Jump to content

Do you support "15 minute cities" in order to save the planet from man-made global warming?


Do you support "15 minute cities" in order to save the planet from man-made global warming?  

79 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 3/24/2023 at 8:36 AM, placeholder said:

Or you can have encourage people not to buy cars or a second car by making them unnecessary. So people could actually save money. And I saw nothing in the question about apartment living vs single home living. And if they have less expense on automobiles, whiich is usually a drain on income, they'll have more to spend on shelter.

Expand  

Per the plan, one's personal movement will be restricted to only places one can drive to in fifteen minutes. So, by mandating people stay within the fifteen-minute range, they can't really go anywhere anyway, which will make having a car unnecessary, yes? 

 

So actually, they (the poor) will be able to save money both by not having a car, and by not having anywhere to go. Yes, I see now how this really will be a big benefit for the poor. 

 

Coincidentally, it should keep the keep the hoi-polloi of the beaches and slopes as well! wink-wink-nudge-nudge

 

 

  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted
  On 3/24/2023 at 8:50 AM, placeholder said:

What's that got to do with whether you live in an apartment or freestanding home?

Expand  

I'm sorry, you're right. Per the plan, you can live anywhere you want, and go anywhere you want to go, as long as you stay within your fifteen-minute restricted area. 

 

We good? 

 

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
  On 3/24/2023 at 9:19 AM, Yellowtail said:

Per the plan, one's personal movement will be restricted to only places one can drive to in fifteen minutes. So, by mandating people stay within the fifteen-minute range, they can't really go anywhere anyway, which will make having a car unnecessary, yes? 

 

So actually, they (the poor) will be able to save money both by not having a car, and by not having anywhere to go. Yes, I see now how this really will be a big benefit for the poor. 

 

Coincidentally, it should keep the keep the hoi-polloi of the beaches and slopes as well! wink-wink-nudge-nudge

 

 

Expand  

Since when does a fifteen minute driving range mean there's nowhere "nowhere to go"

 

Posted
  On 3/25/2023 at 11:05 AM, KhunLA said:

NOT DRIVING ... walking or cycling

Expand  

My reply was to yellowtail who was following the rules laid down by Connda in his 2nd question which stipulates 15 minutes by auto Of course it's a purposely misleading question since connda chose the subject line to read  Do you support "15 minute cities" in order to save the planet from man-made global warming? Obviously it's an attempt to tie the real 15 minute city program to some dystopian vision.  His question also stipulates that residents are forbidden from leaving their district It's B.S. of course, since the actual 15 minute cities program is about 15 minute access by walking or bike ride. And nowhere in the 15 minute city concept is there any reference to forbidding people from leaving their district.

Why even mention the 15 minute city concept if your question has nothing to do with it? Obviously it's there to mislead.

Posted
  On 3/24/2023 at 7:32 AM, placeholder said:

 

Why would the program make it too expensive for the "the poor/non-rich by making it too expensive for them to own cars or homes with a yard, yes?"

You have offered no explanation of how that works.

Expand  

They increase the divide between rich and poor by driving the working man into gig economy serfdom, and paying minimal wages to young people, preventing them from saving and getting on the asset ladder.  

Posted
  On 3/25/2023 at 11:24 AM, placeholder said:

My reply was to yellowtail who was following the rules laid down by Connda in his 2nd question which stipulates 15 minutes by auto Of course it's a purposely misleading question since connda chose the subject line to read  Do you support "15 minute cities" in order to save the planet from man-made global warming? Obviously it's an attempt to tie the real 15 minute city program to some dystopian vision.  His question also stipulates that residents are forbidden from leaving their district It's B.S. of course, since the actual 15 minute cities program is about 15 minute access by walking or bike ride. And nowhere in the 15 minute city concept is there any reference to forbidding people from leaving their district.

Why even mention the 15 minute city concept if your question has nothing to do with it? Obviously it's there to mislead.

Expand  

Perhaps it was an honest misunderstanding.  Perhaps he was a victim of false facts and mid-reporting by others.  
What is more interesting is the stream of reactionary bile that he untapped.

Posted
  On 3/25/2023 at 1:12 PM, StreetCowboy said:

They increase the divide between rich and poor by driving the working man into gig economy serfdom, and paying minimal wages to young people, preventing them from saving and getting on the asset ladder.  

Expand  

Are you referring to the genuine 15 minute city concept or something else?

Posted
  On 3/25/2023 at 1:25 PM, placeholder said:

Are you referring to the genuine 15 minute city concept or something else?

Expand  

Specifically to the question of why and how the wealthy would oppress the poor, from the post I quoted.  
The “fifteen minute city” allows people to dispense with many of the trappings of wealth - reducing our carbon footprint - and perhaps freeing many people from the rat race treadmill of wage-serfdom.

When you provide a service that your neighbours want, and can live on frugal resources, the tax man and Elon Musk can whistle.

Posted
  On 3/25/2023 at 1:25 PM, placeholder said:

Are you referring to the genuine 15 minute city concept or something else?

Expand  

So far, there has been no "genuine 15-minute city concept" plan presented here.

 

All we know it that they will be utopian places to live, much like all the other government housing projects. 

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 3/26/2023 at 9:57 AM, Yellowtail said:

So far, there has been no "genuine 15-minute city concept" plan presented here.

 

All we know it that they will be utopian places to live, much like all the other government housing projects. 

Expand  

More distortions from you. Show me where it's claimed they will be utopias.

And why should there be a plan presented here? The question in this thread uses a misleading premise.. As though it has some actual relation to the 15 minute city premise. All we have to show is that it has nothing to do with a real 15 minute city premise which is simple enough. Here's the basic founding principle of a 15 minute city:

 

"The 15-minute city (FMC or 15mC) is an urban planning concept in which most daily necessities and services, such as work, shopping, education, healthcare, and leisure can be easily reached by a 15-minute walk or bike ride from any point in the city."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/15-minute_city#:~:text=The 15-minute city (FMC,any point in the city.

