Jump to content

Biden says U.S. sending medium-range rocket systems to Ukraine


Recommended Posts

Posted
5 hours ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Putin has no intention of taking over Europe though , its actually NATO/E.U. that wants to expand their influence into the Eastern Block by aligning themselves with Ukraine , at the expense of Russia 

 

Maybe you missed this one out of Russia lately:

 

Russian TV Says Poland Next Target for Invasion

NATO member Poland could be the next target of a Russian invasion as the war in Ukraine drags on, according to pro-Kremlin Russian TV channel Russia-1.

 

Presenter Olga Skabeeva, host of the "60 Minutes" talk show and one of Russia's most prominent state propagandists, was quoted by Daily Beast journalist Julia Davis as saying that Russia should smash Western countries after Ukraine, starting with its neighbor Poland.

...

"Perhaps it's time to acknowledge that maybe Russia's special operation in Ukraine has come to an end, in a sense that a real war had started: World War III. We're forced to conduct the demilitarization not only of Ukraine, but of the entire NATO alliance."

 

https://www.newsweek.com/russian-tv-says-poland-next-target-invasion-1711967

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

 It's Russia that has the nukes. Of course Ukraine 30 years ago made a big mistake giving up their nukes. That was going to guarantee not being invaded by Russia (then USSR). DO NOT TRUST RUSSIA! Also to note, Putin is probably on his way out, he's very ill, but his replacement could easily be even worse.

 

Why Ukraine gave up nuclear weapons and what that means in a Russian invasion : NPR


 

Quote

 

Why Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons — and what that means in an invasion by Russia

 

Three decades ago, the newly independent country of Ukraine was briefly the third-largest nuclear power in the world.

 

 

 

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

 

Maybe you missed this one out of Russia lately:

 

Russian TV Says Poland Next Target for Invasion

NATO member Poland could be the next target of a Russian invasion as the war in Ukraine drags on, according to pro-Kremlin Russian TV channel Russia-1.

 

Presenter Olga Skabeeva, host of the "60 Minutes" talk show and one of Russia's most prominent state propagandists, was quoted by Daily Beast journalist Julia Davis as saying that Russia should smash Western countries after Ukraine, starting with its neighbor Poland.

...

"Perhaps it's time to acknowledge that maybe Russia's special operation in Ukraine has come to an end, in a sense that a real war had started: World War III. We're forced to conduct the demilitarization not only of Ukraine, but of the entire NATO alliance."

 

https://www.newsweek.com/russian-tv-says-poland-next-target-invasion-1711967

 

Says the host of a Russian talk show , that's hardly an indication of Putins intentions .

   A talk show host said it, Putin didnt say it 

Posted
50 minutes ago, Smoothsailing1 said:

 

The NATO excuse is a total crock. It's Putin himself who is promoting NATO. Putin didn't invade Ukraine because of NATO. Putin is on record for being GENOCIDAL towards Ukrainians specifically. He can't imagine his perverted vision of a renewed Russian empire without Ukraine being completely cancelled as a nation. That is his agenda. Is he invading Finland and Sweden? Of course not. You bought the NATO fake excuse. It is not true.

  • Like 1
Posted
51 minutes ago, Smoothsailing1 said:

 

NATO was not creeping up on Russia. Nations which felt they had reason to fear Russia sought to join NATO. Poland is the latest example of a nation directly threatened by Russia despite having never attacked that country.

 

This propaganda talking point that somehow NATO provoked Russia and justified Russia's invasion and subsequent war crimes is equivalent to justifying the holocaust.

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Says the host of a Russian talk show , that's hardly an indication of Putins intentions .

   A talk show host said it, Putin didnt say it 

Russian talk show hosts  read strictly from the Kremlin script.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Jingthing said:

The NATO excuse is a total crock. It's Putin himself who is promoting NATO. Putin didn't invade Ukraine because of NATO. Putin is on record for being GENOCIDAL towards Ukrainians specifically. He can't imagine his perverted vision of a renewed Russian empire without Ukraine being completely cancelled as a nation. That is his agenda. Is he invading Finland and Sweden? Of course not. You bought the NATO fake excuse. It is not true.

 

1 minute ago, ozimoron said:

NATO was not creeping up on Russia. Nations which felt they had reason to fear Russia sought to join NATO. Poland is the latest example of a nation directly threatened by Russia despite having never attacked that country.

 

This propaganda talking point that somehow NATO provoked Russia and justified Russia's invasion and subsequent war crimes is equivalent to justifying the holocaust.

 

Putin asked about Russia joining NATO and they just laughed at him. They aren't laughing now.

 

When you look at the situation on the ground today, it is obvious that there should have been diplomacy with Russia, not conflict.

 

They should start talking now, so that we can avoid getting into a nuclear war.

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

Russian talk show hosts  read strictly from the Kremlin script.

Really .

What is that based on ?

Do you have any evidence that the Kremlin wrote that or is it something you made up ?

  • Haha 1
Posted
45 minutes ago, Smoothsailing1 said:

Putin asked about Russia joining NATO and they just laughed at him. They aren't laughing now.

 

When you look at the situation on the ground today, it is obvious that there should have been diplomacy with Russia, not conflict.

 

They should start talking now, so that we can avoid getting into a nuclear war.

