Jump to content

Thailand reports another fall in new COVID-19 infections


rooster59

Recommended Posts

Thailand reports another fall in new COVID-19 infections

 

cv.JPG

 

Thailand reported 490 new coronavirus cases on Saturday.

 

Nearly all of the new cases were again discovered during testing of migrant workers at quarantine facilities and hospitals in Samut Sakhon.

 

Of the new cases, 412 were discovered in Samut Sakhon via active contact tracing, while 67  were so-called ‘walk-ins’ discovered from people reporting to hospital. 11 cases were imported from people entering quarantine.

 

Thailand’s Centre for COVID-19 Situation Administration (CCSA) also reported that 943 people were discharged from hospital having made a full recovery.

 

6,781 people remain in hospital or held in a migrant worker quarantine centre. No new deaths were  reported

Saturday’s cases bring the total number of COVID-19 infections in Thailand to 23,135, with 79 deaths. 
 

thai+visa_news.jpg

-- © Copyright Thai Visa News 2021-02-06
 
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, hotandsticky said:

 

 

Well, that UK variant won't hit the streets here if the government maintain their quarantine programme.

The same quarantine program that was in place when the second wave happened? People sneaking over the border can easily bring in the UK variant or others.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Ohyesuare said:

The same quarantine program that was in place when the second wave happened? People sneaking over the border can easily bring in the UK variant or others.

 

It is all about probabilities.  Nothing can stop everything.  But the more you do, the less there is.

 

And they did not do enough on the Burmese border before the second wave.

 

Edited by rabas
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ThailandRyan said:

So if they have that many walk ins in Bangkok, why are they not testing proactively here.  Would be nice to have some idea of where and when these folks were infected.  It might just keep the misses and I from going to certain places.  We walked 12km yesterday evening and visited many locales from Sathon to Sukhumvit and a few malls and side sois getting fruit from some of the vendors on the street.

23 out of 10 million

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, ThailandRyan said:

So if they have that many walk ins in Bangkok, why are they not testing proactively here.  Would be nice to have some idea of where and when these folks were infected.  It might just keep the misses and I from going to certain places.  We walked 12km yesterday evening and visited many locales from Sathon to Sukhumvit and a few malls and side sois getting fruit from some of the vendors on the street.

You're asking for trouble going on 12km walks in the evening.

 

Be sensible.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, ThailandRyan said:

Apparently it is of a major concern Sheryl as public officials are ramping up proactive screening in six districts after a large number cases have now been confirmed.  Those districts in western Bangkok they are now testing pro-actively in are the following districts (Bang Kae, Phasi Charoen, Bang Khunthian, Chom Thong, Nong Khaem and Bang Bon).  It might be connected to factories here in Bangkok but they are checking.  Phasi Charoen is getting close to the downtown Area, and near where the GF and I go on some days and really isn't that far from the Asiatique Area and the backside of the Sathon District where we live.  So it is concerning.

Looks like its going to be the next hotspot. Just published in the Nation

 

54 Covid-19 cases found in Bangkok after proactive testing in factories

 

https://www.nationthailand.com/news/30402321?utm_source=homepage&utm_medium=internal_referral

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hotandsticky said:

 

 

Well, that UK variant won't hit the streets here if the government maintain their quarantine programme.

Yes, been reading up about the UK variant as found the timing interesting, here are a few facts that might cause one to think a little bit.

 

Health officials, politicians and the media around the world turned their focus on the variant right after the publication of three theoretical-modeling papers on B.1.1.7, the one originating in the U.K. None of the three papers was checked over for accuracy by objective observers – a process called ‘peer review', nonetheless, all three were portrayed as solid science. So yet again no checking allowed.

 

So who was behind this new modelling? Why our old friend Neil Ferguson, the UK government has relied on his mathematical modeling for many years, despite his work turning out to be highly inaccurate time after time. In fact this insider has rarely gotten anything right. He  also supposedly stepped down from his government-advisory role last May after being caught secretly meeting with his gik during lock downs, but was then quietly restored to positions of influence. Funny how some get a free pass while the public gets arrested.

