Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

I said, 'as a Thai citizen". Stop hijacking the thread lol

You said "I am Thai".  I'm not hijacking anything.  I just wanted to clarify as it is relevant to the argument you were making.

Posted
4 minutes ago, 473geo said:

Presumably you did obtain the life saving medication from elsewhere otherwise you would be dead 

...deliberately obtuse much ???

 

The Op explained the situation well enough to understand, the Dr. prescribed mediation that would help his condition.

Life saving is of course an exaggeration, but antiviral medication has also saved lives during the Covid pandemic. 

Posted
48 minutes ago, peterrabbit said:

In civilised countries patients are treated on a medical need basis regardless of their race or nationality. Even in wars wounded soldiers are treated on the seriousness of their medical needs and not whose side they are on.

Your statement that the government policy of denying medication to patients who are not Thai is not RACIST is false. It is totally racist as you obviously are. Racism is not just the colour of a person's skin or economic circumstances but the ethnic group that they belong to being discriminated against. 

Why don't you educate yourself on the meaning of racism so you won't make such obvious racist comments in future.

      I'm fully aware of what racism is.  You were not a victim of racism, sorry.  Your experience had nothing to do with race or ethnicity.   Being a non-citizen is neither a race or an ethnicity.  You may have been discriminated against, but it was not racial discrimination.   I do not subscribe to the 'dumbing down' of language; nor the excuse of being lazy--writers using 'racist' when they are just too lazy to actually find the correct word. 

     I'm also well-aware that you are not the only one miss-using the word.  These days, the slightest offense and out comes 'racist' to describe the experience.  "That old dude got a discount on his movie ticket and I didn't!  That's so racist!"  Unfortunately, this results in the word losing its force and being devalued.  It's a very important, powerful word and should not be cheapened by being carelessly used without thought to describe anything remotely offensive.  When you're actually a victim of racism, you'll know it.

  • Love It 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

...deliberately obtuse much ???

 

The Op explained the situation well enough to understand, the Dr. prescribed mediation that would help his condition.

Life saving is of course an exaggeration, but antiviral medication has also saved lives during the Covid pandemic. 

Well if the pharmacy where the OP recd his anti virals, was not much further out of the way than the hospital dispensary then we could perhaps ascertain this is much ado about nothing 

 

We don't appear to be supplied with this information Richard perhaps the whole story is obtuse 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, 473geo said:

Well if the pharmacy where the OP recd his anti virals, was not much further out of the way than the hospital dispensary then we could perhaps ascertain this is much ado about nothing 

 

We don't appear to be supplied with this information Richard perhaps the whole story is obtuse 

Agreed... thats also a possibility.... 

 

 

One thing which is somewhat odd in the story....  Since when does a ‘big boss’ get involved with a Dr’s diagnosis and prescription ???

 

It does seem very strange that a Dr would prescribe something only for the ‘Big Boss’ to say no...  at which point in the proceedings was he consulted etc ?...   

 

Note: (as already pointed out) IF the mediation was Favipiravir is neither expensive or in short supply in Thailand, so the response is just strange. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

Agreed... thats also a possibility.... 

 

 

One thing which is somewhat odd in the story....  Since when does a ‘big boss’ get involved with a Dr’s diagnosis and prescription ???

 

It does seem very strange that a Dr would prescribe something only for the ‘Big Boss’ to say no...  at which point in the proceedings was he consulted etc ?...   

 

Note: (as already pointed out) IF the mediation was Favipiravir is neither expensive or in short supply in Thailand, so the response is just strange. 

Surely Richard you are experienced enough to understand the introduction and implementation of authority signature chains in Thailand as a means of control 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Adumbration said:

Why did you go to the hospital in the first place.  You knew what drug you were after.  Why not just check proper dosage on google and then go straight to the pharmacy and buy it.

I didn't know which antiviral drug I needed or the dose, my wife and daughter were given different drugs and doses so I needed to see a doctor who could prescribe the right drug for me.

 

The pharmacies don't have it and wouldn't give it you anyway without a proper prescription. The doctor only gave me a scrap of paper with the name and dosage on it, definitely not a proper prescription which her boss had prevented her from issuing because if she had given a proper prescription then the hospital would have had to dispense the medicine.

 

I went to Pattaya City Hospital after first phoning and checking they were dispensing covid medication as I was feeling so awful I didn't want to be running all round Pattaya trying to get prescribed and supplied the medication.

 

The hospital never told me where I could obtain the medicine, they only said "go to a pharmacy". I rang Fascino's main branch and they didn't have any. If Fascino doesn't have it then the chances of anyone else having it are low to non existent and I was in no condition to start running round town trying to find somewhere,  so I went to Memorial and paid "falang special prices" there.

Posted
25 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

Agreed... thats also a possibility.... 

 

 

One thing which is somewhat odd in the story....  Since when does a ‘big boss’ get involved with a Dr’s diagnosis and prescription ???

 

It does seem very strange that a Dr would prescribe something only for the ‘Big Boss’ to say no...  at which point in the proceedings was he consulted etc ?...   

 

Note: (as already pointed out) IF the mediation was Favipiravir is neither expensive or in short supply in Thailand, so the response is just strange. 