It is not the time to talk. Putin isn't interested in talking. It's delusional to think that. It is the time to make military gains against Putin so when the time comes to talk Ukraine can be in the driver's seat. All Putin would accept now is total surrender. I'm sure the Putin shills would love that.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Really .

What is that based on ?

Do you have any evidence that the Kremlin wrote that or is it something you made up ?

There are more hawkish factions in the Kremlin than Putin but I would assume at this point any noise on Russian propaganda tv about invading Poland is just noise. So is the empty outrage that the U.S. is helping Ukraine with weapons. Putin's game is to try to scare the world with all kinds of threats. He hopes that will make the west back down. Some weak voices in the west are falling for that. 

Edited by Jingthing
  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

You're kidding, right? What happens to Russian media organisations and journalists which fail to toe the party line?

Journalists  may have trouble if they start to criticise Putin and Russia , but they wouldn't get in any trouble if they implied that Russia is a World power and can do whatever it wants to do (like invading Poland), BUT , that doesn't mean what journalists say is official Russian policy

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

Try again:

 

"Presenter Olga Skabeeva, host of the "60 Minutes" talk show and one of Russia's most prominent state propagandists..."

 

Yes, a "propergandists"

 

Propergandist..................................which may not be objective and may be selectively presenting facts to encourage a particular synthesis or perception, or using loaded language to produce an emotional rather than a rational response to the information that is being presented.

'

Posted
2 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Journalists  may have trouble if they start to criticise Putin and Russia , but they wouldn't get in any trouble if they implied that Russia is a World power and can do whatever it wants to do (like invading Poland), BUT , that doesn't mean what journalists say is official Russian policy

A rare case where I agree with you. This is part of their propaganda policy. Keep making big threats. Create divisions in the west with growing factions becoming more afraid of Russia so that they pressure Ukraine to surrender. They're so obvious. 

  • Like 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

There are more hawkish factions in the Kremlin than Putin but I would assume at this point any noise on Russian propaganda tv about invading Poland is just noise. So is the empty outrage that the U.S. is helping Ukraine with weapons. Putin's game is to try to scare the world with all kinds of threats. He hopes that will make the west back down. Some weak voices in the west are falling for that. 

And if Russia were to invade Poland , that would mean all 30 NATO Countries defending Poland and declaring war on Russia , which is something Russia isnt going to want to happen 

Posted
Just now, Mac Mickmanus said:

And if Russia were to invade Poland , that would mean all 30 NATO Countries defending Poland and declaring war on Russia , which is something Russia isnt going to want to happen 

Does a dying despot who wants his own mausoleum and place in history as a Russian patriot care about that?

Posted
1 minute ago, ozimoron said:

Does a dying despot who wants his own mausoleum and place in history as a Russian patriot care about that?

He is struggling to meet his war goals in Ukraine and Ukraine is what Putin cares about the most. 

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

Does a dying despot who wants his own mausoleum and place in history as a Russian patriot care about that?

You think that Putin may be a psychopath who has little time left in the World and he wants to start a World war before he dies ?

  OK, so if that were the case. he would have already invaded Poland m as he hasnt done that , your fears are without reason

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

You think that Putin may be a psychopath who has little time left in the World and he wants to start a World war before he dies ?

Yes, but I never suggested he was a psychopath. Don't misquote me.

 

4 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

  OK, so if that were the case. he would have already invaded Poland m as he hasnt done that , your fears are without reason

He doesn't possess the military capacity to do so. He's barely making ground against a much smaller army in the east of Ukraine despite much larger ambitions.

Edited by ozimoron
Posted
7 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

Yes, but I never suggested he was a psychopath. Don't misquote me.

 

 

Well , starting a World war just so he can get a mausoleum before he dies , plunging the world in to a war for his own benefit is quite descriptive of psychopathic  behavior .

   You didnt say he was a psychopath , but you are expecting him to behave like a psychopath , so you do think that hes a psychopath, even if you didnt out righty say it 

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Well , starting a World war just so he can get a mausoleum before he dies , plunging the world in to a war for his own benefit is quite descriptive of psychopathic  behavior .

   You didnt say he was a psychopath , but you are expecting him to behave like a psychopath , so you do think that hes a psychopath, even if you didnt out righty say it 

Nope, you have a habit of putting words into other peoples mouths. Let me be quite clear, criminal behavior, no matter how egregious, is not necessarily an indication of mental illness. I rather think personality disorders are the main cause. That goes for mass shooters as well. Nutcases don't usually get to lead their country. Fascists are just evil people.

Edited by ozimoron
Posted
2 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

Nope, you have a habit of putting words into other peoples mouths. Let me be quite clear, criminal behavior, no matter how egregious, is not necessarily and indication of mental illness. I rather think personality disorders are the main cause. That goes for mass shooters as well. Nutcases don't usually get to lead their country. They are just evil people, fascists, mostly.

If a person decides to start a World War where millions would die just for his own minimal benefit , I feel that the Doctors should make the decision  as to whether he's a psychopath or not 

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, Mac Mickmanus said:

If a person decides to start a World War where millions would die just for his own minimal benefit , I feel that the Doctors should make the decision  as to whether he's a psychopath or not 

In the case of the US, apparently they can't make that call.

Posted
8 hours ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

So, you are in favour of World War three and you think that the Biden and the USA should lead the Western World into a war with Russia and defeat Putin, like what happened in World War two ?

You don't understand the Chamberlain analogy very well, do you?

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...