Jump to content

FBI found more than 11,000 government records at Trump's Florida home


Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

"Confirmed and well known fact not conspiracy theory"?

 

Possibly only in an alternate reality. 

You still do not understand "overtaken by recent events" and the recent redacted DOJ report proving Barr lied about the Mueller Report.

Mueller said Trump was guilty of obstruction and there was evidence to suggest he colluded with Russia. Manafort admitted collusion. Therefore the FBI was obviously justified in it's probe of the Trump Campaign.


 

Just to add to that. A federal judge openly castigated Barr for his misrepresentation of the Mueller report. 

  • Like 2
Posted
30 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Sorry Chomper it is confirmed and well known fact not conspiracy theory. You know this already don't you. Why call something we all know to be true as a conspiracy theory? We are bound by the forum rules to not knowingly lie and misrepresent situations.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/kevin-clinesmith-fbi-pleads-guilty/2020/08/19/6c0dec54-e0a0-11ea-8dd2-d07812bf00f7_story.html

Clinesmith, he’s the guy that doesn’t work at the FBI anymore.

 

Is that correct?

  • Like 2
Posted
39 minutes ago, Walker88 said:

The 'special master' is a dangerous stalling ploy, but in the end will not save 45's bloated behind. All the special master allows is that docs can be reviewed to see if there is anything that would fall under the category of attorney-client privilege.

 

Highly classified docs would never fall under that privilege. Never. There are no attorneys involved in classified docs.

 

Unfortunately, allowing this special master will damage US national security. Besides granting access to yet more people, it will be made clear that the docs 45 stole had TS/SCI and HCS markings. That means the docs contained 'sources and methods' or identities of clandestine sources. Those sources are now at risk. (Already a number of clandestine sources have been rolled up since 45 left office with those classified docs, which may or may not be a coincidence.)

 

To make it even worse, POTENTIAL clandestine assets---which could be anyone from a close contact of a major foreign leader like putin or xi, or it could be someone close to senior terrorist leaders---will now know that a self-serving, reckless, irresponsible ex-POTUS could jeopardize their lives or the lives of their families by revealing identities. They will cease to cooperate with US intel.

 

No big deal, right?  Say that when the next hijacked plane hits a major building, or a dirty bomb goes off in some major metropolitan area. Such attacks have been thwarted by the intel gleaned from clandestine assets. Now it will be much more difficult to stop these kind of attacks.

 

Perhaps so long as such attacks hit MaL or a CPAC convention or 45 rally, I guess no harm done. The cult and its leader can reap what they sow.

This is the real issue.

 

It’s terrifying to consider the very likely threats Trump has unleashed.

 

It’s also why non of Trump’s supporters and apologists want to go near it.

 

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
38 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Sorry Chomper it is confirmed and well known fact not conspiracy theory. You know this already don't you. Why call something we all know to be true as a conspiracy theory? We are bound by the forum rules to not knowingly lie and misrepresent situations.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/kevin-clinesmith-fbi-pleads-guilty/2020/08/19/6c0dec54-e0a0-11ea-8dd2-d07812bf00f7_story.html

Ok that actually happened but really a non event. The Justice Department inspector general failed to establish that political considerations played a role in Clinesmith's action. Judge Boasberg concurred and gave the sentencing as part of his routine duties of 12 months probabtion and 400 hours communty service. LOL. You made it sound much more serious as a loyal Maga supporter does. 

  • Like 2
Posted

 

1 hour ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Possibly is not factual, It's a possibility or an opinion.

It did find that it could not say that Trump was guilty of criminal conspiracy, ergo not guilty as not found guilty in a court of law. Presumption of innocence and all that.

The post was to correct your claim that "the Russia thing was pretty much dismissed as fake".  Did you note the words from your own source "It also found that Russia had interfered in the election"  The 'It' refers to the Mueller investigation report Report On The Investigation Into Russian Interference In The 2016 Presidential Election.

  • Confused 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Walker88 said:

How is it hard for you to understand what should be obvious to anyone but a child?

 

The docs were CLASSIFIED. That means they are not just available anywhere or online. The LAW (law is a quaint concept now seemingly known only to non magats) states that classified docs must be kept in a secure location or SCIF, unless a trail of authorizations (non verbal and certainly not grandfathered) allows them to be removed for some specific and stated official purpose. Mere existence of docs outside of a SCIF or lacking the paper trail of authorization is a felony.

 

Get it?

Everyone is just spitballing what Trump had. You included. To call them Classified doesn't really mean much. Weather reports are labeled Confidential just as an example.

 

If Trump was truly trying to steal secrets he'd merely take pics of documents. But, sadly the dems are so fueled by hatred and fear of Trump they don't think rationally. As is obvious by the name calling here.

 

I find your condescending, name calling remarks highly humorous. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

Everyone is just spitballing what Trump had. You included. To call them Classified doesn't really mean much. Weather reports are labeled Confidential just as an example.

 

If Trump was truly trying to steal secrets he'd merely take pics of documents. But, sadly the dems are so fueled by hatred and fear of Trump they don't think rationally. As is obvious by the name calling here.

 

I find your condescending, name calling remarks highly humorous. 

To be clear:  You're asking why Trump simply packed the documents made available to him while he was President and shipped them to Mar-a-Lago with his stuff, versus taking the difficult, time-consuming and suspicious approach of taking a picture of every page of classified he wanted?

