.O (modus operandi, or mode of operation in case someone wonders).  Trump declares "Mail in voting is rife with fraud" without mentioning that the fraud would likely come from his party, that's one check for dishonesty, ie lying by omission. In the same token, "voting for Biden will bring chaos" and at the same time Trump himself inciting hatred and division. The wise think you can fool some people some time, the fool think you can fool all people all the time. Trump and his supporters belong in the latter category because they believe they are living in a world of fools.

 

Then again: "and then it's just a matter of repeating it over and over again to make it truth." That's something Trump does as often as he breathes, isn't it? Funny how a lot of time the Trump fans appear to be criticizing themselves and their master... 

 

[yellowboat]

3 hours ago, 2 is 1 said:

So you call Trump is "average American" ! Lord please help us!

No, but Jo Jorgensen is running too.   Gary Johnson got 5% of the popular vote despite having weak performances on cable news. That is the problem that you have uncovered.  People only think there are two choices. 

 

One thing in Trumps favor, he doesn't pretend to be anything but who he is.  Joe Biden is a pretender but he created the crime bill and supports war.  He's a shill for the American 1%.   I wouldn't vote for either, but I dislike Biden more.       

[Poet]

I am not political, but I suspect that among ordinary swing voters - the folks who voted for Obama twice but couldn't stomach Hillary - incidents such as the cops getting shot, businesses getting looted, and even seemingly trivial stuff such as those old people getting harassed in DC, may be more upsetting than the Democrats realize.

Even fairly non-technical people are getting to see this stuff online, so, it creates a sense of unreality when the Democrat convention and media ignore those details.

In May, I was pretty certain that Trump had no path to re-election, after being a near certainty in February due to the economy. In just a few short months, too many key factors had swung in the wrong direction and he was toast. In May, I realized it would take a miracle for him to turn this around, an absolute miracle.

That miracle was George Floyd's neck. What at first looked like yet another electoral torpedo turned out to be a liferaft for Trump as BLM, bouyed by the initiable surge of public support and corporate protection money, went insane and starting saying out loud the things they weren't meant to say.

Then the Democrats joined the insanity by holding a national convention that did not once mention the riots which most potential voters were fully aware of. Then they embraced Jacob Blake, a man who had sexually molested his estranged wife the very morning he was shot. All of this is alarming regular folks outside the media bubble. I have never seen public sentiment shift as fast as it has against BLM over the past few months. I'm guessing the current protests, chanting "All pigs must die" outside the hospital where the police deputies shot earlier are in serious condition, won't help either.

I'm genuinely curious to know if the Biden supporters here are aware that this perceptual gap between you and public could be a problem, possibly blowing what should be a sure thing.

 

Edited September 14, 2020 by Poet

[Morch]

3 minutes ago, Poet said:

I am not political, but I suspect that among ordinary swing voters - the folks who voted for Obama twice but couldn't stomach Hillary - incidents such as the cops getting shot, businesses getting looted, and even seemingly trivial stuff such as those old people getting harassed in DC, may be more upsetting than the Democrats realize.

Even fairly non-technical people are getting to see this stuff online, so, it creates a sense of unreality when the Democrat convention and media ignore those details.

In May, I was pretty certain that Trump had no path to re-election, after being a near certainty in February due to the economy. In just a few short months, too many key factors had swung in the wrong direction and he was toast. In May, I realized it would take a miracle for him to turn this around, an absolute miracle.

That miracle was George Floyd's neck. What at first looked like yet another electoral torpedo turned out to be a liferaft for Trump as BLM, bouyed by the initiable surge of public support and corporate protection money, went insane and starting saying out loud the things they weren't meant to say.

Then the Democrats joined the insanity by holding a national convention that did not once mention the riots which most potential voters were fully aware of. Then they embraced Jacob Blake, a man who had sexually molested his estranged wife the very morning he was shot. All of this is alarming regular folks outside the media bubble. I have never seen public sentiment shift as fast as it has against BLM over the past few months. I'm guessing the current protests, chanting "All pigs must die" outside the hospital where the police deputies shot earlier are in serious condition, won't help either.

I'm genuinely curious to know if the Biden supporters here are aware that this perceptual gap between you and public could be a problem, possibly blowing what should be a sure thing.

 

 

"I am not political..."

 

[pegman]

8 hours ago, Puchaiyank said:

It is unfortunate that electing an American President has become such an expensive endeavor. 

 

Entire election process needs to be revised.

The American version of democracy has always seemed more auction than election to me

[Poet]

2 minutes ago, Morch said:

Somewhat redundant to protest too much, not being political and all that.

I appreciate the attention that you are helping me shine on my thoughts. In return, I feel you deserve proper answers.

[rumak]

When asked where his supporters were,  Biden looked confused.   He quickly got briefed and assured

everyone that he wore them at home,   but was told they did not look "presidential" worn in public

 

[sawadee1947]

The best investment in the future 

[simple1]

3 hours ago, TopDeadSenter said:

Thank you, but the statement I am reacting to is that Trump has been personally bankrupt 5 times. It is false. 100% false. That businesses Trump had involvement in have filed for bankruptcy is irrelevant. 