 

In the one paper published the authors state in the last section of their paper that “It is important to remember that our maps define biochemical phenotypes of the RBD, not how these phenotypes relate to viral fitness. There are many complexities in the relationship between biochemical phenotypes of yeast-displayed RBD and viral fitness.”

Translation: Just because our experiments showed that the presence of N501Y or other changes in the RBD seems to make the RBD bind tighter to the ACE2 receptor, we don’t know whether any of these changes make the virus more transmissible. 

 

So is it more dangerous? Maybe, but no one actually knows. It is all 100% conjecture.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Rancid said:

Yes, been reading up about the UK variant as found the timing interesting, here are a few facts that might cause one to think a little bit.

 

Health officials, politicians and the media around the world turned their focus on the variant right after the publication of three theoretical-modeling papers on B.1.1.7, the one originating in the U.K. None of the three papers was checked over for accuracy by objective observers – a process called ‘peer review', nonetheless, all three were portrayed as solid science. So yet again no checking allowed.

 

So who was behind this new modelling? Why our old friend Neil Ferguson, the UK government has relied on his mathematical modeling for many years, despite his work turning out to be highly inaccurate time after time. In fact this insider has rarely gotten anything right. He  also supposedly stepped down from his government-advisory role last May after being caught secretly meeting with his gik during lock downs, but was then quietly restored to positions of influence. Funny how some get a free pass while the public gets arrested.

 

In the one paper published the authors state in the last section of their paper that “It is important to remember that our maps define biochemical phenotypes of the RBD, not how these phenotypes relate to viral fitness. There are many complexities in the relationship between biochemical phenotypes of yeast-displayed RBD and viral fitness.”

Translation: Just because our experiments showed that the presence of N501Y or other changes in the RBD seems to make the RBD bind tighter to the ACE2 receptor, we don’t know whether any of these changes make the virus more transmissible. 

 

So is it more dangerous? Maybe, but no one actually knows. It is all 100% conjecture.

Very unlikely. A virus wants to grow and infect as many people as possible not kill people. This nonsense about mutant virus strains is all scaremongering. Its the natural evolution of a virus to be more contagious! Everyday you see headlines saying that the new virus may not be affective against a new strain and then a few days later its confirmed it does. Thais are not suffering like other countries for whatever reasons and lets just be happy with that!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, FarFlungFalang said:

I'm not questioning Thailands level of expertise in the medical field but what are they doing that is so different to the rest of the world that make such a huge difference.As for the track ad tracing every case they have managed to track and trace the 4000 cases in the last week?

So a private venue would be excluded from such announcements such as shopping malls?There is absolutely no details give about these mystery transmissions other than they occurred in Bangkok,which begs the question why other countries give so much detail and perform so many tests and lockdowns if Thailand consistently shows that's completely unnecessary in order to prevent spread.What's your theory on why they don't publish testing numbers?

without the system accepting Point Data

- the following sort of Report (the detailed one) can never come to fruition

 image.jpeg.8e906843717995ff95a3ecece4959cf4.jpeg 

Every single test/outbreak location needs to be Included, to get a Real result 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sametboy2019 said:

Very unlikely. A virus wants to grow and infect as many people as possible not kill people. This nonsense about mutant virus strains is all scaremongering. Its the natural evolution of a virus to be more contagious! Everyday you see headlines saying that the new virus may not be affective against a new strain and then a few days later its confirmed it does. Thais are not suffering like other countries for whatever reasons and lets just be happy with that!

Every year the UK health system gets to breaking point dealing with flues an common colds and it seems this year is no different except doing massive testing to see if those that died had a cold in the previous month.I still haven't seen any bodies lining the streets and haven't seen people keeling over on any videos since those in China what's with that?  

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...