Jump to content

Classified documents from Biden’s time as VP discovered in private office


Scott

Recommended Posts

On 1/17/2023 at 10:26 AM, JonnyF said:

The polt thickens. The irony/hypocrisy is thick on this one. Biden has some nerve. 

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-64290971

 

image.png.ca1f2db5f0b17bc1b6467499cd24411b.png

 

As so often is the case with The Left, they are what they accuse you of being.

As is all too often the case with the extreme right, they take the conduct of one person they disagree with and generalize it to all of them. There's nothing in the shape of your responses that can't be predicted by Pavlov's law.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, candide said:

Right! Six documents! So the total number of documents found is what? 26?

 

Note the full-cooperation demonstrated (very different from the behaviour of who shall not be named):

 

"The FBI found more classified documents at the Wilmington, Delaware, home of President Joe Biden during a consensual search Friday that lasted nearly 13 hours, his personal lawyer and a prosecutor said Saturday evening"

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/01/21/search-of-bidens-home-by-doj-finds-6-more-classified-documents.html

Funny how you're keeping a count...like the relevant statues specify a minimum number of classified documents is okay but over that is a crime.

 

Maybe start keeping count of the days Mr. Biden has left in office!

 

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/01/21/doj-finds-6-more-classified-documents-at-bidens-delaware-home-00078889

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, candide said:

Right! Six documents! So the total number of documents found is what? 26?

 

Note the full-cooperation demonstrated (very different from the behaviour of who shall not be named):

 

"The FBI found more classified documents at the Wilmington, Delaware, home of President Joe Biden during a consensual search Friday that lasted nearly 13 hours, his personal lawyer and a prosecutor said Saturday evening"

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/01/21/search-of-bidens-home-by-doj-finds-6-more-classified-documents.html

Joe's been a bad boy. I believe they said same docs were found from his senator days. Biden cooperating has zero to do him having classified docs scattered around. The liberal MSM is after him as well, bye bye joe.

  • Love It 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Pattaya Spotter said:

Funny how you're keeping a count...like the relevant statues specify a minimum number of classified documents is okay but over that is a crime.

 

Maybe start keeping count of the days Mr. Biden has left in office!

 

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/01/21/doj-finds-6-more-classified-documents-at-bidens-delaware-home-00078889

Right, But a few documents can easily be lost or forgotten. 

Edited by candide
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

Joe's been a bad boy. I believe they said same docs were found from his senator days. Biden cooperating has zero to do him having classified docs scattered around. The liberal MSM is after him as well, bye bye joe.

What I indirectly evoked, in case you did not get it: he cannot be accused of obstruction, unlike the guy who should not be named.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

You're really not helping ole Biden's defense there. It's all for the best, he really has zero business running again.

We'll see what comes up from the investigation. The law specifies: "knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials". I doubt having a few classified documents scattered here and there can be used to accuse him of such intent!

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1924

 

BTW my personal opinion has always been that Biden is too old for a second mandate  (provided another good candidate can be found, of course).

Edited by candide
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A post violating Fair Use Policy has been removed.  

 

27. You will not post any copyrighted material except as fair use laws apply (as in the case of news articles). Only post a link, the headline and three sentences from the article. Content in the public domain is limited to the same restrictions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fox News host Maria Bartiromo on Sunday asked Rep. James Comer (R-KY) whether classified documents found at President Joe Biden's home amounted to "treason" against the United States, a crime which carries the death penalty.

"We need to know now who had access to those documents because our national security could be at risk," Comer told Bartiromo regarding the classified documents.

"Is this treason?" Bartiromo wondered.

 

https://www.rawstory.com/maria-bartiromo-biden-treason/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Pattaya Spotter said:

MORE documents found in FBI search of Mr. Biden's residence...how many are we up to now? It seems like Joe was keeping an entire private library of classified government documents for his own nefarious uses! Let's just hope both the front and garage doors of the house were locked ???? 

 

 

It just keeps getting worse for the Big Guy. LOL.

  • Love It 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Pattaya Spotter said:

MORE documents found in FBI search of Mr. Biden's residence...how many are we up to now? It seems like Joe was keeping an entire private library of classified government documents for his own nefarious uses! Let's just hope both the front and garage doors of the house were locked ???? 

 

 

The number found in the Biden house and office is a small fraction of the number found in Mar-a-Lago.  Plus the Biden team is responding in accordance with the law upon discovery, while the Trump team broke the law.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thaibeachlovers said:

I wonder if that excuse from the poster you quoted ( only a few classified documents ) would have mollified the Trump haters that were in full on cry over Trump's documents?

Hundreds of classified documents were being held by Trump, and he resisted returning them to the point that they had to be recovered using a search warrant. 

 

You and other Trump supporters consistently ignore this important fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

You're obviously in the wrong thread. This is about Biden's unlawful possession of Classified Docs. Biden has been keeping and shuffling classified docs around since his senator days. Trump haters are ignoring this very important fact.