She prescribed Molnupiravir

 

She spoke to Her boss in the hospital who told Her his boss in Banglamung had issued an order NOT to dispense antiviral Covid drugs to falangs (possibly she ment foreigners) so she could not prescribe them for me even though in her medical opinion I absolutely needed them as I am a "high risk" patient.

Posted
7 minutes ago, peterrabbit said:

She prescribed Molnupiravir

 

She spoke to Her boss in the hospital who told Her his boss in Banglamung had issued an order NOT to dispense antiviral Covid drugs to falangs (possibly she ment foreigners) so she could not prescribe them for me even though in her medical opinion I absolutely needed them as I am a "high risk" patient.

Molnupiravir used to be expensive at 8000-10,000 baht per course but is now approx 600 baht per course.

 

No sensible reason to block the Op from receiving this. 

 

 

 


 

 

  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted
40 minutes ago, 473geo said:

Surely Richard you are experienced enough to understand the introduction and implementation of authority signature chains in Thailand as a means of control 

 

Yes… the Dr. Being the authority….  Having further oversight is what surprises me in this case. 
I’d be surprised if any medication I’ve been prescribed in the past requires higher authority than a Dr’s signature.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

Molnupiravir used to be expensive at 8000-10,000 baht per course but is now approx 600 baht per course.

 

No sensible reason to block the Op from receiving this. 

 

 

 


 

 

Memorial charged me 4000b for the medicine and 1050 for the hospital/doctors charges a total of 5050b. "falang special price"

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
7 hours ago, peterrabbit said:

would a Thai be discriminated against in such a manor?

well, not in the manor maybe but Asians are being physically attacked in manner, due to race in my home country... including a vicious attack on a young Thai lady. There is a lot of open racism and sucker-punching etc... 

 

There is a lot of vicious discrimination in the world.. when you live in another culture, you can surely come to accept that things are often done differently than you might expect... 

 

I mean, why are all these people walking around saying sawasdee and smiling when they could just as easily say, "Good day fine sir, top of the morning to you"

 

I mean the nerve of them...  

  • Love It 1
Posted
3 hours ago, peterrabbit said:

If this had happened in any Western country there would be a hell of a court case being filed right now for large damages,

The great litigious societies... where prices go to the moon as people carry insurance to protect them from litigation... often frivolous too.  

 

Think how lucky you were to be spared years of expensive, life disrupting litigation... 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Neeranam said:

a farang Thai

What's that??? You can only be born Thai! There are only, kaeks, jeks, farang and Khon Thai!

  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, BangkokReady said:

You said "I am Thai".  I'm not hijacking anything.  I just wanted to clarify as it is relevant to the argument you were making.

I'm an American, I wasn't born there. But, I'm an American.....same same.

  • Like 1
  • Love It 1
Posted
9 hours ago, peterrabbit said:

I do have health insurance, just not outpatient covers as its unaffordable here.

As I stated I fully expected to pay for it.

 

Perhaps you should fully read my post because your comments show you have not fully read it.

It is just 'Thainess'!

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

We all know there is no consistency for any one thing or service here.

I was given the anti-bacterial medicines at a government hospital for free, but I did show the yellow book, which probably helped 

Posted
9 hours ago, Neeranam said:

I understand but would you like Thailand to be like the UK and let immigrants from all over to come and get equal treatment? 

Foreigners, especially over 60 are a huge burden on the Thai health system, one reason they ask for insurance now.

Going to the cheap hospitals does work out sometimes but you can't rely on them.  Calling them racist when they can't help is very inappropriate, after all they do for farang who can't afford private. 

Immigrants don't pay anything,most Thais don't pay anything or only a few baht  at government hospitals, farangs pay full price and pay cash,on top of that farangs get overcharged because they are farangs,and yes this is racistic and greedy.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
9 hours ago, peterrabbit said:

Strange how history repeats itself.

Didn't Adolf Hitler, the head of the Socialist Nationalist party of Germany, constantly refer to nationalism, (for the good of Germany), as being the excuse for his barbaric and racist actions against non Germans?

     Again, you were turned away due to a nationalistic, not a racist, policy regarding medical care at a government hospital.  The debate should be on whether this was medically ethical on the part of the hospital, given your health condition when you were there.  In what circumstances should a non-Thai citizen be treated if there is a policy to treat only citizens?  Should your case have fallen under the exceptions?

     I do believe the word 'racist' is used far too often, thus cheapening it, when something is actually not racist, but is another form of discrimination.  You make my point best when, in your previous response, you called me 'racist' because I posted that you were not turned away because of your race but because you were not a Thai citizen.  See my point?  If every action is deemed 'racist' when it is not, what word will we use when something actually is racist?  Soon we will have:  Johnny:  2 + 2 = 5.  Mary:  Actually, it equals 4.  Johnny:  That is so racist to disagree with me!   Looking at your previous post, probably we're already there.

     

  • Like 2
Posted
5 hours ago, Why Me said:

The lesson here is that if you are in a life-threatening situation do not go to a government hospital because of (a) the policy the OP ran into, and (b) the level of care is likely (much) better at a private institution.

Doesn't it seem reasonable, if in a life-threatening situation, to simply go to the nearest hospital to your location, but expect to pay if you are not a citizen, rather than carefully having to seek out a private hospital because government hospitals will refuse to treat you?

  • Thumbs Up 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...