 

This is a good example of a question answering itself.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted (edited)
33 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

Everyone is just spitballing what Trump had. You included. To call them Classified doesn't really mean much. Weather reports are labeled Confidential just as an example.

 

If Trump was truly trying to steal secrets he'd merely take pics of documents. But, sadly the dems are so fueled by hatred and fear of Trump they don't think rationally. As is obvious by the name calling here.

 

I find your condescending, name calling remarks highly humorous. 

You may have a point about his intent if it were only about stealing secrets. Knowing Trump, he may well have been motivated by mere stupidity!

 

However, in this case, it's not only about secrets, it's about documents.

 

Technically, when you take something and refuse to give it back (and also state you don't have it), isn't it considered as stealing?

 

He did know he had them, he did refuse to give them back, and he did hide them. That shows intent to steal (albeit stupidly).

 

The fact that some of these documents were secret is an aggravating factor, as they were not stored in a safe location.

Edited by candide
  • Like 2
Posted
9 minutes ago, heybruce said:

To be clear:  You're asking why Trump simply packed the documents made available to him while he was President and shipped them to Mar-a-Lago with his stuff, versus taking the difficult, time-consuming and suspicious approach of taking a picture of every page of classified he wanted?

 

This is a good example of a question answering itself.

We'll see, but I still contend that if Trump was going into the spy business he would have taken pics vs taking many, many boxes of most likely non TS docs. I wouldn't label taking screen shots as time consuming and certainly not suspicious when alone.

 

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

We'll see, but I still contend that if Trump was going into the spy business he would have taken pics vs taking many, many boxes of most likely non TS docs. I wouldn't label taking screen shots as time consuming and certainly not suspicious when alone.

 

 

Trump probably assumes that originals fetch more than copies!

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, DezLez said:

Trump probably assumes that originals fetch more than copies!

Beat me to it.  As any teenager will tell you, you'll get a lot further with a stolen ID in hand than with a picture of one.

  • Like 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Walker88 said:

He is a self-serving, mendacious, treasonous common criminal.

And that was also true before he became President!

  • Like 1
Posted
15 hours ago, DezLez said:

And that was also true before he became President!

and yet he still became president!

It always comes down to the choice between Trump and HRC, and IMO millions were voting against her, rather than for him. IMO he was a protest vote against the Washington establishment.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
15 hours ago, Walker88 said:

Personally, I just hope if a terrorist attack comes, it only takes out members of the cult and their leader. No harm done.

That would be millions of people then! Isn't that OTT harsh?

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

and yet he still became president!

It always comes down to the choice between Trump and HRC, and IMO millions were voting against her, rather than for him. IMO he was a protest vote against the Washington establishment.

Both were unpopular choice. HRC was leading as poills indicated and according to RealClearPolitics showed a clear lead of 6 points. It was the FBI's badly time announcement of Clinton's email investigation that move the ground. FBI should follow that precedent and moved quickly to indict Trump and not bother with mid-term political consideration. Lock him up even if he is a former President for his egregious crimes to the country. 

  • Like 2
Posted
30 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Both were unpopular choice. HRC was leading as poills indicated and according to RealClearPolitics showed a clear lead of 6 points. It was the FBI's badly time announcement of Clinton's email investigation that move the ground. FBI should follow that precedent and moved quickly to indict Trump and not bother with mid-term political consideration. Lock him up even if he is a former President for his egregious crimes to the country. 

I'm happy to see that you and I are on the same page when it comes to charging him- the sooner the better, but one should not assume he'll be convicted.

Posted
On 9/3/2022 at 2:14 PM, ozimoron said:

But Hilary's email server! Those empty folders are going to be a huge problem for Trump if he can't account for the documents.

were they empty before the F.B.I  arrived?

Posted (edited)
30 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

I'm happy to see that you and I are on the same page when it comes to charging him- the sooner the better, but one should not assume he'll be convicted.

Justice seem to working on a different gear when it comes to the former President. He is not above the law and others have been dealt with swiftly as regards to misuse of classified documents. He has gone beyond classified documents with the discovery of documents on nuclear capabilites and material on a foreign country's nuclear capabilities. He is putting the world at risk in so many ways. He should be charged but more importantly that he should never ever be the President. Another term will be very dark for USA and the world. 

 

voanews.com/a/fbi-justice-department-routinely-prosecute-misuse-of-classified-documents/6694887.html

Edited by Eric Loh
wrong word
  • Like 2
Posted
On 9/7/2022 at 9:52 AM, SunnyinBangrak said:

Sorry Chomper it is confirmed and well known fact not conspiracy theory. You know this already don't you. Why call something we all know to be true as a conspiracy theory? We are bound by the forum rules to not knowingly lie and misrepresent situations.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/kevin-clinesmith-fbi-pleads-guilty/2020/08/19/6c0dec54-e0a0-11ea-8dd2-d07812bf00f7_story.html

Also, do you understand that a conspiracy has to involve more than one person? There is absolutely no evidence that Clinesmith didn't act alone.

Posted
2 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

and yet he still became president!

It always comes down to the choice between Trump and HRC, and IMO millions were voting against her, rather than for him. IMO he was a protest vote against the Washington establishment.

It could be.it also could be that she won the popular vote because some people people voted against Trump.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...