 

And why 15 minutes?    

    The actual idea of a 15-minute city is fundamentally mundane — a form of urban planning that recognises that for journeys that take much longer than a quarter of an hour we tend to use vehicles, and so aims to maximise the density of walkable amenities.

https://www.ft.com/content/93d58155-5a4e-4135-ac6f-00d5a3c8e4d1

 

Posted
  On 3/26/2023 at 12:04 PM, placeholder said:

More distortions from you. Show me where it's claimed they will be utopias.

And why should there be a plan presented here? The question in this thread uses a misleading premise.. As though it has some actual relation to the 15 minute city premise. All we have to show is that it has nothing to do with a real 15 minute city premise which is simple enough. Here's the basic founding principle of a 15 minute city:

 

"The 15-minute city (FMC or 15mC) is an urban planning concept in which most daily necessities and services, such as work, shopping, education, healthcare, and leisure can be easily reached by a 15-minute walk or bike ride from any point in the city."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/15-minute_city#:~:text=The 15-minute city (FMC,any point in the city.

 

And why 15 minutes?    

    The actual idea of a 15-minute city is fundamentally mundane — a form of urban planning that recognises that for journeys that take much longer than a quarter of an hour we tend to use vehicles, and so aims to maximise the density of walkable amenities.

https://www.ft.com/content/93d58155-5a4e-4135-ac6f-00d5a3c8e4d1

 

Expand  

So why are they not being built?

 

What's stopping them? 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 3/26/2023 at 12:17 PM, Yellowtail said:

So why are they not being built?

 

What's stopping them? 

 

 

 

 

Expand  

Zone-based planning regulations.  Minimum parking regulations.  Road design that places traffic speed as a higher priority than access for people.  Lobbying by construction firms. Planning processes that larger developers can more easily manipulate.

Posted
  On 3/27/2023 at 2:21 PM, StreetCowboy said:

Zone-based planning regulations.  Minimum parking regulations.  Road design that places traffic speed as a higher priority than access for people.  Lobbying by construction firms. Planning processes that larger developers can more easily manipulate.

Expand  

It is pretty hard for me to believe that if Apple, or Meta or any one of a thousand companies wanted to do this that there would be significant push-back from the state of California, or that they would not be able to find a developer. 

 

Assuming the people in the 15-minute cities own cars for when they leave the 15-minute city, would they not each have a parking spot? 

 

If the city is designed for walking, why would there be a need for fast moving traffic? Would there not just be an entrance and exit to the city for people coming and going? 

 

Are you saying that big city governments are typically controlled by private developers? Maybe in Texas and Florida, but surely not in California and New York. 

 

To be clear, I would absolutely support these cities as long as they were privately funded and did not have to use eminent domain to displace existing residents. Who would be against them? Who loses? 

 

 

 

Posted
  On 4/1/2023 at 11:27 AM, Yellowtail said:

Any update on this? I was really hoping to learn more about why no one is building these. 

 

 

Expand  

Because it's an uninformed question based on a misconception. And it's compounded by the fact that we're in a thread that was based on a misleading premise.. Instead of asking us to inform you about the concept, why not look it up for yourself? Via a thing called google. or maybe GPIChat...

Posted
  On 4/1/2023 at 4:35 PM, placeholder said:

Because it's an uninformed question based on a misconception. And it's compounded by the fact that we're in a thread that was based on a misleading premise.. Instead of asking us to inform you about the concept, why not look it up for yourself? Via a thing called google. or maybe GPIChat...

Expand  

That's what I thought, thanks. 

 

I did look at the C40 website, scary guys over there. 

Posted
  On 4/2/2023 at 4:58 AM, kwilco said:

Be clear, there are no laws that restrict personal movement. The idea is to make longer journeys not necessary...

Expand  

The concern is not what laws there are, but what laws there will be if the folks at C40.org and the like have their way.

 

Is it your position that people should only be allowed to travel when it is necessary? 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
  On 4/2/2023 at 4:58 AM, kwilco said:

Be clear, there are no laws that restrict personal movement. The idea is to make longer journeys not necessary...

Expand  

there never are when silly things are suggested & enacted ..

... until they are & modified ... for your safety of course.

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 4/2/2023 at 5:24 AM, KhunLA said:

there never are when silly things are suggested & enacted ..

... until they are & modified ... for your safety of course.

Expand  

Obviously you have no idea what you are talking about...I think you should look up 15 minutes cities

  • Heart-broken 1
Posted
  On 4/2/2023 at 5:28 AM, kwilco said:

Obviously you have no idea what you are talking about...I think you should look up 15 minutes cities

Expand  

Obviously you still trust govts & corporations that have done nothing but screw you over & over again.

 

They yet to be honest or follow through with anything they've suggested.

 

Already looked up 15 min cities ... designed to control people with no life at all.

Posted

Where I used to live I Phrakhanong anything I wanted and could access in 15 mins has been turned into a condo or a coffee shop. So that is a big fail.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Topics

  • Popular Contributors

  • Latest posts...

    1. 3

      Ex-School Director Gets 20 Years in Fermented Noodle Scandal

    2. 23

      Thailand Live Wednesday 27 August 2025

    3. 0

      CATI & Thai Airways Launch New Pilot Class

    4. 166

      Dream Crushed: British Expats’ Thai Retirement Nightmare

    5. 104

      Americans seek escape for political reasons at record numbers

    6. 129

      Gavin Newsom

  • Popular in The Pub

×
×
  • Create New...