No, it is not irrelevant, it provides clarity on his complete disregard for suppliers / creditors. If you want to beat trump's drum show where trump has compensated his unsecured creditors once he regained wealth. In the meantime, trump's lack of character has been demonstrated numerous times with various fraudulent activities. Yes, I know he hasn't been jailed, pays large amounts to his lawyers, settles out of Court etc. If it was a guy cheating someone for $10k he would have served time, but for the wealthy...

[candide]

1 hour ago, DaftToPutRealName said:

 Many of his most vocal critics around the Chinese Flu are the same ones which called him racist earlier in the year for suggesting that they close flights to China and which said the WHO showed no evidence of it being dangerous....

Unfortunately these days they will find literally any reason to blame him for something - regardless of the facts. When the media gets their weekly buzzword it's a sight to behold how coordinated each and every outlet seems to be with stuffing it in every key sentence, and then it's just a matter of repeating it over and over again to make it truth.

Which is exactly what you are doing (repeating it over and over again to make it truth).

You will not find any quote from Pelosi or Biden mentioning the CHINA travel ban, nor saying that the WHO showed no evidence etc....

BTW are you aware that it's Trump who downplayed the epidemic, stating that Dems were creating panic?

[Poet]

20 minutes ago, candide said:

You will not find any quote from Pelosi or Biden mentioning the CHINA travel ban

 

Seriously, you don't remember Pelosi dramatic appearance in Chinatown to protest his decision, and inviting everyone in San Francisco to come join her?

I'm pretty sure Biden called it racist too, because that was the Democrat line at that time, around the end of February. Fairly standard rhetoric in these times.

Trump can be criticized for plenty of things, include later aspects of the covid response, why pick on something he happened to get right?


 

Edited September 14, 2020 by Poet

[J Town]

9 hours ago, oompie69 said:

Politics is an expensive business, but the rewards are even more lucrative. Why else would people enter politics in the first place? 

Was it ever about serving the people?

It used to be. In the very beginning, being a US politician was a voluntary position. They believed in the great experiment and it was successful. Then corporate greed entered the picture and it's now a horrible mess. There is hope - history books are full of dictators, dictator wannabes, and empires that all thought they'd last forever.

[Eric Loh]

5 minutes ago, Poet said:

 

Seriously, you don't remember Pelosi dramatic appearance in Chinatown to protest his decision, and inviting everyone in San Francisco to come join her?

I'm pretty sure Biden called it racist too, because that was the Democrat line at that time, around the end of February. Fairly standard rhetoric in these times.

Trump can be criticized for plenty of things, include later aspects of the covid response, why pick on something he happened to get right?


 

On the same day, Trump said this.

“The Coronavirus is very much under control in the USA. We are in contact with everyone and all relevant countries. CDC & World Health have been working hard and very smart. Stock Market starting to look very good to me!”

In any case, Trump mischaracterized and exaggerated what Pelosi said and falsely claimed a video of Pelosi mingling with the Chinatown crowd. There was no such video. He lied again. 

[forehandplus]

1 hour ago, yellowboat said:

No, but Jo Jorgensen is running too.   Gary Johnson got 5% of the popular vote despite having weak performances on cable news. That is the problem that you have uncovered.  People only think there are two choices. 

 

One thing in Trumps favor, he doesn't pretend to be anything but who he is.  Joe Biden is a pretender but he created the crime bill and supports war.  He's a shill for the American 1%.   I wouldn't vote for either, but I dislike Biden more.       

Which is why he's running on a program to increase taxes on the 1 %? In politics, follow the money. It's obvious that if anyone is a shill for the 1 percent, it's Trump.

[forehandplus]

1 hour ago, Poet said:

I'm genuinely curious to know if the Biden supporters here are aware that this perceptual gap between you and public could be a problem, possibly blowing what should be a sure thing.

 

So Biden supporters aren't part of the public? You keep on giving yourself away. Your is just another version of "I don't like Trump but..."

[stevenl]

4 hours ago, TopDeadSenter said:

<snip>That businesses Trump had involvement in have filed for bankruptcy is irrelevant. 

Disagree with you, it is very telling for his business sense and his mentality.

[candide]

3 minutes ago, Poet said:

 

Seriously, you don't remember Pelosi dramatic appearance in Chinatown to protest his decision, and inviting everyone in San Francisco to come join her?

I'm pretty sure Biden called it racist too, because that was the Democrat line at that time, around the end of February. Fairly standard rhetoric in these times.

Trump can be criticized for plenty of things, include later aspects of the covid response, why pick on something he happened to get right?


 

Pelosi did not go to Chinatown to protest his decision. She went there because people were afraid to go there although there was no coronavirus in Chinatown at that time. Pelosi and Biden called Trump a racist many times over the years, in particular because of his statements about immigrants and the so-called Muslim travel bans (including the last one on Jan. 31). As I wrote before, if you want to find a quote mentioning the CHINA travel ban, good luck to you!

 

Trump was right to implement travel restrictions, but his claim that he courageously decided it against the opinion of everyone else is false. There was no particular opposition to it in the US, and around 50 other countries implemented a travel ban at about the same time or before