Jump to content

Thai man dead, had "genitals ripped apart" in Pit Bull attack - owner says he's had enough of his pets


webfact

Recommended Posts

There is no such thing as a Pit Bull. 

 

Quote

“Pit Bull” is an umbrella term commonly reported to contain the following 3 registered breeds of dogs: Staffordshire Bull Terrier, American Staffordshire Terrier, and American Pit Bull Terrier.

So to sensationalise a story any one of those dogs/breeds can and are labeled 'Pit Bulls'. Hence why Pit Bull attacks are reportedly high. It's all siht (anagram) to keep blaming a Pit Bull when basically it could one of at least 3 breeds. But there again a 'Staffie' dog attack doesn't attract readers. So.........   :spin:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't look like a PitBull to me. Looks like some kind of bulldog mastiff cross. 

 

Still, PitBull gets the clicks, so PitBull it is.

 

Proceed with calls for breed specific bans, culling of all PitBulls, painful deaths for PitBull owners etc. ????

 

 

Edited by JonnyF
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, IvorBiggun2 said:

There is no such thing as a Pit Bull. 

 

So to sensationalise a story any one of those dogs/breeds can and are labeled 'Pit Bulls'. Hence why Pit Bull attacks are reportedly high. It's all siht (anagram) to keep blaming a Pit Bull when basically it could one of at least 3 breeds. But there again a 'Staffie' dog attack doesn't attract readers. So.........   :spin:

And that dog doesn't look like any of those 3 breeds (to an educated eye).

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, G Rex said:

They do not have to be purebred to be bad. It only seems to take a touch of their genetics to create the time bomb that these dogs are.

I would argue it is the cross breeding that creates issues.

 

Purebred "dog fighting" dogs are very human friendly, they were bred to fight other dogs and human aggression was an undesirable trait. It's when you cross breed them with breeds such as Mastiffs (which have been used as war dogs to fight humans, or to protect property from humans) that you end up with the strength and tenacity of the "PitBull" and the human aggression/size of the Mastiff (not picking on Mastiffs here, could be other breeds as well). This is why you end up with "huge Pitbulls" which aren't actually "Pitbulls" at all.

 

When such a dog attacks, it is labelled a "PitBull" attack, when in fact it is essentially a mongrel or a cross breed. If you broke down the figures, I'd bet a huge proportion of these "PitBull" attacks are not a specific breed such as the American PitBull Terrier or the Staffordshire Bull Terrier but a mix of various breeds, some of which may have been bred for human aggression.

 

This is why breed specific legislation is such a nonsense. The label "PitBull" is vastly misused. The dog in the OP is a good example. Clearly a mix (I'd guess a Mastiff/American Bulldog mix) but labelled a PitBull.

 

Hence all the uneducated posts on this thread screaming for a ban on PitBulls.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...