Jump to content

Charter Court acquits PM Prayut Chan-o-cha


Recommended Posts

Posted

Thai PM found 'not guilty' in conflict of interest case

 

2020-12-02T083621Z_1_LYNXMPEGB10HU_RTROPTP_4_HEALTH-CORONAVIRUS-THAILAND-VACCINE.JPG

Thailand Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-ocha attends an agreement signing ceremony for purchase of AstraZeneca's potential COVID-19 vaccine at Government House, amid the spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), in Bangkok, Thailand November 27, 2020. REUTERS/Chalinee Thirasupa/Pool

 

BANGKOK (Reuters) - Thailand's constitutional court ruled on Wednesday that Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-ocha was "not guilty" of a conflict of interest for staying in an army residence after retiring.

 

The ruling meant that he can stay in power. The court's decision comes with tension high after months of protests to demand his removal.

 

Opposition parliamentarians filed a petition that it constituted a conflict of interest for Prayuth to have remained in military housing after his retirement from the army in 2014. Prayuth has said he needs to stay there for security reasons.

 

(Reporting by Patpicha Tanakasempipat and Panarat Thepgumpanat; Editing by Matthew Tostevin)

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2020-12-02
 
  • Like 1
  • Sad 5
Posted
20 minutes ago, ThailandRyan said:

I like his defense that he could not live in the PM's residence as it was being remodeled.  For how many years has it been under remodel.  Then add in his own words that "It's to big for his Family", and you know he never intended to live there.  I would like to see the expenses used for his security and housing while living on base.  It is a perk that he gets security and housing, but he should be living in the official residence not a military house that can be used by some other needy military commander.

Needy or greedy?

 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, webfact said:

The Army informed the court that the residence was provided to Prayut because he is PM and deserves the honour and security it provides.

And where do they draw the line about which people and which institutions can give what kinds of benefits providing honour and security?

 

Can rich business people, for example, give politicians fancy cars if they have bulletproof windows? How about a mansion with German Shepards or a Rolex that releases sleeping gas?

 

Will the army be supplying housing for all future PM’s? 

  • Like 2
Posted

Phew! that was close the constitutional court seems to be following Prayuts constitution for some unknown reason let the fireworks begin it's show time????????

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, sammieuk1 said:

Phew! that was close the constitutional court seems to be following Prayuts constitution for some unknown reason let the fireworks begin it's show time????????

It was part of the 20 year Roadmap the good general designed.  That and the way he has taken decisive control of the peoples rights.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...