LOL. It's always about D T judging by the number of threads he features in regardless of the thread topic.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, EVENKEEL said:

You're obviously in the wrong thread. This is about Biden's unlawful possession of Classified Docs. Biden has been keeping and shuffling classified docs around since his senator days. Trump haters are ignoring this very important fact.

"Unlawful" is one thing, "criminal" is another. Unless it can be proved that Biden willfully ignored the law, no crime has been committed. If there is a record of him retaining those records despite the advice of legal counsel, that would be criminal. If there is a record of him denying to the Justice Dept investigators that he had possession of them, when in fact he knew that he did, that would also be criminal. 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, EVENKEEL said:

Please stop, your defense of Biden is becoming quite hilarious.

 

How about that: The day after President Joe Biden insisted of his classified-documents mess, “there is no there there,” yet more “there” popped up at his Wilmington home, including docs that he seems to have grabbed before leaving the Senate in 2009.

 

Speaking with "60 Minutes" reporter Scott Pelley last year, Biden slammed Trump over the FBI's raid on his Palm Beach estate, sternly remarking in-part, "How that could possibly happen, how anyone could be that irresponsible."

 

https://www.foxnews.com/media/bidens-words-trump-raid-come-back-haunt-him-hillarys-comments-benghazi

A wilfully misleading post

 

1. The quote has been taken out of context. It doesn't mean what you claim it means

https://apnews.com/article/biden-politics-united-states-government-wilmington-merrick-garland-f2384a87dcddbd38796f63e1269c6baf

 

2. The "60 minutes" interview occurred in September, the documents were found in November.

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

I wonder if that excuse from the poster you quoted ( only a few classified documents ) would have mollified the Trump haters that were in full on cry over Trump's documents?

Not an excuse, a fact which may be relevant as the law specifies that intent is a necessary condition.

 

The law specifies: "knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials". I doubt having a few classified documents scattered here and there can be used to accuse him of such intent!

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1924

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I don't deny that Biden screwed up very badly. But there's a huge difference between screwing up very badly and willfully committing criminal acts."

 

He's and old foggy man who never should have been elected. He can't even make 2 min speech that's written down on paper.

To have some papers in garage makes me think they were planted there.... by DT agents.

It's so sad Democrats don't have better candidate.

 

 

 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GypsyT said:

"I don't deny that Biden screwed up very badly. But there's a huge difference between screwing up very badly and willfully committing criminal acts."

 

He's and old foggy man who never should have been elected. He can't even make 2 min speech that's written down on paper.

To have some papers in garage makes me think they were planted there.... by DT agents.

It's so sad Democrats don't have better candidate.

 

 

 

Getting desperate. 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

I see what you are saying. So, what is the "magic number" of classified documents someone without authority can be possessing when the situation changes from a "nothing there there" to the crime of the century? 27? 100? 200?

 Now most of us here, self included are not lawyers, but this whole claim about it all hinging on a number of documents to determine legality and severity sounds unlikely.

"...this whole claim about it all hinging on a number of documents to determine legality and severity sounds unlikely."

 

You are correct.  The legality issue is determined by the response taken once the classified is found. 

 

If the classified was misplaced accidentally and is reported and properly secured right away then no law is broken. 

 

If the classified is not properly reported and attempts are made to keep the classified illegally, then obviously the law is broken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

I see what you are saying. So, what is the "magic number" of classified documents someone without authority can be possessing when the situation changes from a "nothing there there" to the crime of the century? 27? 100? 200?

 Now most of us here, self included are not lawyers, but this whole claim about it all hinging on a number of documents to determine legality and severity sounds unlikely.

There is also the vast difference between President Biden clearly telling the FBI and the DoJ to go ahead and search for more, and ex-president Trump and his lawyers denying all knowledge of ANY documents for months and making the DoJ get a search warrant, after nearly 2 years, which was then dealt with by the FBI.

 

If you cannot see the difference then I pity you.

 

President Biden freely gave access, whilst ex-president Trump and his lawyers obstructed justice every step of the way, while screaming witch hunt all the time.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, billd766 said:

There is also the vast difference between President Biden clearly telling the FBI and the DoJ to go ahead and search for more, and ex-president Trump and his lawyers denying all knowledge of ANY documents for months and making the DoJ get a search warrant, after nearly 2 years, which was then dealt with by the FBI.

 

If you cannot see the difference then I pity you.

 

President Biden freely gave access, whilst ex-president Trump and his lawyers obstructed justice every step of the way, while screaming witch hunt all the time.

It is truly a waste of time to try and engage with trumpers.  See no evil Hear no evil, pass the kool aide.  And when it is finally all over and all the investigations are done and the DOJ indicts or does not indict you can be sure if any of the results do not please trumpers they will whine and whine then whine some more about the giant witch hunt and how very unfair it all is to little donnie and the delusionals.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...